|

January 05 , 2001
Volume 7 -- Number 004

What follows is the case style or name, first paragraph, author's
name, and the names of attorneys for the parties of each opinion
released eletronically today to TBALink.
- This Issue (IN THIS ORDER):
-
| 00 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Supreme Court |
| 04 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Supreme Court Workers' Compensation
Panel |
| 00 |
New Document(s) or Proposed Rule(s) from the Tennessee Supreme
Court |
| 04 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Court of Appeals |
| 00 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals |
| 03 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Attorney General (PDF format)
|
| 00 |
New Judicial Ethics Opinion(s) |
| 00 |
New Formal Ethics Opinion(s) from the Board of Professional Responsibility
|
-
There are three ways for TBALink members to get the full-text
versions of these opinions from the Web:
Do a key word search in the Search Link area of TBALink. This option will allow you to view and save
a plain-text version of the opinion.
Browse the Opinion List area of TBALink. This option will allow you to download the original
version of the opinion.
Click the URL at end of each Opinion paragraph below. This option
will allow you to download the original document.
Lucian T. Pera
Editor-in-Chief, TBALink

TERRI L. CARTER v. CMH MANUFACTURING, INC., et al.
Court:TSC - Workers Comp Panel
Attorneys:
Garry W. Ferraris, Knoxville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Terri L.
Carter.
Linda J. Hamilton Mowles, Knoxville, Tennessee, for the appellee, CMH
Manufacturing, Inc.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; E. Blaine Sprouse,
Assistant Attorney General, for the appellee, Dina Tobin, Worker's
Compensation Division of the Tennessee Department of Labor/Second
Injury Fund.
Judge: INMAN
First Paragraph:
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special
Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance
with Tenn. Code Ann. S 50-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the
Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. This action
seeking benefits for total and permanent disability attributable to a
disputed diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome superimposed upon
pre-existing injuries was dismissed. The plaintiff appeals and
presents for review the issues of whether the plaintiff proved that
she suffered a job-related injury, or that she suffered a vocational
disability. We affirm the judgment.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC_WCP/carter.wpd
KAREN HENSON v. FINELLI, HAUGE, SANDERS and RAGLAND, M.C., P.C.
Court:TSC - Workers Comp Panel
Attorneys:
Kimberlee A. Waterhouse, Lenoir City, Tennessee, for the appellant,
Karen Henson.
James T. Shea, IV, Knoxville, Tennessee, for the appellee, Finelli,
Hauge, Sanders and Ragland, M.C., P.C.
Judge: INMAN
First Paragraph:
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special
Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance
with Tenn. Code Ann. S 50-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the
Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. This is a
Rule 60 case. The plaintiff alleges that after her claim for workers'
compensation benefits for a cervical spine and shoulder injury was
settled and judicially approved she continued to suffer pain and
discomfort owing to a torn rotator cuff and nerve impingement which
was not discovered by her treating physician, thus implicating Rule
60.02.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC_WCP/henson.wpd
JANICE S. HOSKINS (BREWER) v. SEAMAN CORPORATION
Court:TSC - Workers Comp Panel
Attorneys:
Michael E. Large, Bristol, Tennessee, for the appellant, Janice S.
Hoskins (Brewer).
Jack M. Vaughn, Kingsport, Tennessee, for the appellee, Seaman
Corporation.
Judge: INMAN
First Paragraph:
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special
Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance
with Tenn. Code Ann. S 50-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the
Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The
plaintiff was laid off 66 months after returning to work following
settlement of her claim for workers' compensation benefits. After the
lay-off she filed this action to recover additional benefits.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC_WCP/hoskinsbrewer.wpd
CARROLL EDWARD MUMPOWER v. CITY OF ERWIN, TENNESSEE
Court:TSC - Workers Comp Panel
Attorneys:
J. Wesley Edens, Bristol, Tennessee, for the appellant, Carroll Edward
Mumpower.
John Rambo, Johnson City, Tennessee, for the appellee, City of Erwin,
Tennessee.
Judge: INMAN
First Paragraph:
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special
Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance
with Tenn. Code Ann. S 50-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the
Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The issue
raised on appeal is whether the filing of a complaint by plaintiff
Mumpower within one year after discovering his current medical
condition to be causally related to an earlier accident is time-barred
and cause for dismissal of this suit. The trial court found equitable
estoppel not implicated and the fact that in 1998 plaintiff received
additional information that his 1992 injury was worse than originally
believed did not serve to extend the operation of the statute of
limitations. We affirm the judgment of the court.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC_WCP/mumpower.wpd
