|

May 23, 2001
Volume 7 Number 094

What follows is the case style or name, first paragraph, author's
name, and the names of attorneys for the parties of each opinion
released eletronically today to TBALink.
- This Issue (IN THIS ORDER):
-
| 00 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Supreme Court |
| 00 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Supreme Court Workers' Compensation
Panel |
| 00 |
New Document(s) or Proposed Rule(s) from the Tennessee Supreme
Court |
| 06 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Court of Appeals |
| 02 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals |
| 04 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Attorney General (PDF format)
|
| 00 |
New Judicial Ethics Opinion(s) |
| 00 |
New Formal Ethics Opinion(s) from the Board of Professional Responsibility
|
-
There are three ways for TBALink members to get the full-text
versions of these opinions from the Web:
Do a key word search in the Search Link area of TBALink. This option will allow you to view and save
a plain-text version of the opinion.
Browse the Opinion List area of TBALink. This option will allow you to download the original
version of the opinion.
Click the URL at end of each Opinion paragraph below. This option
will allow you to download the original document.
Lucian T. Pera
Editor-in-Chief, TBALink

MICHAEL RAY BRENNEMAN v. MARGARET ANN REDD BRENNEMAN
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Clark Lee Shaw, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Margaret Ann
Redd Brenneman.
James B. Dance, Carthage, Tennessee, for the appellee, Michael Ray
Brenneman.
Judge: KOCH
First Paragraph:
This appeal involves the dissolution of a 31-year marriage by the
Circuit Court for Wilson County. Following a bench trial, the trial
court declared the parties divorced and divided their marital property
but declined to award the wife spousal support. On this appeal, the
wife asserts that the trial court erred by declining to grant her
spousal support. We have determined that the trial court placed too
much emphasis on the value of the wife's share of the marital estate
when it declined to grant her spousal support. Accordingly, we have
determined that the judgment should be amended to award the wife
spousal support in the amount of $200 per month until she reaches
sixty-five years of age. We also remand the case to the trial court
to calculate a reasonable award for the wife's legal expenses.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/brennemanmr.wpd
FRANKLIN COUNTY, TENNESSEE v. THE TOWN OF MONTEAGLE, TENNESSEE, et al.
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
William C. Killian, Jasper, Tennessee, and David B. Hamilton,
Knoxville, Tennessee, for the appellant, The Town of Monteagle,
Tennessee and Michael Yarworth, Judith Gunn, Maxine Kemmerly, Thomas
Moore, Sr., and Glenn King, in their official capacities as Members of
the Grundy County Election Commission.
Ben P. Lynch, Winchester, Tennessee, and Carrol D. Kilgore, Nashville,
Tennessee, for the appellee, Franklin County, Tennessee.
Judge: INMAN
First Paragraph:
This is an annexation by referendum case. Monteagle is located in
Grundy County. Its corporate limits extend to Franklin County.
Interested residents of the area sought to be annexed in Franklin
County petitioned Monteagle to be annexed. Monteagle adopted a
Resolution for the referendum. Nineteen out of twenty eligible voters
favored annexation. Franklin County filed a complaint for injunctive
relief, which was granted upon a finding that the Resolution was not
properly published. Monteagle appealed, but in the interim, adopted
another Resolution for a referendum. The voters again favored
annexation. The County challenged the second referendum by a Rule 52
motion alleging that Monteagle repealed the Resolution for the second
referendum thus making it a nullity.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/franklincounty.wpd
IN THE MATTER OF JUSTIN IVORY JONES ROCHELLE MCDONALD v. PERCY L. JONES
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Gail W. Horner, Germantown, For Appellant, Rochelle McDonald
Melanie E Taylor, Memphis, For Appellee, Percy L. Jones
Judge: CRAWFORD
First Paragraph:
This is an appeal of an order changing custody of the parties' minor
child. Father filed a petition for change of custody, alleging that
