|

July 19, 2000
Volume 6 -- Number 113

What follows is the case style or name, first paragraph, author's
name, and the names of attorneys for the parties of each opinion
released eletronically today to TBALink.
- This Issue (IN THIS ORDER):
-
| 00 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Supreme Court |
| 00 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Supreme Court Workers' Compensation
Panel |
| 00 |
New Document(s) or Proposed Rule(s) from the Tennessee Supreme
Court |
| 16 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Court of Appeals |
| 03 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals |
| 00 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Attorney General (PDF format)
|
| 00 |
New Judicial Ethics Opinion(s) |
| 00 |
New Formal Ethics Opinion(s) from the Board of Professional Responsibility
|
-
There are three ways for TBALink members to get the full-text
versions of these opinions from the Web:
Do a key word search in the Search Link area of TBALink. This option will allow you to view and save
a plain-text version of the opinion.
Browse the Opinion List area of TBALink. This option will allow you to download the original
version of the opinion.
Click the URL at end of each Opinion paragraph below. This option
will allow you to download the original document.
Lucian T. Pera
Editor-in-Chief, TBALink

PATRICIA DARLENE BEAN, v. HOWARD DALE BEAN
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Paul A. Bates, Lawrenceburg, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
C. Alex Meacham, LaVergne, for Defendant-Appellant.
Judge: FRANKS
First Paragraph:
In the appeal of this divorce case, the Court dismissed the appeal for
failure of appellant to substantially comply with T.R.A.P. Rule 27 and
Court of Appeals Rules 6 and 15.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/beanp.wpd
CLAUDIA HIBBETT BEECH v. PATRICIA HIBBETT
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
John C. Hofstetter, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Patricia
Hibbett.
Robert L. Hudson, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellee, Claudia
Hibbett Beech.
Judge: KOCH
First Paragraph:
This appeal involves a dispute over the proceeds from the Department
of Transportation's condemnation of a portion of a tract of real
property on Harding Road in Davidson County. When the condemnation
took place, a life tenant was occupying the property with a vested
remainder interest being held by the life tenant's stepdaughter.
Following a disagreement over who should receive the condemnation
proceeds, the life tenant's stepdaughter filed suit in the Chancery
Court for Davidson County.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/Beechch.wpd
TALMAGE CRUMP v. KIMBERLY BELL
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
James T. Allison, Memphis, For Appellant
Craig Creighton Conley, Robert L. Moore, Memphis, For Appellee
Judge: CRAWFORD
First Paragraph:
This is a personal injury case. Plaintiff filed a complaint and
issued summons, which was returned "not to be found." Plaintiff
issued an alias summons which was also returned "not to be found."
Plaintiff issued pluries summons more than one year after the return
of the alias summons. The trial court dismissed plaintiff's case for
failure to comply Rule 3, Tenn.R.Civ.P. Plaintiff asserts that
defendant is equitably estopped from relying upon Tenn.R.Civ.P. 3,
because of action of defendant's liability insurance carrier leading
him to believe that the defense would not be raised upon which he
relied to his detriment. The trial court found no estoppel, and
plaintiff has appealed.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/crumptal.wpd
RONALD L. DAVIS v. TENNESSEE BOARD OF PAROLES, et al.
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Ronald L. Davis, Pikeville, Tennessee, Pro Se.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter, Michael E. Moore,
Solicitor General, and Stephanie R. Reevers, Assistant Attorney
General, for the appellee, Tennessee Board of Paroles.
Judge: CAIN
First Paragraph:
This is another in a series of cases filed by a certain prison inmate,
Ronald L. Davis, this time seeking the issuance of a common law writ
of certiorari on the basis that the Tennessee Board of Probation and
Parole improperly refused to grant him early release. The board cited
the seriousness of the offense for which he was convicted as the basis
for its decision and moved for dismissal of the petition or
alternatively for summary judgment. The trial court held this suit to
be barred by Tennessee Code Annotated section 41-21-812 which
prohibits the filing of subsequent lawsuits by inmates who have unpaid
costs related to previous suits. The trial court dismissed this case
under Tennessee Code Annotated section 41-21-812 and on the basis that
the Petition for Writ of Certiorari failed to state a claim upon which
relief could be granted. We affirm.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/DavisRLT.wpd
NANCY M. ARMSTRONG ERWIN v. RICHARD V. ERWIN
WITH CONCURRING IN PART AND DISSENTING IN PART
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
John S. Richbourg, Memphis, Tennessee, for the Appellant, Richard V.
Erwin
Kathryn A. King, Memphis, Tennessee, for the Appellee, Nancy M.
Armstrong Erwin
Judge: LILLARD
First Paragraph:
This is a divorce case. The trial court awarded custody of the
parties' minor child to the wife. The husband was ordered to pay
child support and alimony in futuro based on his earning capacity
rather than his actual earnings, because he voluntarily retired early.
