
Here is today's issue of TBALink Opinion-Flash. What follows is the document name, first paragraph and the names of the attorneys for the parties (If you know one of them you might want to give them a call, chances are they don't know about the opinion yet) of each electronic opinion/rules released TODAY from the three appellate courts.
- 00-New Opinions From TSC
- 00-New Opinions From TSC-Rules
- 05-New Opinions From TSC-Workers Comp Panel
- 00-New Opinions From TCA
- 00-New Opinions From TCCA
There are three ways to get the full opinion from the Web: (TBALink members only)
George Dean
TBALink Chief Editor

CARRIER AIR CONDITIONING CO. and CIGNA PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANIES vs. HENRY MAGUFFIN Court:TSC - Workers Comp Panel Attorneys: For Appellant: For Appellees: Michael A. Friedland Michael Lee Parsons Nashville, Tennessee Gracey, Ruth, Howard, Tate & Sowell Nashville, Tennessee Judge: Loser First Paragraph: In this appeal, the employee or claimant, Maguffin, contends the evidence preponderates against the trial court's finding that he did not suffer an injury by accident. The panel has concluded the judgment should be affirmed. AFFIRMED. URL:http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC_WCP/CARRIERA_OPN.WP6CLARENCE WAYNE DUNN vs. SEQUATCHIE CONCRETE SERVICE, INC. and LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO. and RDF TRANSPORTATION, INC. and LUMBERMEN'S MUTUAL INSURANCE Court:TSC - Workers Comp Panel Attorneys: For Appellants: For Appellee, Clarence Wayne Dunn: D. Randall Mantooth C. Kelly Wilson Leitner, Moffitt, Williams, Shelbyville, Tennessee Dooley& Napolitan Nashville, Tennessee Thomas F. Bloom Nashville, Tennessee For Appellees, RDF Transportation Inc. and Lumbermen's Mutual Ins. Jerry R. Humphreys Davies, Cantrell, Humphreys & McCoy Judge: Loser First Paragraph: The appellant is seeking review of the findings of the trial court with respect to the following issues: (1) Whether the employee's claim against it is barred by Tenn Code Ann. section 50-6-203, a one-year statute of limitations; (2) Whether the claim should be disallowed for the employee's failure to give timely written notice of his claim, as required by Tenn. Code Ann. section 50-6-201; (3) Whether the appellee was an employee of the RDF at the time of the injury; (4) Whether the award of permanent partial disability benefits is excessive; and (5) Whether the trial judge abused his discretion by commuting permanent partial disability benefits to a single lump sum. The employee contends the appeal is frivolous. As discussed below, the panel has concluded the judgment should be affirmed. AFFIRMED. URL:http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC_WCP/DUNNCW_OPN.WP6
PATRICIA LEE DUNN vs. H. D. LEE COMPANY Court:TSC - Workers Comp Panel First Paragraph: Whereupon, it appears to the Court that the motion for review filed by plaintiff is well taken and should be granted in light of our recent decision in Lawson v. Lear Seating Corp., ___ S.W.2d ___ (Tenn. 1997). In accordance with the principles announced in Lawson, we conclude that plaintiff's claim for benefits was timely filed. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court finding that plaintiff's claim was timely is affirmed. Costs will be paid by defendant-appellant. URL:http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC_WCP/DUNNP_ORD.WP6
DIANNE B. FOWLER vs. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY and DELORES' MARKET Court:TSC - Workers Comp Panel Attorneys: FOR THE APPELLANTS: FOR THE APPELLEE: ROBERT R. DAVIES FRANK D. FARRAR DAVIES, CANTRELL, HUMPHREYS WILLIAM JOSEPH BUTLER & McCOY FARRAR & HOLLIMAN P.O. Box 190609 P.O. Box 280 Nashville, TN 37219-0609 Lafayette, TN 37083 Judge: RUSSELL First Paragraph: The dispositive issue in this case is whether or not the trial judge's award of compensation for permanent partial disability based upon a vocational disability of 50% to the body as a whole is adequately supported by the evidence. We hold that the evidence preponderates against an award in that amount and modify the judgment to reduce the permanent partial disability judgment to an amount based upon a vocational disability of 20% to the body as a whole. This modification renders moot the appellants' other issues. MODIFIED AND REMANDED. URL:http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC_WCP/FOWLERDB_OPN.WP6
RANDY F. SHADDEN vs. ITT HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY Court:TSC - Workers Comp Panel Attorneys: For Appellant: For Appellee, Randy F. Shadden: Blakely D. Matthews Michael A. Walker Leigh A. Buckley Jamestown, Tennessee Cornelius & Collins Nashville, Tennessee For Appellee, Second Injury Fund: Charles E. Burson Attorney General and Reporter Sandra E. Keith Assistant Attorney General Nashville, Tennessee Judge: Loser First Paragraph: In this appeal, the employer's insurer, Hartford, argues (1) the evidence preponderates against the trial court's finding that the employee or claimant, Shadden, suffered a work related injury, (2) the evidence preponderates against the trial court's award of permanent total disability benefits and (3) the trial court erred in awarding medical expenses not disclosed in response to discovery requests and not "properly proven at trial." The Second Injury Fund (the Fund), which was made a party by an amended complaint, contends the evidence preponderates against the trial judge's finding that the claimant is permanently and totally disabled. As discussed below, the panel has concluded the judgment should be affirmed. AFFIRMED. URL:http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC_WCP/SHADDENR_OPN.WP6

Feel free to forward this Opinion-Flash on to any attorney you know of with an internet address, who is not a TBALink member. To Join TBALink - Http://www.tba.org/join.html/
Would you like to receive the TBALink Opinion-Flash each day
via e-mail?
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: SUBSCRIBE
3) Leave the body of the message blank
Non TBA members are WELCOME to subscribe...it's free!!
Would you like to STOP receiving the TBALink Opinion-Flash?
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: UNSUBSCRIBE
3) Leave the body of the message blank
