YOLANDA URIA v. STEVE URIA

This appeal involves post-trial motions in a divorce case. Several years after the divorce decree was entered, the father filed a petition to modify the parenting plan to seek more parenting time, and he filed a petition for contempt, alleging that the mother had prevented him from exercising his parenting time. The father later filed a motion asking the trial court to alter or amend the original divorce decree’s child support provision in order to reduce his child support obligation retroactive to the date of the decree, and the arrearage that he had accrued over the years. The trial court modified the parenting plan, found the mother in contempt, and altered the portion of the original divorce decree pertaining to child support, thereby reducing the father’s child support arrearage. The mother appeals. We affirm in part and reverse in part and remand for further proceedings.

Attorney 1: 

Geoffrey Coston, Franklin, Tennessee, for the appellant, Yolanda Uria

Attorney 2: 

D. Scott Parsley, Joshua G. Strickland, , Tennessee, for the appellee, Steve Uria

Judge: 
HIGHERS
AttachmentSize
uriay_020713.pdf139.39 KB
Groups: