|

August 25, 2000
Volume 6 -- Number 135

What follows is the case style or name, first paragraph, author's
name, and the names of attorneys for the parties of each opinion
released eletronically today to TBALink.
- This Issue (IN THIS ORDER):
-
| 06 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Supreme Court |
| 00 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Supreme Court Workers' Compensation
Panel |
| 00 |
New Document(s) or Proposed Rule(s) from the Tennessee Supreme
Court |
| 05 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Court of Appeals |
| 06 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals |
| 00 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Attorney General (PDF format)
|
| 00 |
New Judicial Ethics Opinion(s) |
| 00 |
New Formal Ethics Opinion(s) from the Board of Professional Responsibility
|
-
There are three ways for TBALink members to get the full-text
versions of these opinions from the Web:
Do a key word search in the Search Link area of TBALink. This option will allow you to view and save
a plain-text version of the opinion.
Browse the Opinion List area of TBALink. This option will allow you to download the original
version of the opinion.
Click the URL at end of each Opinion paragraph below. This option
will allow you to download the original document.
Lucian T. Pera
Editor-in-Chief, TBALink

CLEVELAND SURGERY CENTER, L.P. et al. v. BRADLEY COUNTY MEMORIAL
HOSPITAL, et al.
Court:TSC
Attorneys:
Dan H. Elrod, G. Brian Jackson, and David L. Johnson, Nashville,
Tennessee, for the appellant, Bradley County Memorial Hospital.
David J. Cocke, Memphis, Tennessee, for the appellant, Ocoee Health
Alliance.
William H. West, Nashville, Tennessee and Buddy B. Presley, Jr.,
Chattanooga, Tennessee, for the appellees, Cleveland Surgery Center,
L.P. and Ocoee Physical Therapy, Incorporated.
William B. Hubbard and William Penny, Nashville, Tennessee, for amici
curiae, Tennessee Hospital Association and Hospital Alliance of
Tennessee, Incorporated
Judge: DROWOTA
First Paragraph:
The plaintiffs/appellees, private health care providers, brought a
declaratory judgment action alleging that the defendants/appellants
were violating Article II, S 29 of the Tennessee Constitution which
precludes any "County, City or Town" from either giving or loaning its
credit to any private person or private business or becoming a
stockholder with others in a private company unless an election is
held and the qualified voters of the county, city or town approve by a
three-fourths majority of the votes cast the giving or loaning of
credit or owning of stock. The trial court found that the defendants
were in violation of the constitutional provision and issued an
injunction to preclude future activities that would violate the
constitutional provision.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC/bradleycty.wpd
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JAMES THOMAS JEFFERSON
Court:TSC
Attorneys:
Jeffrey A. DeVasher, Nashville, Tennessee for the appellant, James
Thomas Jefferson.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter, Michael E. Moore,
Solicitor General, Kathy Morante, Deputy Attorney General, Victor S.
Johnson, III, District Attorney, and Roger Moore, Assistant District
Attorney General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee.
Judge: BIRCH
First Paragraph:
This case is before us upon a jury's resentencing of the defendant,
James Thomas Jefferson, on his conviction for premeditated first
degree murder. In the original appeal, the Court of Criminal Appeals
affirmed the conviction, vacated the sentence, and remanded the matter
to the trial court for resentencing. On remand, the defendant
requested a new jury trial on the merits in addition to the
already-ordered resentencing. The trial court denied the request for
a new trial. After a new hearing, the jury fixed a sentence of life
imprisonment. The defendant appealed of right, challenging the trial
court's overruling of his motion for a new trial on the merits.
Relying on the "law of the case" doctrine, the Court of Criminal
Appeals affirmed the trial court's judgment.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC/jeffersonj.wpd
GAYLE PENLEY v. HONDA MOTOR COMPANY, LTD., et al.
