
Opinion FlashSeptember 15, 2004Volume 10 Number 178 Following this index are summaries of each case, including its name, first paragraph, author's name, and the names of attorneys for the parties of each opinion. This Issue (IN THIS ORDER):
TBA members can get the full-text versions of these opinions three ways detailed below. All methods require a TBA username and password. If you have forgotten your password, you can look it up on-line at http://www.tba.org/getpassword.mgi . If you are a TBA member, but do not have a username and password, you can receive one online at http://www.tba.org/signup.mgi. Here's how you can obtain full-text version. Click the URL at end of each Opinion paragraph below. This option will allow you to download the original document. Howard H. Vogel THE CITY OF MEMPHIS v. SHELBY COUNTY ELECTION COMMISSION, ET AL. Court:TSC Attorneys: Allan J. Wade, Lori Hackleman Patterson, Brandy S. Parrish, Sara L. Hall, Memphis, Tennessee, for the appellant, The City of Memphis. Paul G. Summers, Attorney General & Reporter; Michael E. Moore, Solicitor General; Ann Louise Vix, Senior Counsel, Charles L. Lewis, Deputy Attorney General, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellee, Shelby County Election Commission, Gregory M. Duckett, Richard J. Holden and Maura Black Sullivan, Members. Judge: DROWOTA First Paragraph: In this expedited appeal, this Court is asked to decide whether the Shelby County Election Commission exceeded its authority by refusing to place Referendum Ordinance No. 5072 on the November 2, 2004, ballot based upon the State Election Coordinator's opinion that the Ordinance is unconstitutional. We hold that the Shelby County Election Commission exceeded its authority in refusing to place the measure on the ballot. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is reversed, and the Commission is hereby ordered to include Referendum Ordinance No. 5072 on the November 2, 2004, ballot. http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TSC/cityofmemphis.wpd J.E.B. v. J.C.W. Court:TCA Attorneys: Kevin W. Shepherd, Maryville, for the Appellant J.C.W. Sandra E. Myatt, Maryville, for the Appellee J.E.B. Judge: LEE First Paragraph: This is a child custody case. After a trial, the trial court designated the Father as primary residential custodian of the parties' child. Mother appeals, arguing that the trial court should have awarded her primary residential custody. We find that the evidence does not preponderate against the trial court's finding that the child's best interests are served by awarding Father primary residential custody. Consequently, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCA/jeb.wpd STATE OF TENNESSEE v. CORNELIUS D. HICKS, aka "HOLLYWOOD," and TROY LEE SPRINGFIELD Court:TCCA Attorneys: D. Michael Dunavant, Ripley, Tennessee, for the appellant, Cornelius D. Hicks; and David M. Livingston, Brownsville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Troy Lee Springfield. Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Renee W. Turner, Assistant Attorney General; Elizabeth T. Rice, District Attorney General; and Tracey A. Brewer, Assistant District Attorney General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee. Judge: GLENN First Paragraph: The defendants, Cornelius D. Hicks and Troy Lee Springfield, and two codefendants, Bryan T. Oldham and Kenyale M. Pirtle, were charged with aggravated assault, a Class C felony, for firing a gun at the victim, Keiston Campbell, as he drove his car down a Henning street. Pirtle subsequently pled guilty to aggravated assault, and a fifth individual involved in the incident had his case handled in juvenile court. The three remaining defendants, Springfield, Hicks, and Oldham, were tried jointly before a Lauderdale County Circuit Court jury, which acquitted Oldham but convicted both Hicks and Springfield of the lesser-included offense of facilitation of aggravated assault, a Class D felony. The trial court sentenced Hicks as a Range I, standard offender to three years in the Department of Correction, with the sentence suspended and the defendant placed on supervised probation following service of 250 days, to be served consecutively to a sentence for an offense for which he was on probation at the time of the instant offense. Springfield was sentenced as a Range I, standard offender to three years in the Department of Correction, with the sentence ordered to be served consecutively to his sentence for violation of parole. The sole issue Hicks raises on appeal is whether the evidence was sufficient to sustain his conviction. Springfield challenges the trial court's denial of his motions to sever his trial and for judgment of acquittal. Following our review, we affirm the judgments of the trial court. http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/hickscornd.wpd STATE OF TENNESSEE v. LARRY HUNT Court:TCCA Attorneys: W. Mark Ward (on appeal) and Trent Hall (at trial), Assistant Public Defenders, Memphis, Tennessee, for the appellant, Larry Hunt. Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Jennifer L. Bledsoe, Assistant Attorney General; William L. Gibbons, District Attorney General; and Stephen Jones, Assistant District Attorney General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee. Judge: OGLE First Paragraph: The appellant, Larry Hunt, was convicted by a jury in the Shelby County Criminal Court of one count of aggravated rape, one count of aggravated robbery, and one count of aggravated kidnapping. Following a hearing, the trial court sentenced the appellant to twenty-five years incarceration for the aggravated rape conviction, twelve years incarceration for the aggravated robbery conviction, and twelve years incarceration for the aggravated kidnapping conviction. The trial court ordered the sentence for aggravated rape be served consecutively to the remaining sentences, for an effective thirty-seven year sentence. On appeal, the appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction of aggravated rape and the imposition of consecutive sentencing. In light of the United States Supreme Court's decision in Blakely v. Washington, __ U.S. __, 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004), we modify the appellant's sentence for aggravated rape to twenty-two years and the sentences for aggravated robbery and aggravated kidnapping to ten years, for an effective sentence of thirty-two years incarceration. We also vacate the judgment of conviction for count two of indictment number 00-12640, which judgment was entered in error. We otherwise affirm the judgments of the trial court. http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/huntlarry.wpd STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ALFONSO MARTINEZ Court:TCCA Attorneys: Bradley G. Kirk, Lexington, Tennessee (at trial and on appeal) and Frankie K. Stanfill, Lexington, Tennessee (at trial), for the appellant, Alfonso Martinez. Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; J. Ross Dyer, Assistant Attorney General; Jerry Woodall, District Attorney General; and William R. Martin, Assistant District Attorney General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee. Judge: OGLE First Paragraph: The appellant, Alfonso Martinez, was found guilty by a jury in the Henderson County Circuit Court of felony possession of drug paraphernalia and was sentenced to two years incarceration in the Tennessee Department of Correction. On appeal, the appellant's sole issue is the constitutionality of Tennessee Code Annotated sections 39-17-424 and 39-17-425 (2003). Upon review of the record and the parties' briefs, we conclude that the appellant has waived his issue. Therefore, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/martinezalf.wpd STATE OF TENNESSEE v. DARRY MILLER Court:TCCA Attorneys: Julie K. Pillow, Somerville, Tennessee (at trial and on appeal); and Clifford K. McGown, Jr., Waverly, Tennessee (on appeal only), for the Appellant, Darry Miller. Paul G. Summers, Attorney General & Reporter; Michael Markham, Assistant Attorney General; Elizabeth T. Rice, District Attorney General; and Tracey Brewer, Assistant District Attorney General, for the Appellee, State of Tennessee. Judge: WITT First Paragraph: Darry Miller appeals from his Lauderdale County Circuit Court conviction of delivery of a Schedule II controlled substance less than 0.5 grams. He claims that the evidence presented at trial is insufficient to sustain a conviction. We disagree and affirm. http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/millerdarry.wpd STATE OF TENNESSEE v. GREGORY MORROW Court:TCCA Attorneys: Jack McNeil, Memphis, Tennessee (at trial and on appeal), and Lance Chism, Memphis, Tennessee (at trial), for the appellant, Gregory Morrow. Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Renee W. Turner, Assistant Attorney General; William L. Gibbons, District Attorney General; and Scot A. Bearup and Tiffani Taylor, Assistant District Attorneys General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee. Judge: OGLE First Paragraph: The appellant, Gregory Morrow, was found guilty by a jury in the Shelby County Criminal Court of possessing 300 grams or more of cocaine with the intent to sell, possessing 300 grams or more of cocaine with the intent to deliver, and two counts of possessing marijuana. The appellant received a total effective sentence of fifteen years incarceration in the Tennessee Department of Correction. On appeal, the appellant challenges the trial court's ruling on his motion to suppress and raises complaints regarding the application of Rule 41(g) of the Tennessee Rules of Criminal Procedure. Upon our review of the record and the parties' briefs, we affirm the judgments of the trial court, but we remand for a merger of the appellant's two cocaine convictions and his two marijuana convictions. http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/morrowgreg.wpd STATE OF TENNESSEE v. SYREETA PATTERSON Court:TCCA Attorneys: Jake Erwin, Memphis, Tennessee, for the appellant, Syreeta Patterson. Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Michael Markham, Assistant Attorney General; William L. Gibbons, District Attorney General; and Lee Coffee, Assistant District Attorney General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee. Judge: OGLE First Paragraph: The appellant, Syreeta Patterson, pled guilty in the Shelby County Criminal Court to voluntary manslaughter. Pursuant to a plea agreement, the appellant was sentenced to six years with the manner of service to be determined by the trial court. Following a hearing, the trial court denied the appellant's request for alternative sentencing, and the appellant timely appealed. Upon review of the record and the parties' briefs, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. http://www.tba.org/tba_files/TCCA/pattersnsyreeta.wpd PLEASE FORWARD THIS E-MAIL! GET A FULL-TEXT COPY OF AN OPINION! JOIN THE TENNESSEE BAR ASSOCIATION! SUBSCRIBE TO OPINION FLASH! UNSUBSCRIBE TO OPINION FLASH? ... SURELY NOT! But if you must, visit the TBALink web site at: http://www.tba.org/op-flash.mgi Home Contact Us PageFinder What's New Help |
|
© Copyright 2004 Tennessee Bar Association
|