|

July 13, 1999
Volume 5 -- Number 097

What follows is the case style or name, first paragraph, author's
name, and the names of attorneys for the parties of each opinion
released eletronically today to TBALink from Tennessee's three
appellate courts.
- This Issue (IN THIS ORDER):
-
| 00 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Supreme Court |
| 00 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Supreme Court Workers' Compensation
Panel |
| 00 |
New Document(s) or Proposed Rule(s) from the Tennessee Supreme
Court |
| 10 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Court of Appeals |
| 02 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals |
| 00 |
New Judicial Ethics Opinion(s) |
| 00 |
New Formal Ethics Opinion(s) from the Board of Professional Responsibility
|
-
There are three ways for TBALink members to get the full-text
versions of these opinions from the Web:
Do a key word search in the Search Link area of TBALink.This option will allow you to view and save a
plain text version of the opinion.
*NEW* Browse the Opinion List area of TBALink. This option will allow you to download the original
WordPerfect 6.0 version of the opinion.
Click the URL at end of each Opinion paragraph below. This option
will allow you to download the original WordPerfect 6.0 document.
Lucian T. Pera
Editor-in-Chief, TBALink

ALLEN BULLARD and WANDA BULLARD
VS.
DEWAYNE SCOTT AND RHONDA SCOTT
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
For Appellants For Appellees
DONALD MART LASLEY DAVID W. WALLACE
Chattanooga, Tennessee Chattanooga, Tennessee
Judge:SUSANO
First Paragraph:
This controversy focuses on a subdivision lot that is owned by numerous
tenants in common. The lot in question, Lot 10, with dimensions of
196.14' x 100.4' x 245' x 160.2', is located in Thatcher Shore Acres
Subdivision in Hamilton County. Significantly, it has water access to
Chickamauga Lake. In 1981, it was conveyed to the plaintiffs or their
predecessors in title, 38 of the 39 property owners of Thatcher Shore
Acres Subdivision, by the subdivision's developer, James C. Thatcher.
By such conveyance, each of the grantees received an undivided 1/39th
interest in Lot 10. Such an interest -- a 1/39th -- was also conveyed
to a predecessor in title of defendants Dewayne and Rhonda Scott ("the
Scotts").
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/Bullarda_opn.WP6
IN THE ESTATE OF
MAX CHRISTIAN CARPENTER,
GRACE CARPENTER
VS.
IN RE: SULLIVAN
and
LUCCHESI
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
DAVID M. SULLIVAN,
Memphis, pro se.
THOMAS E. HANSOM,
Memphis, for Appellant/Cross-Appellee, Ronald Lucchesi.
Judge:FRANKS
First Paragraph:
This action is based on a dispute between two attorneys over the
division of attorneys' fees. The attorneys' fees were generated by
representation of the Estate in a civil rights action, which was
settled, and the law firm which was to distribute the attorneys' fees
filed a Complaint for Interpleader and Declaratory Relief. Both
Sullivan, appellee, and Lucchesi, appellant, answered the Interpleader.
Lucchesi requested the court divide the fees equally between the two
attorneys, and Sullivan requested that he be awarded 90% of the fees.
The Estate filed an Answer to the Complaint, asserting that Lucchesi's
request for one-half of the fee is in violation of DR 2-106, and that
his portion of the fee should be awarded to the Estate.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/Carpentr_opn.WP6
DON DAY and KIM DAY, on behalf
of themselves and all others similarly
situated
VS.
GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE
CORPORATION
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
GORDON BALL, Knoxville, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
STEPHEN G. ANDERSON
and
ANDREW L. COLOCOTRONIS, BAKER, DONELSON, BEARMAN & CALDWELL, P.C.,
Knoxville, for Defendant-Appellee.
Judge: FRANKS
First Paragraph:
This action was dismissed by the Trial Judge for failure to state a
claim upon which relief could be granted, pursuant to T.R.C.P.
S12.02(6). The alleged facts in this case are identical in all material
respect, to the alleged facts in Harvey v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 1999
WL 356301 (Tenn. App.).
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/Dayd_opn.WP6
GEORGE DERRYBERRY
VS.
SARAH ELIZABETH DERRYBERRY
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
VIRGINIA A. SCHWAMM OF KNOXVILLE FOR APPELLANT
WILLIAM H. HORTON OF CHATTANOOGA FOR APPELLEE
Judge:GODDARD
First Paragraph:
Sarah Elizabeth Derryberry appeals a divorce judgement entered in the
Circuit Court for Hamilton County and raises various issues for our
consideration. Mr. Derryberry also raises issues in his reply brief.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/Derrybeg_opn.WP6
ANNA MAY FAIR
VS.
CHARLES FULTON, M.D., and
INDIAN PATH HOSPITAL, INC.,
d/b/a HCA INDIAN PATH
MEDICAL CENTE
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Lon V. Boyd,
Kingsport, for Appellant.
M. Lacy West
and
Julia C. West,
Kingsport, for Appellee Indian Path Hospital.
