|

October 31, 2001
Volume 7 Number 202
Missing Reports
Due to technical problems at our service provider, Opinion Flash files for Monday, Oct. 29, and Tuesday, Oct. 30, were not distributed to subscribers. We are including cases from those days in today's Opinion Flash. We are sorry for the inconvenience.
What follows is the case style or name, first paragraph, author's name, and the names of attorneys for the parties of each opinion released eletronically today to TBALink.
- This Issue (IN THIS ORDER):
-
-
| 02 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Supreme Court |
| 00 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Supreme Court Workers' Compensation Panel |
| 01 |
New Document(s) or Proposed Rule(s) from the Tennessee Supreme Court |
| 06 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Court of Appeals |
| 06 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals |
| 01 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Attorney General (PDF format) |
| 00 |
New Judicial Ethics Opinion(s) |
| 00 |
New Formal Ethics Opinion(s) from the Board of Professional Responsibility |
-
There are three ways for TBALink members to get the full-text versions of these opinions from the Web:
Do a key word search in the Search Link area of TBALink. This option will allow you to view and save a plain-text version of the opinion.
Browse the Opinion List area of TBALink. This option will allow you to download the original version of the opinion.
Click the URL at end of each Opinion paragraph below. This option will allow you to download the original document.
Howard H. Vogel
Knoxville, Tennessee
Editor-in-Chief, TBALink

FRED EDMOND DEAN A/K/A OMAWALI ASHANTI SHABAZZ v. STATE OF TENNESSEE
Court:TSC
Attorneys:
Richard L. Gaines, Knoxville, Tennessee, for the appellee, Fred Edmond
Dean.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Michael E. Moore,
Solicitor General; Mark E. Davidson, Assistant Attorney General;
Greeley Wells, District Attorney General; and Barry Staubus, Assistant
District Attorney General, for the appellant, State of Tennessee.
Judge: ANDERSON
First Paragraph:
We granted this appeal to determine whether the petitioner properly
raised a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel in a
post-conviction proceeding when it was based upon the failure of
defense counsel to object to or appeal the trial court's erroneous
range of punishment instruction to the jury on the offense of
attempted second degree murder. We conclude (1) that the issue of
ineffective assistance of counsel was properly raised in the
post-conviction proceeding and (2) that defense counsel's failure to
object to or appeal the erroneous jury instruction fell below the
range of competence demanded of attorneys in criminal cases and was
prejudicial to the petitioner. We therefore affirm the judgment of the
Court of Criminal Appeals.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC/deanfred.wpd
JACKIE W. MCLANEY v. RICKY BELL, Warden, et al.
Court:TSC
Attorneys:
Jeffrey T. Loy, Jamestown, Kentucky, for the appellant, Jackie W.
McLaney.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter, Michael E. Moore,
Solicitor General, Kim R. Helper, Assistant Attorney General, and
Victor S. Johnson, III, District Attorney, for the appellees, Ricky
Bell, Warden, and the State of Tennessee.
Judge: BIRCH
First Paragraph:
This case is before the Court by way of a petition for writ of habeas
corpus filed by Jackie W. McLaney, challenging a plea agreement which
encompassed a sentence alleged to be illegal. McLaney presents three
issues for review: (1) whether the record shows that his arrest
occurred while he was on bail for a felony offense (thus requiring
consecutive sentences pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. S 40-20-111 (2000)
and Tenn. R. Crim. P. 32(c)(3)(C)); (2) whether such an arrest while
on bail affects the concurrent sentence imposed; and (3) whether
habeas corpus provides a remedy for the review and correction of such
a sentence imposed pursuant to a plea agreement. We hold that if the
face of the judgment or the record of the underlying proceedings shows
that the concurrent sentences is illegal, such sentence creates a void
judgment for which habeas corpus relief is available. Therefore, we
reverse the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals and remand the
cause to the trial court for appointment of counsel and a
determination whether the face of the judgment or the record of the
proceedings indicates that McLaney committed the offenses for which he
received the concurrent sentence while on bail for a felony offense.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC/mclaneyj.wpd
SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SUPREME COURT DISCRETIONARY APPEALS
Court:TSC - Rules
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC_Rules/certlist_1029.wpd
EDNA COOKSEY, et al. v. HCA HEALTH SERVICES OF TENNESSEE, INC.
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
James M. Balthrop, Springfield, Tennessee, for the appellants Edna
Cooksey and Virgil Cooksey.
C. J. Gideon, Jr. and Benjamin Papa, Nashville, Tennessee, for the
appellee, HCA Health Services of Tennessee, Inc.
