
What follows is the case style or name, first paragraph, author's name, and the names of the attorneys for the parties of each opinion released today from Tennessee's three appellate courts.
- 03-New Opinons From TSC
- 00-New Opinons From TSC-Rules
- 01-New Opinons From TSC-Workers Comp Panel
- 00-New Opinons From TCA
- 00-New Opinons From TCCA
There are three ways to get the full opinion from the Web: (TBALink members only)
Lucian T. Pera
Editor-in-Chief, TBALink

STATE OF TENNESSEE VS. JAMES BLANTON Court:TSC Judge:HOLDER First Paragraph: Appellant James Blanton has filed a petition to rehear in this cause pursuant to Tenn. R. App. R. 39 contending that our opinion is in conflict with established federal and state constitutional law. URL:http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC/blantonj_reh.WP6HERBERT S. MONCIER VS. CHARLES E. FERRELL, IN HIS CAPACITY AS THE ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTOR OF THE COURTS Court:TSC Attorneys: FOR PETITIONER: FOR RESPONDENT: HERBERT S. MONCIER JOHN A. DAY KNOXVILLE NASHVILLE Judge:HOLDER First Paragraph: The defendant, Thomas Dee Huskey, has been charged on four counts of murder, eleven counts of rape, fourteen counts of kidnapping and three counts of robbery. The State filed notice of intention to seek the death penalty. URL:http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC/moncierh_opn.WP6
ANN C. SHORT VS. CHARLES E. FERRELL, in his official capacity as the Administrative Director of the Courts Court:TSC Attorneys: FOR PETITIONER: FOR RESPONDENT: ANN C. SHORT JOHN A. DAY KNOXVILLE NASHVILLE Judge:HOLDER First Paragraph: This cause comes to us on a common law writ of certiorari to review a fee dispute in a post-conviction proceeding involving an indigent defendant, David McNish. The issue is whether an attorney appointed to review the records in a post-conviction proceeding may exceed the maximum allowable rates for attorneys representing indigent defendants. We hold that: (1) Tenn. Sup. Ct. R. 13 (1996) required an attorney performing services as an "expert" to obtain prior approval for an hourly rate in excess of the hourly rate provided for attorneys in Rule 13; and (2) the trial court should have explicitly set forth the approved "expert" hourly rate in its order if such rate was intended to exceed the normal hourly rate provided for attorneys in Rule 13. URL:http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC/shortann_opn.WP6
WILLA DEAN VALENTINE VS. HEEKIN CAN, INC. Court:TSC - Workers Comp Panel Attorneys: For Appellant: For Appellee: James T. Shea William G. Ball Knoxville, Tennessee Knoxville, Tennessee Judge:Loser First Paragraph: This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. section 50-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The issue for review is whether the claim is barred by Tenn. Code Ann. section 50-6-203, a statute of limitations. As discussed below, the panel has concluded the judgment should be affirmed. URL:http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC_WCP/valevhee_opn.WP6
![]()

Feel free to forward this Opinion-Flash on to any attorney you know of with an internet address, who is not a TBALink member. To Join TBALink - Http://www.tba.org/join.html/
Would you like to receive the TBALink Opinion-Flash each day via e-mail?
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: SUBSCRIBE
3) Leave the body of the message blank
Non TBA members are WELCOME to subscribe...it's free!!
Would you like to STOP receiving the TBALink Opinion-Flash?
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: UNSUBSCRIBE
3) Leave the body of the message blank
