|

August 14, 2001
Volume 7 Number148

What follows is the case style or name, first paragraph, author's name, and the names of attorneys for the parties of each opinion released eletronically today to TBALink.
- This Issue (IN THIS ORDER):
-
-
| 00 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Supreme Court |
| 00 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Supreme Court Workers' Compensation Panel |
| 00 |
New Document(s) or Proposed Rule(s) from the Tennessee Supreme Court |
| 09 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Court of Appeals |
| 19 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals |
| 05 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Attorney General (PDF format) |
| 00 |
New Judicial Ethics Opinion(s) |
| 00 |
New Formal Ethics Opinion(s) from the Board of Professional Responsibility |
-
There are three ways for TBALink members to get the full-text versions of these opinions from the Web:
Do a key word search in the Search Link area of TBALink. This option will allow you to view and save a plain-text version of the opinion.
Browse the Opinion List area of TBALink. This option will allow you to download the original version of the opinion.
Click the URL at end of each Opinion paragraph below. This option will allow you to download the original document.
Howard H. Vogel
Knoxville, Tennessee
Editor-in-Chief, TBALink

J. HOWARD GREGG v. JACK JOHNSON
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Ashley L. Ownby, Cleveland, Tennessee, for the Appellant, Jack
Johnson.
Roger E. Jenne, Cleveland, Tennessee, for the Appellee, J. Howard
Gregg.
Judge: SWINEY
First Paragraph:
J. Howard Gregg ("Plaintiff"), sued his former business partner, Jack
Johnson ("Defendant"), essentially alleging that Defendant breached an
agreement to pay a debt originally incurred by their former
partnership, Jack Johnson Motors. Plaintiff also alleged that
Defendant owed him money as part of their partnership ("Partnership")
dissolution agreement. Neither the Partnership agreement nor the
dissolution agreement was written. Defendant raises as defenses the
statute of limitations and the Statute of Frauds. The Trial Court
held in favor of Plaintiff. Defendant appeals. We affirm.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/greggjhoward.wpd
PATSY HILL OAKLEY v. JAMES SPENCER OAKLEY
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
David E. Caywood and Cynthia L. McLendon, Memphis, Tennessee, for the
appellant, James Spencer Oakley.
James O. Parker and Sam Blaiss, Memphis, Tennessee, for the appellee,
Patsy Hill Oakley.
Judge: FARMER
First Paragraph:
This appeal arises from a divorce action. Husband and Wife divorced
after 22 years of marriage. Both had received property by bequest
during the marriage. Husband had received stocks and securities, real
property, and Company, which he owned and operated. Wife received
property which she subsequently sold. The proceeds of these sales
were deposited in a separate investment account after first passing
through a marital checking account and were later used to buy Condo.
The trial court specifically found that Wife had not substantially
contributed to appreciation of stocks and securities, but awarded her
25% of their appreciation. The appreciation of Husband's real
property was found to be marital property, as well as the entire value
of Company. Wife's Condo was found to be separate property. We
affirm in part, reverse in part, modify and remand.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/oakleypatsyhill.wpd
RAYMOND G. PRINCE, P.C. v. MANFRED POLK
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Manfred Polk, Brentwood, Tennessee, Pro Se.
Raymond G. Prince, Nashville, Tennessee, Pro Se.
Judge: CAIN
First Paragraph:
This matter originated from a default judgment granted in general
sessions court against Appellant/Defendant, Manfred Polk, for payment
of attorney's fees. Appellant filed a Rule 60.02 Motion to Vacate the
default judgment, which was denied; an appeal to the circuit court,
which was dismissed for failure to set; followed by a Motion to
Reinstate and Motion to Set, which were denied. Defendant now appeals
the denial of the Motion to Reinstate and Motion to Set claiming a
violation of due process and abuse of discretion on the part of the
circuit court. We affirm the circuit court's dismissal of these
motions.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/princeraymond.wpd
KEVIN SANDERS, et al. v. LINCOLN COUNTY, et al.
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Kevin Sanders, Fayetteville, Tennessee, Pro Se.
Gregory H. Oakley, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellees, Lincoln
County, Tennessee and Steve Graham.