Richard M. Currie, Jr.,
Kingsport, for Appellee Charles Fulton, M.D.
Judge:INMAN
First Paragraph:
This is a malpractice action against an emergency room physician. The
plaintiff alleged that on April 17, 1994 she sought treatment at the
emergency room of Indian Path Hospital for severe chest pains which the
defendant attributed to a fractured rib. He obtained no
electrocardiogram. Three days later she returned to the emergency room
suffering from chest pains. Another physician diagnosed her condition
as congestive heart failure, and advised her that she had no broken rib.
She alleged that the defendant was negligent in his diagnosis and
treatment of her on April 17, and that he failed to exercise proper care
and skill, resulting in "grievous bodily injuries."
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/Fair-ann_ca3.WP6
MIKE HARVEY, on behalf of himself
and all others similarly situated
VS.
FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
GORDON BALL, Knoxville, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
STEVEN D. LIPSEY,
STONE & HINDS, P.C., Knoxville,
and
THOMAS M. BYRNE
and
DANIEL H. SCHLUETER,
SUTHERLAND, ASBILL & BRENNAN, LLP, Atlanta, for
Defendant-Appellee.
PAUL G. SUMMERS,
Tennessee Attorney General and Reporter,
and
TIMOTHY C. PHILLIPS,
Assistant Attorney General, Nashville, Amicus Curiae for the State of
Tennessee.
Judge:FRANKS
First Paragraph:
Plaintiff has filed a Petition for Rehearing in response our opinion in
Harvey v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 1999 WL 356301 (Tenn.App). Plaintiff
argues that the Court misinterpreted the term "quoted Ford Motor Credit
Rates" in his Amended Complaint. He argues that the term "quoted Ford
Motor Credit Rates" refers to the final rate quoted to the consumer by
the dealer. In other sections of the Amended Complaint, the term
"quoted rates" refers to the initial rates set by the defendant and not
the rates given to the consumer. In another portion of the Amended
Compliant, however, the plaintiff states that the defendant "instructs
and/or permits its dealers to inform consumers that the interest rate
quoted to them is a fixed Ford Motor Credit rate, when in fact it is
not."
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/Harvyvfd_opn.WP6
NATIONAL GAS DISTRIBUTORS
VS.
SEVIER COUNTY UTILITY
DISTRICT of Sevier County,
Tennessee,
VS.
PAUL G. SUMMERS, Attorney
General and Reporter for the State of
Tennessee
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
DONALD K. VOWELL,
VOWELL & ASSOCIATES, Knoxville, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
ROBERT E. COOPER, JR.,
and
W. SCOTT SIMS,
BASS, BERRY & SIMS, PLC., Nashville, and
RONALD E. SHARP,
SHARP & RIPLEY, Sevierville, for Defendant-Appellee.
PAUL G. SUMMERS,
Attorney General and Reporter,
MIKE E. MOORE,
Solicitor General,
and
JANET M. KLEINFELTER,
Senior Counsel, Financial Division, Nashville,
for Intervening Defendant-Appellee.
Judge:FRANKS
First Paragraph:
Plaintiff appeals from a T.R.C.P. 12.02(6), dismissal of its complaint.
Plaintiff's principal place of business is in Knoxville, Tennessee, and
it sells and distributes propane in Sevier County, Tennessee.
Defendant is a utility district created pursuant to the Tennessee
Utility District Law of 1937.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/Natgas_opn.WP6
AHMED MOAYED PERTEW
VS.
KATHLEEN RUTH MALONEY PERTEW
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
For Appellant For Appellee
KATHLEEN RUTH MALONEY PERTEW AHMED MOAYED PERTEW
Pro Se Pro Se
East Norwich, New York Leesburg, Virginia
Judge:SUSANO
First Paragraph:
These parties were divorced by judgment entered November 17, 1989. In
1996, they filed competing pleadings seeking various post-divorce
relief. The trial court, following a hearing on April 15, 1997, granted
a portion of the requested relief in an order entered October 6, 1997.
Being dissatisfied with the trial court's order, Kathleen Ruth Maloney
Pertew ("Wife") appeals, raising several issues. In order to reach
these issues, it is necessary to review, in some detail, the pertinent
procedural history of this case.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/Pertewam_opn.WP6
STATE OF TENNESSEE,
DEPT. OF CHILDREN'S SERVICES
VS.
MURDIS (nmn) PHILLIPS and
LORETTA COOK PHILLIPS,
IN THE MATTER OF:
Curtis Lee Phillips, dob 9/30/90
Emma Jay Phillips, dob 10/03/94
Children Under Eighteen Years of Age
Court:TCA
Judge:INMAN
First Paragraph:
Murdis Phillips and Loretta Cook Phillips appeal from an order of the
Anderson County Juvenile Court terminating their parental rights to
their two children, Curtis Lee Phillips (DOB 9/30/90) and Emma Jay
Phillips (DOB 10/03/94). We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/Phillips_ca3.WP6
ESTATE OF J.P. WALKER
VS.
