|

November 23, 1999
Volume 5 -- Number 161

What follows is the case style or name, first paragraph, author's name, and the names of attorneys for the parties of each opinion released eletronically today to TBALink from Tennessee's three appellate courts.
- This Issue (IN THIS ORDER):
-
| 08 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Supreme Court |
| 00 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Supreme Court Workers' Compensation Panel |
| 01 |
New Document(s) or Proposed Rule(s) from the Tennessee Supreme Court |
| 07 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Court of Appeals |
| 02 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals |
| 00 |
New Judicial Ethics Opinion(s) |
| 00 |
New Formal Ethics Opinion(s) from the Board of Professional Responsibility |
-
There are three ways for TBALink members to get the full-text versions of these opinions from the Web:
Do a key word search in the Search Link area of TBALink.This option will allow you to view and save a plain text version of the opinion.
*NEW* Browse the Opinion List area of TBALink. This option will allow you to download the original WordPerfect 6.0 version of the opinion.
Click the URL at end of each Opinion paragraph below. This option will allow you to download the original WordPerfect 6.0 document.
Lucian T. Pera
Editor-in-Chief, TBALink

HENRY CIRCUIT
VS.
BRENDA ANNE BURNS
CORRECTED OPINION
Court:TSC
Attorneys:
For the Appellant: For the Appellee:
Andrew Frazier Paul G. Summers
Camden, Tennessee Attorney General and Reporter
(At Trial)
Michael C. Moore
David Raybin Solicitor General
Nashville, Tennessee
(On Appeal) Elizabeth T. Ryan
Assistant Attorney General
Nashville, Tennessee
Robert Radford
District Attorney General
Judge: BARKER
First Paragraph:
Defendant/appellee Brenda Burns was tried and convicted of criminal
responsibility for the commission of first-degree murder in the death
of her ex-husband, Paul Burns. The Court of Criminal Appeals reversed
the conviction on the basis that trial counsel was ineffective in
failing to interview two potential defense witnesses and present the
testimony of those witnesses before the jury. The State filed an
Application for Permission to Appeal contesting the intermediate
court's reversal of the defendant's conviction on that basis. The
defendant filed a Cross-Application for Permission to Appeal raising,
among other issues, whether the trial court had committed reversible
error by failing to instruct the jury on the lesser-included offenses
of facilitation of a felony (i.e., first-degree murder), Tenn. Code
Ann. S 39-11-403 (1991), and solicitation to commit a criminal offense
(i.e., first-degree murder), Tenn. Code Ann. S 39-12-102 (1991). We
granted both Applications in order to address these important issues.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC/burnsba.wpd
STATE OF TENNESSEE
VS.
CHARLES D. FOWLER
DISSENTING OPINION
CORRECTED OPINION
Court:TSC
Judge: BIRCH
First Paragraph:
The criminal attempt statute in issue provides:
(a) A person commits criminal attempt who, acting with the kind of
culpability otherwise required for the offense:
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC/FOWLERC_DIS.wpd
HARRY LUTHER
VS.
BILLY COMPTON, Warden; BEN LINDEMOOD, Warden;
DONNIE NOLES, Warden; DONNA KLUTTS, P.A.;
EDNA FREEMEN, Health Administrator; JANE VERNON, Director of Nurses;
PAT BURCH, L.P.N.; BRITTON MORTON, L.P.N.;
JIMMY CHILDRESS, Vo-Tech Shop Instructor; KENNY FOSTER,
Vo-Tech Security Officer; and ROY O'STEEN, Safety Inspector
Court:TSC
Attorneys:
For Appellee: For Appellants:
W. LEWIS JENKINS, JR. PAUL G. SUMMERS
Dyersburg, TN Attorney General and Reporter
MICHAEL E. MOORE
Solicitor General
PATRICIA C. KUSSMAN
Assistant Attorney General
Nashville, TN
Judge: BIRCH
First Paragraph:
We granted review in this case to determine if the plaintiff should be
allowed to conduct additional discovery on his claim that the
defendants were "deliberate[ly] indifferen[t]" to his serious medical
needs. In addition, we will consider whether the plaintiff's 42
U.S.C. S 1983 and negligence claims were properly dismissed pursuant
to the defendants' motion for summary judgment. Because we conclude
that the plaintiff's assertions of deliberate indifference do not
state an independent cause of action but are, instead, part of his 42
U.S.C. S 1983 claim, we reverse only that portion of the intermediate
court's decision permitting additional discovery. Further, we
reinstate the trial court's decision granting the defendants' motion
for summary judgment on the plaintiff's negligence claim.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC/lutherh.wpd
STATE OF TENNESSEE
VS.
