
Opinion FlashJanuary 12, 2004Volume 10 Number 007 Following this index are summaries of each case, including its name, first paragraph, author's name, and the names of attorneys for the parties of each opinion. This Issue (IN THIS ORDER):
TBA members can get the full-text versions of these opinions three ways detailed below. All methods require a TBA username and password. If you have forgotten your password, you can look it up on-line at http://www.tba.org/getpassword.mgi . If you are a TBA member, but do not have a username and password, you can receive one online at http://www.tba.org/signup.mgi. Here's how you can obtain full-text version. Click the URL at end of each Opinion paragraph below. This option will allow you to download the original document. Howard H. Vogel STATE OF TENNESSEE v. SHAWN RAFAEL BOUGH Court:TCCA Attorneys: Mark E. Stephens, District Public Defender and John Halstead, Assistant Public Defender for the appellant, Shawn Rafeal Bough. Paul G. Summers, Attorney General & Reporter; Thomas E. Williams, Assistant Attorney General; Randall E. Nichols, District Attorney General; and G. Scott Green, Assistant District Attorney General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee. Judge: SMITH First Paragraph: The appellant, Shawn Rafael Bough, was convicted by a jury of felony murder and especially aggravated robbery. A co-defendant was tried separately. The trial court immediately sentenced the appellant to life in prison for the felony murder conviction. After a sentencing hearing, the trial court sentenced the appellant to a sentence of twenty-one years at 100% for the especially aggravated robbery conviction, to be served concurrently with the life sentence. The trial court denied the appellant's motion for new trial, amended motion for new trial, and second amended motion for new trial, and he appeals. Because the first motion for new trial was not timely filed in regards to the felony murder conviction and an untimely notice of appeal resulted, we determine that the appellant has waived all issues except for sufficiency of the evidence in regards to the felony murder conviction, which we choose to address in the interests of justice. Because the amended motion for new trial and second amended motion for new trial were likewise untimely, we hold that the only other issues properly before this Court are those raised in the initial motion for new trial that relate to the conviction for especially aggravated robbery. Those issues include: (1) whether the trial court erred in allowing the State to comment on the appellant's failure to produce a witness; (2) whether the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction for especially aggravated robbery; and (3) whether the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury regarding the corroboration of accomplice testimony and out-of-court confessions. After a thorough review of the record, we find the evidence sufficient to sustain the convictions and affirm the judgment of the trial court. As to the remaining issues, we find no reversible error and, therefore, affirm the judgments of the trial court. http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/boughshawn.wpd STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JIMMY BUCK Court:TCCA Attorneys: Mark S. Cizek, Clinton, Tennessee, for the appellant, Jimmy Buck. Paul G. Summers, Attorney General & Reporter; Peter M. Coughlan, Assistant Attorney General; James N. Ramsey, District Attorney General; and Jan Hicks, Assistant District Attorney General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee. Judge: SMITH First Paragraph: An Anderson County grand jury indicted the defendant and two co-defendants on a single count of aggravated robbery. While one co-defendant pled guilty to a reduced offense, the defendant and remaining co-defendant elected a jury trial. Following the close of proof, the trial court jury found these two individuals guilty as charged. For this offense the lower court sentenced the defendant to ten years as a standard offender. Thereafter the defendant unsuccessfully pursued a new trial motion. In this appeal the defendant continues to assert that his conviction cannot be upheld because it is based on the uncorroborated testimony of a co-defendant. http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/buckjimmy.wpd ROBERT ANTHONY DEVITO v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Court:TCCA Attorneys: William F. Kroeger, Springfield, Tennessee, for the appellant, Robert Anthony Devito. Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Elizabeth B. Marney, Assistant Attorney General; John Wesley Carney, Jr., District Attorney General; and Arthur F. Bieber, Assistant District Attorney General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee. Judge: TIPTON First Paragraph: The petitioner, Robert Anthony Devito, appeals from the Montgomery County Circuit Court's dismissal of his petition for post-conviction relief from a first degree murder conviction and life sentence. He contends that the trial court erred in concluding that his petition was untimely filed. We affirm the trial court. http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/devitorobertanthony.wpd STATE OF TENNESSEE v. LARRY LENORD FRAZIER Court:TCCA Attorneys: Andrew Jackson Dearing, III, Shelbyville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Larry Leonard Frazier. Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Michael Moore, Solicitor General; Elizabeth B. Marney, Assistant Attorney General; William Michael McCown, District Attorney General; and Michael D. Randles, Assistant District Attorney General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee. Judge: WEDEMEYER First Paragraph: The Defendant, Larry Lenord Frazier, pled guilty to one count of possession of cocaine for resale, and one count of sale of a substance containing cocaine. Following a sentencing hearing, the trial court denied the Defendant's request for alternative sentencing to community corrections and sentenced the Defendant to serve prison terms of eight years and nine months for the possession for resale conviction, and nine years and four months for the sale conviction, and ordered that the sentences run consecutively. The Defendant appeals, contending that the trial court erred when it denied his request for alternative sentencing to community corrections. Finding no reversible error, we affirm the trial court's judgments. http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/frazierll.wpd STATE OF TENNESSEE v. LEVAR DERRON LEE Court:TCCA Attorneys: William C. Barnes, Jr., Columbia, Tennessee, for the appellant, Levar Derron Lee. Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Michael Moore, Solicitor General; J. Ross Dyer, Assistant Attorney General; T. Michel Bottoms, District Attorney General; Joseph Lee Penrod, Assistant District Attorney General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee. Judge: WEDEMEYER First Paragraph: A Maury County jury found the Defendant, Levar Derron Lee, guilty of domestic assault. Following a sentencing hearing, the trial court denied the Defendant's request for alternative sentencing and sentenced the Defendant to serve 11 months and 29 days to be served at 75% in the county jail. The Defendant appeals, contending that the trial court erred when it denied his request for alternative sentencing. Finding no reversible error, we affirm the trial court's judgment. http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/leeld.wpd STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MICHAEL RENEE LEE Court:TCCA Attorneys: Stacey M. Brackeen, Franklin, Tennessee, for the appellant, Michael Renee Lee. Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Brent C. Cherry, Assistant Attorney General; Ronald L. Davis, District Attorney General; and Sharon T. Guffee, Assistant District Attorney General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee. Judge: GLENN First Paragraph: Following a bench trial, the defendant, Michael Renee Lee, was convicted of aggravated burglary, a Class C felony, and theft over $1000, a Class D felony, and was sentenced as a career offender to fifteen years and twelve years, respectively. The sentences were ordered to be served consecutively for an effective sentence of twenty-seven years in the Department of Correction. On appeal, he argues that the evidence is insufficient to support his convictions and that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a continuance. Following our review, we affirm the judgments of the trial court. http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/leemichaelr.wpd STATE OF TENNESSEE v. SHANNON MAYES Court:TCCA Attorneys: Gregory D. Smith, Clarksville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Shannon Mayes Paul G. Summers, Attorney General & Reporter; P. Robin Dixon, Jr., Assistant Attorney General; Mike Bottoms, District Attorney General; and J. Douglas Dicus, Assistant District Attorney General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee. Judge: SMITH First Paragraph: The appellant, Shannon Mayes, was convicted by a jury of first degree murder and sentenced to life in prison. The appellant appealed after the denial of his motion for new trial. The following issues are presented for our review: (1) whether the trial court erred in admitting the victim's dying declaration into evidence; and (2) whether the evidence was sufficient to convict the appellant of first degree murder. After a review of the record, we find no reversible error and, therefore, affirm the decision of the trial court. http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/mayesshannon.wpd JASON EUGENE MIZE v. STATE OF TENNESSEE ORDER Court:TCCA Judge: PER CURIAM First Paragraph: The State has filed a Petition for Rehearing, pursuant to Rule 39, Tennessee Rules of Appellate Procedure, to have this court reconsider its opinion previously filed in this case on December 18, 2003. This court held that the trial court erred by dismissing the Appellant's petition for habeas corpus relief for failure "to file the partial payment of the filing fee." This court went on to state that, upon remand, "the Appellant is entitled to a hearing to determine whether he has alleged sufficient facts that entitle him to relief." http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/mizejasoneugene_ord.wpd TERRY PROFFITT v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Court:TCCA Attorneys: Tim S. Moore, Newport, Tennessee, for the Appellant, Terry Lynn Proffitt. Paul G. Summers, Attorney General & Reporter; David H. Findley, Assistant Attorney General; Al Schmutzer, Jr., District Attorney General; and Steven R. Hawkins, Assistant District Attorney General, for the Appellee, State of Tennessee. Judge: WITT First Paragraph: Terry Proffitt appeals the Sevier County Criminal Court's denial of his petition for post-conviction relief. Proffitt claims that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel during the proceedings in which he was convicted of first degree murder for the death of his ex-wife and that improper jury instructions were given during those proceedings. Because the lower court properly found that the petitioner failed to carry his burden of proving these claims by clear and convincing evidence, we affirm. http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/proffittterry.wpd GARY MAURICE SEXTON, JR. v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Court:TCCA Attorneys: Gary Maurice Sexton, Jr., Wartburg, Tennessee, Pro Se. Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; John H. Bledsoe, Assistant Attorney General; Randall Eugene Nichols, District Attorney General; and Patricia Cristil, Assistant District Attorney General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee. Judge: RILEY First Paragraph: The petitioner, Gary Maurice Sexton, Jr., appeals the Knox County trial court's denial of his pro se motion requesting "credit for time at liberty." On appeal, the petitioner asserts: (1) the trial court erred in denying the motion; (2) the trial court erred in requiring him to proceed pro se at the hearing; and (3) he received ineffective assistance of counsel prior to the pro se hearing. Upon review of the record and the applicable law, we dismiss the appeal. http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/sextongary.wpd PLEASE FORWARD THIS E-MAIL! GET A FULL-TEXT COPY OF AN OPINION! JOIN THE TENNESSEE BAR ASSOCIATION! SUBSCRIBE TO OPINION FLASH! UNSUBSCRIBE TO OPINION FLASH? ... SURELY NOT! But if you must, visit the TBALink web site at: http://www.tba.org/op-flash.mgi Home Contact Us PageFinder What's New Help |
|
© Copyright 2004 Tennessee Bar Association
|