|

November 13, 2001
Volume 7 Number 210

What follows is the case style or name, first paragraph, author's name, and the names of attorneys for the parties of each opinion released eletronically today to TBALink.
- This Issue (IN THIS ORDER):
-
-
| 00 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Supreme Court |
| 00 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Supreme Court Workers' Compensation Panel |
| 00 |
New Document(s) or Proposed Rule(s) from the Tennessee Supreme Court |
| 03 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Court of Appeals |
| 02 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals |
| 07 |
New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Attorney General (PDF format) |
| 00 |
New Judicial Ethics Opinion(s) |
| 00 |
New Formal Ethics Opinion(s) from the Board of Professional Responsibility |
-
There are three ways for TBALink members to get the full-text versions of these opinions from the Web:
Do a key word search in the Search Link area of TBALink. This option will allow you to view and save a plain-text version of the opinion.
Browse the Opinion List area of TBALink. This option will allow you to download the original version of the opinion.
Click the URL at end of each Opinion paragraph below. This option will allow you to download the original document.
Howard H. Vogel
Knoxville, Tennessee
Editor-in-Chief, TBALink

JAMES LEE JONES, III, et al. v. PIERCE BRANDON GARRETT, a/k/a PERRY
GARRETT
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Douglas R. Beier, Morristown, Tennessee, for the Appellant, Pierce
Brandon Garrett, a/k/a Perry Garrett
Jonathan R. Perry, Morristown, Tennessee, for the Appellees, James Lee
Jones, III, and Stephanie Trent Jones
Judge: GODDARD
First Paragraph:
This is a suit wherein James Lee Jones, III, and his wife seek a
determination that Pierce Brandon Garrett, a/k/a Perry Garrett, has
abandoned his son so that they may adopt him. The Trial Judge found
by clear and convincing evidence that abandonment had occurred, but
did not make any finding as to the best interest of the child. We
affirm the finding as to abandonment and remand the case for a
determination as to best interest.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/jonesjames.wpd
ROBERT LEE McNABB, et al. v. STEVE HATFIELD, et al.
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Barrett T. Painter, Cleveland, Tennessee, for the Appellants, Robert
Lee McNabb and Roberta McNabb Poteet.
Hallie H. McFadden, Chattanooga, Tennessee, for the Appellees, Steve
Hatfield and Almeda Hatfield.
Judge: SWINEY
First Paragraph:
Robert Lee McNabb and Roberta McNabb Poteet ("Plaintiffs") brought a
partition action against Steve Hatfield and Almeda Hatfield
("Defendants") and Mary R. Edwards, concerning property located in
Chattanooga, Tennessee ("Property"). The Property originally was
owned by the parties' grandparents. During the pendency of this
matter at the trial level, Plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed Mary R.
Edwards from this suit. Defendants, who had possessed the Property
and paid taxes on it since 1977, filed a counterclaim in which they
requested the Trial Court quiet title in their favor. Defendants filed
a Motion for Summary Judgment, arguing they were the true owners of
the Property under the theories of adverse possession and title by
prescription. Defendants also argued in their motion that they were
entitled to the statutory presumption under Tenn. Code Ann. S 28-2-109
that they were the prima facie owners of the Property because they
paid property taxes for more than twenty years, and that Plaintiffs'
claim of ownership was barred by Tenn. Code Ann. S 28-2-110 due to
Plaintiffs' failure to pay property taxes for more than twenty years.
The Trial Court partially granted Defendants' motion, holding that
Defendants were entitled to judgment as a matter of law as to
Plaintiffs. The Trial Court held that Mary R. Edwards had a claim of
ownership to the Property but was no longer a party to the partition
action. The Trial Court concluded that the only effect of its
judgment was to hold that Plaintiffs have no legal interest in the
Property. Plaintiffs appeal. We reverse, in part, and affirm, in
part.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/mcnabbrl.wpd
ROY MICHAEL SHANKS v. HAZEL R. ALBERT, ACTING COMMISSIONER, TENNESSEE
DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, et al.
Court:TCA
Attorneys:
Paul G. Whetstone, Morristown, Tennessee, for the Appellant, Roy
Michael Shanks
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter, and Douglas Earl
Dimond, Assistant Attorney General, Nashville, Tennessee, for the
Appellee, Hazel R. Albert
Robert C. Jessee and Lori L. Jessee, Morristown, Tennessee, for the
Appellee, The City of Morristown
Judge: GODDARD
First Paragraph:
Roy Michael Shanks appeals dismissal of his suit seeking to overturn a
determination of the Board of Review that he was not entitled to
unemployment compensation because of misconduct. We concur in the
determination of the Chancellor and affirm.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/shanksroy.wpd
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JANICE CAROL BISKNER
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
Ardena J. Garth, District Public Defender; William Dobson, Assistant
Public Defender; and Donna R. Miller, Assistant Public Defender, for
the appellant, Janice Carol Biskner.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Elizabeth B. Marney,
Assistant Attorney General; William H. Cox, III, District Attorney
General; Tom Kimball, Assistant District Attorney General; and Parke
Masterson, Assistant District Attorney General, for the appellee,
State of Tennessee.
Judge: WOODALL
First Paragraph:
Defendant was convicted of driving under the influence ("DUI"), fourth
or subsequent offense, driving while license revoked, and child
endangerment. In this appeal, Defendant challenges all convictions on
the ground that the trial court's refusal to bifurcate the trial
proceedings violated her right to a fair trial. Defendant also argues
that recently amended Tennessee Code Annotated section 55-10-403(a)(1)
is unconstitutional and that her sentence is excessive. After a
review of the record and applicable law, we reverse Defendant's
convictions and remand this case for a new trial.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/bisknerjanicecarol.wpd
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. KEITH GOODMAN
Court:TCCA
Attorneys:
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter, and Elizabeth B.
Marney, Assistant Attorney General, for the appellant, State of
Tennessee.
J. Thomas Marshall, Jr., District Public Defender, Clinton, Tennessee,
for the appellee, Keith Goodman.
Judge: TIPTON
First Paragraph:
The state appeals the dismissal of the especially aggravated
kidnapping charge against the defendant, Keith Goodman. The trial
court held that the defendant, as the natural father of the infant
victim, could not be held criminally liable for kidnapping because a
natural parent's removal or confinement of a child is not "unlawful"
as that term is defined in Tenn. Code Ann. S 39-13-301(2). The state
claims that the trial court misinterpreted the kidnapping statutes.
We conclude that the trial court's dismissal of the indictment was
essentially a summary judgment for the defendant, which is improper in
criminal cases. We reverse the trial court's ruling and remand the
case for reinstatement of the indictment.
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/goodmank.wpd
Legality and Reinstatement of Beer Permit Distance Standards
Date: October 25, 2001
Opinion Number: 01-157
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/AG/OP157.pdf
Education: Use of Confidential Information About Juvenile Delinquent
Date: October 25, 2001
Opinion Number: No. 01-158
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/AG/OP158.pdf
Placement of Double-Wide Trailers in Trailer Parks
Date: October 25, 2001
Opinion Number: 01-159
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/AG/OP159.pdf
Authority of city to refer to its court as a general sessions court
Date: October 25, 2001
Opinion Number: 01-160
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/AG/OP160.pdf
Limits on Loans from Candidate's Personal Funds to Candidate's
Campaign
Date: November 5, 2001
Opinion Number: Opinion No. 01-161
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/AG/OP161.pdf
Juvenile court referees also serving as appointed counsel in criminal
cases
Date: November 5, 2001
Opinion Number: No. 01-162
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/AG/OP162.pdf
Certified Trainers under the Private Protective Services Licensing and
Regulatory Act
Date: November 5, 2001
Opinion Number: 01-163
http://www.tba.org/tba_files/AG/OP163.pdf