Court:TSC
Attorneys:
William H. Haltom, Jr., Memphis, Tennessee; Kenneth W. Hooks,
Birmingham, Alabama; and Keith Belt, Birmingham, Alabama, for the
appellant, Ms. Gayle Penley.
R. Dale Bay, Nashville, Tennessee; Susan R. High-McAuley, Nashville,
Tennessee; and Marshall T. Cook, Nashville, Tennessee, for the
appellees, Honda Motor Company, Ltd.; Honda Research & Development
Company, Ltd.; American Honda Motor Company, Inc.; Joe's Cycle Shop,
Inc.
Judge: BARKER
First Paragraph:
The sole issue in this appeal is whether the ten-year statute of
repose codified in the Tennessee Products Liability Act, Tenn. Code
Ann. S 29-28-103(a) (1980 & Supp. 1999), is tolled during any period
of a plaintiff's mental incompetence. Granting the defendants' motion
for summary judgment, the Chester County Circuit Court ruled that (1)
the plaintiff's action was brought more than ten years from the
product's first purchase for use or consumption; and (2) the ten-year
statute of repose was not tolled by reason of mental incompetence.
The Court of Appeals affirmed the grant of summary judgment, and the
plaintiff was granted permission to appeal by this Court. For the
reasons given herein, we likewise affirm the grant of summary judgment
to the defendants and hold that mental incompetency does not operate
to toll the statute of repose contained within the Tennessee Products
Liability Act. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed, and
the plaintiff's suit is dismissed.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC/penleygayle.wpd
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. TINA SWINDLE
Court:TSC
Attorneys:
Terry J. Canady, Madison, Tennessee, for the appellant, Tina Swindle.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Michael E. Moore,
Solicitor General; Elizabeth B. Marney, Assistant Attorney General,
Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellee, State of Tennessee.
Judge: BARKER
First Paragraph:
This is an appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County, which
convicted the defendant of two counts of facilitation of child rape
and two counts of aggravated sexual battery. The defendant appealed,
arguing that the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury on
Class B misdemeanor assault as a lesser-included offense of aggravated
sexual battery. After the Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the
convictions, the defendant sought, and this Court granted, permission
to appeal on the following issue: whether the trial court erred in
failing to instruct the jury on Class B misdemeanor assault as a
lesser-included offense of aggravated sexual battery. We hold that
Class B misdemeanor assault is a lesser-included offense of aggravated
sexual battery and that it was error for the trial court not to
instruct the jury accordingly. Nevertheless, having determined that
such error was harmless, the defendant's convictions for aggravated
sexual battery are affirmed.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC/swindletina.wpd
LARRY L. WILSON v. KIMBERLY TITTLE
Court:TSC
Attorneys:
Thomas L. Whiteside, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Kimberly
Tittle.
D. Scott Parsley, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellee, Larry Wilson.
Judge: LILLARD
First Paragraph:
This is a child custody case. The mother and father, who were never
married, had a child in Tennessee. The mother subsequently married
another man and filed petitions in a Tennessee court to establish
paternity of the child and for adoption by the stepfather. During the
pendency of the suit, the mother and stepfather moved with the child
to Texas. The Tennessee court awarded custody of the child to the
mother but denied the mother's petition for adoption. The court
awarded the father visitation. Later, the father filed petitions in
the Tennessee court for contempt and for change of custody, arguing
that the mother had refused to allow him visitation. Mother
subsequently filed a petition in a Texas court to modify the Tennessee
court's prior order.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC/WilsonLarry.wpd
DEBBIE YOUNG v. CARADON BETTER-BILT, INC.
Court:TSC
Attorneys:
Larry G. Trail and Diana C. Benson, Murfreesboro, Tennessee, for the
appellant, Caradon Better- Bilt, Incorporated.
Christopher K. Thompson, Murfreesboro, Tennessee, for the appellee,
Debbie Young.