The order included an automatic increase in alimony when the minor
child reached majority and the husband's child support obligation
ended. The trial court awarded more than half of the marital property
to the wife and ordered the husband to pay a portion of her attorney's
fees. The husband appeals, arguing that the trial court awarded
excessive alimony and child support, that the trial court erred in
ordering an automatic increase in alimony when the child support
ended, that the division of marital property was inequitable and that
the award of attorney's fees was an error. We affirm, finding that
the evidence and undisputed facts support the trial court's order.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/ErwinN_opn.wpd
WITH CONCURRING IN PART AND DISSENTING IN PART
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/ErwinN_dis.wpd
DEWEY SCOTT FRAZIER v. CANDACE WHISMAN
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Dewey Scott Frazier, Mountain City, Tennessee, Pro Se.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter, and John R. Miles,
Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellee, Candace Whisman.
Judge: KOCH
First Paragraph:
This appeal arises from the efforts of an inmate of the Tennessee
Department of Correction to have his sentence recalculated. The
prisoner initially wrote to an employee of the department requesting
the recalculation. Ten months after receiving the department's letter
denying his request, the prisoner filed a petition for a declaratory
judgment in the Chancery Court for Davidson County. The trial court
dismissed the petition, and the prisoner appeals. We affirm the trial
court because the prisoner did not file his petition within sixty days
of the department's decision.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/Frazierds.wpd
STATE EX REL., ALICIA M. GRAHAM v. DAVID R. CHERRY, JR.
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter, and Stuart
Wilson-Patton, Assistant Attorney General, for the appellant, State EX
REL., Alicia M. Graham.
David R. Cherry, Jr., Nashville, Tennessee, Pro Se.
Judge: CAIN
First Paragraph:
This is an appeal by the State of Tennessee on behalf of Alicia M.
Graham pursuant to an assignment of rights to the state under
Tennessee Code Annotated section 71-3-124(a)(1)(Supp. 1999). The
State of Tennessee provided child support enforcement and paternity
establishment services to Ms. Graham and two children, pursuant to
Title IV-D of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. SS 651 - 669. The
trial court granted child support from the time of the filing of the
petition. However, the court denied retroactive support on the basis
of the delay of the State of Tennessee in filing the petition finding
that such a judgment would be burdensome to the respondent, David R.
Cherry, Jr., the father of the children. The State of Tennessee
appeals, and we reverse and remand on the issue of retroactive child
support.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/Grahamalicia.wpd
JOHNNA LEA HAYES (BEUERLEIN) v. JEFF C. HAYES
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
L. L. Harrell, Jr., Trenton, Tennessee, for the appellant, Jeff C.
Hayes.
Nancy S. Nelson, Jackson, Tennessee, for the appellee, Johnna Lea
Hayes (Beuerlein).
Judge: FARMER
First Paragraph:
This appeal arises from a dispute between Plaintiff Johnna Lea Hayes
(Beuerlein) and Defendant Jeff C. Hayes regarding the amount of Mr.
Hayes' child support obligation and the enforcement of a promissory
note executed by Ms. Beuerlein in conjunction with the parties'
divorce. The trial court found (1) that Mr. Hayes has an annual
income of $64,139.00, (2) that Mr. Hayes' child support obligation is
$1,221.00 per month but that this amount should be reduced to $621.00
per month until Ms. Beuerlein's debt under the promissory note is
satisfied, (3) that Mr. Hayes' child support arrearage is equal to
$14,940.00, (4) that Ms. Beuerlein's debt under the promissory note is
equal to $39,569.85, (5) that, subtracting Mr. Hayes' child support
arrearage from Ms. Beuerlein's debt under the promissory note, the net
amount that Ms. Beuerlein owes to Mr. Hayes is $24,665.85 plus ten
percent (10%) interest, and (6) that each party shall pay his or her
own attorney's fees.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/HayesJl.wpd
KAREN GARRETT HUMPHRIES v. DAVID ALISON HUMPHRIES
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
David S. Haynes, Bristol, for the Defendant/Appellant, David Alison
Humphries.
Robert D. Arnold, Johnson City, for the
Plaintiff/Appellee/Counter-Appellant, Karen Garrett Humphries.
Judge: SWINEY
First Paragraph:
Both parties appeal the Trial Court's Judgment in this divorce case.
Wife appeals the Trial Court's enforcement of a prenuptial agreement.
Husband appeals the Trial Court's division of the marital assets and
the amount and duration of rehabilitative alimony awarded to Wife.
