|

October 1, 2001
Volume 7 Number 180

What follows is the case style or name, first paragraph, author's name, and the names of attorneys for the parties of each opinion released eletronically today to TBALink.
- This Issue (IN THIS ORDER):
-
-
| 00 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Supreme Court |
| 01 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Supreme Court Workers' Compensation Panel |
| 00 |
New Document(s) or Proposed Rule(s) from the Tennessee Supreme Court |
| 02 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Court of Appeals |
| 06 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals |
| 05 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Attorney General (PDF format) |
| 00 |
New Judicial Ethics Opinion(s) |
| 00 |
New Formal Ethics Opinion(s) from the Board of Professional Responsibility |
-
There are three ways for TBALink members to get the full-text versions of these opinions from the Web:
Do a key word search in the Search Link area of TBALink. This option will allow you to view and save a plain-text version of the opinion.
Browse the Opinion List area of TBALink. This option will allow you to download the original version of the opinion.
Click the URL at end of each Opinion paragraph below. This option will allow you to download the original document.
Howard H. Vogel
Knoxville, Tennessee
Editor-in-Chief, TBALink

ELVIS WAYNE IVEY v. LONG HOLLOW LEASING, INC., et al.
Court:TSC - Workers Comp Panel
Attorneys:
Larry L. Crain, Brentwood, Tennessee, for the appellants, Long Hollow
Leasing, Company, Inc., et al.
William Joseph Butler and Frank D. Farrar, Lafayette, Tennessee, for
the appellee,Elvis Wayne Ivey.
Judge: LOSER
First Paragraph:
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special
Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance
with Tenn. Code Ann. S 50-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the
Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. In this
appeal, the defendant-employer contends the trial court abused its
discretion by (1) awarding the plaintiff- employee a default judgment
after the defendant failed to obey an order compelling discovery, and
by (2) denying its motion for a new trial. As discussed below, the
panel has concluded the judgment should be affirmed.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC_WCP/iveyelvis.wpd
THE ESTATE OF JAMES WENDELL KIRK BY YOUR ADMINISTRATOR, RANDALL LEE
KIRK, et al. v. JAMES LOWE
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Fred N. McLean, Paris, Tennessee, for the appellant, James Lowe.
Terry J. Leonard, Camden, Tennessee, for the appellees, Randall Lee
Kirk, Administrator of the Estate of James Wendell Kirk and Onellia
Kirk.
Judge: FARMER
First Paragraph:
The Plaintiffs in this case sued "John Doe," an unknown driver, for
injuries and damages resulting from the death of Plaintiffs' decedent.
Process was served on decedent's uninsured motorist insurance carrier
pursuant to Tennessee's Uninsured Motor Vehicle Coverage statutes.
More than one year after the accident, the identity of the "John Doe"
was discovered and Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint, naming him
as Defendant. The Defendant moved for summary judgment on the basis
that he was never an uninsured motorist, but at all pertinent times
was insured, and that the one-year statute of limitations had expired.
The trial court denied the motion, and we reverse.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/kirkjames.wpd
DAVID WAYNE ROUSE v. IRA NELL ROUSE
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Venita Marie Martin, Memphis, Tennessee, for the appellant, David
Wayne Rouse.
Kay Farese Turner, Martin W. Cash, Jr. and William E. Miller, Memphis,
Tennessee, for the appellee, Ira Nell Rouse.
Judge: FARMER
First Paragraph:
This is a divorce action wherein the trial court declared the parties
divorced. Husband appeals the trial court's decision to admit
evidence regarding his retirement plan; its valuation of the same; its
award of rehabilitative alimony to Wife; its award of attorney's fees
to Wife; its division of marital debt; its adopting Wife's proposed
final decree of divorce; its division of marital property; its
admitting evidence regarding Husband's use of pornography; and its
refusal to permit Husband's Rule 15 Memorandum in the record on
appeal. Additionally, Wife seeks her attorney's fees on appeal. We
affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/rousedavidw.wpd
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. HENRY B. BASON
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
Raymond Mack Garner, District Public Defender, and George H. Waters,
Assistant District Public Defender, for the appellant, Henry B. Bason.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Peter M. Coughlan,
Assistant Attorney General; Michael L. Flynn, District Attorney
General; and William R. Reed, Assistant District Attorney General, for
the appellee, State of Tennessee.
Judge: TIPTON
First Paragraph:
The defendant, Henry B. Bason, appeals from his conviction for
disorderly conduct, contesting the sufficiency of the evidence. We
affirm the judgment of conviction.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/basonhb.wpd
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ANTHONY S. CARIE
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
John H. Henderson, District Public Defender; C. Diane Crosier,
