|

July 23, 2001
Volume 7 Number 133

What follows is the case style or name, first paragraph, author's
name, and the names of attorneys for the parties of each opinion
released eletronically today to TBALink.
- This Issue (IN THIS ORDER):
-
| 00 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Supreme Court |
| 00 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Supreme Court Workers' Compensation
Panel |
| 00 |
New Document(s) or Proposed Rule(s) from the Tennessee Supreme
Court |
| 07 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Court of Appeals |
| 04 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals |
| 00 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Attorney General (PDF format)
|
| 00 |
New Judicial Ethics Opinion(s) |
| 00 |
New Formal Ethics Opinion(s) from the Board of Professional Responsibility
|
-
There are three ways for TBALink members to get the full-text
versions of these opinions from the Web:
Do a key word search in the Search Link area of TBALink. This option will allow you to view and save
a plain-text version of the opinion.
Browse the Opinion List area of TBALink. This option will allow you to download the original
version of the opinion.
Click the URL at end of each Opinion paragraph below. This option
will allow you to download the original document.
Howard H. Vogel
Knoxville, Tennessee
Editor-in-Chief, TBALink

CHARLES DOSS, et al. v. GRACE T. SAWYERS
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
J. Arnold Fitzgerald, Dayton, Tennessee, for the Appellant, Grace T.
Sawyers
Steven D. Brown, Dayton, Tennessee, for the Appellee, Robert Doss
Judge: GODDARD
First Paragraph:
This is a suit wherein the Plaintiffs seek to remove a cloud in the
form of a purchase agreement from the title of property owned by the
Plaintiffs. The Trial Court found that the purchase agreement was
invalid because of lack of mental capacity of the then owner, Charles
Doss, to sign the agreement, and awarded a judgment in the amount of
$6900 to the Defendant for payments made under the agreement. We
reverse the judgment of the Court relative to the invalidity of the
purchase agreement and, in accordance with the prayer of the
counter-complaint, order that the property be conveyed by the Clerk
and Master to the Defendant subject to payment of the balance owed on
the property as determined upon remand.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/dosscha.wpd
IN RE: ESTATE OF JOHN D. GOODIN
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Joel A. Conkin and Tara B. Hinkle, Kingsport, Tennessee, for the
Appellant, Shriner's Hospitals for Children.
John E. Sanders, Johnson City, Tennessee, for the Appellee, David
Goodin; John L. Bowers, III, Elizabethton, Tennessee, and T.J. Little,
Elizabethton, Tennessee, for the Appellee, Dee Goodin Couch; Bonnie
Webster, Johnson City, Tennessee, and Jack Carrier, Johnson City,
Tennessee, for the Appellee, John W. Goodin.
Judge: SWINEY
First Paragraph:
In this will construction case, the children of John B. Goodin
("Children") and Shriner's Hospitals for Children ("Shriner's
Hospitals"), a charity named as a beneficiary in Goodin's will
("Will"), are disputing Goodin's intent expressed in his Will,
including the residuary clause, Article XI. The value of specific
bequests to the Children far exceed the applicable state and federal
estate tax exemption limit of $650,000. Article XI, however, provides
that the charities named in the Will ("Charities"), including
Shriner's Hospitals, would receive "the sum of $25,000 or an amount
necessary to reduce [Goodin's] estate . . . to be a non taxable
estate, whichever amount is greater. . . ." The Trial Court held that
since Goodin's paramount intent was to provide for his Children, the
specific bequests to his Children take precedence over Article XI's
bequest to the Charities. Shriner's Hospitals appeals. We affirm as
modified.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/goodinjd.wpd
SHARON FAYE BROWN HARTMAN v. LEONARD LEE HARTMAN
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Jerry W. Laughlin, Greeneville, Tennessee, for the Appellant, Leonard
Lee Hartman.
Mark D. Slagle, Johnson City, Tennessee, for the Appellee, Sharon Faye
Brown Hartman.
Judge: SWINEY
First Paragraph:
In this divorce action, Leonard Lee Hartman ("Defendant"), appeals the
Trial Court's award of alimony in futuro to Sharon Faye Brown Hartman
("Plaintiff"), in the amount of $800 per month for twenty years or
remarriage, whichever occurs first. Defendant does not dispute the
Trial Court's determination that Plaintiff can not be economically
rehabilitated. We affirm.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/hartmansfb.wpd
KAREN GARRETT HUMPHRIES v. DAVID ALISON HUMPHRIES
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
David S. Haynes, Bristol, Tennessee, for the appellant, David Alison
Humphries.
Robert D. Arnold, Johnson City, Tennessee, for the appellee, Karen
Garrett Humphries.
Judge: SUSANO
First Paragraph:
In this divorce case, the trial court classified the parties'
property, following which it divided the marital property, but
