|

May 23, 2000
Volume 6 -- Number 077

What follows is the case style or name, first paragraph, author's
name, and the names of attorneys for the parties of each opinion
released eletronically today to TBALink.
- This Issue (IN THIS ORDER):
-
| 00 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Supreme Court |
| 00 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Supreme Court Workers' Compensation
Panel |
| 00 |
New Document(s) or Proposed Rule(s) from the Tennessee Supreme
Court |
| 04 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Court of Appeals |
| 00 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals |
| 00 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Attorney General (PDF format)
|
| 00 |
New Judicial Ethics Opinion(s) |
| 00 |
New Formal Ethics Opinion(s) from the Board of Professional Responsibility
|
-
There are three ways for TBALink members to get the full-text
versions of these opinions from the Web:
Do a key word search in the Search Link area of TBALink. This option will allow you to view and save
a plain-text version of the opinion.
Browse the Opinion List area of TBALink. This option will allow you to download the original
version of the opinion.
Click the URL at end of each Opinion paragraph below. This option
will allow you to download the original document.
Lucian T. Pera
Editor-in-Chief, TBALink

A. L. BELCHER & ASSOCIATES, L.L.C.
VS.
JOHN HARRISON and CHUCK ZINGALE
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Jerred A. Creasy, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellants, John
Harrison and Chuck Zingale.
William L. Moore, Jr., Gallatin, Tennessee, for the appellee, A. L.
Belcher & Associates, L.L.C.
Judge: COTTRELL
First Paragraph:
A. L. Belcher & Associates sued its former employees, John Harrison
and Chuck Zingale, alleging that they breached the non-compete clauses
in their respective employment contracts. The employees appeal the
trial court's order granting an injunction and an award of damages to
the employer. Because the employer failed to satisfy its burden of
proving that its former employees breached the non-compete clauses or
caused the alleged damages, we reverse the trial court's decision.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/BelcherAL.wpd
In re C.W.W., N.W.W., Z.W.W., & A.L.W.
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Jennifer Lynn Thompson, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellant,
Christine Shroth Wideman.
Dennis L. Nordhoff, Franklin, Tennessee, for the appellant,
Christopher Wayne Wideman.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter, and Douglas Earl
Dimond, Assistant Attorney General, for the appellee, State of
Tennessee, Department of Children's Services.
Stephanie Cantrell Hatchett, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellees,
Jamie and Jorge Flores.
Judge: FARMER
First Paragraph:
Christine Stroth Wideman (Mother) appeals the trial court's judgment
terminating her parental rights to three of her children, C.W.W.,
N.W.W., and Z.W.W. The Department of Children's Services (DCS)
obtained custody of these children for the second time in February
1998. Several days earlier, the Mother instructed the children to go
to a neighbor's house for a few hours. When the Mother did not return
for the children, school officials notified DCS that the children had
been abandoned. The Mother was arrested and incarcerated on March 31,
1998, on prostitution and other charges. In November 1998,
approximately one month after her release, DCS filed this petition to
terminate the Mother's parental rights. At the trial's conclusion,
the trial court entered a final decree terminating the Mother's
parental rights based upon the court's findings that the Mother had
abandoned the children and that the conditions which led to the
children's removal still persisted. We affirm the trial court's
judgment based upon our conclusion that the record contains clear and
convincing evidence to support the trial court's findings that the
Mother abandoned the children by engaging in conduct prior to her
incarceration which exhibited a wanton disregard for the children's
welfare and that termination of the Mother's parental rights was in
the children's best interests.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/CWW.wpd
PETER GREGG McKEE
VS.
PENNY MARIE PEARSALL McKEE
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Robert L. Holloway, Jr., Columbia, Tennessee, for the appellant, Penny
Marie Pearsall McKee.
Thomas W. Hardin and Darren J. Scoggins, Columbia, Tennessee, for the
appellee, Peter Gregg McKee.
Judge: KOCH
First Paragraph:
This appeal involves the financial aspects of a marriage that lasted
less than ten years. Both parties sought a divorce and vigorously
joined issue over the classification of their property, the division
of the marital estate, and the wife's demands for spousal support and
attorney's fees. Following a bench trial, the Chancery Court for
Maury County declared the parties divorced. The trial court also
awarded the parties their separate property, distributed 37% of the
marital estate to the wife, and declined to award the wife spousal
support. On this appeal, the wife takes issue with the trial court's
classification and division of the property and its refusal to award
her either spousal support or attorney's fees. While the trial court
erred in the classification of the marital property, we have
determined that its division of the marital estate, once corrected, is
equitable. We have also determined that the trial court should have
granted the wife short-term spousal support but properly denied her
request for attorney's fees.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/Mckeepg.wpd
DAVID ALTON REECE, et al.
VS.
ROBY BROWN
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Howard G. Swafford, Jasper, Tennessee, for the appellants, David Alton
Reece and Connie Irene Reece.
J. Harvey Cameron, Jasper, Tennessee, for the appellee, Roby Brown.
Judge: KOCH
First Paragraph:
This appeal involves a dispute over whether a passageway through
private land has been dedicated to public use. The owners of a tract
adjoining the tract through which the passageway runs filed suit in
the Chancery Court for Marion County seeking a declaration that the
passageway had been dedicated for public use. After a bench trial,
the trial court dismissed the complaint, and the property owners
seeking to prove dedication appeal. We affirm the trial court because
the evidence does not preponderate against it's finding that there was
no manifest intention to give the passageway to public use.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/Reeceda.wpd

PLEASE FORWARD THIS E-MAIL!
Feel free to forward this Opinion Flash on to anyone you know
of with an e-mail address.
GET A FULL-TEXT COPY OF AN OPINION!
See the intrsuctions at the beginning of this edition of Opinion
Flash.
JOIN TBALink!
While Opinion Flash is a free service of the Tennessee Bar Association,
you must be a subscriber to TBALink, the premier Web site for
Tennessee attorneys, in order to access the full-text of the opinions
or enjoy many other features of TBALink. TBA members may join
TBALink for just $50 per year. To join, go to: http://www.tba.org/join.html/
SUBSCRIBE TO OPINION FLASH!
Would you like to receive the TBALink Opinion Flash free each
day by e-mail? Anyone, whether a TBA member or not, is welcome
to subscribe ... it's free!
For the Plain Text Version:
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: SUBSCRIBE
3) Leave the body of the message blank
For the HTML Text Version:
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: SUBSCRIBE HTML
3) Leave the body of the message blank
UNSUBSCRIBE TO OPINION FLASH? ... SURELY NOT!
To STOP receiving TBALink Opinion-Flash:
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: UNSUBSCRIBE
3) Leave the body of the message blank

     
© Copyright 2000 Tennessee Bar Association
|