the change was in the best interests of the child. The juvenile
court, upon rehearing of father's petition to change custody,
reconfirmed the original order changing custody to the father. Mother
appeals. We reverse the order of the juvenile court and hold that
custody of the minor child be returned to his mother.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/jonesjus.wpd
ROBERT J. McCURLEY, et al. v. HAROLD ANGUS, et al.
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
John Van den Bosch, Jr., Jesse H. Ford, III, Jackson, for Appellants
Phillip L. Davidson, Nashville, for Appellee
Judge: HIGHERS
First Paragraph:
This is an action in negligence arising out of the demolition by the
Appellee of a condemned building in Jackson, Tennessee pursuant to a
contract with the city of Jackson. The demolished building was
located adjacent to the Appellants' building, and the two buildings
shared a party wall. The Appellants' building sustained damages as a
result of the demolition of the condemned building. The Appellants
brought a complaint against the Appellee in the Circuit Court of
Madison County, alleging negligence on the part of the Appellee. The
jury found in favor of the Appellee.
The Appellants appeal from the entry of a jury verdict in favor of the
Appellee. For the reasons stated herein, we affirm the trial court's
decision.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/mccurleyrobertj.wpd
JAMES C. PYBURN, et al. v. BILL HEARD CHEVROLET
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
James W. Cameron, III, and Alexandra Coulter Cross, Nashville,
Tennessee, for the Appellant Bill Heard Chevrolet.
Douglas S. Johnston, Jr., and George E. Barrett, Nashville, Tennessee,
John W. Barrett and Charles Barrett, Lexington, Mississippi, and Tom
Scott, Knoxville, Tennessee, for the Appellee James C. Pyburn.
Judge: SWINEY
First Paragraph:
James C. Pyburn ("Plaintiff") filed a complaint styled "Class Action
Complaint" against Bill Heard Chevrolet ("Defendant") arising from
Plaintiff's purchase of a 1999 Chevrolet van. Plaintiff claims he was
told by Defendant that it could arrange financing through General
Motors Acceptance Corporation ("GMAC") at competitive rates offered by
GMAC. Plaintiff alleges that he did not obtain GMAC's real interest
rate, but instead received a "secretly inflated" interest rate, and
that Defendant was paid a kickback on the interest rate over and above
the lender's real interest rate. Plaintiff sued pursuant to the
Tennessee Consumer Protection Act ("TCPA"), T.C.A. S 47-18-101, et
seq., and also asserted several common law theories of recovery. At
the time of the purchase, Plaintiff and Defendant executed an
Arbitration Agreement ("Agreement") covering the claims currently
asserted by Plaintiff. Defendant moved to compel arbitration pursuant
to the Federal Arbitration Act ("FAA"), 9 U.S.C. S 2. The Trial Court
held that the FAA applied, that the Agreement did not need separate
consideration to be enforceable, that it was not an unenforceable
adhesion contract, and that TCPA claims in general were amenable to
arbitration under the FAA. The Trial Court further held, however,
that this particular Agreement was not enforceable because of the
unavailability of class action or injunctive relief in an arbitral
forum, and because the costs of arbitration were "potentially
prohibitive" since Plaintiff's claims were so small. We reverse the
Trial Court's holding that the Agreement is not enforceable.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/pyburnjc.wpd
MELISSA JANE (NICHOLS) STEEN v. EVANS HARRINGTON STEEN
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Michael W. Binkley, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Melissa
Jane (Nichols) Steen.
Mary Arline Evans and John Michael Garrett, Nashville, Tennessee, for
the appellee, Evans Harrington Steen.
Judge: CANTRELL
First Paragraph:
In this custody case the General Sessions Court of Wilson County
changed its custody order from joint care and control with primary
custody in the father to exclusive custody in the father and standard
visitation to the mother. The record shows, however, that the mother
has had primary custody of the children since the divorce and that
both parties are fit parents. They each love the children and take
good care of them. Under those circumstances, we hold that there is a
presumption in favor of continuity of placement. Therefore, we