declined to order spousal support. The husband appeals, arguing (1)
that the trial court erred in classifying the increase in value of his
separate property as marital property; (2) that the division of the
marital property was not equitable; and (3) that the trial court erred
in assigning, without classifying, the wife's credit card debt to the
husband. By way of a separate issue, the wife argues that she is
entitled to an award of alimony. We affirm.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/humphrieskg.wpd
WILLIAM P. LIVINGSTON, JR. v. MIKE HAYES, et al.
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
William P. Livingston, Jr., Mountain City, Tennessee, Appellant, Pro Se
Earl Jerome Melson, Knoxville, Tennessee, for the Appellee, Joel Seal.
Gary Prince, Knoxville, Tennessee, for the Appellees, Mike Hayes and
Charles Long.
William O. Foutch, Morristown, Tennessee, for the Appellees, Jack
Fishman, Lakeway Publishers, inc., Citizen Tribune and Robert Moore.
Judge: GODDARD
First Paragraph:
In this appeal from the Circuit Court for Hamblen County, the
Plaintiff/Appellant, William P. Livingston, Jr., questions whether the
Trial Court erred in entering a summary judgment dismissing his action
for libel against the Defendants/Appellees, Mike Hayes, et al. We
affirm the judgment of the Trial Court and remand for collection of
costs below. We adjudge costs of the appeal against Mr. Livingston
and his surety.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/livingstonwil.wpd
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. LARRY D. UPSHAW
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Leslie M. Jeffress, Knoxville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Larry D.
Upshaw.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General & Reporter; Peter M. Coughlan,
Assistant Attorney General; and Robert L. Jolley, Jr., Assistant
District Attorney General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee.
Judge: WADE
First Paragraph:
The defendant, Larry D. Upshaw, was convicted of second degree murder.
The trial court imposed a sentence of 38 years in the Department of
Correction. The sole issue on appeal is whether the evidence was
sufficient to support his conviction for second degree murder. The
judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/upshawlarryd.wpd
DAVID MELVIN YORK and wife, MARILYN YORK v. VULCAN MATERIALS CO., v.
TRANSCONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Craig R. Allen and John M. Hull, Chattanooga, Tennessee, for
Appellant.
Tom Williams and William H. Webb, Chattanooga, for Appellee.
Judge: FRANKS
First Paragraph:
Contractor sought recovery from subcontractor's insurance carrier for
moneys paid to a third party who had sued contractor and subcontractor
in tort. The Trial Court ordered recovery under the policy.
Insurance Company appealed. We affirm.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/yorkd.wpd
TRACY LAMAR BELLE, SR. v. STATE OF TENNESSEE
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
Tracy Lamar Belle, Sr., pro se.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General & Reporter; John H. Bledsoe,
Assistant Attorney General; Randy Nichols, District Attorney General;
Robert L. Jolley, Jr., and John Gill, Assistant District Attorneys
General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee.
Judge: WADE
First Paragraph:
The petitioner, Tracy Lamar Belle, Sr., appeals the denial of
post-conviction relief contending that his right to due process has
been violated by the application of the statute of limitations.
Because the notice of appeal was not timely filed and because "the
interest of justice" does not require the waiver of a timely notice,
this appeal is dismissed. See Tenn. R. App. P. 4(a).
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/belletracyl.wpd
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JOHN ROBERT BENTON
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
Edward C. Miller, District Public Defender; and Susanna Thomas,
Assistant Public Defender, Newport, Tennessee, for the appellant, John
Robert Benton.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Angele M. Gregory,
Assistant Attorney General; Al C. Schmutzer, Jr., District Attorney
General; and Ronald C. Newcomb, Assistant District Attorney General,
for the appellee, State of Tennessee.
Judge: WOODALL
First Paragraph:
The defendant, John Robert Benton, pled guilty in the Cocke County
Criminal Court to burglary, Tenn. Code Ann. S 39-14-402(a)(1), and
vandalism, Tenn. Code Ann. S 39-14-408, both Class D felonies. He
also pled guilty to theft of property less than five hundred dollars
($500), a Class A misdemeanor. Thereafter, the trial court sentenced
Defendant as a Range I standard offender to terms of four years for
each of the felony convictions and eleven months and twenty-nine days
for the misdemeanor offense. On appeal, Defendant raises the
following issues: (1) whether the trial court erred by failing to
apply an appropriate mitigating factor and by improperly enhancing
Defendant's sentences for his felony convictions, and (2) whether the