Judge: CANTRELL
First Paragraph:
The only question in this appeal is whether the injury a patient
suffered during post-operative care resulted from a medical procedure
and, therefore, required expert proof to establish the hospital's
liability. The Circuit Court of Davidson County held that the
complaint sought damages for professional negligence and that since
the plaintiff did not rebut the hospital's motion for summary judgment
with any expert proof, the complaint must be dismissed. We affirm.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/cookseye.wpd
CORRECTED OPINION
STATE OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES v. MICHELLE STEWART,
PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF CHARLIE MAE CURREN, DECEASED
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter, Pamela A. Hayden-Wood,
Assistant Attorney General, Nashville,
For Appellant, Tennessee Department of Human Services Samuel F.
Anderson, Nashville, Attorney Ad Litem, For Appellee, Charlie Mae
Curren David A Dearolf, Nashville, Guardian Ad Litem for Appellee,
Charlie Mae Curren
Judge: CRAWFORD
First Paragraph:
The Department of Human Services (DHS) instituted an action in
chancery court pursuant to the Tennessee Adult Protection Act, T.C.A.
S 71-6-101 et seq. (1995) after receiving a report of possible abuse,
neglect, or exploitation of the respondent. The court appointed
counsel to represent the respondent and also appointed a guardian ad
litem to represent respondent. Subsequently, the court also appointed
a temporary guardian to represent the interest of the respondent.
After an evidentiary hearing, the trial court found that DHS had not
carried its burden of proof required by the applicable statute and had
failed to properly investigate the case before proceeding with the
action. The trial court also ordered that DHS proceed with the filing
of a conservatorship proceeding in the probate court which DHS did.
Respondent's appointed attorney, guardian ad litem, temporary
guardian, and later the conservator filed motions for assessment of
fees and discretionary costs against DHS. The trial court granted the
motions and assessed the fees and discretionary costs against DHS.
DHS has appealed. We reverse.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/currenchar.wpd
WILLIAM ERNEST HOOD, III v. PATSY SEALS HOOD (BAST)
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Jennifer Austin Mitchell, Dunlap, Tennessee, for the appellant, Patsy
Seals Hood (Bast).
Howard L. Upchurch, Pikeville, Tennessee, for the appellee, William
Ernest Hood, III.
Judge: CANTRELL
First Paragraph:
The parties executed a marital dissolution agreement pursuant to
divorce, which required the wife to transfer her interest in a 36 acre
tract of marital property to the husband, and the husband to sell the
tract, with the net proceeds to be divided between the parties. The
wife subsequently quitclaimed her interest in the property, and the
trial court incorporated the marital dissolution agreement into the
Final Decree of Divorce by reference. When the wife filed a motion to
enforce the agreement, the trial court ruled that any lien on the
property the wife had acquired by virtue of the agreement was
extinguished when she signed the quitclaim deed. We reverse the trial
court.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/hoodwe.wpd
JOHN HOPKINS d/b/a RICHLAND CREEK SOD FARM v. POLO DEVELOPMENT,
L.L.C., et al.
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Harold E. Bishop, Maryville, Tennessee, for the appellant, John
Hopkins d/b/a Richland Creek Sod Farm.
Celeste H. Herbert, Knoxville, Tennessee, for the appellee, Gettysvue
Partners, L.P.
Judge: INMAN
First Paragraph:
The sub-contractor plaintiff filed a lien against property owned by
Gettysvue Partners, L.P., and leased to Polo Development, L.L.C.
Kilmers, Inc., had contracted with Polo Development to construct a
golf course thereon, and subcontracted with the plaintiff to supply
sod for the course. The plaintiff was discharged by Kilmers and
claimed a balance owing of $190,278.41. A performance bond had been
posted by Kilmers as general contractor, a copy of which was filed by
Gettysvue Partners pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. S 66-11-142(b)(1) for
the purpose of discharging the lien. The plaintiff consequently did
not sue out the attachment required by Tenn. Code Ann. S 66-11-126.
Two years after the complaint was filed the court ruled that the bond
was ineffective because the insurance company was not licensed in
Tennessee. Gettysvue Partners filed a motion for summary judgment
because the plaintiff failed to sue out an attachment. The motion was
granted. We affirm.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/hopkinsjohn.wpd
DAN MCCOY, et al. v. SUZI MIZELL
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
R.D. Hash, Maryville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Suzi Mizell.
John L. McCord, Knoxville, Tennessee, for the appellees, Dan and Jan
McCoy.