FRED BIRDSALL, et al. v. FLOYD BIRDSALL
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Fred Birdsall and Wanda Birdsall, Lafollette, Tennessee, Pro Se.
Floyd Birdsall, Lafollette, Tennessee, Pro Se.
Judge: SWINEY
First Paragraph:
Plaintiffs/Appellants sought the return of several items, including a
shotgun, tiller and lawn mower, as well as $1,500 in damages to a 1980
Ford pick-up truck, from Defendant/Appellee. The Trial Court found
the matter too speculative and dismissed the case. We have no
transcript and no Statement of the Evidence. Accordingly, we must
assume that the record, had it been preserved, would have contained
sufficient evidence to support the Trial Court's factual findings.
Judgment of the Trial Court affirmed.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/birdsallf.wpd
JAMI ALLYSON ROSS CARTER v. GUY MARSHALL CARTER
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Robert D. Arnold, Johnson City, Tennessee, for the appellant, Jami
Allyson Ross Carter.
Lois B. Shults-Davis, Erwin, Tennessee, for the appellee, Guy Marshall
Carter.
Judge: GODDARD
First Paragraph:
This appeal from the Washington County Chancery Court concerns whether
the Trial Court erred in refusing to allow the testimony of an expert
witness in accordance with a local rule. The Appellant, Jami Allyson
Ross Carter, appeals the decision of the Chancery Court. We vacate
the decision of the Trial Court.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/carterjami.wpd
HARRY FLETCHER, et al. v. ANTHONY EDWIN BICKFORD, et al.
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Michael R. Campbell, Chattanooga, Tennessee, for Appellants Anthony
Edwin Bickford and Robert Gamble.
G. Brent Burks, Chattanooga, Tennessee, for Appellees Harry Fletcher
and Phyllis Fletcher.
Ronald D. Wells, Chattanooga, Tennessee for Nationwide Insurance
Company.
Gary W. Starnes, Chattanooga, Tennessee for Blue Cross & Blue Shield
of Tennessee.
Judge: SWINEY
First Paragraph:
Plaintiff's car was caught between the minivan in front of him and the
dump truck behind him when the minivan and Plaintiff's car stopped to
avoid an obstruction in the roadway. The dump truck was unable to
stop and hit Plaintiff's car. The jury returned a verdict for
Plaintiff for $225,000. The jury allocated 80 percent of the fault
against the dump truck driver and owner and 20 percent of the fault
against Plaintiff's uninsured motorist insurance carrier on behalf of
the unknown driver of a truck which dropped the obstruction onto the
road. The dump truck driver and owner appeal, raising issues of law
including the introduction of claimed inadmissible evidence,
prejudicial final argument, improper and incomplete jury instructions,
jury misconduct and the failure of the Trial Court to grant
Defendants' motions for directed verdict and judgment notwithstanding
the verdict. We affirm the judgment of the Trial Court.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/fletcherh.wpd
TINDELL'S, INCORPORATED v. MARY AVA PARTIN
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
David A. Winchester, LaFollette, Tennessee, for the Appellant, Mary
Ava Partin
Edward L. Summers, Knoxville, Tennessee, for the Appellee, Tindell's,
Incorporated
Judge: GODDARD
First Paragraph:
This is a suit to recover the sales price of certain materials sold to
the Defendant and to enforce a lien against certain property if the
judgment rendered is not paid. The Trial Court found in favor of the
Plaintiff, resulting in this appeal, wherein the Defendant questions
the introduction of certain proof and insists the preponderance of the
evidence is contrary to the Trial Court's determination. We affirm.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/tindellinc.wpd
Salary of Jackson County General Sessions Judge
Date: December 20, 2000
Opinion Number: 00-190
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/AG/OP190.pdf
Authority to request the POST Commission to suspend or revoke the
certification of a police officer
Date: December 20, 2000
Opinion Number: 00-191
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/AG/OP191.pdf
Right to a Jury Trial for Class C Misdemeanant
Date: December 21, 2000
Opinion Number: 00-192
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/AG/OP192.pdf

PLEASE FORWARD THIS E-MAIL!
Feel free to forward this Opinion Flash on to anyone you know
of with an e-mail address.
GET A FULL-TEXT COPY OF AN OPINION!
See the intrsuctions at the beginning of this edition of Opinion
Flash.
JOIN TBALink!
While Opinion Flash is a free service of the Tennessee Bar Association,
you must be a subscriber to TBALink, the premier Web site for
Tennessee attorneys, in order to access the full-text of the opinions
or enjoy many other features of TBALink. TBA members may join
TBALink for just $50 per year. To join, go to: http://www.tba.org/join.html/
SUBSCRIBE TO OPINION FLASH!
Would you like to receive the TBALink Opinion Flash free each
day by e-mail? Anyone, whether a TBA member or not, is welcome
to subscribe ... it's free!
For the Plain Text Version:
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: SUBSCRIBE
3) Leave the body of the message blank
For the HTML Text Version:
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: SUBSCRIBE HTML
3) Leave the body of the message blank
UNSUBSCRIBE TO OPINION FLASH? ... SURELY NOT!
To STOP receiving TBALink Opinion-Flash:
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: UNSUBSCRIBE
3) Leave the body of the message blank

     
© Copyright 2001 Tennessee Bar Association
|