|

September 22 , 2000
Volume 6 -- Number 152

What follows is the case style or name, first paragraph, author's
name, and the names of attorneys for the parties of each opinion
released eletronically today to TBALink.
- This Issue (IN THIS ORDER):
-
| 00 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Supreme Court |
| 01 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Supreme Court Workers' Compensation
Panel |
| 00 |
New Document(s) or Proposed Rule(s) from the Tennessee Supreme
Court |
| 05 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Court of Appeals |
| 00 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals |
| 00 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Attorney General (PDF format)
|
| 00 |
New Judicial Ethics Opinion(s) |
| 00 |
New Formal Ethics Opinion(s) from the Board of Professional Responsibility
|
-
There are three ways for TBALink members to get the full-text
versions of these opinions from the Web:
Do a key word search in the Search Link area of TBALink. This option will allow you to view and save
a plain-text version of the opinion.
Browse the Opinion List area of TBALink. This option will allow you to download the original
version of the opinion.
Click the URL at end of each Opinion paragraph below. This option
will allow you to download the original document.
Lucian T. Pera
Editor-in-Chief, TBALink

GRATZ CARDEN, JR.
v.
THE TENNESSEE COAL COMPANY
Court:TSC - Workers Comp Panel
Attorneys:
Robert W. Knolton, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, for the appellant, The
Tennessee Coal Company.
Roger L. Ridenour, Clinton, Tennessee, for the appellee, Gratz Carden,
Jr.
Judge: LAFFERTY
First Paragraph:
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special
Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance
with Tennessee Code Annotated S 50-6-225(e)(3) for a hearing and
reporting of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The
appellant/defendant challenges the trial court's award of permanent
and total disability benefits to the appellee/plaintiff. Also, the
appellant contends that the evidence does not support the trial
court's award of benefits to the body as a whole. After an in-depth
review of the entire record, briefs of the parties and applicable law,
we affirm the trial court's judgment.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC_WCP/cardeng.wpd
RANDY L. CHAMBERS
v.
JONNITA M. CHAMBERS AMONETTE
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Jacqueline B. Dixon, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Jonnita
M. Chambers Amonette.
Louise R. Fontecchio, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellee, Randy L.
Chambers.
Judge: FARMER
First Paragraph:
At the time of the parties' divorce in 1992, their minor child was
placed in the primary residential custody of the mother, and the
father was ordered to pay child support in the amount of $300.00 per
month. The mother instituted a petition to modify. The father is in
the military and, at the time of trial, had a base pay of $2,888.46
per month, which included allowances for BAS, BAH, and BAQ- DIFF. The
parties anticipated at the time of trial that the father would be
transferred to Korea for one year of service, and then would be
transferred to England. According to the father, he would continue to
receive his BAQ-DIFF allowance, but, while in Korea, he would no
longer receive BAS or BAH allowances. The mother sought an increase
in the monthly support payments based upon a significant variation
with the Tennessee Child Support Guidelines and based upon reduced
visitation by the father. According to the parties' final divorce
decree, the father's visitation schedule provided for an average of
sixty-nine days of visitation throughout the year, as compared to the
anticipated eighty days in the Guidelines. After a hearing on the
matter, the trial court denied the petition and ordered the mother to
pay the father's costs and attorney's fees. We reverse and remand.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/chambersrl.wpd
WILLIE LUE PRENTICE
v.
RONALD W. PRENTICE
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Kathy A. Leslie, Nashville, for Appellant
Stephanie C. Hatchett, Nashville, for Appellee
Judge: HIGHERS
First Paragraph:
Ronald Prentice appeals from a decision of the Davidson County Circuit
Court. The appeal involves a dispute over property division arising
out of a divorce.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/prenticewillie.wpd
R & D MARINA, INC., et al.
v.
ROANE COUNTY, TENNESSEE, et al.
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Gerald Largen, Kingston, Tennessee, and J. Scott McCluen, Harriman,
Tennessee, for Appellants Sam Browder, Rhea Browder and J. T. Day.
Tom McFarland, Kingston, Tennessee, for Appellees Ron Billbury and
Diane Billbury.
Judge: SWINEY
First Paragraph:
Plaintiffs, a marina and its owners, were holders of a 1996 lease from
