|

September 6, 2001
Volume 7 Number 163

What follows is the case style or name, first paragraph, author's name, and the names of attorneys for the parties of each opinion released eletronically today to TBALink.
- This Issue (IN THIS ORDER):
-
-
| 00 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Supreme Court |
| 04 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Supreme Court Workers' Compensation Panel |
| 00 |
New Document(s) or Proposed Rule(s) from the Tennessee Supreme Court |
| 04 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Court of Appeals |
| 00 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals |
| 10 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Attorney General (PDF format) |
| 00 |
New Judicial Ethics Opinion(s) |
| 00 |
New Formal Ethics Opinion(s) from the Board of Professional Responsibility |
-
There are three ways for TBALink members to get the full-text versions of these opinions from the Web:
Do a key word search in the Search Link area of TBALink. This option will allow you to view and save a plain-text version of the opinion.
Browse the Opinion List area of TBALink. This option will allow you to download the original version of the opinion.
Click the URL at end of each Opinion paragraph below. This option will allow you to download the original document.
Howard H. Vogel
Knoxville, Tennessee
Editor-in-Chief, TBALink

MAGGIE JEAN HICKS v. KROGER FOOD STORES, INC., et al.
Court:TSC - Workers Comp Panel
Attorneys:
Stephen E. Yeager, Knoxville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Kroger
Food Stores, Inc. et al.
Roger L. Ridenour, Clinton, Tennessee, for the appellee, Maggie Jean
Hicks.
Judge: BYERS
First Paragraph:
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special
Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance
with Tennessee Code Annotated S 50-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and
reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of
law.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC_WCP/hicks.wpd
GEORGE R. LEE v. T.I.G. INSURANCE, et al.
Court:TSC - Workers Comp Panel
Attorneys:
Timothy W. Conner, Knoxville, Tennessee for the Appellant.
J. Randolph Humble, Knoxville, Tennessee for the Appellee.
Judge: BYERS
First Paragraph:
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special
Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance
with Tennessee Code Annotated S 50-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and
reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of
law.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC_WCP/lee.wpd
DAVIS REECE, JR. v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., et al.
Court:TSC - Workers Comp Panel
Attorneys:
James T. Shea, IV, Knoxville, Tennessee, for the appellants, Liberty
Mutual Insurance Co., et. al.
David H. Dunaway, LaFollette, Tennessee, for the appellee, Davis
Reece, Jr.
Judge: BYERS
First Paragraph:
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special
Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance
with Tennessee Code Annotated S 50-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and
reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of
law. The trial court found the plaintiff sustained a 40 percent
vocational disability to the body as a whole as a result of exposure
to formaldehyde which caused permanent respiratory injury. The trial
judge found the plaintiff failed to show by a preponderance of the
evidence that he sustained any psychiatric injury as a result of the
accident. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC_WCP/reeced.wpd
GLEN WILLIAMSON v. SENTRY INSURANCE COMPANY, et al.
Court:TSC - Workers Comp Panel
Attorneys:
James T. Shea IV, Knoxville, Tennessee, for appellant, Sentry
Insurance Company.
David H. Dunaway, LaFollette, Tennessee, for the appellee, Glen
Williamson.
Judge: BYERS
First Paragraph:
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special
Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance
with Tennessee Code Annotated S 50-6- 225(e)(3) for hearing and
reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of
law. The trial judge found the plaintiff sustained a 44 percent
permanent disability to the body as a whole. Further, the trial court
awarded the plaintiff temporary disability benefits from February 16,
1994, until January 5, 1996. We affirm the judgment of the trial
court.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC_WCP/williamson.wpd
JULIE AMANDA DURBIN, et vir. v. SUMNER COUNTY REGIONAL HEALTH SYSTEMS,
INC., et al.
