



The 34 members of the Commission on the Future of the Tennessee Judicial System represent broad and diverse backgrounds and interests. We vary widely in age, sex, race, occupation, education, politics and virtually any other category.
We were asked to serve because the public believes the judicial
system is too slow, too costly, too complex and too uneven. The
Commission believes the public is right.
Over time, despite our diversity, we came to fundamental agreement
on both broad responses to those problems and a greater vision
for the future of the judicial systems:
The judicial system should aim to solve problems, which means more than processing cases.The details of those themes can be found in the recommendations of the report. Some are quite specific; others are more abstract. Some are only minor refinements; others are substantial departures from the present. Some could be accomplished immediately; others would have to be mitigated by fund-shifting, grandfathering and time.It should aim to solve them at the lowest level possible, which means finding alternatives to courtroom resolution.
It should redirect its attention to the public it serves, which means better access, modern management and enhanced accountability.
Over almost two and a half years, the Commission held numerous
public hearings and other meetings. This report relies heavily
on the observations of the dozens of people who generously shared
their wisdom and experience with us.
In many cases, our conclusions are matters of analysis and judgment,
based on a preponderance of evidence, but not clearly provable
one way or another. Often - and this is one measure of a failing
within the judicial system - basic data are simply not available
to quantify these judgments.
Not every recommendation had unanimous support within the commission,
and we take note of a few differences within the report.
Still, remembering the divergent directions from which we began
and noting that some suggestions would require substantial changes
in the present system, we wish to emphasize that the vast majority
of these proposals were adopted by the Commission without dissent.

Donald W. Bouldin
Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering
University of Tennessee
Knoxville
Susan W. Bowen
President and CEO
Champion Awards Inc.
Memphis
Christine J. Bradley
Chief of Staff to the Mayor
Nashville
Melvin T. Burgess, Sr.
Retired, Director of Police Services
Memphis Police Department
Memphis
Charles W. Burson
Attorney General
State of Tennessee
Nashville
Lew Conner
Attorney
Boult, Cummings, Conners & Berry
Nashville
Andrea Conte
President
"You Have the Power ?Know How to Use It, Inc."
Nashville
(Facilitator, Function Task Force)
Robert L. Crossley
Attorney
Long, Ragsdale & Waters
Knoxville
Frank F. Drowota, III
Justice
Tennessee Supreme Court
Nashville
Thomas F. Frist Jr., M.D.
Vice-Chairman of the Board
Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corp.
Nashville
J. Kenneth Glass
President, Tennessee Banking Group
First Tennessee Bank National Association
Memphis
Michael A. Grant
G? Motivational Consultants
Nashville
Monice Moore Hagler
City Attorney
Memphis
John A. Jones
Editor-in-Chief, Johnson City Press,
and President, Press Holding Corp.
Johnson City
Joe Lancaster
CEO Emeritus
Tennessee Farmers Insurance Companies
Columbia
Lemuel Lewis
President
WTVF-TV - Channel 5
Nashville
John J. Maddux, Jr.
Circuit Court Judge
13th Judicial District
Cookeville
Judith P. Medearis
Circuit Court Clerk
Hamilton County
Chattanooga
James G. Neeley
President
Tennessee AFL-CIO Labor Council
Nashville
Paul Neely
Publisher
The Chattanooga Times
Chattanooga
(Chair, Writing Committee)
Clayburn L. Peeples
District Attorney General
28th Judicial District
Trenton
(Facilitator, Organization Task Force)
M. Lee Smith
Founder and Publisher
M. Lee Smith Publishers & Printers
Nashville
(Chair, Distribution Committee)
William B. Stokely, III
Chairman and President
The Stokely Company
Knoxville
Gary R. Wade
Judge
Court of Criminal Appeals
Knoxville
A. C. Wharton, Jr.
Chief Public Defender
Memphis
Jane W. Wheatcraft
Criminal Court Judge
18th Judicial District
Gallatin
Richard S. Wirtz
Dean and Professor of Law
University of Tennessee College of Law
Knoxville

Also participating in the work of the Commission have been two
leading members of the General Assembly:
Likewise, while Justice Frank Drowota is the only member of the
Supreme Court who is formally a member of the Commission, other
members of the Court have been valuable participants in our deliberations.

The Commission gratefully acknowledges the assistance of three additional groups.
The Court Executive Team, which includes three Commission members, was instrumental in the organizational work of the Commission.
John J. Maddux, Jr., Chair
Circuit Court Judge
13th Judicial District
Cookeville
Cornelia A. Clark
Circuit Court Judge
21st Judicial District
Franklin
J. S. (Steve) Daniel
Circuit Court Judge
16th Judicial District
Murfreesboro
Frank F. Drowota, III
Justice
Tennessee Supreme Court
Charles E. Ferrell
Director
Administrative Office of the Courts
Nashville
C. Creed McGinley
Circuit Court Judge
24th Judicial District
Savannah
Gary R. Wade
Judge
Court of Criminal Appeals
Knoxville
The Working Group on Lawyer Education and Admission to the Bar conducted a parallel study that appears as an Appendix of the
Commission report, but which should be considered an integral
part of the Commission's work.
The group's members, chaired by Commission member Richard Wirtz, include the deans of the state's four law schools and the three present members and one former member of the Tennessee Board of Law Examiners.
Richard S. Wirtz, Chair
Dean, University of Tennessee College of Law
Knoxville
H. Lee Barfield, II
Bass, Berry and Sims
Nashville
Prince C. Chambliss, Jr.
Armstrong, Allen, Prewitt, Gentry, Johnston & Holmes
Memphis
John J. Costonis
Dean, School of Law
Vanderbilt University
Lewis R. Hagood
Arnett, Draper & Hagood
Knoxville
Lowry F. Kline
Miller & Martin
Chattanooga
Joe C. Loser, Jr.
Dean, Nashville School of Law
Donald J. Polden
Dean, Cecil L. Humphreys School of Law
University of Memphis
Goto Next Section
Return to Table of Contents
