|

December 11, 2000
Volume 6 -- Number 200

What follows is the case style or name, first paragraph, author's
name, and the names of attorneys for the parties of each opinion
released eletronically today to TBALink.
- This Issue (IN THIS ORDER):
-
| 03 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Supreme Court |
| 00 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Supreme Court Workers' Compensation
Panel |
| 00 |
New Document(s) or Proposed Rule(s) from the Tennessee Supreme
Court |
| 01 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Court of Appeals |
| 03 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals |
| 00 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Attorney General (PDF format)
|
| 01 |
New Judicial Ethics Opinion(s) |
| 00 |
New Formal Ethics Opinion(s) from the Board of Professional Responsibility
|
-
There are three ways for TBALink members to get the full-text
versions of these opinions from the Web:
Do a key word search in the Search Link area of TBALink. This option will allow you to view and save
a plain-text version of the opinion.
Browse the Opinion List area of TBALink. This option will allow you to download the original
version of the opinion.
Click the URL at end of each Opinion paragraph below. This option
will allow you to download the original document.
Lucian T. Pera
Editor-in-Chief, TBALink

BERNARD BRUCE BRYANT v. GENCO STAMPING & MFG. CO., INC., et al.
Court:TSC
Attorneys:
Randolph A. Veazey and Connie Jones, Nashville, Tennessee, for the
appellant, Genco Stamping & Mfg. Co., Inc.
Ronald Thurman, Cookeville, Tennessee, for the appellee, Bernard Bruce
Bryant.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General & Reporter; Dianne Stamey Dycus,
Deputy Attorney General, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellee, Dina
Tobin, Director, Workers' Compensation Second Injury Fund.
Judge: BARKER
First Paragraph:
The sole issue in this case is whether Tennessee Code Annotated
section 50-6-208(a) applies to a pre-existing permanent mental
disability. The employee suffered a work-related shoulder injury,
treatment for which resulted in aggravation of a pre-existing mental
disorder. The trial court concluded that the previous mental
disability is included within the purview of Tennessee Code Annotated
section 50-6-208(a). The court thereby found both the employer and
the Second Injury Fund liable for disability benefits. On appeal, the
Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel reversed the trial court's
apportionment of liability to the Second Injury Fund, holding that
section -208(a) does not contemplate pre-existing mental disorders.
We affirm the judgment of the Special Appeals Panel and find the
employer liable for the full amount of benefits due the employee.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC/bryantbb.wpd
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. TONY V. CARRUTHERS & JAMES MONTGOMERY
WITH DISSENTING OPINION AND APPENDIX
Court:TSC
Attorneys:
Stephen R. Leffler and Lee A. Filderman, Memphis, Tennessee, for the
appellant, Tony V. Carruthers.
Robert C. Brooks and Edward W. Chandler, Memphis, Tennessee, for the
appellant, James Montgomery.
Michael E. Moore, Solicitor General; Amy Tarkington, Senior Counsel;
Phillip Gerald Harris; Assistant District Attorney General; and J.
Robert Carter, Jr., Assistant District Attorney General, for the
appellee, State of Tennessee.
Judge: DROWOTA
First Paragraph:
Tony Carruthers and James Montgomery were each convicted of three
counts of first degree premeditated murder and were sentenced to death
on each conviction. The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the
convictions and sentences of both Carruthers and Montgomery.
Thereafter, the cases were docketed in this Court. After carefully
reviewing the record and the relevant legal authorities, we conclude
that none of the errors raised by Tony Carruthers require reversal,
that the evidence is sufficient to support the jury's findings of the
aggravating circumstances, and that the sentences of death are not
excessive or disproportionate considering the circumstances of the
crimes and the defendant. With respect to James Montgomery, we
conclude that the trial court erred in denying him a severance and
that the error resulted in Montgomery being deprived of a fair trial.
Accordingly, we reverse Montgomery's convictions and sentences and
remand for a new trial.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC/carrutherst_opn.wpd
DISSENTING OPINION
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC/carrutherst_dis.wpd
APPENDIX
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC/carrutherst_apx.wpd
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. RANDALL SCOTT
Court:TSC
Attorneys:
Jeffrey A. DeVasher, Assistant Public Defender, Nashville,
Tennessee--appellate counsel; J. Michael Engle, Assistant Public
Defender, Nashville, Tennessee--trial counsel, for the appellant,
Randall Scott.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Michael E. Moore,
Solicitor General; Kim R. Helper, Assistant Attorney General,
Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellee, State of Tennessee.
Judge: BARKER
First Paragraph:
The appellant in this case was arrested and charged with the rape and
aggravated sexual battery of a nine-year-old child in Davidson County.
Prior to trial, the State conducted various types of DNA analysis on
several pieces of evidence, and the appellant, who is indigent,
requested state-funded expert assistance in the field of DNA analysis
to prepare his defense. The trial court denied the appellant's motion
for expert assistance and declined to hold a hearing to establish the
reliability of mitochondrial DNA analysis. The trial court also held
that the State properly established the chain of custody for certain
hairs removed from the victim during her physical examination. The
appellant was found guilty by a jury on both charges, and the Court of
Criminal Appeals affirmed the convictions and sentences. On appeal to
this Court, we address the following issues: (1) whether the appellant
was entitled to expert assistance in the field of DNA analysis under
State v. Barnett, 909 S.W.2d 423 (Tenn. 1995) and Tennessee Supreme
Court Rule 13; (2) whether the trial court erred in failing to hold a
pre-trial hearing on the reliability of mitochondrial DNA analysis;
and (3) whether the State's failure to establish a chain of custody as
to certain hairs retrieved from the victim was error. For the reasons