For the reasons herein stated, we find the Trial Court erred in
enforcing the prenuptial agreement. We reverse and vacate the
decision of the Trial Court and remand the case to that Court for
further proceedings consistent with our Opinion.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/HumphriesKaren.wpd
HENDERSON KELLY v. SOUTH CENTRAL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY DISCIPLINARY
BOARD
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Henderson Kelly, Whiteville, Tennessee, Pro Se.
Tom Anderson, Jackson, Tennessee, for the appellee, South Central
Correctional Facility Disciplinary Board.
Judge: CAIN
First Paragraph:
Petitioner, Henderson Kelly, appeals the action of the trial court in
granting a Tennessee Rule of Civil Procedure 12.02(6) motion to
dismiss his petition for a writ of certiorari requesting review of an
agency decision. We affirm the action of the trial judge.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/KellyHenderson.wpd
PLANTERS GIN COMPANY v. FEDERAL COMPRESS & WAREHOUSE COMPANY, INC., et
al.
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Allan B. Thorp, Memphis, Tennessee, for the appellant, Planters Gin
Company
Michael B. Neal, Elizabeth J. Landrigan, Memphis, Tennessee, for the
appellee, Federal Compress & Warehouse Company, Inc.
John Barry Burgess, Memphis, Tennessee, for the appellee, Wells Fargo
Alarm Services, Inc.
Judge: LILLARD
First Paragraph:
This case involves a commercial lease agreement which contained an
exculpatory clause and a waiver of subrogation clause. The lessee
suffered damage to goods stored in its warehouse when the roof of an
adjacent warehouse owned by the lessor collapsed, leaking rainwater
into the lessee's warehouse. The lessee sued the lessor and its alarm
service provider for failing to notify the fire department about the
water leak or taking other appropriate action. The trial court
granted summary judgment in favor of the lessor and the alarm company.
The lessee appeals. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand,
finding that the exculpatory clause and the waiver of subrogation
clause in the lease are inapplicable to claims arising from acts
unrelated to the landlord-tenant relationship, and that the alarm
company had no affirmative duty to protect or warn the lessee.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/Plantersgin.wpd
JAMES DONALD POWELL, et al. v. M. P. GURKIN, et al.
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Kendall Reeves, Timothy J. Williams, Memphis, For Appellants
Robert B.C. Hale, Memphis, For Appellees, M. P. Gurkin and Sons, etc.
James S. Wilder, III, Memphis, For Appellee, Curtis Hardin Plumbing
Company
Judge: HIGHERS
First Paragraph:
This is a personal injury action arising out of a slip-and-fall
accident which occurred at a laundromat owned by the Gurkin
Defendants. The fall was allegedly caused by a hole in the floor of
the laundromat which was created by the Defendant Hardin in attempting
to locate and repair a water leak in the laundromat. The Plaintiff
fell while walking into the laundromat carrying his laundry basket.
He brought the present suit claiming that the Defendants were
negligent in failing to repair the hole or providing adequate warning
of the dangerous condition. The Defendants filed a Motion for Summary
Judgment claiming that the Plaintiff failed to use reasonable care in
confronting a known risk. After arguments of counsel, the trial court
granted both Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/powelljamesd.wpd
'AZZAM M. TARIF v. DEREK BULLION, et al.
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
'Azzam M. Tarif, Only, Tennessee, Pro Se.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter, Michael E. Moore,
Solicitor General and Mark A. Hudson, Assistant Attorney General, for
the appellees, Derek Bullion, Ricky Mathis, and Wayne Brandon.
Judge: CAIN
First Paragraph:
Petitioner, a state prisoner, appeals the action of the trial court in
dismissing under Tennessee Rule of Civil Procedure 12.02(6) his civil
rights complaint. We affirm.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/TarifAzzam.wpd
WILLIE TOLES & IDA MAY TOLES v. CITY OF DYERSBURG, et al.
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Martin L. Howie, Dyersburg, for Appellants
Fred Collins, Dyersburg; John M. Lannom, Dyersburg, for Appellees
Judge: HIGHERS
First Paragraph:
The present appeal arises out of a zoning dispute between the
plaintiff property owner and the City of Dyersburg, Tennessee. The
property in question had been operated as a tavern since 1960. In
1998, the area in which the property was located was re-zoned as a
residential area. At that point, the tavern became a non-conforming
use. Prior to the re-zoning, the tavern's business license had
expired and the beer license had also lapsed. The operator of the
club applied for a beer permit but was denied based upon the fact that
at the time of the re-zoning there was no business in operation on the
premises.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/toleswillie.wpd
JEREMY EARL TOMPKINS v. MARY HELEN RAINEY
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Aubrey L. Brown, Jr., Memphis, Tennessee, for the appellant, Jeremy
Earl Tompkins.
Wm. Craig Hall, Collierville, Tennessee, and Richard F. Vaughn,
Memphis, Tennessee, for the appellee, Mary Helen Rainey.