Judge: CAIN
First Paragraph:
This case questions the defendants' decision to remove Gill Road and
Endsley Road from the county road list, thereby exempting landowners
on these roads from the stock gap removal policy of the county
affecting public roads. Plaintiff claims such action violates
constitutional equal protection rights. The jury returned a verdict
in favor of the defendants. The plaintiffs assert that the jury's
verdict is contrary to the weight of the evidence and that the trial
court erred by submitting an incomplete and misleading verdict form to
the jury. The trial court approved the jury verdict for the defendant
and we affirm.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/sanderskevin.wpd
CLIFFER SAULSBERRY v. LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA, AKA LABCORP
OCCUPATIONAL TESTING SERVICES
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Roger K. Rutledge, Gregory C. Morton; Memphis, For Appellant, Cliffer
Saulsberry
Charles McPherson, William E. Godbold, III; Memphis; D. Faye Caldwell;
Houston For Appellee, Laboratory Corporation of America
Judge: CRAWFORD
First Paragraph:
Plaintiff truck driver was required to submit to a random urine drug
test pursuant to his employer's drug policy and mandatory Department
of Transportation (DOT) guidelines. After the specimen tested
positive for the presence of cocaine metabolites, plaintiff was
discharged from his employment. Plaintiff sued the laboratory that
conducted the test, alleging negligence in the testing procedure that
resulted in a false report. The trial court granted the laboratory
summary judgment, and plaintiff appeals. We reverse.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/saulsberrycli.wpd
KIMBERLY J. SVACHA, et al. v. WALDENS CREEK SADDLE CLUB, et al.
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Robert L. Ogle, Jr., Sevierville, Tennessee for the Appellants
Kimberly and William Svacha.
David H. Parton, Gatlinburg, Tennessee, for the Appellees Benjamin and
Mary Darnell, and Waldens Creek Saddle Club.
Judge:
First Paragraph:
The Trial Court granted Defendants' motion for summary judgment
relying, at least in part, on oral testimony from one of the
Plaintiffs. This testimony was not transcribed, filed with the Trial
Court, and provided to this Court as part of the record on appeal.
Due to the somewhat peculiar procedural aspects of this case, we
conclude that Defendants had the responsibility to file a transcript
of this testimony. Because we cannot evaluate the propriety of the
grant of summary judgment without having before us this evidence
relied on by the Trial Court, we vacate the grant of summary judgment.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/svachakj.wpd
JOSEPH TURLEY v. FRANCIS P. MARINO, ET AL.
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Jodie A. Bell, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Joseph Turley.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General & Reporter and Jennifer L. Bledsoe,
Assistant Attorney General, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellee,
State of Tennessee, (Francis P. Marino and Teresa Goldsberry).
Judge: CAIN
First Paragraph:
Appellant, Joseph Turley, was charged with two counts of criminal
contempt by the trial court in an order issued May 3, 2000. The trial
court appointed a special prosecutor to pursue this matter and
appointed the public defender to represent the appellant. The trial
on June 15, 2000 resulted in a trial court finding of guilty, after
which the appellant was sentenced to 48 hours in jail. Turley
appeals, and we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/turleyjoseph.wpd
BETTY FAYE VESTAL v. THOMAS WAYNE LAWLER, et al.
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Harold R. Gunn, Humboldt, For Appellant, Thomas Wayne Lawler
James L. Kirby; Michelle M. Drake, Memphis, For Appellee, Kyle Atkins
Marty R. Phillips, Jackson, For Appellee, Betty Faye Vestal
Judge: CRAWFORD
First Paragraph:
Buyer, under warranty deed, sued seller for breach of warranty against
encumbrances after receiving notice of trustee's sale pursuant to deed
of trust encumbering the property. Seller answered the complaint and
filed a third party complaint against the lawyer he retained to
perform a title search, which search failed to show the deed of trust.
The third party defendant filed a counter complaint against the
seller. The trial court granted the buyer judgment on the pleadings
against seller, dismissed seller's third party complaint, and granted
third party defendant summary judgment against seller. Seller
appeals. We reverse in part and modify in part.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/vestalbet.wpd
SUSAN RENEE WIECHERT WILSON, et al. v. RUSHTON E. PATTERSON, JR., M.D.
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Lanier Fogg, Memphis, For Appellants, Susan Renee Wiechert Wilson and
James Kelly Wiechert
David M. Cook, Karen S. Koplon, Greg A. Ziskind, Memphis, For
Appellee, Rushton E. Patterson, Jr., M.D.
