|

July 28, 2000
Volume 6 -- Number 118

What follows is the case style or name, first paragraph, author's
name, and the names of attorneys for the parties of each opinion
released eletronically today to TBALink.
- This Issue (IN THIS ORDER):
-
| 00 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Supreme Court |
| 04 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Supreme Court Workers' Compensation
Panel |
| 00 |
New Document(s) or Proposed Rule(s) from the Tennessee Supreme
Court |
| 10 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Court of Appeals |
| 02 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals |
| 00 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Attorney General (PDF format)
|
| 00 |
New Judicial Ethics Opinion(s) |
| 00 |
New Formal Ethics Opinion(s) from the Board of Professional Responsibility
|
-
There are three ways for TBALink members to get the full-text
versions of these opinions from the Web:
Do a key word search in the Search Link area of TBALink. This option will allow you to view and save
a plain-text version of the opinion.
Browse the Opinion List area of TBALink. This option will allow you to download the original
version of the opinion.
Click the URL at end of each Opinion paragraph below. This option
will allow you to download the original document.
Lucian T. Pera
Editor-in-Chief, TBALink

SAMUEL D. NUNLEY v. CARRIER CORPORATION
JUDGMENT
Court:TSC - Workers Comp Panel
Judge: PER CURIAM
First Paragraph:
This case is before the Court upon the entire record, including the
order of referral to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel,
and the Panel's Memorandum Opinion setting forth its findings of fact
and conclusions of law, which are incorporated herein by reference.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC_WCP/nunleysam.wpd
SHIRLEY B. RODGERS v. GUYS & GALS, INC., et al.
JUDGMENT
Court:TSC - Workers Comp Panel
Judge: PER CURIAM
First Paragraph:
This case is before the Court upon the entire record, including the
order of referral to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel,
and the Panel's Memorandum Opinion setting forth its findings of fact
and conclusions of law, which are incorporated herein by reference.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC_WCP/rodgerssh.wpd
DONNA THWEATT v. TRAVELERS PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
JUDGMENT
Court:TSC - Workers Comp Panel
Judge: PER CURIAM
First Paragraph:
This case is before the Court upon the entire record, including the
order of referral to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel,
and the Panel's Memorandum Opinion setting forth its findings of fact
and conclusions of law, which are incorporated herein by reference.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC_WCP/thweatt.wpd
MARY ZELEK v. FLAGSTAR SYSTEM, et al.
JUDGMENT
Court:TSC - Workers Comp Panel
Judge: PER CURIAM
First Paragraph:
This case is before the Court upon the entire record, including the
order of referral to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel,
and the Panel's Memorandum Opinion setting forth its findings of fact
and conclusions of law, which are incorporated herein by reference.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC_WCP/zelekmary.wpd
MARGARET ABBOTT v. ROBERTO GATEWAY, et al.
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Sean Antone Hunt, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellants, Roberto
Gateway, Emma Barton, and unnamed defendant/appellant, Nationwide
Insurance Company.
Larry H. Hagar, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellee, Margaret
Abbott.
Judge: CAIN
First Paragraph:
The General Sessions Court of Davidson County awarded a judgment
against the defendant below, Nationwide Insurance Company, in a case
involving a car accident. Nationwide filed an appeal to the Davidson
County Circuit court but failed to secure a trial date within 45 days
as required by Davidson County Local Rule of Practice 20(b) (1999).
The circuit court dismissed the case due to Nationwide's failure, and
Nationwide filed a Tennessee Rule of Civil Procedure 60.02 motion to
set aside the circuit court dismissal due to its attorney's excusable
neglect. When the circuit court denied Rule 60.02 relief Nationwide
appealed to this court. On appeal, we reverse the decision of the
circuit court finding that it should have granted Nationwide's request
for Rule 60.02 relief and set aside the dismissal of Nationwide's
circuit court appeal.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/AbbottMargaret.wpd
CLAUDIA HIBBETT BEECH v. PATRICIA HIBBETT
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
James C. Hofstetter, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Patricia
Hibbett.
Robert L. Hudson, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellee, Claudia
Hibbett Beech.
Judge: KOCH
First Paragraph:
This appeal involves a dispute over the proceeds from the Department
