December 17, 2002
Volume 8 Number 221
Following this index are summaries of each case, including its name, first paragraph, author's name, and the names of attorneys for the parties of each opinion.This Issue (IN THIS ORDER):
||New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Supreme Court
||New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Supreme Court Workers' Compensation Panel
||New Document(s) or Proposed Rule(s) from the Tennessee Supreme Court
||New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Court of Appeals
||New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals
||New Opinion(s) from the Tennessee Attorney General (PDF format)
||New Judicial Ethics Opinion(s)
||New Formal Ethics Opinion(s) from the Board of Professional Responsibility
TBA members can get the full-text versions of these opinions three ways detailed below. All methods require a TBA username and password. If you have forgotten your password, you can look it up on-line at http://www.tba.org/getpassword.mgi . If you are a TBA member, but do not have a username and password, you can receive one online at http://www.tba.org/signup.mgi. Here's how you can obtain full-text version.
Click the URL at end of each Opinion paragraph below. This option will allow you to download the original document.
Do a key word search in the Search Link area of TBALink. This option will allow you to view and save a plain-text version of the opinion.
Browse the Opinion List area of TBALink. This option will allow you to download the original version of the opinion.
Howard H. Vogel
TZE-PONG "RAYMOND" KU v. STATE OF TENNESSEE
Arthur F. Knight, III, and Samuel W. Brown, Knoxville, Tennessee, for
the Appellant Tze-Pong "Raymond" Ku.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General, Michael E. Moore, Solicitor
General, and Donald R. Ungurait, Assistant Attorney General,
Nashville, Tennessee, for the Appellee State of Tennessee.
Tze-Pong "Raymond" Ku ("Plaintiff") is a student at the East Tennessee
State University College of Medicine ("College"). After completing
his first two years of study, Plaintiff was required to take the USMLE
Step 1 examination. He took this examination and failed. Thereafter,
the College removed Plaintiff from his third year clerkships and
eventually created a list of requirements he had to meet in order to
be allowed to resume his classes. After successfully suing the
College in federal court based on a procedural due process violation,
Plaintiff brought the present lawsuit for damages against the State of
Tennessee claiming breach of written contract, to wit: his letter of
acceptance to the College and the College's student handbook. The
Claims Commission concluded these documents did not constitute a
written contract and dismissed the lawsuit for lack of subject matter
jurisdiction. Plaintiff appeals, and we affirm.
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. NICOLE BEAUDION a/k/a NIKKI NAPIER
Kirk Vandivort, Charlotte, Tennessee, for the Appellant, Nicole
Beaudion a/k/a Nikki Napier.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General & Reporter; Braden H. Boucek,
Assistant Attorney General; Victor S. Johnson, III, District Attorney
General; and Grady A. Moore, Assistant District Attorney General, for
the Appellee, State of Tennessee.
The defendant, Nicole Beaudion, also known as Nikki Jo Napier, appeals
pursuant to Tennessee Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(b). After
pleading guilty to facilitation of especially aggravated robbery, a
Class B felony, and agreeing to accept a fifteen-year sentence to be
served in the Department of Correction with a 30 percent release
eligibility date, the defendant filed a timely Rule 35(b) motion to
reduce her sentence to ten years. The trial court denied this motion,
and the propriety of this action is now challenged on appeal.
JAMES DARRELL HORN v. STATE OF TENNESSEE
Larry S. Weddington, Bristol, Tennessee, for the Appellant, James
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General & Reporter; Angele M. Gregory,
Assistant Attorney General; H. Greeley Wells, Jr., District Attorney
General; and Teresa Murray Smith and James F. Goodwin, Assistant
District Attorneys General, for the Appellee, State of Tennessee.
The petitioner, James Darrell Horn, appeals the Sullivan County
Criminal Court's denial of post- conviction relief. In his
post-conviction petition, the petitioner challenged his jury
convictions on more than 30 aggravated burglary counts and nearly as
many theft counts. As a result of his many convictions, the
petitioner is serving an effective 90-year sentence in the Department
of Correction. On direct appeal, his convictions and sentences were
affirmed by this court. See State v. James D. Horn, No.
03C01-9712-CR-00537 (Tenn. Crim. App., Knoxville, Jul. 20, 1999),
perm. app. denied (Tenn. 2000). The petitioner asserted that his
previous appellate counsel was ineffective because she did not raise
on direct appeal whether the trial court (1) erred in not suppressing
the petitioner's pretrial statements and (2) in not suppressing
physical evidence seized during a warrantless search of his residence.
He also claimed that his trial and appellate counsel were ineffective
because they did not properly challenge the sufficiency of the
evidence on three or four specific counts of the indictments. After
an evidentiary hearing, the trial court entered a very thorough order
denying post- conviction relief. Upon our review, we affirm.
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JEFFREY LYNN MURPHY
David Brady, Public Defender and John B. Nisbet, III, Assistant Public
Defender, Cookeville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Jeffrey Lynn
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Thomas E. Williams,
III, Assistant Attorney General; William E. Gibson, District Attorney
General; and William Locke, Assistant District Attorney General, for
the appellee, State of Tennessee.
The Defendant, Jeffrey Lynn Murphy, pled guilty to one count of fraud
and was placed on probation for three years. The Defendant's
supervising officer subsequently filed a probation violation warrant
and a hearing was held. The trial court revoked the Defendant's
probation and ordered him to serve his sentence in the Department of
Correction. The Defendant now appeals, claiming that the trial court
should have extended his period of probation, instead. We affirm the
trial court's judgment.
PLEASE FORWARD THIS E-MAIL!
Feel free to forward this Opinion Flash on to anyone you know of with an e-mail address.
GET A FULL-TEXT COPY OF AN OPINION!
See the intrsuctions at the beginning of this edition of Opinion Flash.
JOIN THE TENNESSEE BAR ASSOCIATION!
While Opinion Flash is a free service of the Tennessee Bar Association, you must be a member of the Tennessee Bar Association in order to access the full text of the opinions or enjoy the many other features of TBALink.
To join the TBA go to: http://www.tba.org/join_bar.mgi
SUBSCRIBE TO OPINION FLASH!
Would you like to receive the TBALink Opinion Flash free each day by e-mail? Anyone, whether a TBA member or not, is welcome to subscribe ... it's free! Sign up for text or HTML version.
Visit the TBALink web site at: http://www.tba.org/op-flash.mgi
UNSUBSCRIBE TO OPINION FLASH? ... SURELY NOT!
But if you must, visit the TBALink web site at: http://www.tba.org/op-flash.mgi
Home Contact Us PageFinder What's New Help