|

September 21, 2001
Volume 7 Number 174

What follows is the case style or name, first paragraph, author's name, and the names of attorneys for the parties of each opinion released eletronically today to TBALink.
- This Issue (IN THIS ORDER):
-
-
| 00 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Supreme Court |
| 01 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Supreme Court Workers' Compensation Panel |
| 00 |
New Document(s) or Proposed Rule(s) from the Tennessee Supreme Court |
| 04 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Court of Appeals |
| 03 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals |
| 00 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Attorney General (PDF format) |
| 00 |
New Judicial Ethics Opinion(s) |
| 00 |
New Formal Ethics Opinion(s) from the Board of Professional Responsibility |
-
There are three ways for TBALink members to get the full-text versions of these opinions from the Web:
Do a key word search in the Search Link area of TBALink. This option will allow you to view and save a plain-text version of the opinion.
Browse the Opinion List area of TBALink. This option will allow you to download the original version of the opinion.
Click the URL at end of each Opinion paragraph below. This option will allow you to download the original document.
Howard H. Vogel
Knoxville, Tennessee
Editor-in-Chief, TBALink

MARILYN REDDICK v. MURRAY, INC.
Court:TSC - Workers Comp Panel
Attorneys:
Bradley G. Kirk, Memphis, Tennessee, for the appellant, Marilyn
Reddick.
J. Arthur Crews, II, Jackson, Tennessee, for the appellee, Murray,
Inc.
Judge: LOSER
First Paragraph:
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special
Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance
with Tenn. Code Ann. S 50-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the
Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. In this
appeal, the plaintiff insists the trial court erred in dismissing her
claim at the close of her proof. As discussed below, the panel has
concluded the judgment should be reversed and the cause remanded for
full trial of all issues fairly raised by the pleadings.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC_WCP/reddickm.wpd
LORI CASTLE v. JEFFREY LEE BAKER
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Mark H. Toohey and Thomas R. Bandy, III, Kingsport, Tennessee, for the
Appellant, Lori Castle.
John P. Chiles, Kingsport, Tennessee, and Thomas F. Bloom, Nashville,
Tennessee, for the Appellee, Jeffrey Lee Baker.
Judge: GODDARD
First Paragraph:
These parties were divorced in May 1992. Custody of their daughter,
Brittany, then 5 years old, was awarded to Mother pursuant to an
Marital Dissolution Agreement [MDA] which obligated Father to pay
$575.00 monthly support. About three months after the divorce was
granted, the custodial care of Brittany was transferred to Father, by
agreement of the parties and without recourse to the Court. In June
1998, Mother sought contempt liability against Father alleging that he
was in arrears with his child support obligation in the amount of
$40,800.00: at trial, the amount was stipulated to be $36,800.00.
Father responded by filing a petition for change of custody, alleging
that Brittany had resided with him for several years, a material
change in circumstances. He also sought forgiveness of the arrearage.
The Trial Court found a change in circumstances and awarded custody
of Brittany to her father who was also credited with the monetary
value of the necessities he furnished Brittany from August 1992
through February 1997. Mother appeals. We affirm.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/castlelori.wpd
BEN B. DOUBLEDAY v. LARRY HARGROVE
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Forest A. Durand, Jr., Shelbyville, Tennessee, for the appellant,
Larry Hargrove.
John R. White and Ginger Bobo Shofner, Shelbyville, Tennessee, for the
appellee, Ben B. Doubleday.
Judge: INMAN
First Paragraph:
This is an action to recover the balance due on a contract for the
sale of timber. The purchaser's defense was impossibility of
performance, because the seller had allegedly destroyed access. The
seller testified that the purchaser cut and removed 95 percent of the
timber, while the purchaser said he removed only about 40 percent
owing to lack of access. The trial judge awarded the seller a
judgment for the balance owing less some off-sets not relevant here.
We affirm.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/doubledayben.wpd
LEON WILLIAMS GENERAL CONTRACTOR, A/K/A LEON WILLIAMS GENERAL
CONTRACTOR, INC. v. D. F. SHOFFNER MECHANICAL & INDUSTRIAL
CONTRACTORS, INC.
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Wanda G. Sobieski, Knoxville, Tennessee, for the Appellant, Leon
Williams General Contractor, a/k/a Leon Williams General Contractor,
Inc.
William A. Reeves, Knoxville, Tennessee, for the Appellee, D. F.
Shoffner Mechanical & Industrial Contractors, Inc.
Judge: GODDARD
First Paragraph:
This is a suit by a general contractor against a sub-contractor for
breach of contract and negligence in installing heating, ventilation
and air conditioning equipment. The Trial Court granted summary
judgment in favor of the sub-contractor, resulting in this appeal. We
find in light of the Supreme Court case of Harris v. Chern, which was
delivered after the Trial Court ruled on the motion to alter or amend,
that the order overruling the motion should be vacated and the Trial
Court should reconsider it in light of Harris. We accordingly vacate
the order overruling the motion to alter or amend, and remand.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/leonwilliams.wpd
STATE OF TENNESSEE, et al. v. A. D. WRIGHT, et ux, et al.
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Homer R. Ayers, Goodlettsville, Tennessee, for the Appellants, Edwin
Lee Nix, et ux Ira M. Nix.
Charles M. Walker, Nashville, Tennessee, for the Appellee, Associates
Financial Services Co., Inc.
Judge: SWINEY
First Paragraph:
Edwin Lee Nix and Ira M. Nix ("Purchasers") bought a parcel of land
("Property") at a tax sale in September 1999. Other than the tax
lien, Purchasers' title search uncovered no liens on the Property.
Unbeknownst to Purchasers, the Property had been devised to a previous
owners' daughter who had given a Deed of Trust for the Property to
Associates Financial Services Company, Inc. ("Lienholder") as security