PLEASE FORWARD THIS E-MAIL!
Feel free to forward this Opinion Flash on to anyone you know of with an e-mail address.
GET A FULL-TEXT COPY OF AN OPINION!
See the intrsuctions at the beginning of this edition of Opinion Flash.
JOIN TBALink!
While Opinion Flash is a free service of the Tennessee Bar Association, you must be a subscriber to TBALink, the premier Web site for Tennessee attorneys, in order to access the full-text of the opinions or enjoy many other features of TBALink. TBA members may join TBALink for just $50 per year. To join, go to: http://www.tba.org/join.html/
SUBSCRIBE TO OPINION FLASH!
Would you like to receive the TBALink Opinion Flash free each day by e-mail? Anyone, whether a TBA member or not, is welcome to subscribe ... it's free!
For the Plain Text Version:
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: SUBSCRIBE
3) Leave the body of the message blank
For the HTML Text Version:
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: SUBSCRIBE HTML
3) Leave the body of the message blank
UNSUBSCRIBE TO OPINION FLASH? ... SURELY NOT!
To STOP receiving TBALink Opinion-Flash:
1) Send an e-mail message to: Opinion-Flash@tba.org
2) In the SUBJECT of the message type: UNSUBSCRIBE
3) Leave the body of the message blank

     
© Copyright 2001 Tennessee Bar Association
|