Judge: SUSANO
First Paragraph:
This appeal involves the application of T.C.A. S 47-29-101, a statute
dealing with civil liability for dishonored checks and drafts. The
lessors of a residence sued their lessee alleging that the latter
acted with "fraudulent intent" when she stopped payment on a rent
check given to the plaintiffs. Following a bench trial, the court
below found that the defendant's action in stopping payment on the
$650 rent check triggered the provisions of T.C.A. S 47-29-101. The
court awarded the plaintiffs the face amount of the check, as well as
interest, treble damages capped at $500, and attorney's fees of $1,500
- a total of $2,720.52. In the same judgment, the court also awarded
the plaintiff damages for breach of the lease, finding these damages -
before the allowance of a credit to avoid a double recovery - to be
$1,483.25. The defendant only appeals the judgment awarded under
T.C.A. S 47- 29-101. She argues that the trial court erred in its
application of that statute to the facts of this case. The plaintiffs
contend that the defendant's appeal is frivolous, thus entitling them
to damages pursuant to the provisions of T.C.A. S 27-1-122. We modify
the judgment below to delete the award of $2,720.52 to the plaintiffs
under T.C.A. S 47-29-101. This modification also requires us to
modify the trial court's award for breach of the lease so as to
increase that award to $1,493.25. As modified, the trial court's
judgment is affirmed.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/mccoyd.wpd
IN RE: ESTATE OF GUY ALLEN WHITE
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
W. Howell Forrester, Pulaski, Tennessee, for the appellant, Mable White.
Robert D. Massey, Pulaski, Tennessee, Pro Se.
Bobby Allen White, Terry Lee White, James Edward White, Jeffery Lane
White, Mack Dean White, and Jack Eugene White, Pulaski, Tennessee, Pro
Se.
Judge: KOCH
First Paragraph:
This appeal involves a dispute between a widow and her six sons
regarding a small tract of property her estranged husband conveyed to
the sons approximately nine months before he died. The widow filed a
petition in the Chancery Court for Giles County seeking appellate
review of the Giles County Probate Court's orders. She also sought a
declaration that the decedent's conveyance to the sons was a
fraudulent conveyance and, in the alternative, requested a partition
sale of the property. Following a hearing, the trial court determined
that it lacked appellate jurisdiction over the probate court and that
the widow lacked standing to seek partition of the property because
she owned no interest in it. The widow asserts on this appeal that
the trial court erred by dismissing her petition to partition the
property. We affirm the dismissal of the widow's fraudulent
conveyance and partition claims. However, we vacate the dismissal of
her appeal from the probate court and remand this claim for further
proceedings in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. S 16-4-108(a)(2)
(1994).
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/whitegaestate.wpd
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. DAVID GLENN AYERS
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
Ann D. Coria, Clinton, Tennessee, for the appellant, David Glenn
Ayers.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General & Reporter; John H. Bledsoe,
Assistant Attorney General; and Jan Hicks, Assistant District Attorney
General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee.
Judge: WADE
First Paragraph:
The defendant, David Glenn Ayers, was convicted of driving under the
influence, second offense. The trial court imposed a sentence of 11
months and 29 days with release eligibility after service of 75%. In
this appeal of right, the defendant challenges the sufficiency of the
evidence, argues that the trial court should have set aside the
verdict as thirteenth juror, and contends that the sentence is
excessive. The judgment is affirmed.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/ayersdavidglenn.wpd
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. STANLEY BOXLEY
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
Garland Erguden, Memphis, Tennessee (on appeal); William L. Johnson
and Dianne Thackery, Memphis, Tennessee (at trial), for the Appellant,
Stanley Boxley.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Laura E. McMullen,
Assistant Attorney General; William L. Gibbons, District Attorney
General; and Thomas Henderson, Assistant District Attorney General,
for the Appellee, State of Tennessee.
Judge: WEDEMEYER
First Paragraph:
The Defendant, Stanley Boxley, was convicted by a jury of first degree
felony murder and attempted aggravated robbery. He was sentenced to
life imprisonment for the murder and to a consecutive ten year term
for the attempted aggravated robbery. In this appeal as of right the
Defendant contends that there is insufficient evidence to sustain his
convictions and that the trial court erred by ruling that the State
could introduce evidence of threats against the accomplice witnesses
if the Defendant inquired into the prosecution's recommendation that
they receive probation. Finding the evidence insufficient to
corroborate the accomplices' testimony, we reverse the Defendant's
convictions and dismiss.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/boxleys.wpd
WALTER L. JOHNSON v. STATE OF TENNESSEE
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
Robert Little, Memphis, Tennessee, for the Appellant, Walter L.
