|

May 8, 2001
Volume 7 Number 084

What follows is the case style or name, first paragraph, author's
name, and the names of attorneys for the parties of each opinion
released eletronically today to TBALink.
- This Issue (IN THIS ORDER):
-
| 00 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Supreme Court |
| 08 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Supreme Court Workers' Compensation
Panel |
| 00 |
New Document(s) or Proposed Rule(s) from the Tennessee Supreme
Court |
| 02 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Court of Appeals |
| 01 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals |
| 00 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Attorney General (PDF format)
|
| 00 |
New Judicial Ethics Opinion(s) |
| 00 |
New Formal Ethics Opinion(s) from the Board of Professional Responsibility
|
-
There are three ways for TBALink members to get the full-text
versions of these opinions from the Web:
Do a key word search in the Search Link area of TBALink. This option will allow you to view and save
a plain-text version of the opinion.
Browse the Opinion List area of TBALink. This option will allow you to download the original
version of the opinion.
Click the URL at end of each Opinion paragraph below. This option
will allow you to download the original document.
Lucian T. Pera
Editor-in-Chief, TBALink

DANNY BELL v. EMERSON ELECTRIC COMPANY
Court:TSC - Workers Comp Panel
Attorneys:
P. Allen Phillips, Jackson, Tennessee, for the appellant Emerson
Electric Company.
Robert B. Vandiver, Jackson, Tennessee, for the appellee, Danny Bell.
Judge: BYERS
First Paragraph:
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special
Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance
with Tennessee Code Annotated S 50-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and
reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of
law. The trial court found the plaintiff sustained a seven and
one-half percent permanent partial disability to the body as a whole
as a result of an on-the-job injury to his left shoulder. The
defendant says the evidence does not support the finding. We affirm
the judgment of the trial court.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC_WCP/belldan.wpd
FREIDA BOYLE v. THE PROCTER & GAMBLE MANUFACTURING COMPANY
Court:TSC - Workers Comp Panel
Attorneys:
Edwin E. Wallis, Jr. and Beth H. DuPree, Jackson, Tennessee, for the
Appellant, Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Company.
David Hardee, Jackson, Tennessee, for the Appellee, Freida Boyle
Judge: MCGINLEY
First Paragraph:
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special
Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann.
S 50-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting of findings of fact and
conclusions of law. The employer contends the trial court erred in
determining that the employee's injury was causally connected to her
employment and that the employee complied with statutory notice
provision pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. S 550-6-201. It also contends
that the award of 40% permanent partial disability to the body was
excessive. As discussed below, the panel concludes that the judgment
of the trial court should be affirmed.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC_WCP/boylef.wpd
BOBBIE HICKS v. WAUSAU INSURANCE COMPANIES, et al.
Court:TSC - Workers Comp Panel
Attorneys:
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General & Reporter, and E. Blaine Sprouse,
Assistant Attorney General, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellant,
Second Injury Fund.
George E. Morrison, III, Jackson, Tennessee, and Mary Dee Allen,
Cookeville, Tennessee, for the appellee, Bobbie Hicks.
R. Dale Thomas and Michael L. Mansfield, Jackson, Tennessee, for the
appellee, Wausau Insurance Companies.
Judge: LOSER
First Paragraph:
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special
Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance
with Tenn. Code Ann. S 50-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the
Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. In this
appeal, the Second Injury Fund insists (1) the evidence preponderates
against the trial court's finding that the employee suffered a
compensable injury on January 14, 1997, (2) the trial court erred in
admitting into evidence the testimony by deposition of a vocational
expert and (3) the evidence preponderates against the trial court's
finding that the employee is permanently and totally disabled. As
discussed below, the panel has concluded the judgment should be
affirmed.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC_WCP/hicksbobbie.wpd
DONALD L. HUGHES v. MEMPHIS LIGHT, GAS & WATER, et al.
Court:TSC - Workers Comp Panel
Attorneys:
Robert L. J. Spence and Michelle L. Betserai, Memphis, Tennessee, for
the appellant, Memphis Light, Gas & Water.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General & Reporter, and E. Blaine Sprouse,
Assistant Attorney General, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellee,
Second Injury Fund.
R. Sadler Bailey and Andrew C. Clarke, Bailey & Clarke, Memphis,
Tennessee, for the appellee and cross-appellant, Donald L. Hughes.
Judge: LOSER
First Paragraph:
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special
Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance
with Tenn. Code Ann. S 50-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the
Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The
employer insists (1) the trial court erred in finding a causal
connection between the injury and the employment and (2) the trial
court violated Tenn. R. Civ. P. 52.02 by filing findings of fact and
conclusions of law after entry of final judgment. The Second Injury
Fund insists the award of permanent partial disability benefits based
on 85 percent to the body as a whole is excessive. The employee
insists that the Second Injury Fund lacks standing in this tribunal
because it did not file a notice of appeal, that the award is
inadequate and that the appeal is frivolous. As discussed below, the
panel has concluded the judgment should be affirmed.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC_WCP/hughesdonald.wpd
LETA JOHNSON v. HENRY I. SIEGEL CO., INC., et al.
Court:TSC - Workers Comp Panel
Attorneys:
Terry J. Leonard, Camden, Tennessee, for the appellant, Leta Johnson.
Stephen D. Jackson, Huntingdon, Tennessee, for the appellees, Henry I.
Siegel Co., Inc. and Royal Insurance Co.
Judge: CHILDERS
First Paragraph:
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special
Workers' Compensation Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with
Tennessee Code Annotated S 50-6-225(e)(1999) for a hearing and
reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of
law. The appellant presents the following issues for review: Whether
the evidence preponderates against the trial court's determination of
permanent partial disability. After a review of the entire record,
briefs of the parties and applicable law, we affirm the trial court's
judgment.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC_WCP/johnsonleta.wpd
VIKI PARKER v. WAUSAU INSURANCE COMPANIES.
Court:TSC - Workers Comp Panel
Attorneys:
R. Dale Thomas and Michael L. Mansfield, Jackson, Tennessee, for the
appellant, Wausau Insurance Companies.
T. J. Emison, Jr., Alamo, Tennessee, for the appellee, Viki Parker.
Judge: LAFFERTY
First Paragraph:
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special
Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann.
S 50-6-225(e)(3) for a hearing and reporting to the Supreme Court of
findings of fact and conclusions of law. After a detailed analysis of
the evidence in the trial record, the trial court found the plaintiff
sustained a 45 percent permanent partial disability to the right and
left arms. However, the trial court denied the request for a lump
sum. The defendant, Wausau Insurance Companies, appeals and presents
one issue for appellate review: Whether the trial court's award of 45
percent permanent partial disability to each of the plaintiff's arms
is excessive and not supported by a preponderance of the evidence?
From our review of the entire record, the judgment of the trial court
is affirmed for the reasons set forth below.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC_WCP/parkerv.wpd
ALLEN SERATT v. NEO PRODUCTS CORPORATION, et al.
Court:TSC - Workers Comp Panel
Attorneys:
Stephen Craig Kennedy, Selmer, Tennessee, for the appellants, Neo
Products Corporation and State Auto Ins. Co.
David Hardee, Jackson, Tennessee, for the appellee, Allen Seratt.
Judge: BELL
First Paragraph:
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special
Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance
with Tenn. Code Ann. S 50-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the
Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The
defendants Neo Products Corporation and State Auto Insurance Company
appeal the judgment of the Chancery Court of Chester County awarding
plaintiff permanent partial disability of ten (10%) percent to the
body as a whole. For the reasons stated in the opinion we affirm the
judgment.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC_WCP/serattal.wpd
MURIEL C. WARREN v. HENRY I. SIEGEL CO., INC., et al.
Court:TSC - Workers Comp Panel
Attorneys:
Stephen D. Jackson, Huntingdon, Tennessee, for the Appellants, Henry
I. Siegel, et al.
Charles L. Hicks, Camden, Tennessee, for the Appellee, Muriel C.
Warren.
Judge: LAFFERTY
First Paragraph:
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special
Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance
with Tenn. Code Ann. S 50-6-225(e)(3)(2000) for hearing and reporting
to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The
employer has appealed two issues from the trial court: (1) Whether the
ten percent (10%) of the anatomical rating provided by Plaintiff's
evaluating physician should have been assigned to Plaintiff's thumbs
rather than to the arms; and (2) Whether the preponderance of the
evidence supports the trial court's award of ninety percent (90%)
permanent partial disability to the right arm and fifty percent (50%)
permanent partial disability to the left arm. From our review of the
record, we affirm the trial court's judgment.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC_WCP/warrenmc.wpd
LINDA KAY LOVELL GAGE v. RILEY GAGE, JR.
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Harold R. Gunn, Humboldt, Tennessee, for the appellant, Riley Gage,
Jr.
Jere B. Albright, Humboldt, Tennessee, for the appellee, Linda Kay
Lovell Gage.
Judge: LILLARD
First Paragraph:
This is a divorce case. The wife filed for divorce approximately
fourteen months after she moved out of the marital home. The
husband filed an answer and counter-complaint for divorce. The trial
