Opinion FlashApril 22, 2002Volume 8 — Number 068 What follows is the case style or name, first paragraph, author's name, and the names of attorneys for the parties of each opinion released eletronically today to TBALink.
There are three ways for TBALink members to get the full-text versions of these opinions from the Web:
Howard H. Vogel SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SUPREME COURT DISCRETIONARY APPEALS Court:TSC - Rules http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC_Rules/certlist_0422.wpd RONNIE BRADFIELD, a/k/a PAUL FARNSWORTH v. JAMES DUKES, et al. Court:TCA Attorneys: Ronnie Bradfield, Pro Se. Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Michael E. Moore, Solicitor General; and Dawn Jordan, Assistant Attorney General for the appellees, James Dukes, Tennessee Department of Correction and Donal Campbell. Judge: FARMER First Paragraph: Appellant is an inmate housed in the custody of the Tennessee Department of Corrections (TDOC). Appellant filed a writ of certiorari with the trial court asserting that the TDOC violated his rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act and section 1983 of the U.S. Code. Appellant also claimed that the parole board refused to provide scheduled parole hearings in 1994 and 1995. The trial court dismissed the case ruling that a writ of certiorari was not proper in this case, that Appellant did not exhaust his administrative claims, and that the petition was not timely. For the reasons below, we affirm the trial court's dismissal of the case. http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/bradfieldr.wpd JIMMY E. CAMPBELL v. TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION Court:TCA Attorneys: Jimmy E. Campbell, Only, Tennessee, Pro Se. Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Michael E. Moore, Solicitor General; and Stephanie R. Reevers, Associate Deputy Attorney General, for the appellee, Tennessee Department of Correction. Judge: KOCH First Paragraph: This appeal involves a dispute between a prisoner and the Tennessee Department of Correction regarding the calculation of sentence reduction credits. The prisoner, believing that he has a right to have his sentence calculated "according to the least onerous method," filed suit in the Chancery Court for Davidson County seeking to require the Department to calculate his sentence reduction credits using the pre-1985 sentence credit statutes. The trial court dismissed the prisoner's petition after concluding that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction because the prisoner had failed to allege in his petition that he had exhausted his administrative remedies as required by Tenn. Code Ann. S 4-5-225(b) (1998). We have determined that the prisoner's petition should have been dismissed, not for lack of subject matter jurisdiction but because it fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment dismissing the prisoner's complaint. http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/campbellj.wpd SHARON GLENN v. GORDON CONSTRUCTION, INC., et al. Court:TCA Attorneys: W. Thomas Schmitz, Brentwood, Tennessee, counsel on appeal for the appellant, Gordon Construction, Inc. Eugene N. Bulso, Jr., Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellee, Sharon D. Glenn. Judge: COTTRELL First Paragraph: Plaintiff filed suit against construction company for negligent repair of tornado damage to her home. Parties submitted an Agreed Order of Compromise, Settlement, and Dismissal which was signed by the trial court and filed on the same day it was received. The construction company retained new counsel and filed a motion to set aside the order. Plaintiff sought contempt because the construction company refused to comply with the Agreed Order. Months later Plaintiff issued execution against construction company after failure to comply with the terms of the Agreed Order and garnished over $11,000 from its bank account. The trial court denied a motion to quash execution filed by the construction company. The construction company appeals arguing that the agreed order could not have been entered after one of the parties withdrew consent for the settlement. We affirm the decision of the trial court. http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/glenns.wpd SHERRY ANN HALL v. MARK STEPHEN HALL Court:TCA Attorneys: Thomas F. Bloom, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Mark Stephen Hall. Janet D. Powell, Murfreesboro, Tennessee, for the appellee, Sherry Ann Hall. Judge: LILLARD First Paragraph: This is a divorce case. The wife was awarded more than half of the martial assets and alimony in futuro in amounts that would step down after three