DONALD TERRY MOORE
Court:TSC
Attorneys:
For the Appellant: For the Appellee:
Charles R. Ray Paul G. Summers
Nashville, Tennessee Attorney General & Reporter
Jeffery S. Frensley Michael E. Moore
Nashville, Tennessee Solicitor General
Elizabeth T. Ryan
Assistant Attorney General
Nashville, Tennessee
Judge: BARKER
First Paragraph:
We granted the appeal in this case to address the proper application
of Tennessee Rule of Criminal Procedure 14(b)(1), which is used to
sever criminal offenses. For the reasons set forth below, we hold
that the Court of Criminal Appeals erred in affirming the trial
court's denial of appellant's motion to sever one count of child rape
based upon a finding that the offense was part of a common scheme or
plan. However, we also hold that the error is harmless because the
appellant was acquitted on two of the three counts of child rape, and
the evidence is entirely sufficient to support the appellant's
conviction on the remaining count. Accordingly, the judgment of the
Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC/MOOREDT.wpd
CHRISTOPHER NIZIOL
VS.
LOCKHEED MARTIN ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC.
Court:TSC
Attorneys:
For the Appellant: For the Appellee:
John D. Agee Robert M. Stivers, Jr.
COOLEY, COOLEY & AGEE Associate General Counsel
Kingston, Tennessee Lockheed Martin Energy Systems, Inc.
Oak Ridge, Tennessee
Judge: ANDERSON
First Paragraph:
We granted the motion to review this workers' compensation case to
determine whether an award that was paid in a lump sum pursuant to
Tenn. Code Ann. S 50-6-231 (1999) may be later reconsidered and
increased upon the filing of a new cause of action by the employee
pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. S 50-6-241(a)(2) (1999).
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC/NIZIOLC.wpd
STATE OF TENNESSEE
VS.
DONALD RAY SHIRLEY
Court:TSC
Attorneys:
For the Appellant: For the Appellee:
William J. Brown Paul G. Summers
Nashville, Tennessee Attorney General & Reporter
Michael E. Moore
Solicitor General
Elizabeth T. Ryan
Assistant Attorney General
Nashville, Tennessee
Judge: BARKER
First Paragraph:
In this case we consider the proper standard of appellate review of a
trial court's denial of a motion to sever offenses under Tennessee
Rule of Criminal Procedure 14(b)(1). For the reasons set forth below,
we hold that a denial of a severance will only be reversed for an
abuse of discretion. We also hold that the trial court in this case
abused its discretion in denying a severance because the methods used
to commit the offenses were not so materially distinct or unique as to
rise to an inference of identity. Because we find that this abuse of
discretion was not harmless, the decision of the Court of Criminal
Appeals is reversed, and this case is remanded to the trial court for
new trials.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC/SHIRLEYD.wpd
STEVEN A. WAKEFIELD
VS.
MICHAEL F. CRAWLEY, MacTENN VALVE COMPANY, a Tennessee
Corporation, and MACAWEBER SYSTEMS, INC., a Tennessee Corporation
Court:TSC
Attorneys:
For Plaintiff-Appellee: For Defendants-Appellants:
H. Allen Bray William S. Lockett, Jr.
Maryville, Tennessee Kennerly,Montgomery & Finley,PC
Knoxville, Tennessee
Judge: DROWOTA
First Paragraph:
We granted this appeal to determine whether stock in a closely-held
corporation is a "security," as defined by Tenn. Code Ann. S 47-8-102
(1992 Repl. & Supp. 1998), so that Chapter 8 of the Uniform
Commercial Code (UCC) governs its sale or transfer.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC/wakefieldsa.wpd
PAULA YORK and BRIAN YORK
VS.
SEVIER COUNTY AMBULANCE AUTHORITY, ET AL., and
BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF TENNESSEE
Court:TSC
Attorneys:
For the Appellants: For Appellee, Blue Cross and
Blue Shield of Tennessee:
Richard T. Wallace
WALLACE & JONES Daniel M. Gass
Sevierville, Tennessee O'NEIL, PARKER & WILLIAMSON
Knoxville, Tennessee
Stephen J. Cox
REISCHLING & AULT
Knoxville, Tennessee
For Amicus Curiae, Tennessee
Trial Lawyers Association:
Jimmy W. Bilbo
LOGAN, THOMPSON, MILLER, BILBO,
THOMPSON & FISHER, P.C.