court granted the divorce to the wife and awarded her half of the
value of the husband's pension and alimony in futuro. Husband
appeals. We affirm.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/gagelk.wpd
DANA HOPE DAVIS THURMON (SCOTT), INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SURVIVING NATURAL
PARENT OF DALTON THURMON, A MINOR , et al. v. EDWARD SELLERS, et al.
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Tim Edwards and James F. Horner, Memphis, Tennessee, for the
Appellant, Dana Hope Davis Thurmon Scott.
Charles Abbott, Memphis, Tennessee, for the Appellants, Shane Thurmon
and Tiffany Thurmon.
Mark Ledbetter, Memphis, Tennessee, for the Appellant, Carl J. Fuhs.
Robert L. Moore and John H. Dotson, Memphis, Tennessee, for the
Appellees, Edward D. Sellers and Donald Sellers.
Judge: FARMER
First Paragraph:
This is a personal injury and wrongful death case arising from a
collision between a pickup truck and a tractor trailer truck. The
five-year-old son of plaintiffs Dana Scott and Shane Thurmon died as a
result of the accident. The driver of the car was an "on call"
employee of his father's business at the time. The plaintiffs sued
the driver of the car and his father, alleging vicarious liability
under the doctrine of respondeat superior and under the family purpose
doctrine. Plaintiff Dana Scott also sued for consortium-type damages
for the loss of her son. Although referring to it as a directed
verdict, the trial court, pursuant to Rule 41.02 of the Tennessee
Rules of Civil Procedure, entered an involuntary dismissal in favor of
the defendants on the vicarious liability issue, under both respondeat
superior and the family purpose doctrine, and on the loss of filial
consortium claim. The trial court awarded damages, inter alia, to
Dana Scott for the wrongful death of her son and to Carl Fuhs for
personal injuries based upon his negligent infliction of emotional
distress claim. We hold the following: (1) employer is not
vicariously liable under the doctrine of respondeat superior for acts
or omissions of "on call" employee when employee is not acting within
the course and scope of his employment; (2) the requirements of the
family purpose doctrine were met and defendant Donald Sellers, Sr. is
vicariously liable under this theory; (3) parents may recover filial
consortium damages in wrongful death actions for the death of their
child; (4) the trial court's wrongful death award to Dana Scott was
supported by the evidence; (5) Carl Fuhs sufficiently established a
claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress; and (6) the
personal injury award to Carl Fuhs is affirmed.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/thurmondana.wpd
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MICHAEL A. MILLER
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
John B. Nisbet, III; David N. Brady, District Public Defender; and
Cynthia Lyons, Assistant District Public Defender, Cookeville,
Tennessee (on appeal) and Anthony Turner, Crossville, Tennessee (at
trial) for the appellant, Michael A. Miller.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Patricia C. Kussmann,
Assistant Attorney General; William Edward Gibson, District Attorney
General; and Anthony J. Craighead, Assistant District Attorney
General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee.
Judge: GLENN
First Paragraph:
The defendant was convicted in the Cumberland County Criminal Court of
aggravated sexual battery of a seven-year-old boy. Following the
trial court's denial of his motion for a new trial, the defendant
filed an appeal as of right to this court, raising three issues: (1)
whether the evidence was sufficient for a rational trier of fact to
find him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of aggravated sexual
battery; (2) whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying
his motion for a new trial, based upon newly discovered evidence; and
(3) whether the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury on
lesser-included offenses. Based upon our review, we affirm the
judgment of the trial court.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/millerma.wpd

PLEASE FORWARD THIS E-MAIL!
Feel free to forward this Opinion Flash on to anyone you know
of with an e-mail address.
GET A FULL-TEXT COPY OF AN OPINION!
See the intrsuctions at the beginning of this edition of Opinion
Flash.
JOIN TBALink!
While Opinion Flash is a free service of the Tennessee Bar Association,
you must be a subscriber to TBALink, the premier Web site for
Tennessee attorneys, in order to access the full-text of the opinions
or enjoy many other features of TBALink. TBA members may join
TBALink for just $50 per year. To join, go to: http://www.tba.org/join.html/
SUBSCRIBE TO OPINION FLASH!
Would you like to receive the TBALink Opinion Flash free each
day by e-mail? Anyone, whether a TBA member or not, is welcome
to subscribe ... it's free!
For the Plain Text Version:
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: SUBSCRIBE
3) Leave the body of the message blank
For the HTML Text Version:
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: SUBSCRIBE HTML
3) Leave the body of the message blank
UNSUBSCRIBE TO OPINION FLASH? ... SURELY NOT!
To STOP receiving TBALink Opinion-Flash:
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: UNSUBSCRIBE
3) Leave the body of the message blank

     
© Copyright 2001 Tennessee Bar Association
|