Judge: CRAWFORD
First Paragraph:
This is a medical malpractice case. Plaintiffs, husband and wife,
sued defendant physician for injuries allegedly caused to Wife by the
physician's negligence. Physician moved for summary judgment
supported by his affidavit that he conformed to the required standard
of care. Plaintiffs, in opposition to the summary judgment, filed a
deposition and affidavit of a physician practicing in Kentucky that
expressed his knowledge of the standard of care in Memphis and similar
communities. Physician moved to strike the affidavit primarily on the
ground that plaintiffs' physician expert did not show a familiarity
with the standard of care in Memphis, Tennessee. The court granted
the motion to strike the affidavit and also granted summary judgment
to defendant physician. Plaintiffs appeal. We reverse and remand.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/wiechertsus.wpd
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. COURTNEY ANDERSON
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
William L. Johnson, Memphis, Tennessee, for the Appellant, Courtney
Anderson.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Michael Moore,
Solicitor General; Kim R. Helper, Assistant Attorney General; Amy
Weirich, Assistant District Attorney General, for the Appellee, State
of Tennessee.
Judge: HAYES
First Paragraph:
The Appellant, Courtney Anderson, was indicted by a Shelby County
Grand Jury on multiple counts of theft of property, forgery, and one
count of misdemeanor possession of a handgun. Under the terms of a
plea agreement, Anderson pled guilty to a reduced number of the
charged offenses and was sentenced to an extended term in the
Department of Correction. The resulting convictions reflect class C,
D and E grade felony offenses. The trial court found Anderson to be a
career offender for all convictions and ordered consecutive sentences.
In this appeal, Anderson contends that the effective sentence imposed
by the trial court is excessive. After review, we find that
Anderson's designation as a career offender for the class C felony
convictions was error. Furthermore, we are unable to reconcile the
effective sentence pronounced by the trial court with the sentences
reflected by the judgment of conviction documents presented on appeal.
Accordingly, we remand for clarification or correction of the
sentence imposed and for resentencing on the class C felony
convictions.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/andersoncou.wpd
TIFFANY LAFONZO BETTS v. STATE OF TENNESSEE
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
Ernest T. Brooks, II, Jackson, Tennessee, for the appellant, Tiffany
Lafonzo Betts.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; J. Ross Dyer,
Assistant Attorney General; James G. (Jerry) Woodall, District
Attorney General; and Alfred L. Earls, Assistant District Attorney
General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee.
Judge: RILEY
First Paragraph:
The petitioner was originally convicted by a Madison County jury of
second degree murder and unlawful possession of a weapon employed in
committing the offense. He received an effective 20- year sentence.
The petitioner subsequently sought post-conviction relief, which was
denied. The petitioner appeals the denial of post-conviction relief
based on ineffective assistance of counsel, alleging trial counsel
failed to adequately discuss the state's plea offer prior to trial.
We conclude that the post-conviction court correctly denied
post-conviction relief.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/bettstl.wpd
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ANTONIO BONDS
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
W. Mark Ward, Assistant Public Defender; AC Wharton, Public Defender,
Memphis, Tennessee, (on appeal); William L. Johnson, Memphis,
Tennessee, (at trial), for the Appellant, Antonio Bonds.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter, Michael Moore,
Solicitor General, John H. Bledsoe, Assistant Attorney General, and
Edgar Peterson, Assistant District Attorney General, for the Appellee,
State of Tennessee.
Judge: HAYES
First Paragraph:
The Appellant, Antonio Bonds, was indicted by a Shelby County Grand
Jury on one count of premeditated first-degree murder. On September
30, 1999, a jury found Bonds guilty of the indicted offense and he was
sentenced to life imprisonment. On appeal, Bonds raises one issue for
our review: Whether "the evidence of [his] identity as the culprit is
sufficient to support the verdict beyond a reasonable doubt." After
review, we find the evidence legally sufficient to support the verdict
of first-degree murder. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the
trial court.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/bondsantonio.wpd
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. RICKY R. BOWEN
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Elizabeth B. Marney,
Assistant Attorney General; H. Greeley Wells, Jr., District Attorney
General; and Robert Montgomery, Assistant District Attorney General,
for the appellant, State of Tennessee.
Cary C. Taylor, Kingsport, Tennessee, for the appellee, Ricky R.
Bowen.