trial court erred when it failed to address the criteria set forth in
Tenn. Code Ann. S 40-35-103 concerning alternative sentencing. After
a review of the record, we affirm the judgment of the trial court as
modified.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/bentonjr.wpd
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JERRY FLOYD CALDWELL
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
John Philip Parsons, Cookeville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Jerry
Floyd Caldwell.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Jennifer L. Bledsoe,
Assistant Attorney General; and John A. Moore, Assistant District
Attorney General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee.
Judge: LAFFERTY
First Paragraph:
After trial, a Putnam County jury found Defendant guilty of the
unlawful possession of a controlled substance, to wit: cocaine over .5
grams, for resale, driving under the influence of an intoxicant, the
unlawful possession of drug paraphernalia, and evading arrest.
Further, the jury determined Defendant should pay fines of $100,000,
$2,500, $2,500, and $1,500 for each respective offense. Subject to a
sentencing agreement, the trial court imposed a sentence of nine (9)
years on the cocaine offense and 11 months and 29 days for each
misdemeanor. The trial court ordered the sentences to be served
concurrently and imposed judgment for the fines in accordance with the
verdict of the jury. Defendant presents two appellate issues: (1)
Whether there is sufficient evidence to convict Defendant of sale of
cocaine over 0.5 grams, driving under the influence and possession of
drug paraphernalia?; and (2) Whether Defendant's fines are excessive?
After a review of the entire record, briefs of the parties and
applicable law, we affirm the trial court's judgment.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/caldwelljf.wpd
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ANTHONY REID
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
William J. Brown, Cleveland, Tennessee, for the appellant, Anthony
Reid.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Peter M. Coughlan,
Assistant Attorney General; Jerry Estes, District Attorney General;
Carl Petty, Assistant District Attorney General; and Steven Crump,
Assistant District Attorney General, for the appellee, State of
Tennessee.
Judge: WOODALL
First Paragraph:
The defendant, Anthony Reid, was convicted by a Bradley County jury of
first degree felony murder and especially aggravated robbery, Class A
felonies, aggravated robbery, a Class B felony, attempted aggravated
robbery, a Class C felony, and evading arrest, a Class E felony.
Thereafter, the trial court sentenced Defendant to life imprisonment
for his first degree murder conviction, twenty-five years for his
especially aggravated robbery conviction, ten years for his aggravated
robbery conviction, six years for his attempted aggravated robbery
conviction, and two years for evading arrest. The trial court further
ordered Defendant's sentence for life imprisonment to be served
consecutively to his other four sentences, which were ordered to be
served concurrently with each other, for an effective sentence of life
plus twenty-five years. On appeal, Defendant contends that his
convictions cannot stand because the State failed to comply with the
mandatory procedures concerning proper presentation and filing of the
indictment in his case as required by statute, and the trial court
erred by refusing Defendant's request for a mistrial after the State
improperly solicited testimony concerning the fact that Defendant
invoked his right to remain silent upon arrest. Defendant also
alleges that the trial court erred by imposing consecutive sentences.
Following a review of the record, we affirm the judgment of the trial
court.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/reida.wpd

PLEASE FORWARD THIS E-MAIL!
Feel free to forward this Opinion Flash on to anyone you know
of with an e-mail address.
GET A FULL-TEXT COPY OF AN OPINION!
See the intrsuctions at the beginning of this edition of Opinion
Flash.
JOIN TBALink!
While Opinion Flash is a free service of the Tennessee Bar Association,
you must be a subscriber to TBALink, the premier Web site for
Tennessee attorneys, in order to access the full-text of the opinions
or enjoy many other features of TBALink. TBA members may join
TBALink for just $50 per year. To join, go to: http://www.tba.org/join.html/
SUBSCRIBE TO OPINION FLASH!
Would you like to receive the TBALink Opinion Flash free each
day by e-mail? Anyone, whether a TBA member or not, is welcome
to subscribe ... it's free!
For the Plain Text Version:
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: SUBSCRIBE
3) Leave the body of the message blank
For the HTML Text Version:
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: SUBSCRIBE HTML
3) Leave the body of the message blank
UNSUBSCRIBE TO OPINION FLASH? ... SURELY NOT!
To STOP receiving TBALink Opinion-Flash:
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: UNSUBSCRIBE
3) Leave the body of the message blank

     
© Copyright 2001 Tennessee Bar Association
|