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
and
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
For Appellant For Appellee
PAUL G. SUMMERS WILLIAM S. ESTABROOK
Attorney General and Reporter ROBERT L. BAKER
Nashville, Tennessee Tax Division
Department of Justice
M. TY PRYOR Washington, D.C.
Assistant Attorney General
Nashville, Tennessee CARL K. KIRKPATRICK
United States Attorney,
Eastern District of Tennessee
Knoxville, Tennessee
Judge:SUSANO
First Paragraph:
This appeal requires us to determine whether the claim of the United
States against the Estate of J.P. Walker ("the Estate") for federal
income and estate taxes is entitled to priority treatment as against the
Tennessee Department of Revenue's claim for state inheritance taxes.
The trial court -- the Sevier County Probate Court -- held, pursuant to
the Federal Insolvency Statute, 31 U.S.C.A. S 3713, that the United
States was entitled to priority as to the remaining assets of the
Estate. The Department of Revenue appeals, contending that its
inheritance tax claim is on an equal footing with the federal claim and,
therefore, should share pro rata in the distribution of the Estate's
remaining assets.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/Walkerjp_opn.WP6
STATE OF TENNESSEE
VS.
ROGER MORRIS GARDNER
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
FOR THE APPELLANT: FOR THE APPELLEE:
GALE K. FLANARY JOHN KNOX WALKUP
Assistant Public Defender Attorney General and Reporter
2nd Judicial District
P. O. Box 839 TODD R. KELLEY
Blountville, TN 37617 Assistant Attorney General
425 Fifth Avenue North
Nashville, TN 37243
GREELEY WELLS
District Attorney General
BARRY STAUBUS
LISA CROCKETT
Assistant Attorney General
P. O. Box 526
Blountville, TN 37617
Judge:SMITH
First Paragraph:
On September 30, 1997, a Sullivan County jury convicted Appellant Roger
Morris Gardner of one count of attempted aggravated kidnapping. After a
sentencing hearing on November 18, 1997, the trial court sentenced
Appellant as a Range II multiple offender to eight years in the
Tennessee Department of Correction. Appellant challenges his
conviction, raising the following issues:
1) whether the evidence was sufficient to support his conviction;
2) whether the trial court should have granted a mistrial because the
jurors may have seen Appellant in the custody of some bailiffs during a
recess in the trial;
3) whether the trial court properly instructed the jury on flight;
4) whether the trial court properly instructed the jury on admissions
against interest; and
5) whether Appellant's right to a speedy trial was violated.
After a review of the record, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/Gardnero_opn.WP6
STATE OF TENNESSEE
VS.
STANLEY WARREN MILLS
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
FOR THE APPELLANT: FOR THE APPELLEE:
TOM LANDIS PAUL G. SUMMERS
Suite 327 Attorney General & Reporter
744 McCallie Avenue
Chattanooga, TN 374063 TODD R. KELLEY
Assistant Attorney General
425 Fifth Avenue North
Nashville, TN 37243
BILL COX
District Attorney General
RODNEY STRONG
Assistant District Attorney
600 Market Street
Chattanooga, TN 37403
Judge:SMITH
First Paragraph:
On July 25, 1996, Juvenile Court of Hamilton County charged Appellant
with the first degree murder of Keith Hood. Appellant was nearly
seventeen years old at the time of the murder and was transferred to
Criminal Court to be tried as an adult. Appellant was indicted for
first degree murder on December 11, 1996. In September of the following
year, a jury found Appellant guilty of second degree murder. He was
sentenced to twenty years incarceration as a Range I Standard Offender.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/Millssta_opn.WP6
PLEASE FORWARD THIS EMAIL!
Feel free to forward this Opinion Flash on to anyone you know
of with an e-mail address.
GET A FULL-TEXT COPY OF AN OPINION!
See the intrsuctions at the beginning of this edition of Opinion
Flash.
JOIN TBALink!
While Opinion Flash is a free service of the Tennessee Bar Association,
you must be a subscriber to TBALink, the premier Web site for
Tennessee attorneys, in order to access the full-text of the opinions
or enjoy many other features of TBALink. TBA members may join
TBALink for just $50 per year. To join, go to: http://www.tba.org/join.html/
SUBSCRIBE TO OPINION FLASH!
Would you like to receive the TBALink Opinion-Flash free each
day by e-mail? Anyone -- whether a TBA member or not is welcome
to subscribe ... it's free!
For the Plain Text Version:
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: SUBSCRIBE
3) Leave the body of the message blank
For the HTML Text Version:
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: SUBSCRIBE HTML
3) Leave the body of the message blank
UNSUBSCRIBE TO OPINION FLASH? ... SURELY NOT!
To STOP receiving TBALink Opinion-Flash:
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: UNSUBSCRIBE
3) Leave the body of the message blank

     
© Copyright 1999 Tennessee Bar Association
|