years and end when the wife reaches retirement age. In addition, the trial court awarded the wife, in lieu of attorney's fees, ownership in a life insurance policy on the husband's life. The husband now appeals the trial court's division of marital property, the award of alimony in futuro, and the award relating to attorney's fees. We affirm the trial court's division of marital property and the award relating to attorney's fees, but we reverse the trial court's award of alimony in futuro and instead award rehabilitative alimony. http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/hallsa.wpd BEN THOMAS HOUSTON v. MICHELE HOUSTON Court:TCA Attorneys: David E. Danner, Nashville, For Appellant, Ben Thomas Houston Phillip Robinson, Nashville, For Appellee, Michele Houston Judge: CRAWFORD First Paragraph: In this post-divorce proceeding, the appellant, Ben Thomas Houston (hereinafter "Father"), filed a petition for modification of child support. The trial court increased Father's child support obligation and awarded the appellee, Michelle Houston (hereinafter "Mother"), attorney's fees. Father appeals. We affirm. http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/houstonben.wpd MELODY JO KNOWLES v. JACK REED KNOWLES Court:TCA Attorneys: David L. Scott, Murfreesboro, For Appellant, Jack Reed Knowles Delilah A. Speed, Columbia, For Appellee, Melody Jo Knowles Judge: CRAWFORD First Paragraph: Wife sued for divorce on grounds of inappropriate marital conduct and adultery. The trial court granted Wife an absolute divorce, awarded her alimony in futuro and attorney fees, and ordered Husband to pay Wife's health insurance costs. Husband appeals. We reverse in part and affirm in part. http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/knowlesmelody.wpd ISHMAEL H. MACE v. PHYLLIS C. MACE Court:TCA Attorneys: Mimi Phillips, Memphis, Tennessee, for the Appellant Ishmael H. Mace Phyllis H. Mace, Pro Se Judge: LILLARD First Paragraph: This is a post divorce action to recover a child support arrearage. The parties' original Pennsylvania divorce decree required that the father pay child support for their three children. Under the foreign decree, the support was not to be reduced on a pro rata basis as each child reached majority, but simply end when the youngest child reached majority. This decree was later domesticated in Tennessee, then modified to increase the monthly child support obligation. The father did not pay. The trial court found him in contempt and ordered him to pay the arrearage. The father filed a motion to alter or amend, arguing that there should be a pro rata reduction as each child reached the age of majority, or at least a pro rata reduction of the amount of the Tennessee modification. This was denied. The father now appeals. We affirm, finding that the father's child support obligation remains subject to the provision in the original foreign decree stating that the child support would not be reduced pro rata as each child reached majority. http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/maceIh_opn.wpd ISHMAEL H. MACE v. PHYLLIS C. MACE Court:TCA HIGHERS DISSENTING http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/maceh_dis.wpd RAYMOND MITCHELL v. DONAL CAMPBELL Court:TCA Attorneys: Raymond Mitchell, Nashville, Tennessee, Pro Se. Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Michael E. Moore, Solicitor General; and Dawn Jordan, Assistant Attorney General, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellee, Donal Campbell. Judge: KOCH First Paragraph: This appeal involves a dispute between a prisoner and the Tennessee Department of Correction regarding the Department's decision to classify the prisoner as a multiple rapist under Tenn. Code Ann. S 39-13-523(b) (2000). After the Commissioner of Correction denied his petition for a declaratory order, the prisoner filed a petition for a declaratory judgment in the Chancery Court for Davidson County claiming that the Department had misclassified him and, if it had not, that he was still entitled to earn sentence reduction credits because he was a Range I standard offender. The trial court dismissed the petition, and the prisoner has appealed. We have determined that the Department properly classified the prisoner as a multiple rapist and that the prisoner is not otherwise entitled to earn sentence reduction credits. