WPC! U>n 03 0<U, 0JG 0T 0^ 0hC 0r 0| 0 0 1u %$ 0d* 0Bv~vN <  9p`(&Times New Roman: 8WP Defaults       !!VL` ` hp x (#%'0*,.8135@8:VX  < :InitialStyle<  9p`(Geneva2 0Indent123  2" 0Indent20 23  2, 0Indent30 0 23  26 0Indent40 0 0 23  2@ 0Indent50 0 0 0 23  2J 0Indent60 0 0 0 0 23  2T 0Indent70 0 0 0 0 0 23  2^ 0Indent80 0 0 0 0 0 0 23   ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)XP 8Mac DefaultMac Default ` X("$   PtPtHH(FG(HH(dH'@Styl{WP}01  HH  2$HH  Geneva  <Px443!#4$*$$*$ KK  Geneva  Geneva .,6 Geneva   ystem Geneva  ystem Geneva ! .     ` XINTHESUPREMECOURTOFTENNESSEEATNASHVILLE  X          INRE:PROPOSEDTENNESSEERULESOFPROFESSIONALCONDUCTX         No.M200002416SCRLRL  ` XX       Q FiledApril26,2002       ORDERSCHEDULINGADDITIONALORALARGUMENT    OnApril19,2002,thisCourtorderedoralargumentwithrespecttotwelveissuesraisedbytheTennesseeBarAssociations( TBA)ProposedTennesseeRulesofProfessionalConduct( ProposedRules).OurpreviousorderdidnotpermittheUnitedStatesAttorneysfortheEastern,Middle,andWesternDistrictsofTennesseetobeheardinargument,nordiditdesignateanyspecificissuesforthemtoheardupon.Anysuchomissionwaspurelyinadvertent,andweareparticularlyinterestedtohearargumentonthefollowingissue: ISSUE13:  WhetherthisCourtshould(1)adoptProposedRule4.2(CommunicationwithPersonRepresentedbyCounsel)asproposedor(2)amendthetextandcommentsoftheProposedRuletoclarifythattheProposedRuledoesnotprohibitcommunicationswithsuchapartybyaprosecutororgovernmentlawyerengagedinaninvestigationpriortothecommencementofcivilorcriminalproceedings;toclarifythattheProposedRuledoesnotprohibitcommunicationwithsuchapersonconcerning mattersoutsidethesubjectmatteroftherepresentation;andtoremovethelastsentenceofComment[7].    Partiesrequestedtoaddressthisissue:TheTBAtoargueinfavorofadoptingProposedRule4.2assubmittedintheRevisedFinalReport;theUnitedStatesAttorneystoargueinfavorofamendingthetextandcommentsoftheRule.    Inaddition,theUnitedStatesAttorneysareinvitedtoparticipateinoralargumentwithrespecttoIssues2,5,6,7,8,and9oftheApril19,2002,Order.AllproceduralaspectsofthisCourtsApril19,2002,Ordershallalsoapplytothebriefingandargumentoftheseadditionalissues.      Q   PERCURIAM