Johnson.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Laura McMullen Ford,
Assistant Attorney General; William L. Gibbons, District Attorney
General; and Katrina Earley, Assistant District Attorney General, for
the Appellee, State of Tennessee.
Judge: WEDEMEYER
First Paragraph:
The Petitioner was convicted of especially aggravated kidnapping and
sentenced to twenty-five years incarceration. The conviction and
sentence were affirmed on direct appeal. Subsequently, the Petitioner
filed a petition for post-conviction relief, alleging that his
attorney at trial was ineffective. The post-conviction court denied
relief. We affirm the judgment of the post-conviction court.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/johnsonwl.wpd
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MARY JANE BURCHFIELD McMAHAN
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
Steve McEwen, Mountain City, Tennessee (on appeal); Raymond Mack
Garner, District Public Defender; and George H. Waters, Assistant
District Public Defender (at hearing), for the appellant, Mary Jane
Burchfield McMahan.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Mark A. Fulks,
Assistant Attorney General; Michael L. Flynn, District Attorney
General; and William R. Reed, Assistant District Attorney General, for
the appellee, State of Tennessee.
Judge: RILEY
First Paragraph:
The defendant appeals the trial court's revocation of her probation.
After a thorough review of the record, we affirm the judgment of the
trial court.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/mcmahanmjb.wpd
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MELVIN M. MELSON
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
Richard DeBerry, Assistant Public Defender, Savannah, Tennessee, for
the Appellant, Melvin M. Melson.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Kim R. Helper,
Assistant Attorney General; G. Robert Radford, District Attorney
General; and John W. Overton, Jr., Assistant District Attorney
General, for the Appellee, State of Tennessee.
Judge: WEDEMEYER
First Paragraph:
The Defendant pled guilty to two counts of aggravated sexual battery,
and the trial court sentenced the Defendant pursuant to his plea
agreement to two concurrent ten-year sentences. In this appeal as of
right, the Defendant argues that the trial court erred by denying his
request that he serve his sentence on community corrections. Because
we conclude that the sentence imposed is adequately supported by the
record, and that the trial court did not err by refusing to allow the
Defendant to serve his sentence on community corrections, we affirm
the judgment of the trial court.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/melsonmm.wpd
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. PATRICK D. PARIS
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
Jeffrey S. Schaarschmidt (on appeal) and John Brooks (at trial),
Chattanooga, Tennessee, for the appellant, Patrick D. Paris.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Jennifer L. Bledsoe,
Assistant Attorney General; William H. Cox, III, District Attorney
General; and Barry Allen Steelman, Assistant District Attorney
General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee.
Judge: TIPTON
First Paragraph:
The defendant, Patrick D. Paris, appeals from his convictions for
attempted first degree murder and especially aggravated robbery,
contending that the evidence is insufficient to support his
convictions and that the trial court erred by allowing hearsay
testimony into evidence as an excited utterance. We affirm the
judgments of conviction.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/parispd.wpd
Admission of service dogs to places of public accommodation
Date: October 22, 2001
Opinion Number: 01-156
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/AG/OP156.pdf

PLEASE FORWARD THIS E-MAIL!
Feel free to forward this Opinion Flash on to anyone you know of with an e-mail address.
GET A FULL-TEXT COPY OF AN OPINION!
See the intrsuctions at the beginning of this edition of Opinion Flash.
JOIN TBALink!
While Opinion Flash is a free service of the Tennessee Bar Association, you must be a subscriber to TBALink, the premier Web site for Tennessee attorneys, in order to access the full-text of the opinions or enjoy many other features of TBALink. TBA members may join TBALink for just $50 per year. To join, go to: http://www.tba.org/join.html/
SUBSCRIBE TO OPINION FLASH!
Would you like to receive the TBALink Opinion Flash free each day by e-mail? Anyone, whether a TBA member or not, is welcome to subscribe ... it's free!
For the Plain Text Version:
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: SUBSCRIBE
3) Leave the body of the message blank
For the HTML Text Version:
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: SUBSCRIBE HTML
3) Leave the body of the message blank
UNSUBSCRIBE TO OPINION FLASH? ... SURELY NOT!
To STOP receiving TBALink Opinion-Flash:
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: UNSUBSCRIBE
3) Leave the body of the message blank

     
© Copyright 2001 Tennessee Bar Association
|