|

September 21 , 2000
Volume 6 -- Number 151

What follows is the case style or name, first paragraph, author's name, and the names of attorneys for the parties of each opinion released eletronically today to TBALink.
- This Issue (IN THIS ORDER):
-
| 02 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Supreme Court |
| 02 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Supreme Court Workers' Compensation Panel |
| 00 |
New Document(s) or Proposed Rule(s) from the Tennessee Supreme Court |
| 03 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Court of Appeals |
| 04 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals |
| 00 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Attorney General (PDF format) |
| 00 |
New Judicial Ethics Opinion(s) |
| 00 |
New Formal Ethics Opinion(s) from the Board of Professional Responsibility |
-
There are three ways for TBALink members to get the full-text versions of these opinions from the Web:
Do a key word search in the Search Link area of TBALink. This option will allow you to view and save a plain-text version of the opinion.
Browse the Opinion List area of TBALink. This option will allow you to download the original version of the opinion.
Click the URL at end of each Opinion paragraph below. This option will allow you to download the original document.
Lucian T. Pera
Editor-in-Chief, TBALink

STATE OF TENNESSEE
v.
DARYL HOOPER
Court:TSC
Attorneys:
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Michael E. Moore,
Solicitor General; Mark E. Davidson, Assistant Attorney General,
Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellant, State of Tennessee.
William H. Farmer, Nashville Tennessee; Mark W. Peters, Nashville,
Tennessee, for the appellee, Daryl Hooper.
Judge: BARKER
First Paragraph:
The single issue in this appeal is whether the proof introduced at the
sentencing hearing is sufficient to support a denial of probation
based solely upon the need for deterrence. The Court of Criminal
Appeals initially affirmed the sentence and held that proof of
deterrence was not needed because drug use and possession cases are
"deterrable per se." Upon the defendant's petition to rehear,
however, the intermediate court reversed itself, holding that a "per
se" rule of deterrence is inconsistent with the holding of this Court
in State v. Ashby, 823 S.W.2d 166 (Tenn. 1991). The State appealed to
this Court. For the reasons given herein, we hold that the proof in
this case is sufficient to justify denial of probation on the sole
ground of deterrence. The judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals
granting an alternative sentence is reversed, and the defendant's
original term of incarceration is reinstated.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC/hooperdaryl.wpd
JONATHAN STEPHENSON
v.
HOWARD CARLTON, WARDEN, ET AL.
Court:TSC
Attorneys:
John E. Herbison, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Jonathan
Stephenson.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General & Reporter; Michael E. Moore,
Solicitor General; Kathy Morante, Deputy Attorney General; and Joe C.
Crumley, Jr., District Attorney General, for the appellee, State of
Tennessee.
Judge: ANDERSON
First Paragraph:
We granted this appeal to determine whether the appellant's sentence
of life without parole for first- degree murder was an illegal
sentence and, if so, whether the appellant was entitled to habeas
corpus relief. The trial court dismissed the petition for habeas
corpus and the Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed. We conclude, and
the State concedes, that the sentence of life without parole was not a
statutorily authorized punishment at the time the appellant committed
the offense of first-degree murder and that the illegal sentence was
properly challenged in a habeas corpus petition. We reverse the
judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals and remand the case to the
trial court for further proceedings.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC/stephens.wpd
ANTONIA REGINA ROSE
v.
EMERSON MOTOR COMPANY
Court:TSC - Workers Comp Panel
Attorneys:
P. Allen Phillips, Jackson, Tennessee, for the appellant, Emerson
Motor Company.
T.J. Emison, Jr., Alamo, Tennessee, for the appellee, Antonia Regina
Rose.
Judge: STAFFORD
First Paragraph:
This is an appeal by the defendant/employer. The only issue presented
is whether the evidence preponderates against the trial court's award
of 35% permanent partial disability to each of the plaintiff's arms.
We find it does not and affirm the judgment of the trial court.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC_WCP/roseant.wpd
ERNESTYNE M. WEBB
v.
SHOE CITY, INC., et al.
Court:TSC - Workers Comp Panel
Attorneys:
Marc A. Sorin, Memphis, Tennessee, for the appellants, Shoe City,
Inc., et al.
Lewis K. Garrison, Sr. and John H. Bledsoe, for the appellee,
Ernestyne M. Webb.
Judge: TATUM
First Paragraph:
This case involves a back injury sustained in 1995 by Ernestyne M.
Webb, an employee of Shoe City, Incorporated. The employee brought