Judge: TIPTON
First Paragraph:
The defendant, Ricky R. Bowen, is charged with driving under the
influence of an intoxicant (DUI). The state was granted an
interlocutory appeal from the trial court's order dismissing the
second "count" of the indictment by which the defendant was subjected
to enhanced minimum sentencing as a second time offender. The issue
presented is whether a conviction for the first DUI offense must
precede the commission of the second offense before a defendant may be
convicted of DUI, second offense. We hold that the conviction must
only precede the second conviction, not the second offense.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/bowenrr.wpd
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. TYRONE BROWN
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
A C Wharton, Jr., Shelby County Public Defender; Garland Ergueden,
Assistant Public Defender (on appeal); and Donna Armstard, Assistant
Public Defender (at trial), for the appellant, Tyrone Brown.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Laura McMullen Ford,
Assistant Attorney General; William L. Gibbons, District Attorney
General; and Julie Mosley, Assistant District Attorney General, for
the appellee, State of Tennessee.
Judge: GLENN
First Paragraph:
The defendant was convicted of especially aggravated robbery and was
sentenced to eighteen years as a violent offender. He appealed,
presenting as his single issue the claim that the evidence at trial
was not sufficient for the finding of guilt. Based upon our review,
we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/browntyrone.wpd
KEVIN BURNS v. STATE OF TENNESSEE
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
Donald E. Dawson, Post-Conviction Defender, and Marjorie A. Bristol,
Assistant Post-Conviction Defender, Nashville, Tennessee, for the
appellant, Kevin Burns.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Kim R. Helper,
Assistant Attorney General; William L. Gibbons, District Attorney
General; and John W. Campbell and Thomas D. Henderson, Assistant
District Attorneys General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee.
Judge: RILEY
First Paragraph:
The petitioner, currently represented by the Office of the
Post-Conviction Defender, was originally convicted of felony murder
and sentenced to death. The petitioner's conviction and sentence were
affirmed on direct appeal. See State v. Burns, 979 S.W.2d 276 (Tenn.
1998). After the filing of a post-conviction relief petition, the
post-conviction court granted the state's request to disqualify the
Post-Conviction Defender since a member of the Post-Conviction
Defender Commission was related to the victim of the crime. In this
interlocutory appeal, the petitioner argues: (1) there is no conflict
of interest; and (2) if a conflict exists, it can be waived. After a
thorough review of the record, we conclude that (1) there is no actual
conflict, and (2) any alleged impropriety may be waived by the
petitioner after full disclosure. We reverse and remand for further
proceedings.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/burnsk.wpd
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. LUKE B. COLE
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
Tim Albers, Memphis, Tennessee, for the appellant, Luke B. Cole.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Laura E. McMullen,
Assistant Attorney General; William L. Gibbons, District Attorney
General; and Camille McMullen, Assistant District Attorney General,
for the appellee, State of Tennessee.
Judge: WELLES
First Paragraph:
The Defendant, Luke B. Cole, was convicted by a jury of second degree
murder in the shooting death of David Burson. The trial court
sentenced the Defendant as a Range I, violent offender to twenty years
incarceration. In this appeal as of right, the Defendant contends
that the trial court erred in ruling admissible certain photographs of
the victim; that the trial court erred in admitting certain rebuttal
evidence submitted by the State; and that his sentence is excessive.
Finding no reversible error in the Defendant's trial, we affirm his
conviction. Finding that the trial court erred in sentencing the
Defendant, we modify his sentence to seventeen years.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/colelb.wpd
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ADRIAN CRANE
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
A. C. Wharton, District Public Defender, W. Mark Ward, Assistant
District Public Defender, Teresa Jones, Assistant District Public
Defender, Karen Massey, Assistant District Public Defender, for the
appellant, Adrian Crane.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General, Angele M. Gregory, Assistant
Attorney General, William L. Gibbons, District Attorney General,
Alanda Horne Dwyer, Assistant District Attorney General, Betsy
Carnesdale, Assistant District Attorney General, for the appellee,
State of Tennessee.
Judge: CLARK
First Paragraph:
A Shelby County jury convicted the defendant of rape of a child, a
Class A felony. The sole issue in this appeal is the sufficiency of
the evidence of unlawful sexual penetration of the victim. We affirm
the judgment of the trial court.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/cranea.wpd
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ROBERT A. CUMMINS
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
Jeffery S. Glatstein, Memphis, Tennessee, for the appellant, Robert A.
Cummins.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General & Reporter; J. Ross Dyer, Assistant
Attorney General; and Jerry Kitchen and Reginald Henderson, Assistant
District Attorneys General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee.