for a loan. In May 2000, pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. S 67-5-2701(a),
the Lienholder filed a Notice of Redemption on the Property to which
Purchasers objected. Part of the basis of Purchasers' objection was
that the Lienholder's security interest in the Property was not within
the chain of title and, therefore, the Lienholder had no standing to
redeem the Property. The Trial Court referred the question to the
Clerk and Master, acting as Master. After a hearing, the Master found
that the Lienholder was a "valid redemptor" under the redemption
statute, and the Trial Court subsequently concurred with this finding.
Purchasers appeal. We affirm.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/wrightad.wpd
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MATTHEW PATRICK FRONTERA, A/K/A MATTHEW ANTHONY
FRONTERA, A/K/A PATRICK MATTHEW FOSTER, A/K/A DERRICK JOSHUA FOSTER
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
Mark C. Scruggs, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Matthew
Patrick Frontera.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Jennifer L. Bledsoe,
Assistant Attorney General; Ron Davis, District Attorney General; and
Sharon E. Guffee, Assistant District Attorney General, for the
appellee, State of Tennessee.
Judge: WELLES
First Paragraph:
The Defendant, Matthew Patrick Frontera, pleaded guilty to criminal
impersonation, a Class B misdemeanor. Sentencing was left to the
discretion of the trial court. As part of his plea agreement, the
Defendant attempted to reserve the right to appeal a certified
question of law relating to the legality of his stop, detention and
questioning by police officers. In this appeal, the Defendant asserts
that the trial court erred by refusing to suppress the evidence
obtained against him due to an unlawful stop and detention. He also
argues that the trial court erred by sentencing him to serve six
months in the county jail with release eligibility at seventy-five
percent. Because the Defendant failed to properly reserve his issue
concerning his stop and detention, we are unable to reach the merits
of that issue. We affirm the sentence imposed by the trial court.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/fronteramp.wpd
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MARVIN W. HILL, JR.
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
Steve McEwen (on appeal), Mountain City, Tennessee; and Shawn Graham,
Maryville, Tennessee; for the Appellant, Marvin W. Hill, Jr.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Peter M. Coughlan,
Assistant Attorney General; Michael L. Flynn, District Attorney
General; and Bill Reed, Assistant District Attorney General, for the
Appellee, State of Tennessee.
Judge: WEDEMEYER
First Paragraph:
In July 1999, the Defendant pled guilty to evading arrest and
possession of marijuana, both Class A misdemeanors, and received
concurrent sentences of eleven months and twenty-nine days supervised
probation. In December 1999, the Defendant was indicted for assault
and aggravated criminal trespass, both of which are also Class A
misdemeanors. In January 2000, a violation of probation warrant was
issued against the Defendant, alleging that he had violated his
probation in the first two cases. In March 2000, the Defendant pled
guilty to the assault and aggravated criminal trespass charges, and a
combined sentencing hearing and probation violation hearing was held
by the trial court. The trial court revoked the Defendant's probation
in the first two cases and imposed concurrent sentences of eleven
months and twenty-nine days incarceration. The court also imposed
sentences of eleven months and twenty-nine days incarceration in the
second two cases, to run concurrently with each other but
consecutively to the sentences imposed in the first two cases. On
appeal, the Defendant argues that the trial court erred in imposing
sentences of incarceration in each case. Because our review of the
record reveals that the sentences were proper, we affirm the judgment
of the trial court.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/hillmw.wpd
CURTIS L. HUTCHERSON v. STATE OF TENNESSEE
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
Curtis L. Hutcherson, Wartburg, Tennessee, Pro Se.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Elizabeth B. Marney,
Assistant Attorney General; Joe C. Crumley, Jr., District Attorney
General; and Victor J. Vaughn, Assistant District Attorney General,
for the appellee, State of Tennessee.
Judge: TIPTON
First Paragraph:
The petitioner, Curtis L. Hutcherson, appeals from the summary
dismissal of his post-conviction claim for relief from a 1999
conviction for selling heroin. The trial court concluded that the
petition failed to state a cause of action. Although we agree with
the trial court's literal conclusion, we believe that the
circumstances in this case warrant allowing the petitioner the
opportunity to amend his petition pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. S
40-30-206(d). The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the
case remanded for further proceedings.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/hutchersoncl.wpd

PLEASE FORWARD THIS E-MAIL!
Feel free to forward this Opinion Flash on to anyone you know of with an e-mail address.
GET A FULL-TEXT COPY OF AN OPINION!
See the intrsuctions at the beginning of this edition of Opinion Flash.
JOIN TBALink!
While Opinion Flash is a free service of the Tennessee Bar Association, you must be a subscriber to TBALink, the premier Web site for Tennessee attorneys, in order to access the full-text of the opinions or enjoy many other features of TBALink. TBA members may join TBALink for just $50 per year. To join, go to: http://www.tba.org/join.html/
SUBSCRIBE TO OPINION FLASH!
Would you like to receive the TBALink Opinion Flash free each day by e-mail? Anyone, whether a TBA member or not, is welcome to subscribe ... it's free!
For the Plain Text Version:
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: SUBSCRIBE
3) Leave the body of the message blank
For the HTML Text Version:
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: SUBSCRIBE HTML
3) Leave the body of the message blank
UNSUBSCRIBE TO OPINION FLASH? ... SURELY NOT!
To STOP receiving TBALink Opinion-Flash:
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: UNSUBSCRIBE
3) Leave the body of the message blank

     
© Copyright 2001 Tennessee Bar Association
|