of Transportation's condemnation of a portion of a tract of real
property on Harding Road in Davidson County. When the condemnation
took place, a life tenant was occupying the property with a vested
remainder interest being held by the life tenant's stepdaughter.
Following a disagreement over who should receive the condemnation
proceeds, the life tenant's stepdaughter filed suit in the Chancery
Court for Davidson County. After the State paid the proceeds into
court, the trial court awarded the proceeds to the stepdaughter on the
condition that she invest them and share the investment income equally
with her stepmother for the duration of the life tenancy. The life
tenant has appealed. We have determined that the trial court erred by
awarding the condemnation proceeds to the life tenant's stepdaughter
and, therefore, reverse the judgment.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/Beechch.wpd
CHAD BLANKINSHIP v. TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Chad Blankinship, Clifton, Tennessee, Pro Se.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter;Michael E. Moore,
Solicitor General; and Stephanie R. Reevers, Senior Counsel, for the
appellee, State of Tennessee.
Judge: CANTRELL
First Paragraph:
A prisoner filed a petition to compel the Department of Correction to
establish a mandatory parole date for his benefit. The trial court
dismissed the petition for failure to state a claim upon which relief
can be granted. We affirm the trial court.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/blankinshipc.wpd
MARCINA CLARK v. NATHAN CROW
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
John E. Herbison, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Nathan
Crow.
Jeffrey L. Levy, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellee, Marcina Clark.
Judge: CAIN
First Paragraph:
We grant this interlocutory appeal to consider a question of first
impression regarding whether there is a right to jury trial prior to
the issuance of an order of protection pursuant to Tennessee Code
Annotated section 36-3-605, (hereinafter "order of protection").
Specifically, we are asked to determine whether a party against whom
an order of protection is sought is entitled to a jury trial as a
matter of right before this order is issued. After reviewing
Tennessee's constitutional and statutory guarantees to a jury trial,
we have determined that there is no right to a jury trial prior to the
issuance of an order of protection. The circuit court's decision is
affirmed and remanded for further proceedings.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/ClarkMarcina.wpd
FAYE L. GREEN v. INNOVATIVE RECOVERY SERVICES, INC.
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Robert L. Whitaker, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Faye L.
Green.
Rhonda M. Whitted, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellee, Innovative
Recovery Services, Inc.
Judge: CANTRELL
First Paragraph:
The attorney for a woman who had been injured in an auto accident
claimed that his services entitled him to a portion of the subrogation
interest asserted by TennCare against the settlement proceeds. The
trial court dismissed his claim. We affirm the trial court.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/greenfl.wpd
JOHNNY PHELPS v. TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Johnny Phelps, Nashville, Tennessee, Pro Se.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter, Michael E. Moore,
Solicitor General, and Pamela S. Lorch, Assistant Attorney General,
for the appellee, Tennessee Department of Correction.
Judge: CAIN
First Paragraph:
Petitioner/Appellant, a state prisoner, filed his petition for common
law certiorari asserting that he was being unconstitutionally and
illegally incarcerated by the state and had not been given proper
credits under various sentence reduction credit statutes and policies.
The trial court granted summary judgment and Petitioner appealed. We
affirm.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/PhelpsJohnny.wpd
THOMAS RODGERS, v. TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Thomas Rodgers, Nashville, pro se.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter and Abigail Turner,
Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent-Appellee, Tennessee
Department of Corrections.
Judge: FRANKS
First Paragraph:
In this Declaratory Judgment plaintiff sought statutory credits on his
prison sentences. The Trial court granted the State summary judgment.
On appeal, we affirm.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/Rodgerst.wpd
IN RE: THE ADOPTION OF A MALE CHILD, DERRICK DOUGLAS DUNCAN, By
RONALD EUGENE TAYLOR, ET UX v. LEO DUNCAN, JR.
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
David Bass, Carthage, For Appellants
James B. Dance, Carthage, For Appellee
Judge: CRAWFORD
First Paragraph:
This appeal involves a petition by prospective adoptive parents for