Judge: WADE
First Paragraph:
The defendant, Robert A. Cummins, was convicted of first degree felony
murder. The trial court imposed a sentence of life imprisonment with
the possibility of parole. On appeal, the defendant presents two
issues: (1) whether the trial court erred by denying his motion to
suppress; and (2) whether the trial court erred by failing to instruct
the jury as to any lesser included offenses of first degree felony
murder. Because the trial court erred by not charging the jury with
the lesser included offenses of felony murder, the judgment is
reversed and the case is remanded for a new trial.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/cumminsroba.wpd
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. QUINCY DAVIS
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
Gerald Stanley Green, Memphis, Tennessee, for the appellant, Quincy
Davis.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Kim R. Helper,
Assistant Attorney General; William L. Gibbons, District Attorney
General; Karen Cook, Assistant District Attorney General; and Greg
Gilluly, Jr., Assistant District Attorney General, for the appellee,
State of Tennessee.
Judge: GLENN
First Paragraph:
The defendant and his four co-defendants were indicted for the
aggravated robbery of a convenience store in Memphis. He was convicted
of this offense, while a co-defendant was convicted for robbery. The
defendant was sentenced to ten years in the Tennessee Department of
Correction. The defendant appealed his conviction, asserting as the
single assignment of error that the verdicts were inconsistent, and,
therefore, his conviction could not stand. Based upon our review, we
affirm the judgment of conviction.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/davisq.wpd
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. HAROLD J. DOUGLAS
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
Bill Anderson, Jr., Memphis, Tennessee, for the Appellant, Harold J.
Douglas.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Michael Moore,
Solicitor General; Angele M. Gregory, Assistant Attorney General; and
Jennifer Nichols, Assistant District Attorney General, for the
Appellee, State of Tennessee.
Judge: HAYES
First Paragraph:
The Appellant, Harold J. Douglas, was indicted by a Shelby County
Grand jury on one count of second degree murder. Following a jury
trial, Douglas was convicted of voluntary manslaughter and was
sentenced to fourteen years in the Department of Correction. On
appeal, Douglas raises one issue for our review: Whether the evidence
presented at trial was sufficient to find him guilty of voluntary
manslaughter. Finding the evidence legally sufficient to support the
verdict, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/douglashj.wpd
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. LAWRENCE DOUGLAS
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
C. Michael Robbins, Memphis, Tennessee, for the appellant, Lawrence
Douglas.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Mark E. Davidson,
Assistant Attorney General; William L. Gibbons, District Attorney
General; and Rosemary Andrews, Assistant District Attorney General,
for the appellee, State of Tennessee.
Judge: GLENN
First Paragraph:
The defendant, Lawrence Douglas, was indicted by a Shelby County Grand
Jury for one count of especially aggravated robbery and one count of
attempted first degree murder, both Class A felonies. He was found
guilty of especially aggravated robbery and attempted second degree
murder, a Class B felony, and sentenced to twenty years for the
especially aggravated robbery conviction at 100% and a concurrent
sentence of twelve years for the attempted second degree murder
conviction, as a Range I, standard offender, for an effective sentence
of twenty years. The defendant challenges: (1) the ruling of the
trial court excluding testimony of the defendant's grandmother
concerning his childhood and (2) his sentences. Finding no error, we
affirm the judgment of the trial court. However, we remand for entry
of corrected judgments in order that the appropriate classes of the
convictions may be indicated on the judgments.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/douglaslawrence.wpd
JAMES DUMAS v. STATE OF TENNESSEE
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
Robert Little (on appeal) and John E. Finklea (at trial), Memphis,
Tennessee, for the appellant, James Dumas.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Michael E. Moore,
Solicitor General; Kim R. Helper, Assistant Attorney General; William
L. Gibbons, District Attorney General; and Daniel R. Woody, Assistant
District Attorney General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee.
Judge: GLENN
First Paragraph:
The petitioner filed a petition for post-conviction relief, claiming
that he had received ineffective assistance of counsel during the
sentencing hearing following his trial in which he was convicted of
second degree murder. Specifically, he argues that trial counsel
should have presented evidence of his youth and mental condition. The
petitioner appealed after being denied relief by the post- conviction
court. Based upon our review, we affirm the judgment of the
post-conviction court.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/dumasj.wpd
MYRON GARMON V. STATE OF TENNESSEE
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
Stephen A. Sauer (at hearing) and Gerald S. Green (on appeal),
Memphis, Tennessee, for the appellant, Myron Garmon.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Laura McMullen Ford,
Assistant Attorney General; William L. Gibbons, District Attorney
General; and William D. Bond, III, Assistant District Attorney
General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee.