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Gary K. Smith and Sherry S. Fernandez, Memphis, Tennessee, for the
appellants, Julie Amanda Durbin and James M. Durbin.
Robert L. Trentham and G. Brian Jackson, Nashville, Tennessee, for the
appellee, Sumner County Regional Health Systems, Inc.
Phillip North, Michael F. Jameson, and Tom Shumate, Nashville,
Tennessee, for the appellee, William R. Caldwell, M.D.
Judge: CANTRELL
First Paragraph:
The appellants sued the appellees for claims connected with the death
of the appellants' twin fetuses. The jury found in favor of the
appellees, and, in addition, after the jury verdict, the trial court
granted appellee Dr. Caldwell's motion to dismiss on the ground that
the statute of limitations had run before he was sued. The appellants
argue that this court should reverse the trial court's order
dismissing Dr. Caldwell and overturn the jury's verdict. We reverse
the trial court's order dismissing Dr. Caldwell, but affirm the jury
verdict in his favor and in favor of the other appellee.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/durbinja.wpd
IN RE: L.S.W., et al.
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Joe R. Johnson, II, Springfield, Tennessee, for the appellant, K.L.S.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter, Douglas Earl Dimond,
Assistant Attorney General, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellee,
Department of Children's Services.
Judge: COTTRELL
First Paragraph:
This case involves the termination of parental rights of the mother of
four children who were removed from the mother's home by the
Department of Children's Services in 1998 and placed in foster care.
DCS devised a Plan of Care for the mother, which, among other things,
required her to address her drug and alcohol addictions. During the
two and one-half years between the removal of the children from the
home and the hearing on the petition to terminate parental rights, the
mother made token efforts to improve her situation, but her substance
abuse continued. The trial court terminated the mother's parental
rights on multiple grounds, including the ground that the conditions
that led to the children's removal continued to persist with little
likelihood of remedy. Because DCS has established grounds for
termination and has established that termination is in the best
interest of the children, we affirm.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/inrelsw.wpd
JIMMY JOE SAVAGE, et al. v. DON HILDENBRANDT
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
David H. King, Franklin, Tennessee (on appeal), for the appellant, Don
Hildenbrandt and third-party plaintiff appellant, Lossie Ledbetter.
Michael E. Spitzer, Hohenwald, Tennessee, for the appellees, Jimmy Joe
Savage and Frances Joy Savage.
Judge: KOCH
First Paragraph:
This appeal involves a dispute among neighbors arising out of a
couple's decision to place a double- wide mobile home on their
property. After one of their neighbors blocked the access road to
their property to prevent them from setting up their mobile home, the
couple who owned the mobile home filed suit in the Chancery Court for
Perry County seeking injunctive relief and damages. In response, two
of the neighboring property owners requested the trial court to
establish the boundary lines, to enjoin the couple from encroaching on
their property, and to award actual and punitive damages for the
damage that the couple's encroachment had caused to their property.
Following a bench trial that continued past midnight and a series of
post-trial motions requesting various corrections in the judgment, the
trial court eventually established the disputed boundary line and
awarded the couple a $6,110.50 judgment against one of their neighbors
to compensate them for the damages stemming from the delay in setting
up their mobile home. The two neighboring property owners have
appealed. They take issue with (1) the trial court's decision to hold
court past midnight, (2) the manner in which the trial court
considered and disposed of their post-judgment motions, (3) the trial
court's decision regarding the location of the southern boundary line
of the couple's property, and (4) the trial court's failure to reduce
the $6,110.50 judgment by the amount of the damages the couple's
encroachment had caused. We have concluded that the trial court did
not commit reversible error during either the trial or the post-trial
proceedings and that the trial court's decision to award the couple
$6,110.50 is supported by the evidence. However, we have also
concluded that the evidence preponderates against the trial court's