Cleveland, Tennessee
Judge: ANDERSON
First Paragraph:
We granted this appeal to decide whether an insured must receive full
compensation for losses, i.e., be "made whole," before an insurer may
receive reimbursement for medical expenses paid on behalf of the
insured.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC/YorkP.wpd
SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE
STATE LIST FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAL
Court:TSC - Rules
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC_Rules/CERTLIST_1122.wpd
DEAN ARNOLD d/b/a, THE CHATTANOOGA FAX and
TENNESSEE-AMERICAN WATER COMPANY
VS.
CITY OF CHATTANOOGA, TENNESSEE, and MAYOR JON KINSEY
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
JOE A. CONNER and MISTY SMITH KELLEY, BAKER DONELSON, BEARMAN &
CALDWELL, Chattanooga, for Petitioner-Appellee, Tennessee American
Water Company.
J. CHRISTOPHER CLEM, LUTHER-ANDERSON, PLLP, Chattanooga, for Appellee,
Dean Arnold, d/b/a The Chattanooga Fax.
RANDALL L. NELSON, City Attorney, Chattanooga, and FREDERICK L.
HITCHCOCK, LARRY L. CASH, and STEPHEN D. BARHAM, STRANG, FLETCHER,
CARRIGER, WALKER, HODGE & SMITH, PLLC, Chattanooga, for Appellants.
PAUL G. SUMMERS, Attorney General and Reporter, MICHAEL E. MOORE,
Solicitor General, and JANET M. KLEINFELTER, Senior Counsel, Financial
Division, Nashville, for Response of Attorney General to Appellants'
Constitutional Challenge.
Judge: FRANKS
First Paragraph:
In this action to inspect documents in the possession of the
defendants, the Trial Judge ordered defendants to "permit the
inspection and reproduction of the full volume report prepared by
Decosimo's Management Consultants, and the written report of the
Public Finance Administration. Defendants obtained a stay of the
Trial Court's judgment, and appealed the matter to this Court.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/arnoldd.wpd
TONY MILO CROWE
VS.
WANDA JUNE COMER
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
TIMOTHY L. BALDRIDGE OF KNOXVILLE FOR APPELLANT
JAMES H. BEELER OF KINGSPORT FOR APPELLEE
Judge: GODDARD
First Paragraph:
This is an appeal from the Circuit Court's order finding it had
subject matter jurisdiction to determine the custody of the minor
child Nicholas Crowe. Wanda Comer, Defendant-Appellant, contests the
Circuit Court's subject matter jurisdiction.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/croweton.wpd
KENNETH DAVIS, T.Q. HEIDEL, JR. and GAIL F. WORTLEY
VS.
BOWATER, INC
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
For the Appellants: For the Appellee:
Gail F. Wortley James Frank Wilson
3715 Powers Street P. O. Box 160
Knoxville, TN 37917 Wartburg, TN 37887
Judge: SWINEY
First Paragraph:
In this dispute over Bowater, Inc.'s cutting of timber on a certain
tract of land, Kenneth Davis, T. Q. Heidel, Jr. and Gail F. Wortley
("Appellants"), appeal the Trial Court's grant of summary judgment to
Bowater ("Appellee").
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/DavisKe.wpd
DEBBIE KAY MARION, as next friend for JONI MARION and
JOY K. BOWLING, children under the age of 18 years
VS.
CHARLES DAVID BOWLING
WITH DISSENTING OPINION
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
For Appellant For Appellee
CHARLES DAVID BOWLING JANETTE TAYLOR
Pro Se Oneida, Tennessee
Pikeville, Tennessee
Judge: SUSANO
First Paragraph:
This is an action brought by Debbie Kay Marion ("Marion") on behalf of
her two minor children seeking damages for injuries allegedly
sustained by the children as a result of the criminal conduct of the
defendant, Charles David Bowling ("Bowling").
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/Mariondk.wpd
DISSENTING OPINION:
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/mariond.wpd
THE OCEANICS SCHOOLS, INC.
VS.
OPERATION SEA CRUISE, INC.
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
For the Appellant: For the Appellee:
J. Douglas Overbey Brian C. Quist
Catherine B. Coffey Jenkins & Jenkins PLLC
Robertson, Ingram & Overbey 2121 First Tennessee Plaza
The Farragut Building Knoxville, TN 37929-2121
530 South Gay Street, Suite 802
Knoxville, TN 37902-1537
Judge: SWINEY
First Paragraph:
This is an appeal from the Trial Court's Order denying the motion of
Plaintiff/Appellant, The Oceanics Schools, Inc. ("Appellant") for
Writ of Execution against Clifford E. Barbour, Jr., sole shareholder
of Defendant/Appellee, Operation Sea Cruise, Inc. ("Appellee" or
"OSC"), or in the alternative, to Amend, after final judgment,
Appellant's Complaint to domesticate a foreign judgment against OSC,
by adding Barbour as a party-defendant.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/Oceanics.wpd
PATSY CARR SMITH
VS.