Judge: RILEY
First Paragraph:
The petitioner was convicted of aggravated sexual battery by a Shelby
County jury. The conviction was affirmed on direct appeal. The
petitioner sought post-conviction relief on the ground that his trial
counsel was ineffective for failing to protect his right to be tried
within one hundred eighty days under the Interstate Compact on
Detainers. The petition was denied by the post-conviction court.
After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the trial
court correctly denied post- conviction relief.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/garmonmv.wpd
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. REGINALD HENDERSON
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
Christine W. Stephens (on appeal) and Howard L. Wagerman (at trial),
Memphis, Tennessee, for the appellant, Reginald Henderson.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Patricia C. Kussmann,
Assistant Attorney General; William L. Gibbons, District Attorney
General; William Bond, Assistant District Attorney General; and
Stephen P. Jones, Assistant District Attorney General, for the
appellee, State of Tennessee.
Judge: GLENN
First Paragraph:
The defendant was convicted of second degree murder for a shooting
which occurred during a birthday outing at a nightclub and was
sentenced to confinement for twenty years. He appealed, raising as
issues, that the trial court erred: (1) in not correctly instructing
the jury as to reasonable doubt; (2) in admitting proof of another bad
act of the defendant; (3) in not allowing impeachment with prior
convictions of a prosecution witness; (4) in allowing proof as to a
prior consistent statement; and (5) in requiring the defendant to show
his teeth to the jury. Based upon our review, we affirm the judgment
of conviction of the trial court.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/hendersonreginald.wpd
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MARCUS DUVALLE HURSTON
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
J. Colin Morris, Jackson, Tennessee, for the appellant, Marcus Duvalle
Hurston.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Kim R. Helper,
Assistant Attorney General; James C. (Jerry) Woodall, District
Attorney General; and Jody S. Pickens, Assistant District Attorney
General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee.
Judge: MCGEE OGLE
First Paragraph:
The appellant, Marcus Duvalle Hurston, was convicted by a jury in the
Madison County Circuit Court of one count of aggravated assault. The
trial court sentenced the appellant as a Range II multiple offender to
eight years incarceration in the Tennessee Department of Correction.
On appeal, the appellant raises the following issue for our review:
whether the evidence was sufficient to sustain his conviction of
aggravated assault. Upon review of the record and the parties'
briefs, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/hurstonm.wpd
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. KEVIN JERMAINE MORRIS
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
George Morton Googe, District Public Defender, and Stephen P.
Spracher, Assistant District Public Defender, for the appellant, Kevin
Jermaine Morris.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Kim R. Helper,
Assistant Attorney General; James G. Woodall, District Attorney
General; and Jody S. Pickens, Assistant District Attorney General, for
the appellee, State of Tennessee.
Judge: GLENN
First Paragraph:
The State sought revocation of the defendant's probation for his
allegedly failing to report to his probation officer within
seventy-two hours of his release from jail, failing to provide proof
of employment, failing to complete required community service work,
failing to provide a DNA sample, and failing to pay probation fees.
After a hearing, the trial court revoked the probation, finding that
the defendant had violated four of its conditions. On appeal to this
court, the defendant presents the sole issue of whether the trial
court erred in revoking his probation. Based upon our review, we
affirm the judgment of the trial court. However, we remand for entry
of a corrected judgment.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/morriskj.wpd
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. GEORGE REDD
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
John Finklea, Murray, Kentucky, for the appellant, George Redd.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; J. Ross Dyer,
Assistant Attorney General; William L. Gibbons, District Attorney
General; and Dan Byer, Assistant District Attorney General, for the
appellee, State of Tennessee.
