
Opinion FlashAugust 28, 2002Volume 8 Number 150 Following this index are summaries of each case, including its name, first paragraph, author's name, and the names of attorneys for the parties of each opinion. This Issue (IN THIS ORDER):
TBA members can get the full-text versions of these opinions three ways detailed below. All methods require a TBA username and password. If you have forgotten your password, you can look it up on-line at http://www.tba.org/getpassword.mgi . If you are a TBA member, but do not have a username and password, you can receive one online at http://www.tba.org/signup.mgi. Here's how you can obtain full-text version.
Howard H. Vogel STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JAMES FRANK ELKINS, JR. Court:TSC Attorneys: Gregory D. Smith, Clarksville, Tennessee, for the appellant, James Frank Elkins, Jr. Paul G. Summers, Attorney General & Reporter; Michael E. Moore, Solicitor General; Elizabeth T. Ryan, Assistant Attorney General; T. Michael Bottoms, District Attorney General; and Richard Dunavant, Assistant District Attorney General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee. Judge: DROWOTA First Paragraph: The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury on the lesser-included offense of child abuse. The Court of Criminal Appeals held that no instruction on child abuse was necessary because the jury was instructed as to Class B misdemeanor assault, an alternative lesser-included offense. We conclude that child abuse is not an alternative lesser- included offense, that the jury should have been instructed as to child abuse, and that the erroneous failure to instruct on this offense is not harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. Accordingly, the defendant's conviction of aggravated sexual battery is reversed, and the case is remanded for a new trial. http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC/elkinsj.wpd CHARLES CHAPMAN v. KATHY KELLEY, et al. Court:TCA Attorneys: Phillip Leon Davidson, Nashville, Tennessee, for Appellant, Charles Chapman. David Randall Mantooth and Jennifer L. Shymate, Nashville, Tennessee, for Appellees, Kathy Kelley and Pam Jackson. Judge: GAYDEN First Paragraph: This is an appeal from the trial court's dismissal of an action filed by Plaintiff against the Maury County Circuit Court Clerk and the Maury County Deputy Circuit Court Clerk. This case concerns the application of the qualified judicial immunity defense and the related question of whether the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to allow the Plaintiff to amend the original complaint under Rule 15 of the Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure. The gravamen of Plaintiff's original complaint is that the Plaintiff suffered damages as a result of negligence of the Deputy Court Clerk by her alleged negligent administration of the criminal court docket that ultimately led to the wrongful arrest and incarceration of the Plaintiff based on a capias issued by the judge. The Defendant Maury County Circuit Court Clerk, who was sued for negligent supervision, interposed the defense of qualified judicial immunity and upon a motion to dismiss, the trial judge dismissed the case against the Maury County Circuit Court Clerk. A Maury County Deputy Circuit Court Clerk was originally sued as Jane Doe for negligent administration of the criminal court docket; when the Deputy Clerk's identity was revealed, the Plaintiff amended his complaint to specifically name her. Subsequently, a second motion to dismiss was filed by the Maury County Deputy Circuit Court Clerk, likewise interposing the defense of qualified judicial immunity. The Plaintiff filed a motion to alter or amend the original dismissal as to the Maury County Circuit Court Clerk and the Plaintiff also filed a second motion to amend the original complaint to allege reckless conduct on the part of the Clerk and the Deputy Clerk. The trial court overruled the motion to alter or amend the original dismissal of the action against the Maury County Circuit Court Clerk , granted the motion to dismiss as to the Maury County Deputy Circuit Court Clerk, and denied Plaintiff's motion to amend. For reasons stated below, the court affirms the action of the trial court. http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/chapmanc.wpd ESTATE OF NAN FRANCIS, PAT LIBBY, ADMINISTRATRIX v. KARL FRANCIS Court:TCA Attorneys: Charles Galbreath, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Estate of Nan Francis, Pat Libby Administratrix. Robert L. Perry, Jr., Ashland City, Tennessee, for the appellee, Karl Francis. Judge: COTTRELL First Paragraph: In this second appeal in this matter, the estate seeks a re-determination of an issue decided previously by the trial court and by this court: distribution of proceeds from a certificate of deposit. Because our prior opinion is the law of the case on this issue, we affirm the trial court's dismissal of the estate's motion for post-appellate relief which sought to modify the prior rulings. http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/estateoffrancis.wpd STATE OF TENNESSEE, et al. v. ROGER D. HAYWOOD, et al. Court:TCA Attorneys: Clifton E. Darnell and Larry W. Johnson, Atlanta, Georgia, for the Appellants, National City Mortgage Co., Morris, Schneider & Prior, L.L.C., and Larry W. Johnson. Robert H. Jennings, Jr., Nashville, Tennessee, and Roger Horner, Brentwood, Tennessee, for the Appellees, State of Tennessee, on relation of The Commissioner of the Department of Transportation, for and on behalf of Said Department, and The City of Brentwood. Judge: SWINEY First Paragraph: The Trial Court held that National City Mortgage Company ("National"), which services the mortgage on the property at issue, and its attorneys violated Tenn. R. Civ. P. 11.02 and imposed sanctions against them in this condemnation proceeding. National and its