
Here is today's issue of TBALink Opinion-Flash. What follows is the document name, first paragraph and the names of the attorneys for the parties (If you know one of them you might want to give them a call, chances are they don't know about the opinion yet) of each electronic opinion/rules released TODAY from the three appellate courts.
- 00-New Opinions From TSC
- 00-New Opinions From TSC-Rules
- 00-New Opinions From TSC-Workers Comp Panel
- 06-New Opinions From TCA
- 01-New Opinions From TCCA
There are three ways to get the full opinion from the Web: (TBALink members only)
George Dean
TBALink Chief Editor

REGINALD FENTRESS vs. MEMPHIS HOUSING AUTHORITY Court:TCA William A. Jeter, GLASSMAN, JETER, EDWARDS & WADE, P.C., Memphis, Tennessee Attorney for Plaintiff/Appellant. Gregory L. Perry, Memphis, Tennessee Mark Beutelschies, Memphis, Tennessee Attorneys for Defendant/Appellee. Judge: FARMER First Paragraph: AFFIRMED AND REMANDED Appellant, Reginald Fentress (Fentress), appeals from the summary judgment entered by the trial court in favor of the appellee, Memphis Housing Authority (MHA). The issue before us is whether the trial court was correct in doing so upon finding, as a matter of law, that Fentress was not entitled to a grievance hearing prior to his termination of employment with MHA. URL:http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/fentress_opn.WP6GEORGEANNE M. HOFER vs. JAMES PATRICK HOFER Court:TCA DAVID E. CAYWOOD and DARRELL D. BLANTON, Memphis, Attorneys for Plaintiff. ROSCOE A. FEILD, JR., Memphis, Attorney for Defendant. Judge: TOMLIN First Paragraph: AFFIRMED Georgeanne M. Hofer ("Wife") filed suit for divorce in the Chancery Court of Shelby County against James P. Hofer ("Husband") seeking a divorce, division of marital property and alimony. Following a bench trial the chancellor awarded Wife a divorce on the ground of inappropriate marital conduct. In addition, he awarded Wife rehabilitative alimony for three years, ordered Husband to pay a portion of Wife's fees and expenses as alimony in solido and divided the marital property between the parties. URL:http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/hofergm_opn.WP6
JOHN T. MEADOR and wife, PELEA E. MEADOR vs. CHARLES E. JOHNSON and JAMES O. CAMPBELL vs. MILLARD V. OAKLEY Court:TCA JAMES S. SMITH, JR., Rockwood, for Appellants. WILLIAM H. SKELTON and MICHAEL S. KELLEY, Bass Berry & Sims, PLC, Knoxville for appellee, Millard V. Oakley. Judge: McMurray First Paragraph: APPEAL DISMISSED This case originated in the trial court as a boundary line dispute. Before we examine the merits of the issues raised on appeal, however, it is necessary for us to address a preliminary issue, i.e., was a notice of appeal timely filed. If a notice of appeal was not timely filed, we have no jurisdiction to entertain this appeal. URL:http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/meadorjt_opn.WP6
EASTERA BELL PORTER, Individually And as Surviving Spouse and Next Friend of Jasper D. Porter, Deceased vs. JESSE McGEE, M.D. and METHODIST HOSPITALS OF MEMPHIS, INC. AND MAHFUZUR RAHMAN, M.D. Court:TCA Judge: FARMER First Paragraph: Appellant has filed a petition for rehearing in this cause which, after having been duly considered, is denied. URL:http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/PORTEREB_ORD.WP6
HARRY GRAY SMITH vs. CITY OF KNOXVILLE, CODE ENFORCEMENT Court:TCA U. WILFRED NWAUWA, Knoxville, for Appellant. K. DICKSON GRISSOM, Deputy law director, City of Knoxville, for appellee. Judge: McMurray First Paragraph: REVERSED, JUDGMENT VACATED and REMANDED This is an action for damages for personal injury and the negligent, malicious and wrongful destruction of real and personal property of the plaintiff, Harry Gray Smith. Plaintiff filed suit in the Chancery Court for Knox County alleging that the defendant destroyed three pieces of his property, located at 1417 Magnolia Avenue, 1421 Magnolia Avenue and 400 Winona Street North, without proper notice. Plaintiff claimed that, notwithstanding a "No Trespassing" sign he had erected on the premises, employees of the City destroyed the structures without service of any final condemnation or demolition notice. He further asserts that the defendant refused to allow him to remove medical equipment from one of the structures in which he was living. He further alleged that as a result of the demolition and verbal threats of bodily harm which he claims were made by agents of the defendant, plaintiff suffered a heart attack necessitating hospitalization. URL:http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/smithhg_opn.WP6
JOHN P. SQUIBB and wife, MARTHA JO SQUIBB and JAMESH. WIDENER vs. TED C. SMITH and wife, ROSE E. SMITH Court:TCA MARK S. DESSAUER, Hunter, Smith & Davis, Kingsport, for Appellant Ted C. Smith. JAMES E. BRADING, Herndon, Coleman, Brading & McKee, Johnson City, for appellees. Judge: McMurray First Paragraph: AFFIRMED AND REMANDED This action was instituted by the plaintiffs to recover a pro-rata share of monies they were required to pay on a guaranty agreement wherein the defendants were co-guarantors. The trial court found that there were three co-guarantors, Mr. Squibb, James H. Widener and Ted C. Smith (defendant). He apportioned liability equally among the three. The court found that the purported signature of Ms. Smith on the guaranty agreement was not her signature. The case was dismissed as to the defendant, Rose E. Smith. No appeal was taken from the action of the court dismissing the case as to Ms. Smith. Judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiffs, John P. Squibb and wife Martha Jo Squibb, in the amount of $45,402.04 plus prejudgment interest at the rate of 10% per annum from April 10, 1991 to April 9, 1996, in the amount of $22,701.02 for a total judgment of $68,103.06. A like judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff, Widener. From these judgments, the defendant appeals. URL:http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/squibbjp_opn.WP6
STATE OF TENNESSEE vs. THOMAS WAYNE JARNIGAN Court:TCCA FOR THE APPELLANT: FOR THE APPELLEE: JOE H. WALKER CHARLES W. BURSON Public Defender Attorney General and Reporter WALTER B. JOHNSON ELIZABETH T. RYAN Assistant Public Defender Assistant Attorney General P.O. Box 334 450 James Robertson Parkway Harriman, TN 37748 Nashville, TN 37243-0493 CHARLES E. HAWK District Attorney General WALTER JOHNSON, II Assistant District Attorney General P.O. Box 334 Harriman, TN 37748 Judge: WELLES First Paragraph: REVERSED AND REMANDED This is an appeal pursuant to Rule 3 of the Tennessee Rules of Appellate Procedure. The Defendant was convicted of the misdemeanor offense of operating a motor vehicle with an impermissibly tinted window. At trial, the Defendant argued only that his motor vehicle windows were not illegally tinted. On appeal, the Defendant argues only that he was denied his right to a trial by jury. Even though it may seem that this Defendant does not deserve relief, we are compelled to reverse the conviction and remand this case to the trial court. URL:http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/jarnigan_opn.WP6

Feel free to forward this Opinion-Flash on to any attorney you know of with an internet address, who is not a TBALink member. To Join TBALink - Http://www.tba.org/join.html/
Would you like to receive the TBALink Opinion-Flash each day
via e-mail?
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: SUBSCRIBE
3) Leave the body of the message blank
Non TBA members are WELCOME to subscribe...it's free!!
Would you like to STOP receiving the TBALink Opinion-Flash?
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: UNSUBSCRIBE
3) Leave the body of the message blank