Judge: DROWOTA
First Paragraph:
Following her termination for excessive absences and tardiness, the
employee filed an action pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. S 50-6-241(a)(2)
seeking reconsideration of her 1996 workers' compensation award. The
employer argued that reconsideration was not appropriate under the
statute because the employee's termination was not causally connected
to her initial work-related injury. The trial court rejected the
employer's argument and entered a judgment awarding the employee an
additional five percent (5%) permanent partial disability. The
employer appealed the trial court's decision, and the Special Worker's
Compensation Appeals Panel held that the trial court had erred in
increasing the initial award because the employee had failed to prove
that her termination was causally connected to her initial
work-related injury. Thereafter, we granted the employee's motion for
full Court review and now reject the findings and conclusions of the
Panel.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC/youngd.wpd
JOANNA MAY BUTTON BAGGETT v. DENNIS KEITH BAGGETT
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Troy L. Brooks, Clarksville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Joanna May
Button Baggett.
James Phillips Bradley, Waverly, Tennessee, for the appellee, Dennis
Keith Baggett
Judge: LILLARD
First Paragraph:
This is a divorce case involving child custody. After awarding the
mother temporary custody of the parties' children during the pendency
of the case, the trial court granted the father sole custody and
granted the mother visitation. The mother appealed the custody award.
We affirm.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/BaggettJMB.wpd
CHARLES DEWAYNE COLBAUGH v. BETH WARREN COLBAUGH
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Wayne Detring, Hendersonville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Beth
Warren Colbaugh.
Barbara J. Walker, Columbia, Tennessee, for the appellee, Charles
DeWayne Colbaugh.
Judge: LILLARD
First Paragraph:
This is a post-divorce visitation case. The mother and father lived
with their infant child in Columbia, Tennessee. After the couple
separated, the mother took the parties' child to her hometown of
Bowling Green, Kentucky, over one hundred miles from Columbia. Upon
the parties' divorce, the trial court awarded custody of the child to
the mother and visitation to the father for twelve days each month, no
greater than fourteen days apart. The trial court ordered the mother
and father to meet halfway between their two residences to exchange
the child for the father's visitation. The mother appealed the trial
court's visitation schedule, arguing that it adversely affects the
child's sense of stability, that it places overly burdensome travel
requirements on the mother and the child, and that it is unworkable in
this case because of the mother and father's inability to cooperate.
We affirm.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/ColbaughCD.wpd
SHELIA RAE GIBBS, et al. v. ROBIN MEDIA GROUP, et al. v. LINEBERRY
PROPERTIES, INC.
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Julie-Karel Elkin, Nashville, for Appellant
Hugh Green, Lebanon, for Appellees, Shelia Rae Gibbs & Charles David
Gibbs Keene W. Bartley, Nashville, for Appellee, Lineberry Properties,
Inc.
Judge: HIGHERS
First Paragraph:
This appeal arises from a slip-and-fall accident which occurred on
property owned by the Defendant Lineberry Properties and leased by the
Defendant Robin Media Group. The latter appeals from the jury verdict
entered in the Wilson County Circuit Court. The jury assigned one
hundred percent of the fault for the Plaintiff's injuries to Robin
Media. After the court denied its motions for remittitur or a new
trial, the present appeal arose.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/gibbssheliar.wpd
DAVID MILLS v. LINDA SOLOMON
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Frank M. Fly, Murfreesboro, Tennessee, for the appellant, David Mills.
John B. Melton, Jr., Woodbury, Tennessee, and Frank Buck and Lena Ann
Buck, Smithville, Tennessee, for the appellee, Linda Solomon.