reverse the lower court's order and grant primary custody to the
mother.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/steenmj.wpd
ALAN HALL v. STATE OF TENNESSEE
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
Alan Hall, Mountain City, Tennessee, pro se.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Mark E. Davidson,
Assistant Attorney General; and H. Greeley Wells, Jr., District
Attorney General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee.
Judge: MCGEE OGLE
First Paragraph:
On April 30, 1996, the petitioner, Alan Hall, pled guilty in the
Sullivan County Criminal Court to first degree murder, especially
aggravated robbery, especially aggravated burglary, aggravated
burglary, theft over $1000, and possession of burglary tools. The
petitioner received a total effective sentence of life plus twelve
years. Subsequently, on September 15, 1999, the trial court entered
an order correcting the petitioner's judgment of conviction for
especially aggravated robbery to reflect that the petitioner would
serve one hundred percent (100%) of his sentence in confinement
instead of thirty percent (30%) as was erroneously reflected on the
original judgment. Within a year after the entry of the corrected
judgment, the petitioner filed a pro se petition for post-conviction
relief. The post-conviction court dismissed the petition as being
barred by the statute of limitations. On appeal, the petitioner
contests the dismissal of his petition for post-conviction relief.
Upon review of the record and the parties' briefs, we affirm the
judgment of the post-conviction court.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/halla.wpd
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. DENNIS R. JACKS
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
J. Thomas Marshall, Jr., District Public Defender, and Nancy Carol
Meyer, Assistant Public Defender, for the appellant, Dennis R. Jacks.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Elizabeth B. Marney,
Assistant Attorney General; James N. Ramsey, District Attorney
General; and Janice G. Hicks, Assistant District Attorney General, for
the appellee, State of Tennessee.
Judge: TIPTON
First Paragraph:
The defendant appeals from the revocation of his probation, contesting
the trial court's jurisdiction. We affirm the judgment of the trial
court.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/Jacksdr.wpd
County Highway Department's Responsibility for Private Bridge Repairs
Date: May 17, 2001
Opinion Number: 01-080
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/AG/OP80.pdf
Review of judicial commissioner appointment and powers
Date: May 18, 2001
Opinion Number: 01-081
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/AG/OP81.pdf
Authority of civil court trial judges to include the expense of jury
members' meals in the assessment of discretionary costs
Date: May 18, 2001
Opinion Number: 01-082
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/AG/OP82.pdf
"Consulting Services" under Senate Bill 239/House Bill 344
Date: May 22, 2001
Opinion Number: 01-083
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/AG/OP83.pdf

PLEASE FORWARD THIS E-MAIL!
Feel free to forward this Opinion Flash on to anyone you know
of with an e-mail address.
GET A FULL-TEXT COPY OF AN OPINION!
See the intrsuctions at the beginning of this edition of Opinion
Flash.
JOIN TBALink!
While Opinion Flash is a free service of the Tennessee Bar Association,
you must be a subscriber to TBALink, the premier Web site for
Tennessee attorneys, in order to access the full-text of the opinions
or enjoy many other features of TBALink. TBA members may join
TBALink for just $50 per year. To join, go to: http://www.tba.org/join.html/
SUBSCRIBE TO OPINION FLASH!
Would you like to receive the TBALink Opinion Flash free each
day by e-mail? Anyone, whether a TBA member or not, is welcome
to subscribe ... it's free!
For the Plain Text Version:
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: SUBSCRIBE
3) Leave the body of the message blank
For the HTML Text Version:
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: SUBSCRIBE HTML
3) Leave the body of the message blank
UNSUBSCRIBE TO OPINION FLASH? ... SURELY NOT!
To STOP receiving TBALink Opinion-Flash:
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: UNSUBSCRIBE
3) Leave the body of the message blank

     
© Copyright 2001 Tennessee Bar Association
|