termination of parental rights, temporary guardianship, and for
adoption of the minor child of the defendant father. In a non- jury
trial, at the conclusion of petitioner's proof, the trial court found
that they had failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that
the defendant father had abandoned the child and dismissed the
petition. The prospective adoptive parents have appealed.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/taylorron.wpd
VICKI DIANNE TUTTLE v. ROBERT EDWARD TUTTLE
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Robert E. Tuttle, Pro Se
No appearance by appellee.
Judge: CRAWFORD
First Paragraph:
In a previous appeal, this divorce case was remanded to the trial
court for a determination of whether the parties had any marital
property and, if so, for the trial court to make an equitable division
thereof. From the trial court's final decree in compliance with the
order of remand, defendant appeals.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/tuttlevic.wpd
TERESA MILLER WITT v. WAYNE KEITH WITT
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
John R. Reynolds and Thomas F. Bloom, Nashville, Tennessee, for the
appellant, Wayne Keith Witt.
Joanie L. Abernathy, Franklin, Tennessee, for the appellee, Teresa
Miller Witt.
Judge: CANTRELL
First Paragraph:
This is an appeal of the trial court's division of marital property in
a divorce proceeding. Finding no error in the trial court's judgment,
we affirm.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/witttm.wpd
MICHAEL A. RHODES v. STATE OF TENNESSEE
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
Michael A. Rhodes, Whiteville, Tennessee, Pro Se.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Clinton J. Morgan,
Assistant Attorney General; and William C. Whitesell, Jr., District
Attorney General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee.
Judge: GLENN
First Paragraph:
This is an appeal arising from the summary dismissal of a petition for
post-conviction relief. The trial court's dismissal was based upon
the failure to file the petition within the one-year statute of
limitations. Upon review of the record, we reverse and remand for
further proceedings since the petition was filed within one year of
the date of the final action of the Tennessee Supreme Court in the
direct appeal.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/rhodesma.wpd
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. DANIEL CHRISTIAN RUSSELL
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
Steve McEwen, Mountain City, Tennessee, Comer L. Donnell and Virginia
M. Townzen, Lebanon, Tennessee, for the appellant, Daniel Christian
Russell.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter, and Marvin E.
Clements, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for the appellee, State of
Tennessee.
Judge: LAFFERTY
First Paragraph:
The appellant, Daniel Christian Russell, referred herein as "the
defendant," appeals as of right from the judgment of the Wilson County
Circuit Court imposing concurrent sentences for aggravated assault and
vandalism. The trial court imposed sentences totaling five (5) years
to be served concurrently in the Department of Correction. The
defendant presents two appellate issues: 1) whether the length of the
sentences imposed by the trial court are excessive; and 2) whether the
trial court erred by denying the defendant's request for probation.
Because the defendant received illegal concurrent sentences, we vacate
the judgments of conviction and remand the case for further
proceedings.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/RussellDC.wpd

PLEASE FORWARD THIS E-MAIL!
Feel free to forward this Opinion Flash on to anyone you know
of with an e-mail address.
GET A FULL-TEXT COPY OF AN OPINION!
See the intrsuctions at the beginning of this edition of Opinion
Flash.
JOIN TBALink!
While Opinion Flash is a free service of the Tennessee Bar Association,
you must be a subscriber to TBALink, the premier Web site for
Tennessee attorneys, in order to access the full-text of the opinions
or enjoy many other features of TBALink. TBA members may join
TBALink for just $50 per year. To join, go to: http://www.tba.org/join.html/
SUBSCRIBE TO OPINION FLASH!
Would you like to receive the TBALink Opinion Flash free each
day by e-mail? Anyone, whether a TBA member or not, is welcome
to subscribe ... it's free!
For the Plain Text Version:
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: SUBSCRIBE
3) Leave the body of the message blank
For the HTML Text Version:
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: SUBSCRIBE HTML
3) Leave the body of the message blank
UNSUBSCRIBE TO OPINION FLASH? ... SURELY NOT!
To STOP receiving TBALink Opinion-Flash:
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: UNSUBSCRIBE
3) Leave the body of the message blank

     
© Copyright 2000 Tennessee Bar Association
|