Judge: FARMER
First Paragraph:
These proceedings began when David Mills filed a complaint seeking to
condemn an easement across Linda Solomon's property. In bifurcated
proceedings, the jury first determined the location of Mills' easement
across Solomon's property and, later, found that Solomon was entitled
to an award of damages totaling $11,908 for the easement, including
$9900 in incidental damages. On appeal from the trial court's
judgment entered on the jury's verdict, Mills challenges only the
award of $9900 in incidental damages. We agree with Mills' contention
that the record fails to contain material evidence to support the
award of incidental damages, and we reverse that portion of the trial
court's judgment.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/Millsd.wpd
CYNTHIA RICHARDSON, et al. v. JAMES MILLER, M.D., et al.
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Mary A. Parker and C. Michael Lawson, Nashville, Tennessee, for the
appellants, Cynthia Richardson and William Richardson.
Douglas Berry, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Principal
Mutual Life Insurance Company.
Thomas A. Wiseman, III, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellee, James
Miller, M.D.
Thomas Pinckney, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellee, Tokos Medical
Corporation.
Judge: KOCH
First Paragraph:
This appeal involves a medical malpractice action stemming from the
use of an infusion pump to administer terbutaline sulphate
subcutaneously to arrest a pregnant woman's labor. After suffering a
heart attack shortly before giving birth to a healthy child, the woman
and her husband filed suit in the Circuit Court for Davidson County
against her attending physician, the supplier of the infusion pump,
and others alleging that their negligence had caused her heart attack.
The woman's medical insurance carrier intervened to assert its
contractual reimbursement rights based on the payments it had advanced
for the woman's medical expenses. The trial court dismissed the
insurance carrier's complaint, and a jury returned a verdict for the
physician and the pump supplier. Among their issues on this appeal,
the woman and her husband take issue with the exclusion of evidence
regarding the FDA-approved uses of terbutaline and with the trial
court's refusal to give their requested missing evidence instruction.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/Richardsonc.wpd
JAY A. CAMERON v. STATE OF TENNESSEE
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
Gregory D. Smith, Clarksville, Tennessee, attorney for the appellant.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter and Lucian D. Geise,
Assistant Attorney General, Nashville, Tennessee, attorney for the
appellee, State of Tennessee.
Judge: SMITH
First Paragraph:
In 1987 the defendant/appellant, Jay A. Cameron, was convicted of
first-degree murder and received a life sentence. On March 4, 1996,
the appellant filed a motion to re-open a petition for post-conviction
relief originally filed March 13, 1989. The Criminal Court,
Montgomery County, Robert W. Wedemeyer, J., denied the petition, and
defendant appealed. After due consideration this Court holds that:
(1) the defendant's trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to
litigate a severance motion when failure to do so was a strategic
decision; (2) defendant did not prove that trial counsel was
inadequately prepared for trial; and (3) the defendant did not prove
that trial counsel failed to adequately prepare the defendant to
testify.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/cameronjay1.wpd
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. RICKY LEE COOK
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
David A. Doyle, District Public Defender, Regan Cothron, Assistant
District Public Defender, for the appellant, Ricky Lee Cook.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter, Clinton J. Morgan,
Assistant Attorney General, Lawrence Ray Whitley, District Attorney
General, Cara Loeffler, Assistant District Attorney General, for the
appellee, State of Tennessee.
Judge: CLARK
First Paragraph:
Defendant appeals the revocation of his probation and reinstatement of
a portion of his original sentence. The defendant plead guilty to
possession of drug paraphernalia, and received a sentence of eleven
(11) months, twenty-nine (29) days, which was completely suspended
after the service of forty-eight (48) hours. After a revocation
hearing, the trial court revoked defendant's probation and required
him to serve a portion of his sentence. Concluding that the defendant
violated at least four specific terms of his probation, we affirm the
judgment of the trial court.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/CookRickyLee.wpd
ARZOLIA CHARLES GOINES v. STATE OF TENNESSEE
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
Arzolia Charles Goines, Mountain City, Tennessee, Pro Se.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter, Elizabeth B. Marney,
Assistant Attorney General, and Randall E. Nichols, District Attorney
General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee.
