MARY JO EARL HEADRICK v. WILLIAM H. HEADRICK, JR.

This is a post-divorce matter. The trial court found the appellant, William H. Headrick, Jr. (“Husband”), in contempt and set forth what Husband was required to do to purge himself of contempt. All of this was accomplished in an order entered on March 21, 2012. Husband filed a timely motion to alter or amend that was denied by the trial court in an order entered on June 13, 2012. Husband filed a notice of appeal on August 2, 2012. The appellee, Mary Jo Earl Headrick (“Wife”), filed a motion to dismiss in this Court predicated on her argument that the notice of appeal was not timely filed. We dismiss Husband’s appeal as untimely filed.

Attorney 1: 

Brett D. Stokes, Knoxville, Tennessee, for the appellant.

Attorney 2: 

Terry G. Vann, Lenoir City, Tennessee, for the appellee.

Judge: 
PER CURIAM
AttachmentSize
headrickm_032113.pdf54.47 KB
Groups: