
Here is today's issue of TBALink Opinion-Flash. What follows is the document name, first paragraph and the names of the attorneys for the parties (If you know one of them you might want to give them a call, chances are they don't know about the opinion yet) of each electronic opinion/rules released TODAY from the three appellate courts.
- 02-New Opinons From TSC
- 00-New Opinons From TSC-Rules
- 02-New Opinons From TSC-Workers Comp Panel
- 00-New Opinons From TCA
- 01-New Opinons From TCCA
There are three ways to get the full opinion from the Web: (TBALink members only)
George Dean
TBALink Chief Editor

STATE OF TENNESSEE, EX REL. JOHN JAY HOOKER v. BROOK THOMPSON, ET AL. STATE OF TENNESSEE, EX REL. LEWIS LASKA v. BROOK THOMPSON, ET AL. Court:TSC Attorneys: N/A Judge: Wm. H. D. Fones First Paragraph: ORDER The motion of Appellant John Jay Hooker to amend the style of these cases to cure the omission of, and to spell out his middle name, is granted. It is ordered that the attached page one be and it is hereby substituted in the place and stead of the page one of the opinion filed herein on October 2, 1996. URL:http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC/HOOKER.OP3.WP6LEONARD L. ROWE, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION of the CITY OF CHATTANOOGA; and DR. HARRY REYNOLDS, SUPERINTENDENT of SCHOOLS of the CITY OF CHATTANOOGA, TENNESSEE, Court:TSC FOR PLAINTIFF/APPELLEE: FOR DEFENDANTS/APPELLANTS: Richard T. Klinger Randall L. Nelson Kennedy, Fulton, Koontz & Farinash City of Chattanooga, City Attorney Chattanooga, Tennessee Chattanooga, Tennessee Michael A. McMahan & Kenneth O. Fritz, Special Counsel Chattanooga, Tennessee FOR AMICUS CURIAE DON LOFTIS SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS, HAMILTON COUNTY: William E. Godbold, III & D. Scott Bennett Chattanooga, Tennessee Judge: DROWOTA First Paragraph: The Board of Education of the City of Chattanooga and Dr. Harry Reynolds, Superintendent of Chattanooga schools, appeal from the Court of Appeals' decision finding that Leonard L. Rowe was deprived of liberty without due process of law by a Board policy which renders any employee previously terminated "for cause, inefficiency, or immorality" ineligible for future employment within the Chattanooga school system. The primary issue for our review is whether adoption of Board policy 4117.5 deprived Rowe of a constitutionally protected property or liberty interest to which the requirements of procedural due process apply. For the reasons that follow, we conclude that due process is not implicated because the Board policy did not deprive Rowe of either a protected property or liberty interest. Accordingly, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed. URL:http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC/ROWELL.OPN.WP6
J. W. ALLEN, v. BOB JONES LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY WEST TENNESSEE CONTRACTORS,INC. SUE ANN HEAD, DIRECTOR OF THE DIVISION OF WORKERS'COMPENSATION, TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, SECOND INJURY FUND, Court:TSC - Workers Comp Panel Attorneys: FOR APPELLANT: FOR APPELLEES: David W. Hawkins Steven C. Grubb Bateman & Childers Phillips, Howard & Grubb 65 Union Avenue, Suite 1010 22 North Front Street Suite 800 Memphis, TN 38103 G. Ray Bratton Richard J. Myers Farris, Mathews, Gilman, Branan & Hellen, P.L.C. One Commerce Square, Suite 2000 Memphis, TN 38103 Marc O. Dedman 424 Church Street, Suite 1350 Nashville, TN 37219 Charles W. Burson James H. Tucker, Jr. Suite 1510, Parkway Towers 404 James Robertson Parkway Nashville, TN 37243-0499 Judge: CLARK First Paragraph: This worker's compensation appeal has been referred to the special worker's compensation appeals panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. S50-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The trial court found (1) that plaintiff was employed by Defendant Bob Jones at the time he sustained permanent injury in the course and scope of his employment; (2) that defendant Liberty Mutual Insurance Company ("Liberty Mutual") was the workers' compensation insurer of Bob Jones at the time of plaintiff's injury; and (3) that the plaintiff is permanently and totally disabled. The court awarded the maximum compensation available under the act, with 77.5% of the total to be paid by defendant Liberty Mutual and 22.5% to be paid by the Tennessee Department of Labor Second Injury Fund. The court also awarded discretionary costs to defendant West Tennessee Contractors, Inc. ("West Tennessee") against defendant Liberty Mutual. URL:http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC_WCP/ALLENJW.OPN.WP6
HAZEL MANESS FLATT, v. THE INSURANCE MART, INC., Court:TSC - Workers Comp Panel For Appellant: For Appellee: Joe Hailey Carthel L. Smith, Jr. Hailey & Seaton Lexington, Tennessee Selmer, Tennessee Judge: Tomlin First Paragraph: This workers' compensation appeal was heard by the Special Workers' Compensation Panel in accordance with provisions of T.C.A. S 50-6-225(e)(3). We have by this opinion reported our findings of fact and conclusions of law to the Supreme Court. Hazel Maness Flatt ("plaintiff") was employed by Gary Wright and his sister Nita Middleton to care for their mother, Lorene F. Wright, at her residence in Chester County. As part of her employment, plaintiff lived in Ms. Wright's home from Monday through Friday. Other sitters provided care for Ms. Wright on weekends. Plaintiff's job duties included fixing meals, cleaning the house, sweeping, vacuuming, washing clothes, taking Ms. Wright on errands, and generally just watching after her. On about October 5, 1990, plaintiff injured her back while assisting Ms. Wright into plaintiff's car. URL:http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC_WCP/FLATTHM.OPN.WP6
STATE OF TENNESSEE, v. MITZI ANN BOYD Court:TCCA For Appellant: For Appellee: Richard A. Tate Charles W. Burson Assistant Public Defender Attorney General & Reporter P.O. Box 839 Blountville, TN 37617 Hunt S. Brown Assistant Attorney General 450 James Robertson Parkway Nashville, TN 37243-0493 Lewis Combs Assistant District Attorney General P.O. Box 526 Blountville, TN 37617 Judge: GARY R. WADE First Paragraph: The defendant, Mitzi Ann Boyd, appeals as of right from the revocation of her probation. In 1992, the defendant pled guilty to five counts of forgery; the trial court imposed concurrent two-year sentences for each offense, to be served consecutively to a prior sentence. The entire sentence was suspended. In 1995, the trial court revoked the defendant's probation and sentenced her to two years in Community Corrections on the condition that she first serve 45 days in the Sullivan County Jail. URL:http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/BOYDMA.OPN.WP6

Feel free to forward this Opinion-Flash on to any attorney you know of with an internet address, who is not a TBALink member. To Join TBALink - Http://www.tba.org/join.html/
Would you like to receive the TBALink Opinion-Flash each day
via e-mail?
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: SUBSCRIBE
3) Leave the body of the message blank
Non TBA members are WELCOME to subscribe...it's free!!
Would you like to STOP receiving the TBALink Opinion-Flash?
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: UNSUBSCRIBE
3) Leave the body of the message blank