decision regarding a portion of the couple's southern boundary line.
Accordingly, we remand the case for the sole purpose of correcting the
error regarding a portion of this boundary line.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/savagejj.wpd
TANYA TUCKER, et al. v. CAPITOL RECORDS, INC.
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Jay S. Bowen and Amy J. Everhart, Nashville, Tennessee, for the
appellants, Tanya Tucker and Tanya Tucker, Inc.
Aubrey B. Harwell, Jr. and Gerald D. Neenan, Nashville, Tennessee, for
the appellee, Capitol Records, Inc.
Judge: CAIN
First Paragraph:
In this two party action, the trial court certified three partial
summary judgment orders to be final judgments pursuant to Rule 54.02
of the Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff appeals, and
Defendant supports the appeal. Both parties assert that the trial
court's finality designations involve multiple claims under Rule
54.02. After review, we find that the dispute between these two
parties involves a single claim and that none of the partial summary
judgment orders entered in the trial court are final judgments within
the meaning of the "multiple claims" provisions of Rule 54.02. This
Court is, therefore, without jurisdiction of this appeal. The
judgments of the trial court are vacated, and the case is remanded for
trial on the merits.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/tuckert.wpd
COTTRELL CONCURRING
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/tuckert_con.wpd
Corporate Agent for Housing Authority
Date: August 31, 2001
Opinion Number: 01-135
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/AG/OP135.pdf
Potential Liability Issues Resulting from Adoption of New Design
Criteria for Rock Fallout Areas
Date: September 4, 2001
Opinion Number: 01-136
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/AG/OP136.pdf
Validity of Metropolitan Government's Ordinance Requiring Graffiti
Removal
Date: September 4, 2001
Opinion Number: 01-137
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/AG/OP137.pdf
Constitutionality of Grand Jury Subpoena of Blood Alcohol Tests
Date: September 4, 2001
Opinion Number: 01-138
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/AG/OP138.pdf
Authority of Local Law Enforcement Agencies to Charge a Fee to a State
Agency for Criminal Background Checks
Date: September 4, 2001
Opinion Number: 01-139
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/AG/OP139.pdf
Application of Tenn. Code Ann. S 4-21-406(b)
Date: September 4, 2001
Opinion Number: 01-140
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/AG/OP140.pdf
Increase in Manchester Hotel/Motel Tax
Date: September 4, 2001
Opinion Number: 01-141
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/AG/OP141.pdf
Constitutionality of H.B.2030, relative to a proposed optional bail
bond procedure for individuals required to appear in the Overton
County General Sessions Court.
Date: September 4, 2001
Opinion Number: 01-142
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/AG/OP142.pdf
Tolls /Fees on County or State Highways
Date: September 4, 2001
Opinion Number: 01-143
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/AG/OP143.pdf
State Employee as School Board Member
Date: September 4, 2001
Opinion Number: 01-144
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/AG/OP144.pdf

PLEASE FORWARD THIS E-MAIL!
Feel free to forward this Opinion Flash on to anyone you know of with an e-mail address.
GET A FULL-TEXT COPY OF AN OPINION!
See the intrsuctions at the beginning of this edition of Opinion Flash.
JOIN TBALink!
While Opinion Flash is a free service of the Tennessee Bar Association, you must be a subscriber to TBALink, the premier Web site for Tennessee attorneys, in order to access the full-text of the opinions or enjoy many other features of TBALink. TBA members may join TBALink for just $50 per year. To join, go to: http://www.tba.org/join.html/
SUBSCRIBE TO OPINION FLASH!
Would you like to receive the TBALink Opinion Flash free each day by e-mail? Anyone, whether a TBA member or not, is welcome to subscribe ... it's free!
For the Plain Text Version:
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: SUBSCRIBE
3) Leave the body of the message blank
For the HTML Text Version:
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: SUBSCRIBE HTML
3) Leave the body of the message blank
UNSUBSCRIBE TO OPINION FLASH? ... SURELY NOT!
To STOP receiving TBALink Opinion-Flash:
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: UNSUBSCRIBE
3) Leave the body of the message blank

     
© Copyright 2001 Tennessee Bar Association
|