suit against the employer and its insurer, The Traveler's Insurance
Company. The trial court found that the employee had sustained a
herniated disk at the L-4 level of her spine and suffered a 15 percent
anatomical impairment rating as a result. The court awarded benefits
based upon 67.5 percent disability to the body as a whole. The court
also found that the employee was not returned to work and declined to
apply the two and one-half (2.5) times cap in Tennessee Code Annotated
S 50-6-241(a). The defendants have presented the following issues on
appeal: (1) whether the evidence preponderates against the trial
court's finding that the plaintiff was not returned to work as
required by Tennessee Code Annotated S 50-6-241(a); and (2) whether
the evidence preponderates against the court's finding that the
plaintiff suffered a 15 percent anatomical impairment to the body as a
whole. We find that we must affirm the trial court's judgment as
modified.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC_WCP/webberne.wpd
BRENDA D. ESTES, et al.
v.
SANDRA H. PEELS, et al.
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Stanley F. Roden and Jody S. Rodenborn, Knoxville, Tennessee, for the
appellants, Brenda D. Estes and Richard W. Estes.
Gene P. Gaby, Greeneville, Tennessee, for the appellee, Magnavox
Corporation and/or North American Philips d/b/a Philips Consumer
Electronics Corporation.
Judge: SUSANO
First Paragraph:
This case arises out of a motor vehicle accident that occurred when a
vehicle exited a manufacturing plant's parking lot and collided with
the plaintiff's vehicle on a public highway. Brenda D. Estes and her
husband sued the owner of the plant for negligence. The trial court
granted the plant owner summary judgment. We hold that, under the
circumstances of this case, the plant owner did not owe a duty of care
to the plaintiff and therefore affirm the grant of summary judgment.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/estesbd.wpd
BETTY L. FOX
v.
FOOD LION, INC., STORE #539
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Clarence Risin, Knoxville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Food Lion,
Inc., Store #539.
Mark E. Floyd, Knoxville, Tennessee, for the appellee, Betty L. Fox.
Judge: SUSANO
First Paragraph:
Betty L. Fox sued Food Lion, Inc., Store #539, seeking damages for
personal injuries sustained when she fell in an aisle of the
defendant's store. The trial court approved the jury's verdict for
the plaintiff and entered judgment in her favor for $112,000. The
defendant appeals, raising three issues, which we restate as follows:
(1) whether there is material evidence that the defendant had actual
or constructive notice of the allegedly dangerous condition that
caused the plaintiff's fall; (2) whether the defendant owed a duty of
care to the plaintiff; and (3) whether there is material evidence to
support the jury's allocation of fault. We affirm.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/foxbl.wpd
JERRY WAYNE KILLION
v.
SANDRA FAYE SWEAT
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Cecilia S. Petersen, Knoxville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Jerry
Wayne Killion.
J. Terry Holland, Knoxville, Tennessee, for the appellee, Sandra Faye
Sweat.
Judge: SUSANO
First Paragraph:
In this post-divorce proceeding, the father of Dustin Lynn Killion
filed a petition seeking the child's custody. The trial court denied
the father's petition. The father appeals the trial court's
determination that the proof fails to demonstrate a material change of
circumstances warranting a change of custody. We reverse.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/killionjw.wpd
ANTHONY EWING
v.
STATE OF TENNESSEE
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
Dwight E. Scott, Nashville, Tennessee, Richard Piliponis, Nashville,
Tennessee, for the appellant, Anthony Ewing.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter, Lucian D. Geise,
Assistant Attorney General, and Kymberly Haas, Assistant District
Attorney General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee.
Judge: OGLE
First Paragraph:
On February 12, 1998, the petitioner, Anthony Ewing, entered a best
interest guilty plea in the Davidson County Criminal Court to one
count of attempt to sell over .5 grams of cocaine, a class C felony.
The trial court imposed a sentence of six years incarceration in the
Davidson County Workhouse. The trial court further ordered this
sentence to be served concurrently with sentences the petitioner was
already serving. The petitioner filed a post-conviction petition for
relief, alleging that he received ineffective assistance of counsel
and that his best interest guilty plea was not made knowingly or
voluntarily. The post-conviction court denied the petition, finding
that the petitioner had received effective assistance of counsel and
that the best interest guilty plea had been made knowingly and
voluntarily. The petitioner now appeals the denial of his petition
for post-conviction relief. Pursuant to a review of the record and
the parties' briefs, we affirm the judgment of the post conviction
court.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/ewinganthony.wpd
STATE OF TENNESSEE
v.
JERRY WAYNE HARBIN
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
Robert S. Peters, Winchester, Tennessee, for the appellant, Jerry
Wayne Harbin.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter, Elizabeth T. Ryan,
Assistant Attorney General, and Bill Copeland, Assistant District
Attorney General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee.
Judge: OGLE
First Paragraph:
On July 1, 1999, the appellant, Jerry Wayne Harbin, was convicted by a
jury in the Franklin County Circuit Court of driving under the
influence of an intoxicant, second offense, and driving on a revoked
license. The trial court imposed a sentence of eleven (11) months and
twenty-nine (29) days incarceration in the Franklin County Jail,
suspended all but sixty-five (65) days of the sentence and ordered
the appellant to pay a fine of $750. For the offense of driving on a
revoked license, the trial court imposed a concurrent sentence of six
(6) months, suspended all but ten (10) days of the sentence and
ordered the appellant to pay a fine of $150. On appeal, the
appellant alleges that the evidence was not sufficient to support his
conviction of driving under the influence. Following a review of the
record and the parties' briefs, we affirm the judgment of the trial
court.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/harbinjerry.wpd
STATE OF TENNESSEE
v.
ANTHONY ROBERTS
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
Dennis L. Tomlin, Hendersonville, Tennessee (at trial), and Nan Shelby
Calloway, Nashville, Tennessee (on appeal), for the appellant, Anthony
Roberts.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Lucian D. Geise,
Assistant Attorney General; Victor S. (Tory) Johnson III, District
Attorney General; Sean K. Allen and Edward S. Ryan, Assistant District
Attorneys General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee.
Judge: RILEY
First Paragraph:
Defendant appeals his conviction by a Davidson County jury of DUI
second offense. He raises the following issues for our review: (1)
whether the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress based
upon the lack of probable cause to arrest; (2) whether the evidence
was sufficient to support the conviction; (3) whether the prosecutor
committed misconduct during final argument, and (4) whether records
pertaining to his prior DUI conviction were properly admitted.
Finding no error, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/robertsa.wpd
STATE OF TENNESSEE
v.
MELISSA STEARNS
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
Ernest W. Williams, Dana C. McLendons, III, Franklin, Tennessee,
attorney for the appellant, Melissa Stearns.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter, and David H. Findley
attorney, for the appellee, State of Tennessee.
Judge: SMITH
First Paragraph:
The appellant, Melissa Ann Stearns, pled guilty in the Williamson
County Circuit Court to one (1) count of reckless endangerment, a
Class E felony, and one (1) count of evading arrest, a Class E felony.
The trial court sentenced the appellant as a Range I offender to
concurrent terms of two (2) years for each offense, suspended after
service of thirty (30) days in the Williamson County Jail. On appeal,
the appellant contends that the trial court erred in ordering her to
serve thirty (30) days in jail. After thoroughly reviewing the record
before this Court, we hold that, due to the seriousness of the
offenses committed by the appellant, the trial court did not err in
denying full probation. Therefore, the judgment of the trial court is
affirmed.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/stearnsmelissa.wpd

PLEASE FORWARD THIS E-MAIL!
Feel free to forward this Opinion Flash on to anyone you know of with an e-mail address.
GET A FULL-TEXT COPY OF AN OPINION!
See the intrsuctions at the beginning of this edition of Opinion Flash.
JOIN TBALink!
While Opinion Flash is a free service of the Tennessee Bar Association, you must be a subscriber to TBALink, the premier Web site for Tennessee attorneys, in order to access the full-text of the opinions or enjoy many other features of TBALink. TBA members may join TBALink for just $50 per year. To join, go to: http://www.tba.org/join.html/
SUBSCRIBE TO OPINION FLASH!
Would you like to receive the TBALink Opinion Flash free each day by e-mail? Anyone, whether a TBA member or not, is welcome to subscribe ... it's free!
For the Plain Text Version:
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: SUBSCRIBE
3) Leave the body of the message blank
For the HTML Text Version:
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: SUBSCRIBE HTML
3) Leave the body of the message blank
UNSUBSCRIBE TO OPINION FLASH? ... SURELY NOT!
To STOP receiving TBALink Opinion-Flash:
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: UNSUBSCRIBE
3) Leave the body of the message blank

     
© Copyright 2000 Tennessee Bar Association
|