Judge: WELLES
First Paragraph:
Following a jury trial, the Defendant, George Redd, was convicted of
burglary. He was sentenced as a career offender to twelve years
incarceration. In this appeal as of right, the Defendant asserts that
the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support his
conviction and that the trial court erred by failing to instruct the
jury on the lesser included offenses of burglary. We hold that the
evidence was sufficient to support the Defendant's conviction but that
the trial court erred by failing to instruct the jury on the lesser
included offenses of burglary. Because we conclude that the error was
harmless beyond a reasonable doubt, we affirm the judgment of the
trial court.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/reddg.wpd
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. CHARLES THOMPSON and VERICO JACKSON
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
Paula Skahan and Gerald Skahan, Memphis, Tennessee, for appellant,
Charles Thompson
James Ball and Joseph Ozment, Memphis, Tennessee, for appellant,
Verico Jackson.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General & Reporter; J. Ross Dyer, Assistant
Attorney General; William L. Gibbons, District Attorney General; Jerry
Harris; Jerry Kitchen, Assistant District Attorneys; for appellee,
State of Tennessee.
Judge: SMITH
First Paragraph:
On October 31, 1996, a Shelby County Grand Jury indicted Charles
Thompson and Verico Jackson for first-degree murder. Later, the
defendants were also indicted for conspiracy to commit murder.
Following a jury trial, the defendants were convicted on both counts.
The trial court dismissed the conspiracy charges, and, following a
sentencing hearing, sentenced Charles Thompson to life without parole
and sentenced Verico Jackson to life. On appeal, both defendants
claim (1) that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the verdicts;
(2) that the trial court should have severed the defendants' trials;
(3) that the trial court erred by shackling defense witnesses and/or
providing extra security in the courtroom; (4) that the trial court
erroneously excluded the victim's "dying declaration"; (5) that the
trial court erroneously excluded evidence that people other than the
defendants had recently threatened the victim; and (6) that the trial
court erroneously overruled a motion for mistrial after a witness
testified that Defendant Thompson had previously ordered other
murders. Additionally, Defendant Thompson claims (1) that the trial
court erroneously allowed the state to use exhibits that had been used
in a previous trial of a codefendant; (2) that the trial court
erroneously overruled a motion for mistrial after an attorney
mentioned the trial of a codefendant in violation of a court order;
(3) that Defendant Jackson's attorney had a conflict of interest that
prejudiced Defendant Thompson; (4) that the trial court erroneously
excluded the prior inconsistent statements of a witness; (5) that the
trial court erroneously excluded evidence of a witness's reputation
for truthfulness; (6) that the trial court erroneously denied
Defendant Thompson's request for a special jury instruction; and (7)
that, at sentencing, the trial court erroneously allowed the state to
introduce prejudicial evidence of prior bad acts. Finding no
reversible error, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/thompsonjackson.wpd
Public Building Authority Subject to 2001 Tenn. Pub. Acts Ch. 364
Date: August 7, 2001
Opinion Number: 01-123
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/AG/OP123.pdf
Sheriff and Police Qualifications -- Minimum Educational Requirements
Date: August 7, 2001
Opinion Number: 01-124
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/AG/OP124.pdf
Requiring Connection to New Sewer System
Date: August 7, 2001
Opinion Number: 01-125
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/AG/OP125.pdf
Correctional Officers Carrying Firearms While Off-Duty
Date: August 7, 2001
Opinion Number: 01-126
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/AG/OP126.pdf
Constitutionality of a proposal to publish names and photographs of
those convicted of prostitution-related offenses.
Date: August 9, 2001
Opinion Number: 01-127
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/AG/OP127.pdf

PLEASE FORWARD THIS E-MAIL!
Feel free to forward this Opinion Flash on to anyone you know of with an e-mail address.
GET A FULL-TEXT COPY OF AN OPINION!
See the intrsuctions at the beginning of this edition of Opinion Flash.
JOIN TBALink!
While Opinion Flash is a free service of the Tennessee Bar Association, you must be a subscriber to TBALink, the premier Web site for Tennessee attorneys, in order to access the full-text of the opinions or enjoy many other features of TBALink. TBA members may join TBALink for just $50 per year. To join, go to: http://www.tba.org/join.html/
SUBSCRIBE TO OPINION FLASH!
Would you like to receive the TBALink Opinion Flash free each day by e-mail? Anyone, whether a TBA member or not, is welcome to subscribe ... it's free!
For the Plain Text Version:
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: SUBSCRIBE
3) Leave the body of the message blank
For the HTML Text Version:
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: SUBSCRIBE HTML
3) Leave the body of the message blank
UNSUBSCRIBE TO OPINION FLASH? ... SURELY NOT!
To STOP receiving TBALink Opinion-Flash:
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: UNSUBSCRIBE
3) Leave the body of the message blank

     
© Copyright 2001 Tennessee Bar Association
|