|

May 11, 2001
Volume 7 Number 087

What follows is the case style or name, first paragraph, author's
name, and the names of attorneys for the parties of each opinion
released eletronically today to TBALink.
- This Issue (IN THIS ORDER):
-
| 00 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Supreme Court |
| 01 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Supreme Court Workers' Compensation
Panel |
| 00 |
New Document(s) or Proposed Rule(s) from the Tennessee Supreme
Court |
| 01 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Court of Appeals |
| 02 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals |
| 00 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Attorney General (PDF format)
|
| 00 |
New Judicial Ethics Opinion(s) |
| 00 |
New Formal Ethics Opinion(s) from the Board of Professional Responsibility
|
-
There are three ways for TBALink members to get the full-text
versions of these opinions from the Web:
Do a key word search in the Search Link area of TBALink. This option will allow you to view and save
a plain-text version of the opinion.
Browse the Opinion List area of TBALink. This option will allow you to download the original
version of the opinion.
Click the URL at end of each Opinion paragraph below. This option
will allow you to download the original document.
Lucian T. Pera
Editor-in-Chief, TBALink

ARLANDA HAYNES v. STEEL FABRICATORS, INC., et al.
Court:TSC - Workers Comp Panel
Attorneys:
Gayden Drew, IV, Jackson, Tennessee, for the appellant, Arlanda
Haynes.
William F. Kendall, III and B. Duane Willis, Jackson, Tennessee, for
the appellee, Steel Fabricators, Inc.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter and E. Blaine Sprouse,
Assistant Attorney General, for the appellee, James Farmer, Director
of the Division of Workers' Compensation, Tennessee Department of
Labor, Second Injury Fund.
Judge: DORAN
First Paragraph:
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special
Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance
with Tennessee Code Annotated S 50-6 225(e)(1999) for hearing and
reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of
law. The appellant presents the following issues for review: (1) Does
the evidence preponderate against the trial court's ruling that the
plaintiff failed to give proper notice to his employer of his
gradually occurring injury to his right arm and back?; (2) Does the
evidence preponderate against the trial court's ruling that the
plaintiff has no permanent disability? After a review of the entire
record, briefs of the parties and applicable law, we affirm the trial
court's judgment.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC_WCP/haynesa.wpd
MARTIN E. WALKER v. HOWARD CARLTON, et al.
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Martin E. Walker, Mountain City, Tennessee, Appellant, Pro Se
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter, Michael Moore,
Solicitor General, and Pamela S. Lorch, Assistant Attorney General,
Nashville, Tennessee, for the Appellees, Howard Carlton, Bobby Colson,
Harold Angel, Jim Rose, Jeff Tester, and Tennessee Department of
Corrections
No Representation on Appeal by American Correctional Association
Judge: GODDARD
First Paragraph:
The Plaintiff, an inmate of the Penal System of this State, sues
various prison officials and the American Correctional Association for
damages incident to other inmates stealing his property and assaulting
him. The Trial Court dismissed the case as to all Defendants. We
affirm under the authority granted by Rule 10 of this Court.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/walkermar.wpd
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. RONNIE LAMAR EVANS
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Patricia C. Kussman,
Assistant Attorney General; William H. Cox, III, District Attorney
General; and C. Parke Masterson, Jr., Assistant District Attorney
General, for the appellant, State of Tennessee.
Lloyd A. Levitt, Chattanooga, Tennessee, for the appellee, Ronnie
Lamar Evans.
Judge: MCGEE OGLE
First Paragraph:
The appellant, State of Tennessee, charged the defendant, Ronnie Lamar
Evans, with driving under the influence (DUI), fourth offense. Prior
to trial, a dispute arose about whether the defendant's prior DUI
convictions are elements of the charged offense that should be proven
during the State's case- in-chief or whether evidence of the
defendant's prior DUI convictions should only be brought before the
jury during the second, or enhancement, phase of a bifurcated trial.
This court granted the State's application for an interlocutory appeal
on this issue. The State now raises the following issues for our
review: (1) whether prior DUI convictions are to be used only to
enhance a sentence and are not elements of DUI, fourth offense; (2)
whether a felony DUI trial should be bifurcated into separate phases
as required by Tenn. Code Ann. S 40-35-203 (1997); and (3) whether the
trial court should make a finding prior to trial as to the number of
applicable prior offenses in order to determine the number of jury
challenges each side may exercise and how the jury should be
instructed. Upon review of the record and the parties' briefs, we
affirm the judgment of the trial court.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/evansrl.wpd
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. BILLY JOE PHILLIPS, a.k.a. BILLY JOE WEST,
a.k.a. JOSEPH L. PHILLIPS, a.k.a. JOHN DOE
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
Joe H. Walker, District Public Defender; Walter B. Johnson II,
Assistant District Public Defender (on appeal); Roland Cowden,
Assistant District Public Defender (at trial), for the appellant,
Billy Joe Phillips.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Patricia C. Kussman,
Assistant Attorney General; J. Scott McCluen, District Attorney
General; and D. Roger Delp, Assistant District Attorney General, for
the appellee, State of Tennessee.
Judge: WILLIAMS
First Paragraph:
The defendant was convicted by a jury of one count of driving while
his driver's license was revoked, one count of criminal impersonation,
and was found guilty of violating the implied consent law. The
defendant claims there was insufficient evidence introduced to support
his convictions. After a careful review, we affirm the defendant's
conviction of criminal impersonation and reverse and dismiss the
defendant's conviction for driving on a revoked driver's license.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/phillipsbj.wpd

PLEASE FORWARD THIS E-MAIL!
Feel free to forward this Opinion Flash on to anyone you know
of with an e-mail address.
GET A FULL-TEXT COPY OF AN OPINION!
See the intrsuctions at the beginning of this edition of Opinion
Flash.
JOIN TBALink!
While Opinion Flash is a free service of the Tennessee Bar Association,
you must be a subscriber to TBALink, the premier Web site for
Tennessee attorneys, in order to access the full-text of the opinions
or enjoy many other features of TBALink. TBA members may join
TBALink for just $50 per year. To join, go to: http://www.tba.org/join.html/
SUBSCRIBE TO OPINION FLASH!
Would you like to receive the TBALink Opinion Flash free each
day by e-mail? Anyone, whether a TBA member or not, is welcome
to subscribe ... it's free!
For the Plain Text Version:
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: SUBSCRIBE
3) Leave the body of the message blank
For the HTML Text Version:
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: SUBSCRIBE HTML
3) Leave the body of the message blank
UNSUBSCRIBE TO OPINION FLASH? ... SURELY NOT!
To STOP receiving TBALink Opinion-Flash:
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: UNSUBSCRIBE
3) Leave the body of the message blank

     
© Copyright 2001 Tennessee Bar Association
|