Assistant District Public Defender (at trial); and C. Edward Fowlkes,
Nashville, Tennessee (on appeal), for the appellant, Anthony S. Carie.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Laura McMullen Ford,
Assistant Attorney General; Ronald L. Davis, District Attorney
General; and Derek K. Smith, Assistant District Attorney General, for
the appellee, State of Tennessee.
Judge: RILEY
First Paragraph:
The defendant, Anthony S. Carie, appeals his bench trial convictions
for burglary of a building other than a habitation and theft over
$1,000. This case presents three issues for our determination: (1)
whether the evidence was sufficient to support the defendant's
convictions; (2) whether the trial court erred in not examining the
defendant in open court regarding his right to testify; and (3)
whether the defendant received effective assistance of counsel at
trial. For the reasons set forth below, we conclude there is no
reversible error; therefore, we affirm the judgment of the trial
court.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/carieas.wpd
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ANTHONY H. DEAN
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
A C Wharton, Jr., Shelby County Public Defender; and W. Mark Ward,
Assistant Public Defender, for the appellant, Anthony H. Dean.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; J. Ross Dyer,
Assistant Attorney General; William L. Gibbons, District Attorney
General; J. Robert Carter, Assistant District Attorney General; and
Paula Wulff, Assistant District Attorney General, for the appellee,
State of Tennessee.
Judge: GLENN
First Paragraph:
The defendant was convicted of aggravated rape and sentenced to forty
years as a violent offender. He timely appealed, alleging, inter alia,
that the trial court erred in not suppressing a confession obtained,
following his warrantless arrest, after he had been jailed for five
days without a determination of probable cause; in allowing DNA
results into evidence; and in permitting a forensic nurse examiner to
testify as a keeper of the sexual assault resource center records.
Based upon our review, we conclude that testimony regarding the
records of the Memphis Sexual Assault Resource Center was properly
admitted as business records testimony and that the DNA evidence was
properly admitted, as well. We conclude that the defendant's
confinement violated his Fourth Amendment rights and that his
confession should have been suppressed. However, this error was
harmless in light of the other evidence. Accordingly, we affirm the
conviction.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/deananthonyh.wpd
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ROBERT L. EASTERLY
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
Wade V. Davies, Knoxville, Tennessee, for the Appellant, Robert L.
Easterly.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General & Reporter; Mark A. Fulks, Assistant
Attorney General; Randall E. Nichols, District Attorney General; and
Leon Franks, Assistant District Attorney General, for the Appellee,
State of Tennessee.
Judge: WITT
First Paragraph:
In this interlocutory appeal, Robert L. Easterly challenges the Knox
County Criminal Court's order denying his motion to dismiss a
presentment against him. Easterly claims that the state is barred
from prosecuting him for the offense charged in the presentment
because (1) the case was not joined with a prior prosecution of him in
Sevier County, (2) the criminal conduct charged in the presentment is
the same offense for double jeopardy purposes as the case in which he
was convicted in Sevier County, and (3) the delay in commencement of
the Knox County prosecution violates his speedy trial and due process
rights. Because we agree with the defendant that both the mandatory
joinder rule and double jeopardy principles bar dual prosecutions, we
reverse the trial court's order and dismiss the presentment.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/easterlyrl.wpd
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. RICKY D. GARDNER
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
William B. McKenzie, Decatur, Tennessee, for the appellant, Ricky D.
Gardner.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General & Reporter; Patricia C. Kussman,
Assistant Attorney General; J. Scott McCluen, District Attorney
General; and Roger Delp, Assistant District Attorney General, for the
appellee, State of Tennessee.
Judge: WADE
First Paragraph:
The defendant, Ricky D. Gardner, was convicted of one count of
vandalism over $500; one count of vandalism over $1,000; three
counts of burglary; one count of burglary of a motor vehicle; three
counts of theft over $1,000; two counts of theft under $500; and one
count of theft over $500. The trial court imposed an effective
six-year sentence to be served in a community corrections program.
Later, the trial court revoked the alternative sentence and ordered
the defendant to serve the balance of his sentence in the Department
of Correction. In this appeal of right, the defendant argues that the
trial court erred by ordering revocation. The judgments are affirmed.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/gardnerrickyd.wpd
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. GERALD L. POWERS
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
W. Mark Ward, Assistant Public Defender, (on appeal), Memphis,