DONALD WALKER SMITH
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
KYLE E. HEDRICK, Chattanooga, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
MITCHELL A. BYRD, Chattanooga, for Defendant-Appellant.
Judge: FRANKS
First Paragraph:
In this action, the Trial Judge dismissed Donald Smith's petition to
modify the alimony award to his former wife, Patsy Smith.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/smithp.wpd
JOHNNY D. YOUNG
VS.
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
For the Appellant: For the Appellee:
Robert D. Bradshaw George L. Foster
Chattanooga Chattanooga
Judge: SWINEY
First Paragraph:
This is an appeal from the Trial Court's denial of a Motion for New
Trial filed by Plaintiff/Appellant, Johnny D. Young. The motion was
based upon allegations of a quotient verdict, improper admission of
evidence, and improper argument by counsel for Defendant/Appellee,
Norfolk Southern Railway Company.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/Youngj.wpd
STATE OF TENNESSEE
VS.
CONLEY ROSS FAIR
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
For the Appellant: For the Appellee:
William B. Lawson Paul G. Summers
112 Gay Street Attorney General of Tennessee
Post Office Box 16 and
Erwin, TN 37650 Erik W. Daab
Assistant Attorney General of Tennessee
425 Fifth Avenue North
Nashville, TN 37243
Joe C. Crumley, Jr.
District Attorney General
144 Alf Taylor Road
Johnson City, TN 37601
Judge: TIPTON
First Paragraph:
The defendant, Conley Ross Fair, appeals as of right from his
convictions by a jury in the Unicoi County Criminal Court for one
count of first degree murder and one count of attempted first degree
murder.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/FAIR.wpd
DAVID EARL MILLER
VS.
STATE OF TENNESSEE
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
FOR THE APPELLANT: FOR THE APPELLEE:
MARK E. STEPHENS PAUL G. SUMMERS
District Public Defender Attorney General & Reporter
JOHN HASTEAD (on appeal) MICHAEL E. MOORE
PAULA R. VOSS Solicitor General
Assistant Public Defenders
1209 Euclid Avenue MICHAEL J. FAHEY, II
Knoxville, TN 37921 Assistant Attorney General
425 Fifth Avenue North
MARK OLIVE (at trial) Nashville, TN 37243
ANDRU VOLINSKY
School of Law RANDALL EUGENE NICHOLS
University of N. Carolina District Attorney General
Van Hecke-Wettach Hall
Chapel Hill, NC 27514 ROBERT L. JOLLEY, JR.
Assistant District Attorney
400 Main
Knoxville, TN 37902
Judge: WILLIAMS
First Paragraph:
The petitioner, David Earl Miller, appeals the Knox County Criminal
Court's dismissal of his post-conviction relief petition. In March of
1982, the petitioner was found guilty of first degree murder and
sentenced to death by a Knox County jury. The petitioner's direct
appeal resulted in the Tennessee Supreme Court affirming his
conviction, but reversing his death sentence and remanding the case
for a new sentencing trial.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/MILLERDE.wpd

PLEASE FORWARD THIS EMAIL!
Feel free to forward this Opinion Flash on to anyone you know of with an e-mail address.
GET A FULL-TEXT COPY OF AN OPINION!
See the intrsuctions at the beginning of this edition of Opinion Flash.
JOIN TBALink!
While Opinion Flash is a free service of the Tennessee Bar Association, you must be a subscriber to TBALink, the premier Web site for Tennessee attorneys, in order to access the full-text of the opinions or enjoy many other features of TBALink. TBA members may join TBALink for just $50 per year. To join, go to: http://www.tba.org/join.html/
SUBSCRIBE TO OPINION FLASH!
Would you like to receive the TBALink Opinion-Flash free each day by e-mail? Anyone -- whether a TBA member or not is welcome to subscribe ... it's free!
For the Plain Text Version:
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: SUBSCRIBE
3) Leave the body of the message blank
For the HTML Text Version:
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: SUBSCRIBE HTML
3) Leave the body of the message blank
UNSUBSCRIBE TO OPINION FLASH? ... SURELY NOT!
To STOP receiving TBALink Opinion-Flash:
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: UNSUBSCRIBE
3) Leave the body of the message blank

     
© Copyright 1999 Tennessee Bar Association
|