attorneys appeal the Trial Court's Rule 11.02 sanctions. We reverse and remand. http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/haywoodr.wpd MOHAMMAD D. HUSSAINI, et al. v. GRANGE MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, et al. Court:TCA Attorneys: Mohammad D. Hussaini, Nashville, Tennessee, Pro Se. Mark S. LeVan, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellee, Grange Mutual Casualty. Judge: COTTRELL First Paragraph: Homeowners, unsatisfied with repairs to their home following a fire, sued their insurance company, the contractor who performed repairs on their home, and another contractor who removed personal property for cleaning and repair. The homeowners settled their claims against the insurance company and, on the day of trial, voluntarily dismissed their claims against the contractor for cleaning of their personal property. The trial proceeded upon their claims against the contractor who repaired the fire damage in their home, and the trial court entered a judgment for $650.00 in favor of the homeowners. Because the appellate record includes no record of the evidence taken at trial, we must presume the trial court's findings were supported by the record. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's judgment. http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/hussainim.wpd STEVEN ALLEN JAMESON v. KATRINA LINN REDMUND Court:TCA Attorneys: Charles G. Blackard III, Brentwood, Tennessee, for Appellant, Katrina Linn Redmund. James Robin McKinney, Jr., Nashville, Tennessee, for Appellee, Steven Allen Jameson. Judge: GAYDEN First Paragraph: This is an appeal from the trial court's final order denying appellant's petition for a change of the sole care, custody and control of the parties' three minor children and the trial court's order denying appellant's alternative petition for an increase in visitation. We hold that the trial court properly denied a change of the sole care, custody and control and properly denied appellant's alternative petition for increased visitation. Counsel for the appellee has petitioned this court for attorney's fees assessed for the hearings in the trial court and for attorney's fees in the immediate appellate case contending that the appeal is frivolous. We decline to award attorney's fees. http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/jamesons.wpd EILEEN ANN SMITH v. ROBERT MAXWELL SMITH Court:TCA Attorneys: Mike W. Binkley, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Robert Maxwell Smith. Joanie L. Abernathy, Franklin, Tennessee, for the appellee, Eileen Ann Smith. Judge: FARMER First Paragraph: This is a divorce case. Acting upon the stipulation of the parties, the trial declared the parties divorced. The court determined that the appreciation of Husband's premarital Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs) was marital property. The court also ruled that a bond account that Husband received from his mother and later titled jointly between the parties remained Husband's separate property. Finally, the court addressed marital debt and alimony. Both parties raise issues regarding the trial court's disposition of the case. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand the case to the trial court. http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/smithe1.wpd ANTONIO L. SWEATT v. TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION Court:TCA Attorneys: Antonio L. Sweatt, Nashville, Tennessee, Pro Se. Paul G. Summers, Attorney General; Michael E. Moore; Solicitor General; Mark A. Hudson, Senior Counsel, for the appellee, State of Tennessee. Judge: CANTRELL First Paragraph: A prison inmate filed a petition for writ of certiorari, which alleged that a prison disciplinary board acted arbitrarily, and convicted him without sufficient evidence. The trial court dismissed the petition for failure to comply with the requirements of Tenn. Code Ann. S 41-21-801, et seq., because the petitioner did not pay the court costs he owed from a prior lawsuit. We affirm the trial court. http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/sweatta1.wpd LARRY WILLIAMS v. TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION Court:TCA Attorneys: Larry Williams, Pikeville, Tennessee, Pro Se. Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Michael Moore, Solicitor General; Pamela S. Lorch, Assistant Attorney General; for the appellee, Tennessee Department of Correction. Judge: COTTRELL First Paragraph: Petitioner, a state inmate, appeals the trial court's decision to deny his pro se petition for common law writ of certiorari challenging the imposition of sanctions following a disciplinary board hearing and the court's grant of the Department of Correction's Motion to Dismiss for failure to state a claim. He alleges that the Department failed to follow disciplinary policies, and violated his due process and equal protection rights. For the reasons set forth below, we find Petitioner's claims without merit, affirm the decision of the trial court and remand the case for any further proceedings which may be necessary. http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/williamsl_opn.wpd LARRY WILLIAMS v. TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION Court:TCA KOCH CONCURRING http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/williamsl_con.wpd ERIC T. WOODRUFF v. TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION Court:TCA Attorneys: Eric Woodruff, Only, Tennessee, Pro Se. Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Michael E. Moore, Solicitor General; Stephanie R. Reevers, Associate Deputy Attorney General, for the appellee, Tennessee Department of Correction. Judge: COTTRELL First Paragraph: Petitioner, an inmate in the custody of the Tennessee Department of Correction, filed the underlying pro se petition for common law writ of certiorari, seeking review of a prison disciplinary board decision and resulting sanctions that he alleges were made in violation of his constitutional rights to due process and equal protection under the laws. Specifically, Petitioner alleges that the disciplinary board violated Department policies by not providing the Petitioner with an adequate statement of reasons prior to his placement in administrative segregation. The trial court dismissed the suit for failure to state a claim. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand the case to the trial court with the direction that the trial court issue the writ. http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/woodruffe.wpd SHANNA DEAN ALDER v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Court:TCCA Attorneys: Herbert S. Moncier, Knoxville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Shanna Dean Alder. Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Kathy D. Aslinger, Assistant Attorney General; Randall E. Nichols, District Attorney General; and Patricia A. Cristil, Assistant District Attorney General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee. Judge: RILEY First Paragraph: The petitioner appeals the denial of her petition for habeas corpus relief. She contends the trial court was without authority to revoke her judicial diversion after her diversionary probation expired, absent the issuance of a revocation warrant prior to its expiration. She, therefore, argues the trial court was without jurisdiction when it revoked judicial diversion, was consequently without jurisdiction when it sentenced her to additional years of probation, and was without jurisdiction when it subsequently issued a probation revocation warrant. We agree and reverse the denial of habeas corpus relief. http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/aldersd.wpd STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JAMES ALLEN BAILEY Court:TCCA Attorneys: Edward C. Miller, District Public Defender (at hearing); and Susanne Bales, Assistant District Public Defendant (on appeal), for the appellant, James Allen Bailey. Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Elizabeth B. Marney, Assistant Attorney General; Al C. Schmutzer, Jr., District Attorney General; and Ronald C. Newcomb, Assistant District Attorney General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee. Judge: RILEY First Paragraph: The defendant pled guilty to six counts of arson, Class C felonies, and one count of setting fire to personal property, a Class E felony. The trial court ordered an effective sentence of fifteen years incarceration followed by five years of probation. On appeal, the defendant argues: (1) the trial court erred in conducting an independent investigation into pyromania; (2) the length of his individual sentences is excessive; (3) the trial court erred in imposing consecutive sentencing; and (4) the trial court improperly denied alternative sentencing. We modify the defendant's sentences to an effective term of ten years in the Department of Correction. http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/baileyja_opn.wpd STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JAMES ALLEN BAILEY Court:TCCA WELLES DISSENTING http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/baileyja_dis.wpd STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MICHAEL E. OWENBY Court:TCCA Attorneys: James Greenlee, Sevierville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Michael E. Owenby. Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Helena Walton Yarbrough, Assistant Attorney General; Al Schmutzer, Jr., District Attorney General; and Steve Hawkins, Assistant District Attorney General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee. Judge: WELLES First Paragraph: The Defendant, Michael E. Owenby, appeals as of right from his conviction by a jury of theft of property over $1,000, a Class D felony. He was sentenced to three years as a Range I standard offender, with ninety days to be served in confinement and the balance to be served in the Community Corrections program. He argues as his sole issue on appeal that there was not sufficient evidence presented at trial to support his conviction of theft. We affirm the judgment of the trial court but remand to the trial court for entry of an amended judgment deleting the "day for day" requirement relating to the ninety days of confinement. http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/owenbymev STATE OF TENNESSEE v. WILLIAM C. SMITH Court:TCCA Attorneys: James Greenlee, Sevierville, Tennessee, for the appellant, William C. Smith. Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Thomas E. Williams, III, Assistant Attorney General; Al Schmutzer, Jr., District Attorney General; and Charles E. Atchley, Assistant District Attorney General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee. Judge: WELLES First Paragraph: The Defendant, William C. Smith, pled guilty to burglary, a class D felony, and theft under $500, a class A misdemeanor. Pursuant to the Defendant's plea agreement, he was sentenced as a Range I standard offender with the sentences to run concurrently. The parties left the length, method, and manner of service to the trial judge's discretion. After a sentencing hearing, the trial court sentenced the Defendant to four years in the Department of Correction for the burglary and a concurrent sentence of 11 months and 29 days at 75% for the misdemeanor theft. The Defendant now appeals as of right. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/smithwc.wpd PLEASE FORWARD THIS E-MAIL! GET A FULL-TEXT COPY OF AN OPINION! JOIN THE TENNESSEE BAR ASSOCIATION! SUBSCRIBE TO OPINION FLASH! UNSUBSCRIBE TO OPINION FLASH? ... SURELY NOT! But if you must, visit the TBALink web site at: http://www.tba.org/op-flash.mgi Home Contact Us PageFinder What's New Help |
|
© Copyright 2002 Tennessee Bar Association
|