Tennessee; Tony N. Brayton, Assistant Public Defender, (on appeal),
Memphis, Tennessee; Garland Erguden, Assistant Public Defender, (on
appeal), Memphis, Tennessee; Loyce Lambert-Ryan, Assistant Public
Defender, (at trial), Memphis, Tennessee; and Larry H. Nance, (at
trial), Memphis, Tennessee, for the appellant, Gerald Powers.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Michael E. Moore,
Solicitor General; Alice B. Lustre, Assistant Attorney General;
William L. Gibbons, District Attorney General; Amy P. Weirich,
Assistant District Attorney General; and Jerry R. Kitchen, Assistant
District Attorney General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee.
Judge: WEDEMEYER
First Paragraph:
The Defendant, Gerald L. Powers, was convicted by a jury of first
degree felony murder in the perpetration of a robbery and of
aggravated robbery. The jury sentenced the Defendant to death for the
murder on the basis of three aggravating circumstances: that the
Defendant was previously convicted of one or more violent felonies;
that the Defendant committed the murder to avoid his arrest and/or
prosecution; and that the Defendant committed the murder while
committing a kidnapping. The trial court subsequently sentenced the
Defendant as a Range III persistent offender to thirty years
incarceration for the aggravated robbery, to be served consecutive to
the death sentence. In this appeal as of right, the Defendant
challenges his convictions, raising the following issues: (1) whether
the evidence identifying him as the perpetrator is sufficient; (2)
whether a variance between the indictment and the proof at trial is
material and prejudicial; (3) whether the trial court had jurisdiction
over the crimes; (4) whether the Defendant's wife's testimony should
have been suppressed pursuant to the marital communications privilege;
(5) whether the trial court erred in refusing to admit evidence in
support of a third-party defense; (6) whether the trial court erred in
admitting a lay witness's testimony identifying photographs as being
of the Defendant; and (7) whether the trial court erred in admitting a
deposition taken in Mississippi by a Tennessee notary public. The
Defendant challenges the imposition of the death sentence on the
following grounds: (1) whether the trial court erred in admitting the
facts underlying the Defendant's prior felonies; (2) whether the
Defendant's prior felonies were violent within the meaning of the
statutory aggravating circumstance; (3) whether the evidence is
sufficient to support the jury's finding that the Defendant committed
the murder to avoid his arrest and/or prosecution; (4) whether the
trial court erred in refusing to admit evidence of the victim's bad
character; and (5) whether Tennessee's death penalty scheme is
constitutional. Finally, the Defendant contends that the trial court
should have sentenced him as a Range II offender for the aggravated
robbery. Upon our review of the record and relevant legal authority,
we find no reversible error in the Defendant's convictions or in the
imposition of the death sentence. We reduce the Defendant's sentence
for the aggravated robbery to twenty years. In all other respects, we
affirm the judgment of the trial court.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/powersgl1.wpd
Service of Process/right of process server/ refusal of service
Date: September 24, 2001
Opinion Number: 01-148
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/AG/OP148.pdf
Authority of a private business to refuse to allow a private process
server or a sheriff from proceeding onto its business property to
serve civil papers.
Date: September 24, 2001
Opinion Number: 01-149
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/AG/OP149.pdf
Licensing of Home Medical Equipment Providers
Date: September 24, 2001
Opinion Number: 01-150
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/AG/OP150.pdf
Reducing Number of County Commissioners
Date: September 25, 2001
Opinion Number: 01-151
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/AG/OP151.pdf
Alderman Serving as Constable
Date: September 25, 2001
Opinion Number: 01-152
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/AG/OP152.pdf

PLEASE FORWARD THIS E-MAIL!
Feel free to forward this Opinion Flash on to anyone you know of with an e-mail address.
GET A FULL-TEXT COPY OF AN OPINION!
See the intrsuctions at the beginning of this edition of Opinion Flash.
JOIN TBALink!
While Opinion Flash is a free service of the Tennessee Bar Association, you must be a subscriber to TBALink, the premier Web site for Tennessee attorneys, in order to access the full-text of the opinions or enjoy many other features of TBALink. TBA members may join TBALink for just $50 per year. To join, go to: http://www.tba.org/join.html/
SUBSCRIBE TO OPINION FLASH!
Would you like to receive the TBALink Opinion Flash free each day by e-mail? Anyone, whether a TBA member or not, is welcome to subscribe ... it's free!
For the Plain Text Version:
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: SUBSCRIBE
3) Leave the body of the message blank
For the HTML Text Version:
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: SUBSCRIBE HTML
3) Leave the body of the message blank
UNSUBSCRIBE TO OPINION FLASH? ... SURELY NOT!
To STOP receiving TBALink Opinion-Flash:
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: UNSUBSCRIBE
3) Leave the body of the message blank

     
© Copyright 2001 Tennessee Bar Association
|