Roane County to build and manage a marina. Plaintiffs received a
permit from TVA to operate the marina in 1997. Plaintiffs filed suit
against Roane County and four boathouse owners, seeking a declaratory
judgment that the marina was entitled to monthly rent from the
individual Defendants from the date of the Roane County lease until
their boathouses were removed from the leased premises. The
boathouse owners were holders of prior TVA permits to moor boathouses
within the same area which became the marina pursuant to the 1996
lease and 1997 permit. The Trial Court ordered the boathouse owners
to pay rent to the marina and to remove their boathouses. We affirm
the judgment of the Trial Court insofar as it ordered the individual
Defendants to remove their boathouses. We hold the Trial Court erred
in ordering the individual Defendants to pay rent starting from the
date of the lease rather than the date of Plaintiffs' TVA permit.
Accordingly, we modify the judgment of the Trial Court to reflect that
Defendants owe rent to Plaintiffs from the date of Plaintiffs' TVA
permit until the boathouses were removed. The judgment of the Trial
Court is affirmed, as modified, and the case is remanded.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/rdmarina.wpd
DANIEL BENSON TAYLOR
v.
JUDGE RUSSELL HELDMAN, et al.
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Daniel Benson Taylor, Only Tennessee, Pro Se.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Michael E. Moore,
Solicitor General; Meredith Devault, Senior Counsel, and Mary M. Bers,
Assistant Attorney General, for the appellees, Judge Russell Heldman,
Judge Donald P. Harris, Lucian D. Geise, Assistant Attorney General,
Mary M. Bers, Assistant Attorney General.
Judge: CAIN
First Paragraph:
Daniel Benson Taylor ("Plaintiff"), a prison inmate, filed suit for
damages and other relief against two judges of the 21st Judicial
District and, by amended complaint, the assistant attorneys general
representing the two judges because of the alleged failure of the
judges to grant his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The trial
judge granted a Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure 12.02(6) motion to
dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
The specially appointed trial judge sustained the motion and
Plaintiff appeals. We affirm.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/taylordanielb.wpd
MARY LYNN WRITESMAN
v.
MICHAEL LAKE WRITESMAN
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Jack Norman, Jr. and James L. Collier, Nashville, Tennessee, for the
appellant, Michael Lake Writesman.
Gregory D. Smith, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellee, Mary Lynn
Writesman.
Judge: CAIN
First Paragraph:
This appeal is from the trial court's order denying Husband's Petition
for Modification and sentencing him to thirty days in jail for
criminal contempt. Husband attempted to show that there had been a
substantial and material change in the relative financial positions of
the parties and that his court ordered alimony obligation should be
terminated or modified. Wife counter-petitioned for contempt of
court, and Husband was, thereafter, charged with criminal contempt and
found guilty for his failure to pay alimony. We agree with the trial
court that Husband failed to show a material change in circumstances
sufficient to justify terminating or modifying his alimony obligation.
We also agree with the trial court's finding of criminal contempt and
uphold its sentence of thirty days in prison for such contempt.
Therefore, the ruling of the trial court on all issues presented on
appeal is affirmed.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/writesmanmaryl.wpd

PLEASE FORWARD THIS E-MAIL!
Feel free to forward this Opinion Flash on to anyone you know
of with an e-mail address.
GET A FULL-TEXT COPY OF AN OPINION!
See the intrsuctions at the beginning of this edition of Opinion
Flash.
JOIN TBALink!
While Opinion Flash is a free service of the Tennessee Bar Association,
you must be a subscriber to TBALink, the premier Web site for
Tennessee attorneys, in order to access the full-text of the opinions
or enjoy many other features of TBALink. TBA members may join
TBALink for just $50 per year. To join, go to: http://www.tba.org/join.html/
SUBSCRIBE TO OPINION FLASH!
Would you like to receive the TBALink Opinion Flash free each
day by e-mail? Anyone, whether a TBA member or not, is welcome
to subscribe ... it's free!
For the Plain Text Version:
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: SUBSCRIBE
3) Leave the body of the message blank
For the HTML Text Version:
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: SUBSCRIBE HTML
3) Leave the body of the message blank
UNSUBSCRIBE TO OPINION FLASH? ... SURELY NOT!
To STOP receiving TBALink Opinion-Flash:
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: UNSUBSCRIBE
3) Leave the body of the message blank

     
© Copyright 2000 Tennessee Bar Association
|