
What follows is the case style or name, first paragraph, author's name, and the names of the attorneys for the parties of each opinion released today from Tennessee's three appellate courts.
- 05-New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Supreme Court
- 00-New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Supreme Court Workers Comp Panel
- 00-New Document(s) or Proposed Rule(s) from the Tennessee Supreme Court
- 07-New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Court of Appeals
- 00-New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals
- 00-New Judicial Ethics Opinion(s)
- 00-New Formal Ethics Opinion(s) from the Board of Professional Responsibility
There are three ways to get the full opinion from the Web: (TBALink members only)
Lucian T. Pera
Editor-in-Chief, TBALink

MARGIE BYERS VS. CALFEE COMPANY OF DALTON, INC. Court:TSC Judge: PER CURIAM First Paragraph: JUDGMENT ORDER This case is before the Court upon the entire record, including the order of referral to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel, and the Panel's Memorandum Opinion setting forth its findings of fact and conclusions of law, which are incorporated herein by reference. Whereupon, it appears to the Court that the Memorandum Opinion of the Panel should be accepted and approved; ... URL:http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC/byersm_jo.WP6JAMES DARVIN HARVEY VS. MUELLER COMPANY Court:TSC Judge:PER CURIAM First Paragraph: JUDGMENT ORDER This case is before the Court upon the entire record, including the order of referral to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel, and the Panel's Memorandum Opinion setting forth its findings of fact and conclusions of law, which are incorporated herein by reference. Whereupon, it appears to the Court that the Memorandum Opinion of the Panel should be accepted and approved; and ... URL:http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC/harveyj_jo.WP6
PATRICIA HENLEY VS. CKR INDUSTRIES, INC. Court:TSC Judge:PER CURIAM First Paragraph: JUDGMENT ORDER This case is before the Court upon the entire record, including the order of referral to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel, and the Panel's Memorandum Opinion setting forth its findings of fact and conclusions of law, which are incorporated herein by reference. Whereupon, it appears to the Court that the Memorandum Opinion of the Panel should be accepted and approved; and ... URL:http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC/henleyp_jo.WP6
ALVIN RALPH MANN VS. CKR INDUSTRIES, INC. Court:TSC Judge:PER CURIAM First Paragraph: JUDGMENT ORDER This case is before the Court upon the entire record, including the order of referral to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel, and the Panel's Memorandum Opinion setting forth its findings of fact and conclusions of law, which are incorporated herein by reference. Whereupon, it appears to the Court that the Memorandum Opinion of the Panel should be accepted and approved; and ... URL:http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC/manna_jo.WP6
DONNIE G. SMITH VS. HERITAGE FORD-LINCOLN-MERCURY,INC.,HARLEYSVILLE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY and DINA TOBIN,Director of the Division of Workers' Compensation TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, SECOND INJURY FUND Court:TSC Judge:PER CURIAM First Paragraph: This case is before the Court upon the entire record, including the order of referral to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel, and the Panel's Memorandum Opinion setting forth its findings of fact and conclusions of law, which are incorporated herein by reference. Whereupon, it appears to the Court that the Memorandum Opinion of the Panel should be accepted and approved; and ... URL:http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC/smithd_jo.WP6
In re: Estate of Louise C. Davis, Deceased. SARAH FOSTER KELLEY VS. SARAH HILL MARTIN Court:TCA Attorneys: DONALD ARKOVITZ 332 White Bridge Road Nashville, Tennessee 37209 ATTORNEY FOR PETITIONER/APPELLANT GEORGE H. CATE, JR. 95 White Bridge Road Suite 503, Cavalier Building Nashville, Tennessee 37205 ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT/APPELLEE Judge:CAIN First Paragraph: This appeal involves the validity of certain transactions entered into by the holder of a power of attorney. The trial court set aside the transactions finding that the attorney in fact had failed to rebut the presumption of undue influence which arose in light of these self-benefitting transactions. We affirm the decision of the trial court. URL:http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/davisl_opn.WP6