given herein, we hold that although the appellant was not entitled to
a pre- trial hearing on the reliability of mitochondrial DNA analysis,
he was entitled to receive expert assistance in the field of DNA
analysis. We also hold that the State failed to properly establish
the chain of custody of the hair samples. We reverse the appellant's
convictions and sentences, and we remand this case to the Davidson
County Criminal Court for a new trial on both counts of the
indictment.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC/scottrl.wpd
JUDICIAL ETHICS COMMITTEE OPINION NO. 00-04
Court:TSC - Rules
First Paragraph:
Inquiry has been presented regarding whether the closing of all
divisions of the Shelby County Courts of General Sessions during
established court holidays constitutes an ethical violation of any
provisions of the Code of Judicial Conduct. For calendar year 2001,
the established court holidays will include regular holidays, an MBA
Bench/Bar conference, the Tennessee General Sessions Judges'
Conference and December 17, 2001 through December 31, 2001. The
request specifically questions whether such closings, in light of Rule
11, S VII(b) of the Rules of the Tennessee Supreme Court, constitute a
violation of the Code of Judicial Conduct.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC_Rules/00-04.wpd
LOCAL UNION 760 OF THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL
WORKERS, et al. v. THE CITY OF HARRIMAN AND THE HARRIMAN UTILITY BOARD
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Gerald Largen, Kingston, Tennessee and R. Jan Jennings, Nashville,
Tennessee, for the appellants, Local Union 760 of the International
Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, et al.
Edward G. Phillips, Jon G. Roach and Dean B. Farmer, Knoxville,
Tennessee for the appellees, the City of Harriman and the Harriman
Utility Board.
Judge: GODDARD
First Paragraph:
This appeal from the Roane County Chancery Court concerns whether the
Chancery Court erred in determining that a collective bargaining
agreement entered into between Appellant, Local Union 760 of the
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, and Appellees, the
City of Harriman and the Harriman Utility Board, is null and void. We
affirm the decision of the Chancery Court and remand for further
proceedings, if any, consistent with this opinion. We adjudge costs of
the appeal against the Appellants.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/localunion760.wpd
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. BRUCE ADAMS
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
Shawn G. Graham, Maryville, Tennessee, for the Appellant, Bruce Adams.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General & Reporter; Clinton J. Morgan,
Nashville, Tennessee, Michael; L. Flynn, District Attorney General;
and William Reed, Assistant District Attorney General, for the
Appellee, State of Tennessee.
Judge: WITT
First Paragraph:
The defendant, Bruce Adams, appeals his convictions of resisting
arrest and disorderly conduct and the manner of service of his
effective six-month sentence. The trial court ordered ten days of
confinement and probated the balance of the sentence. The resisting
arrest conviction is supported by sufficient evidence, and we affirm
that conviction and the sentence, including the confinement term.
However, because we find insufficient evidence to support the
disorderly conduct conviction, we reverse it and dismiss that charge.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/adamsb.wpd
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. WILLIAM TERRELL HAMPTON
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
Ashley L. Ownby, Cleveland, Tennessee, attorney for the appellant,
William Terrell Hampton.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Mark A. Fulks,
Assistant Attorney General; Jerry N. Estes, District Attorney General;
and Sandra N. Donaghy, Assistant District Attorney General, for the
appellee, State of Tennessee.
Judge: TIPTON
First Paragraph:
The defendant appeals his conviction for aggravated sexual battery,
contending that the evidence is insufficient to support his
conviction, the trial court erred in admitting evidence of a fresh
complaint, and the trial court erred in imposing a nine-year sentence.
We affirm the defendant's conviction and sentence.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/hamptonwt.wpd
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. CHRIS A. JEFFERSON
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
Thomas McKinney, Jr. and Clyde L. Tootle, Kingsport, Tennessee, for
the appellant, Chris A. Jefferson.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General & Reporter, Elizabeth B. Marney,
Assistant Attorney General, H. Greeley Wells, Jr., District Attorney
General, J. Lewis Combs, Assistant District Attorney General, for the
appellee, State of Tennessee.
Judge: WITT
First Paragraph:
Chris A. Jefferson appeals a certified question of law regarding a
police officer's stop of him which resulted in his arrest for driving
under the influence. Because we agree with the trial court that
reasonable suspicion supported by specific and articulable facts
existed for the stop, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/jeffersonca.wpd

PLEASE FORWARD THIS E-MAIL!
Feel free to forward this Opinion Flash on to anyone you know
of with an e-mail address.
GET A FULL-TEXT COPY OF AN OPINION!
See the intrsuctions at the beginning of this edition of Opinion
Flash.
JOIN TBALink!
While Opinion Flash is a free service of the Tennessee Bar Association,
you must be a subscriber to TBALink, the premier Web site for
Tennessee attorneys, in order to access the full-text of the opinions
or enjoy many other features of TBALink. TBA members may join
TBALink for just $50 per year. To join, go to: http://www.tba.org/join.html/
SUBSCRIBE TO OPINION FLASH!
Would you like to receive the TBALink Opinion Flash free each
day by e-mail? Anyone, whether a TBA member or not, is welcome
to subscribe ... it's free!
For the Plain Text Version:
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: SUBSCRIBE
3) Leave the body of the message blank
For the HTML Text Version:
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: SUBSCRIBE HTML
3) Leave the body of the message blank
UNSUBSCRIBE TO OPINION FLASH? ... SURELY NOT!
To STOP receiving TBALink Opinion-Flash:
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: UNSUBSCRIBE
3) Leave the body of the message blank

     
© Copyright 2000 Tennessee Bar Association
|