Judge: FARMER
First Paragraph:
In this action to establish parentage, Jeremy Earl Tompkins (Father)
appeals the trial court's final judgment awarding Mary Helen Rainey
(Mother) custody of the parties' infant son. We affirm the trial
court's judgment.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/Tompkinsje.wpd
JOHN WATSON v. MIKE YOUNG, et al
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
John Watson, pro se, Tiptonville, Tennessee
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General & Reporter; Michael E. Moore,
Solicitor General; Pamela S. Lorch, Assistant Attorney General,
Nashville, Tennessee, for Appellees
Judge: HIGHERS
First Paragraph:
This appeal arises from a lawsuit filed by an inmate at the Northwest
Correctional Complex. The complaint sought damages for personal
injuries sustained as a result of an electrical shock allegedly caused
by the Defendant's inactions. The Lake County Circuit Court dismissed
the complaint finding that the plaintiff's claim sounded in negligence
and the defendants, as state employees, enjoyed absolute immunity from
negligence claims.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/watsonjohn.wpd
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. CHRISTOPHER JEROME HENDERSON
ORDER
Court:TCCA
Judge: RILEY
First Paragraph:
Defendant appeals the trial court's denial of judicial diversion and
full probation following his guilty plea to possession of cocaine
under 0.5 grams with intent to deliver and possession of drug
paraphernalia. We affirm the judgment of the trial court pursuant to
Rule 20, Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/HENDER~1.wpd
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. DESHAWN McCLENTON
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
A.C. Wharton, Public Defender, Garland Erguden, Assistant Public
Defender, Memphis, Tennessee, for the appellant, DeShawn McClenton.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter, J. Ross Dyer,
Assistant Attorney General, William L. Gibbons, District Attorney
General, Jennifer Nichols, Assistant Attorney General, for the
appellee, State of Tennessee.
Judge: WELLES
First Paragraph:
The Defendant, DeShawn McClenton, was convicted by a Shelby County
jury of the offenses of aggravated robbery and especially aggravated
kidnapping. The trial court sentenced the Defendant as a career
offender to thirty years imprisonment for the aggravated robbery
conviction and to sixty years imprisonment for the especially
aggravated kidnapping conviction, with the sentences to be served
consecutively.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/MCCLEN~1.wpd
RONALD BRADFORD WALLER v. STATE OF TENNESSEE
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
Ronald Bradford Waller, Pikeville, Tennessee, Pro Se.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter, Ellen H. Pollack,
Assistant Attorney General, William H. Cox, III, District Attorney
General, and C. Leland Davis, Assistant District Attorney General, for
the appellee, State of Tennessee.
Judge: GLENN
First Paragraph:
The petitioner was convicted in the Hamilton County Criminal Court in
1992 of first degree murder, especially aggravated robbery, and theft
over $1,000, receiving an effective sentence of life plus twenty-three
years. The convictions and sentences were affirmed on direct appeal
in 1993; and the petitioner subsequently filed a petition for
post-conviction relief, presenting as issues, whether there was a
variance between the indictment and the proof, whether he was
improperly compelled to participate in a courtroom demonstration,
whether he received ineffective assistance of counsel at trial and on
direct appeal, whether his convictions constitute double jeopardy,
whether the trial court erred in evidentiary rulings, whether he was
improperly convicted because of prosecutorial misconduct or cumulative
errors at the trial, and whether his convictions amount to a
miscarriage of justice. Finding no error, we affirm the judgment of
the trial court denying the petition for post- conviction relief.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/wallerrb.wpd

PLEASE FORWARD THIS E-MAIL!
Feel free to forward this Opinion Flash on to anyone you know
of with an e-mail address.
GET A FULL-TEXT COPY OF AN OPINION!
See the intrsuctions at the beginning of this edition of Opinion
Flash.
JOIN TBALink!
While Opinion Flash is a free service of the Tennessee Bar Association,
you must be a subscriber to TBALink, the premier Web site for
Tennessee attorneys, in order to access the full-text of the opinions
or enjoy many other features of TBALink. TBA members may join
TBALink for just $50 per year. To join, go to: http://www.tba.org/join.html/
SUBSCRIBE TO OPINION FLASH!
Would you like to receive the TBALink Opinion Flash free each
day by e-mail? Anyone, whether a TBA member or not, is welcome
to subscribe ... it's free!
For the Plain Text Version:
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: SUBSCRIBE
3) Leave the body of the message blank
For the HTML Text Version:
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: SUBSCRIBE HTML
3) Leave the body of the message blank
UNSUBSCRIBE TO OPINION FLASH? ... SURELY NOT!
To STOP receiving TBALink Opinion-Flash:
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: UNSUBSCRIBE
3) Leave the body of the message blank

     
© Copyright 2000 Tennessee Bar Association
|