BILLY FLOWERS and AMY FLOWERS VS. CHARLES R. HORNER and REBA M. HORNER Court:TCA Attorneys: Douglas Thompson Bates, Centerville, for Appellants. Allston Vander Horst, Centerville, for Appellees. Judge:INMAN First Paragraph: This controversy may, perhaps, be described as a boundary dispute. The development of Riverview Estates Subdivision began in 1971 with the recordation of a plat which provided for a cul-de-sac fifty feet in width centered on the West boundary of Lot 23. URL:http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/flowers_ca1.WP6
ALLEN E. HASTY and wife, JUDY DARLENE HASTY VS. THOMAS R. THRONEBERRY, Ind. and d/b/a THRONEBERRY PROPERTIES and SHARON CLUTTER Court:TCA Attorneys: L. GILBERT ANGLIN Murfreesboro, Tennessee Attorney for Appellant LARRY D. BRANDON Murfreesboro, Tennessee Attorney for Appellee Judge:HIGHERS First Paragraph: Defendant Thomas R. Throneberry appeals the trial court's judgment in the amount of $6,000 entered in favor of Plaintiff/Appellee Allen E. Hasty after a jury trial. For the reasons hereinafter stated, we affirm the trial court's judgment. URL:http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/hastyae_opn.WP6
ROGER P. HOGAN, FRED C. DANCE, and MUSIC CITY DUST-TEX SERVICE, INC. VS. COYNE INTERNATIONAL ENTERPRISES CORPORATION d/b/a COYNE TEXTILE SERVICES Court:TCA Attorneys: HELEN S. ROGERS 2205 State Street Nashville, Tennessee 37203 Attorney for Plaintiffs/Appellants C.J. GIDEON, JR. WILLIAM S. WALTON 414 Union Street Suite 1900, NationsBank Plaza Nashville, Tennessee 37219-1782 Attorneys for Defendant/Appellee Judge:CANTRELL First Paragraph: This action is based on a series of contracts executed in the sale of an industrial dust control and laundry business. The Chancery Court of Davidson County dismissed the claims of the sellers, held that one of the sellers had breached one of the agreements but that the buyer had failed to prove its damages, and awarded the buyer attorneys' fees. We reverse the dismissal of the sellers' action and modify the award of attorneys' fees. URL:http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/hoganrp_opn.WP6
MARY M. PAWLAKOS VS. LAURIE WATSON PAWLAKOS Court:TCA Attorneys: ROBERT H. MOYER RUDOLPH, ROSS & FENDLEY, P.L.L.C. Clarksville, Tennessee Attorney for Appellant DAN R. BRADLEY Waverly, Tennessee Attorney for Appellee Judge:HIGHERS First Paragraph: Respondent Laurie Watson Pawlakos (the Wife) appeals the trial court's order requiring her to return certain funds to the estate of her deceased husband, John T. Pawlakos (the Decedent). For the reasons hereinafter stated, we affirm in part and reverse in part the trial court's judgment. URL:http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/pawlakos_opn.WP6
STATE OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN'S SERVICES VS. TAMRA LEEANN VIAR and JOHN FITZGERALD GROSS and THE UNKNOWN FATHER OF KATELYN NICOLE VIAR IN THE MATTER OF: KATELYN NICOLE VIAR d/o/b: 9/22/95 Court:TCA Attorneys: J. Brooks Fox, Tullahoma, for Appellant Tamra Leann Viar. John Knox Walkup, Attorney General, and Douglas Earl Dimond, Assistant Attorney General, Nashville, for the Appellee DHS. Judge:INMAN First Paragraph: The parental relationship between Tamra Viar and her daughter, Katelyn, was terminated by the Juvenile Court, the propriety of which she presents for review. Our review of the findings of fact made by the trial Court is de novo upon the record of the trial Court, accompanied by a presumption of the correctness of the finding, unless the preponderance of the evidence is otherwise. Tenn. R. App. P., Rule 13(d); Campbell v. Florida Steel Corp., 919 S.W.2d 26 (Tenn. 1996). URL:http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/viar_ca1.WP6
ANN S. WING VS. JAMES E. WING Court:TCA Attorneys: Carol L. Soloman and Thomas F. Bloom, Nashville, for Appellant. F. Dulin Kelly, Hendersonville, for Appellee. Judge:INMAN First Paragraph: This is a domestic relations dispute involving money only. The trial court held that a certificate of deposit and one investment account were the separate property of Husband and declined to award Wife alimony or the total amount of her attorney fees. She appeals and presents these issues for review. URL:http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/wing_ca1.WP6

Feel free to forward this Opinion-Flash on to any attorney you know of with an internet address, who is not a TBALink member. To Join TBALink - http://www.tba.org/join.html/
Would you like to receive the TBALink Opinion-Flash each day via e-mail?
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: SUBSCRIBE
3) Leave the body of the message blank
Non TBA members are WELCOME to subscribe...it's free!!
Would you like to STOP receiving the TBALink Opinion-Flash?
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: UNSUBSCRIBE
3) Leave the body of the message blank