Judge: OGLE
First Paragraph:
The appellant, Arzolia Charles Goines, appeals the dismissal of his
writ of error coram nobis by the Knox County Criminal Court on
September 1, 1999. Following a review of the record and the parties'
briefs, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/goinesac.wpd
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. WILLIAM M. HUKOWICZ
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
Frank Lannom, Lebanon, Tennessee attorney for the appellee, William M.
Hukowicz.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General & Reporter, Lucian D. Geise,
Assistant Attorney General and Tom P. Thompson, Jr., District Attorney
General and Robert Hibbett, Assistant District Attorney, attorneys for
the appellant, State of Tennessee
Judge: SMITH
First Paragraph:
Following a suppression hearing, the Wilson County Criminal Court,
J.O. Bond, J., ordered certain portions of the defendant's statement
given to police suppressed, holding that the defendant had exercised
his right to remain silent. The state filed an interlocutory appeal.
The Court holds that the evidence does not preponderate against the
trial court's finding that the defendant's refusal to answer other
questions by stating "no comment" or a similar declaration was a
proper assertion of the defendant's right to remain silent. However,
the trial court should have suppressed the entire statement given
following the defendant's assertion of his right to remain silent.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/hukowiczwil.wpd
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. GERALD W. McCULLOUGH
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
John E. Herbison, Nashville, Tennessee (on appeal), and Andrew Jackson
Dearing, III, Shelbyville, Tennessee (at trial), for the appellant,
Gerald W. McCullough.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General & Reporter, Marvin E. Clements, Jr.,
Assistant Attorney General, and Michael David Randles, Assistant
District Attorney General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee.
Judge: WADE
First Paragraph:
The defendant, Gerald W. McCullough, was convicted of aggravated
sexual battery. The trial court imposed a twelve-year sentence. In
this appeal of right, the defendant contends that the trial court
erred by allowing proof of more than one instance of sexual misconduct
and by imposing an excessive sentence. Because the sentence was not
excessive, and because the defendant waived the issue of the
admissibility of uncharged sex crimes, the judgment is affirmed.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/McCullough.wpd
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JOE W. STEWARD
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
Gary M. Howell, Columbia, Tennessee, for the appellant, Joe W.
Steward.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General & Reporter, Marvin E. Clements, Jr.,
Assistant Attorney General, and Jeffrey L. Long, Assistant District
Attorney General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee.
Judge: WADE
First Paragraph:
Because the defendant, Joe W. Steward, was lawfully stopped at a
traffic enforcement roadblock, his conviction for driving under the
influence, second offense, is affirmed. The issue reserved on appeal
by the defendant does not warrant suppression of the evidence.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/Steward.wpd

PLEASE FORWARD THIS E-MAIL!
Feel free to forward this Opinion Flash on to anyone you know
of with an e-mail address.
GET A FULL-TEXT COPY OF AN OPINION!
See the intrsuctions at the beginning of this edition of Opinion
Flash.
JOIN TBALink!
While Opinion Flash is a free service of the Tennessee Bar Association,
you must be a subscriber to TBALink, the premier Web site for
Tennessee attorneys, in order to access the full-text of the opinions
or enjoy many other features of TBALink. TBA members may join
TBALink for just $50 per year. To join, go to: http://www.tba.org/join.html/
SUBSCRIBE TO OPINION FLASH!
Would you like to receive the TBALink Opinion Flash free each
day by e-mail? Anyone, whether a TBA member or not, is welcome
to subscribe ... it's free!
For the Plain Text Version:
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: SUBSCRIBE
3) Leave the body of the message blank
For the HTML Text Version:
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: SUBSCRIBE HTML
3) Leave the body of the message blank
UNSUBSCRIBE TO OPINION FLASH? ... SURELY NOT!
To STOP receiving TBALink Opinion-Flash:
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: UNSUBSCRIBE
3) Leave the body of the message blank

     
© Copyright 2000 Tennessee Bar Association
|