|

May 3, 2001
Volume 7 Number 081

What follows is the case style or name, first paragraph, author's
name, and the names of attorneys for the parties of each opinion
released eletronically today to TBALink.
- This Issue (IN THIS ORDER):
-
| 00 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Supreme Court |
| 00 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Supreme Court Workers' Compensation
Panel |
| 00 |
New Document(s) or Proposed Rule(s) from the Tennessee Supreme
Court |
| 01 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Court of Appeals |
| 03 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals |
| 00 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Attorney General (PDF format)
|
| 00 |
New Judicial Ethics Opinion(s) |
| 00 |
New Formal Ethics Opinion(s) from the Board of Professional Responsibility
|
-
There are three ways for TBALink members to get the full-text
versions of these opinions from the Web:
Do a key word search in the Search Link area of TBALink. This option will allow you to view and save
a plain-text version of the opinion.
Browse the Opinion List area of TBALink. This option will allow you to download the original
version of the opinion.
Click the URL at end of each Opinion paragraph below. This option
will allow you to download the original document.
Lucian T. Pera
Editor-in-Chief, TBALink

THE ESTATE OF VELMA MONROE RUSSELL v. KNOX COUNTY, TENNESSEE
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Samuel W. Brown, Knoxville, Tennessee, for the Appellant, The Estate
of Velma Monroe Russell
Wendell K. Hall, Knoxville, Tennessee, for the Appellee, Knox County,
Tennessee
Judge: GODDARD
First Paragraph:
The Estate of Velma Monroe Russell, which was substituted as a party
Plaintiff after the death of Mrs. Russell after the suit was filed but
prior to trial, sues Knox County for injuries to her as a result of an
automobile accident at a four-way-stop intersection. The Trial Court
found the County was guilty of no negligence proximately causing the
accident and the injuries to Mrs. Russell. We affirm.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/russellvel.wpd
WILLIAM RONALD JORDAN v. STATE OF TENNESSEE
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
Hershell D. Koger, Pulaski, Tennessee (on appeal); and William Bright,
District Public Defender, Pulaski, Tennessee, (at trial) for the
appellant, William Ronald Jordan.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; R. Stephen Jobe,
Assistant Attorney General; Mike Bottoms, District Attorney General;
and Richard Dunavant, Assistant District Attorney General, for the
appellee, State of Tennessee.
Judge: WOODALL
First Paragraph:
The petitioner, William Ronald Jordan, was convicted by a jury in the
Giles County Circuit Court of driving under the influence of an
intoxicant ("DUI") and attempted robbery. The trial court sentenced
Petitioner as a multiple Range II offender to six years for the
attempted robbery conviction and to eleven months and twenty-nine days
for the DUI conviction, with the sentences to be served concurrently.
This court affirmed Petitioner's convictions on direct appeal, and
Petitioner subsequently filed a pro se petition, with two amendments,
for post-conviction relief alleging ineffective assistance of counsel.
The post-conviction court denied Petitioner relief. In this appeal,
Petitioner asserts that he received ineffective assistance of counsel
on the following grounds: (1) counsel failed to submit adequate
evidence at the hearing on his motion to dismiss based upon denial of
his right to a speedy trial; (2) counsel's advice to Petitioner not to
testify at trial deprived him of a jury instruction on renunciation as
a defense; and (3) counsel failed to object when the State filed an
untimely motion for enhanced punishment under Tenn. R. Crim. P. 12.3.
After a review of the record and applicable law, we affirm the
post-conviction court's judgment.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/jordanwr.wpd
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ROBERT LEE PATTEE
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
John P. Cauley, Franklin, Tennessee, (on appeal) and Lionel R.
Barrett, Jr. and Jefre S. Goldtrap, Nashville, Tennessee, (at trial)
for the appellant, Robert Lee Pattee.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; David H. Findley,
Assistant Attorney General; Lawrence Ray Whitley, District Attorney
General; and Wayne Hyatt, Assistant District Attorney General, for the
appellee, State of Tennessee.
Judge: WOODALL
First Paragraph:
The defendant, Robert Lee Pattee, appeals as of right following his
conviction by a jury in the Sumner County Criminal Court for first
degree murder. The trial court sentenced Defendant to life
imprisonment in the Department of Correction. Defendant raises the
following issues in this appeal: (1) whether the trial court erred by
refusing to instruct the jury on the lesser-included offense of
voluntary manslaughter; (2) whether the trial court erred when it
determined Defendant's suicide note was inadmissible at trial; and (3)
whether the evidence of premeditation was sufficient to convict him of
first degree murder. After a thorough review of the record, we affirm
the judgment of the trial court.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/patteerl.wpd
CONCURRING
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/patteerlcon.wpd
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. LINDA GAIL PHILPOT
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
Curtis H. Gann (on appeal) and Andrew Jackson Dearing, (at trial)
Asst. Public Defenders, Shelbyville, Tennessee, for the Appellant,
Linda Gail Philpot.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter, Michael Moore,
Solicitor General, Elizabeth T. Ryan, Assistant Attorney General,
William Michael McCown, District Attorney General, and Michael
Randles, Assistant District Attorney General, for the Appellee, State
of Tennessee.
Judge: HAYES
First Paragraph:
Linda Gail Philpot entered "best interest" pleas to forty-one counts
of forgery. Pursuant to the negotiated plea agreement, Philpot
received an effective sentence of fourteen years. The manner of
service, including entitlement to probation, was submitted to the
trial court. The trial court denied all forms of alternative
sentencing based upon its finding of lack of remorse and poor
prospects for rehabilitation. On appeal, Philpot argues that the
trial court erred in denying an alternative sentence. After review,
we conclude that a sentence of split confinement will best serve the
interests of the public and the Appellant. The judgment, accordingly,
is reversed and remanded for entry of a sentence of split confinement
reflecting a period of thirty-five days confinement in the local jail
or workhouse with the remainder of the effective fourteen-year
sentence to be served on supervised probation.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/philpotlg.wpd

PLEASE FORWARD THIS E-MAIL!
Feel free to forward this Opinion Flash on to anyone you know
of with an e-mail address.
GET A FULL-TEXT COPY OF AN OPINION!
See the intrsuctions at the beginning of this edition of Opinion
Flash.
JOIN TBALink!
While Opinion Flash is a free service of the Tennessee Bar Association,
you must be a subscriber to TBALink, the premier Web site for
Tennessee attorneys, in order to access the full-text of the opinions
or enjoy many other features of TBALink. TBA members may join
TBALink for just $50 per year. To join, go to: http://www.tba.org/join.html/
SUBSCRIBE TO OPINION FLASH!
Would you like to receive the TBALink Opinion Flash free each
day by e-mail? Anyone, whether a TBA member or not, is welcome
to subscribe ... it's free!
For the Plain Text Version:
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: SUBSCRIBE
3) Leave the body of the message blank
For the HTML Text Version:
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: SUBSCRIBE HTML
3) Leave the body of the message blank
UNSUBSCRIBE TO OPINION FLASH? ... SURELY NOT!
To STOP receiving TBALink Opinion-Flash:
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: UNSUBSCRIBE
3) Leave the body of the message blank

     
© Copyright 2001 Tennessee Bar Association
|