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's judgment. http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/mitchellr.wpd VARNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., and THE ESTATE OF BROOKS VARNER v. DAVID M. MARRS AND LATITIA M. MARRS Court:TCA Attorneys: John J. Heflin, III, and Kenneth P. Jones, Memphis, Tennessee, for the appellants, David M. Marrs and Latitia M. Marrs. J. Frank Hall, Memphis, Tennessee, for the appellees, Varner Construction Company and the Estate of Brooks Varner. Judge: LILLARD First Paragraph: This is a construction case. In 1981, the defendant owners hired the plaintiff construction company to build a custom home. Over the course of construction, the parties disagreed over many things, and their relationship ended in July or August 1983. The construction company sued the owners, alleging that the owners had not paid the full amount due under the contract. The owners filed a counterclaim, alleging that the construction company owed them for amounts expended in completing the project and for estimated amounts to cure remaining defects. The chancellor referred the case to a special master who, after taking the case under advisement for a lengthy time, issued findings which favored the construction company. The chancellor adopted the findings of the master and awarded the construction company damages plus prejudgment interest. The owners now appeal. We affirm in part, reverse in part and modify. http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/varner.wpd STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ELWOOD JEFFREY BARRIGHER Court:TCCA Attorneys: Joseph P. Atnip, District Public Defender, Dresden, Tennessee, for the Appellant, Elwood Jefffrey Barrigher. Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Michael Moore, Solicitor General; Braden H. Boucek, Assistant Attorney General; Thomas A. Thomas, District Attorney General; and Kevin McAlpin, Assistant District Attorney General, for the Appellee, State of Tennessee. Judge: HAYES First Paragraph: The Appellant, Elwood Jeffrey Barrigher, appeals the judgment of the Obion County Circuit Court revoking his placement in the Community Corrections program and reinstating his original nine-year sentence in the Department of Correction. Prior to his revocation, Barrigher was serving a nine-year Community Corrections sentence, which stemmed from his 1999 class B felony conviction for delivery of a Schedule II controlled substance. Finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm the revocation. http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/barrigherej.wpd STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MICHAEL WAYNE BELCHER Court:TCCA Attorneys: H. Randy Fallin, Mountain City, Tennessee, for the appellant, Michael Wayne Belcher. Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Thomas E. Williams III, Assistant Attorney General; Joe C. Crumley, Jr., District Attorney General; and Dennis D. Brooks, Assistant District Attorney General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee. Judge: WILLIAMS First Paragraph: The defendant appeals his convictions for aggravated burglary and possession of burglary tools. After a review of the record, we conclude that the defendant was not prejudiced by the State's failure to redact an obscure reference to the defendant's probation status from an audio taped statement that was played at trial. However, we are unable to find sufficient evidence to establish that the defendant had a hammer and screwdriver in his automobile with the intent to commit burglary. Therefore, the defendant's conviction for possession of burglary tools, a Class A misdemeanor, is reversed and dismissed. The aggravated burglary conviction is affirmed. http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/belchermw.wpd JACKIE WILLIAM CROWE v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Court:TCCA Attorneys: Jackie William Crowe, Appellant, Pro Se. Michael E. Moore, Solicitor General; Christine M. Lapps, Assistant Attorney General; and Jerry N. Estes, District Attorney General, for the Appellee, State of Tennessee. Judge: WITT First Paragraph: Jackie W. Crowe appeals from the McMinn County Criminal Court's denial of his post-conviction motion to dismiss the indictments against him. Crowe, who is incarcerated in the Department of Correction on convictions of rape and incest, is proceeding pro se. Because he has already exhausted his one opportunity for post-conviction relief and because his motion does not comply with the requirements for a habeas corpus proceeding, we dismiss the appeal. http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/crowejackiewilliam.wpd STATE OF TENNESSEE v. CHARLES R. DEASON Court:TCCA Attorneys: Gregory D. Smith, Clarksville, Tennessee (on appeal); William (Jake) Bradley Lockert III, District Public Defender; and Christopher L. Young, Assistant Public Defender (at trial and on appeal), for the appellant, Charles R. Deason. Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Angele M. Gregory, Assistant Attorney General; Dan Mitchum Alsobrooks, District Attorney General; and Suzanne M. Lockert, Assistant District Attorney General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee. Judge: WILLIAMS First Paragraph: The defendant was convicted by a jury of DUI. After stipulating to two prior DUI convictions, he was sentenced for third offense DUI to eleven months and twenty-nine days, to be served in the county jail. We conclude that there is sufficient evidence to establish that the defendant was driving while intoxicated as charged in the indictment. Furthermore, the trial court permissibly ordered the defendant to serve eleven months and twenty-nine days in jail. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/deasoncr.wpd STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JACOB DYCK Court:TCCA Attorneys: Steve McEwen, Mountain City, Tennessee, for the appellant, Jacob Dyck. Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Angele M. Gregory, Assistant Attorney General; Jerry N. Estes, District Attorney General; and Chal Thompson, Assistant District Attorney General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee. Judge: WELLES First Paragraph: The Defendant, Jacob Dyck, was convicted by a jury of theft of property valued over $10,000 but less than $60,000, a Class C felony. See Tenn. Code Ann. S 39-14-105(4). The trial court sentenced him to six years in the Department of Correction. In this appeal the Defendant raises five issues: 1) whether the trial court erred in denying him his right to self-representation; 2) whether the State failed to elect the offense for which it was seeking a conviction; 3) whether a material variance exists between the indictment and the proof at trial; 4) whether the evidence is sufficient to support his conviction; and 5) whether the Defendant's sentence is excessive. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/dyckj.wpd STATE OF TENNESSEE v. SYLVESTER FORD Court:TCCA Attorneys: C. Michael Robbins, Memphis, Tennessee, on appeal; George M. Googe, District Public Defender; and Stephen P. Spracher, Assistant Public Defender, Jackson, Tennessee, at trial and on appeal, for appellant, Sylvester Ford. Paul G. Summers, Attorney General & Reporter; J. Ross Dyer, Assistant Attorney General; Jerry Woodall, District Attorney General; and Jody S. Pickens, Assistant District Attorney General, for appellee, State of Tennessee. Judge: SMITH First Paragraph: The defendant, Sylvester Ford, was tried by jury and found guilty of one count of rape of a child and one count of aggravated sexual battery. The trial court sentenced the defendant to serve twenty years as a Range I offender. The defendant filed a timely motion for new trial, which the trial court denied. The defendant now brings this appeal, alleging that he should receive a new trial because the trial court committed plain error by failing to require the state to elect which acts the jury should consider to support the defendant's indicted offenses. The defendant subsequently filed a writ of error coram nobis, and the trial court denied the defendant's petition, finding that the petition was untimely filed and did not allege information that would warrant a new trial. After reviewing the record, we find that the defendant's direct appeal claim has merit and warrants a new trial, and, therefore, we need not address the merits of the defendant's coram nobis petition. http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/fordsylvester.wpd STATE OF TENNESSEE v. BRADLEY R. FULCHER Court:TCCA Attorneys: Michael A. Colavecchio, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Bradley R. Fulcher. Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Renee W. Turner, Assistant Attorney General; Ronald L. Davis, District Attorney General; and Mary Katharine Harvey, Assistant District Attorney General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee. Judge: TIPTON First Paragraph: The defendant, Bradley R. Fulcher, appeals the Williamson County Circuit Court's denial of alternative sentencing for his convictions for aggravated burglary, a Class C felony, and theft of property valued over one thousand dollars but less than ten thousand dollars, a Class D felony. We affirm the judgments of the trial court. http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/fulcherbr.wpd STATE OF TENNESSEE v. STEPHEN GREENE Court:TCCA Attorneys: Kevin Wayne Shepherd, Maryville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Stephen Greene. Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Patricia C. Kussmann, Assistant Attorney General; Michael L. Flynn, District Attorney General; and Kirk E. Andrews and Edward P. Bailey, Jr., Assistant District Attorneys General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee. Judge: WILLIAMS First Paragraph: The defendant appeals his convictions of rape of a child and incest. We conclude that the State did not improperly bolster the victim's testimony on direct examination. In addition, the defendant was not denied his constitutional right to confront witnesses against him or to an impartial jury when the trial court denied his request to question a non-witness about an alleged statement made out-of-court. Furthermore, the State was not obligated to disclose the contents of a Department of Human Services file requested by the defendant under Brady v. Maryland or Rule 16 of the Tennessee Rules of Criminal Procedure. We must, however, reverse the defendant's conviction of incest and remand for a new trial on Count Two based upon the State's failure to make a proper election for the offense. We, therefore, affirm the rape of a child conviction, reverse the conviction of incest, and remand for a new trial. http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/greenes.wpd STATE OF TENNESSEE v. HAMADI G. HALEY Court:TCCA Attorneys: Susan Shipley, Knoxville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Hamadi G. Haley. Paul G. Summers, Attorney General & Reporter; J. Ross Dyer, Assistant Attorney General; and Marsha Mitchell, Assistant District Attorney General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee. Judge: WADE First Paragraph: The defendant, Hamadi G. Haley, was convicted of felony murder, especially aggravated robbery, and aggravated robbery. The trial court imposed a sentence of life with the possibility of parole for the felony murder, 17 years for the especially aggravated robbery, and eight years for the aggravated robbery, with all terms to be served concurrently. In this appeal of right, the defendant claims that he was denied access to material witnesses by the state and that he should have been granted a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. The judgments of the trial court are affirmed. http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/haleyhg.wpd STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JACKY E. JONES Court:TCCA Attorneys: Mack Garner, Maryville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Jacky E. Jones. Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Renee W. Turner, Assistant Attorney General; Michael L. Flynn, District Attorney General; and John Bobo, Assistant District Attorney General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee. Judge: MCGEE OGLE First Paragraph: The appellant, Jacky E. Jones, was found guilty by a jury in the Blount County Circuit Court of one count of obtaining a controlled substance by fraud and was sentenced to three years incarceration in the Blount County Jail. The trial court later granted the appellant probation. Months into the service of his probationary sentence, the appellant stopped reporting to his probation officer. Subsequently, the trial court revoked the appellant's probation and sentenced him to serve his original sentence in confinement. On appeal, the appellant contends that the trial court erred in failing to sentence him to community corrections after revoking his probation. Upon review of the record and the parties' briefs, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/jonesjacky.wpd STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JOHNNY MOFFITT Court:TCCA Attorneys: Lloyd R. Tatum, Henderson, Tennessee, for the appellant, Johnny Moffitt. Paul G. Summers, Attorney General & Reporter; J. Ross Dyer, Assistant Attorney General; and Alfred L. Earls, Assistant District Attorney General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee. Judge: WADE First Paragraph: The defendant, Johnny Moffitt, entered a plea of guilt to second degree murder. The trial court imposed a Range I sentence of 10 years. By agreement, the defendant reserved a certified question of law. See Tenn. R. Crim. P. 37. The issue presented in this appeal is whether the trial court should have dismissed the charge due to the loss or destruction of evidence. The judgment is affirmed. http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/moffittj.wpd EL PASO PITTS v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Court:TCCA Attorneys: Robert Little, Memphis, Tennessee, for the appellant, El Paso Pitts. Paul G. Summers, Attorney General & Reporter; Kim R. Helper, Assistant Attorney General; and Katrina Earley, Assistant District Attorney General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee. Judge: WADE First Paragraph: The petitioner, El Paso Pitts, appeals the trial court's denial of post-conviction relief. In this appeal of right, the petitioner contends that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel and argues that the trial court erred by allowing his trial counsel to be present during the evidentiary hearing. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/pittselpaso.wpd NAKIA RUMPH v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Court:TCCA Attorneys: Mechelle Story, Taylor and Associates, Jackson, Tennessee, for the Appellant, Nakia Rumph. Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Michael Moore, Solicitor General; Braden H. Boucek, Assistant Attorney General; James G. (Jerry) Woodall, District Attorney General; and Alfred Earls, Assistant District Attorney General, for the Appellee, State of Tennessee. Judge: HAYES First Paragraph: The Appellant, Nakia Rumph, appeals from the dismissal of his petition for post-conviction relief. In 2000, Rumph pled guilty to two counts of aggravated sexual battery and was sentenced to eight years imprisonment on each count. On appeal, Rumph challenges the validity of his guilty plea upon grounds of: (1) voluntariness and (2) ineffective assistance of counsel. After review, we affirm the judgment of the Madison County Circuit Court dismissing the petition. http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/rumphnakia.wpd STATE OF TENNESSEE v. TAVARUS WILLIAMS Court:TCCA Attorneys: C. Anne Tipton, Memphis, Tennessee, for the Appellant, Tavarus Williams. Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; John H. Bledsoe, Assistant Attorney General; William L. Gibbons, District Attorney General; Jerry Kitchen, Assistant District Attorney General; and Rosemary Andrews, Assistant District Attorney General, for the Appellee, State of Tennessee. Judge: WEDEMEYER First Paragraph: The Defendant was convicted in 1991 of first degree murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. After his conviction was affirmed on direct appeal, the Defendant filed a post-conviction petition, and the trial court denied relief. However, on post-conviction appeal, this Court determined that the Defendant received ineffective assistance of counsel at trial and therefore reversed the trial court's decision, vacated the Defendant's conviction, and remanded the case for a new trial. The Defendant was tried a second time in 2000 before a Shelby County jury, and on this occasion, the jury found the Defendant guilty of second degree murder. The trial court sentenced him to twenty years incarceration. The Defendant now appeals his conviction and sentence, arguing (1) that insufficient evidence was presented at trial to support his conviction, and (2) that he was improperly sentenced. We conclude that sufficient evidence supports the jury's verdict and thus affirm the Defendant's conviction. However, we conclude that the trial court erred in sentencing the Defendant and therefore we remand for re-sentencing in accordance with this opinion. http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/williamst.wpd ANDRE WILSON v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Court:TCCA Attorneys: Andre Wilson, Pro Se, Memphis, Tennessee, the Appellant. Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Kim R. Helper, Assistant Attorney General; William L. Gibbons, District Attorney General; and James A. Wax, Jr., Assistant District Attorney General for the Appellee, State of Tennessee. Judge: WEDEMEYER First Paragraph: On November 27, 1995, the Petitioner, pursuant to a negotiated plea agreement, pleaded guilty to six counts of aggravated robbery. The trial court sentenced the Petitioner to eighteen years incarceration for each count, to be served concurrently with each other and with a 1993 federal sentence of 137 months for armed bank robbery. On July 19, 2001, the Petitioner filed a petition for post-conviction relief and/or a writ of coram nobis based on the decision of federal authorities not to award him credit for the time he served in state custody. The post-conviction court denied relief based on the statute of limitations. The Petitioner now appeals, arguing that the post-conviction court erred in denying him post-conviction relief. Finding no error, we affirm the judgment of the post-conviction court. http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/wilsona.wpd PLEASE FORWARD THIS E-MAIL! GET A FULL-TEXT COPY OF AN OPINION! JOIN TBALink! SUBSCRIBE TO OPINION FLASH! For the HTML Text Version: UNSUBSCRIBE TO OPINION FLASH? ... SURELY NOT! To STOP receiving TBALink Opinion-Flash: Home • Contact Us • PageFinder • What's New • Help |
|
© Copyright 2002 Tennessee Bar Association
|