HANNAH LEAH WADE v. MARK WADE

The appellant (“Mother”) appeals from an order of the trial court entered on November 27, 2012, which granted the counter-petition to alter or amend the parties’ Permanent Parenting Plan and to relocate to Indiana filed by the appellee (“Father”). The November 27, 2012 order stated that “[a]ll other issues raised” in Mother’s response in opposition to the petition to relocate and counter-petition to modify custody as well as Mother’s initial Motion for Contempt were “reserved for further hearing.” It is clear that the order appealed from does not resolve all issues raised in the proceedings below. As such, the order is not a final order and this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Attorney 1: 

Hannah Leah Wade, Franklin, Tennessee, pro se.

Attorney 2: 

Michael B. Menefee of Menefee & Brown, LLP, Knoxville, Tennessee, for the appellee.

Judge: 
PER CURIAM
AttachmentSize
wadeh_020713.pdf61.14 KB
Groups: