News

Northern Virginia Law Firm Opens Nashville Office

The northern Virginia Spiggle Law Firm has opened an office in Nashville, founder Tom Spiggle announced today. The employment law firm in the Washington, D.C., area focuses on wrongful termination and pregnancy and family-care discrimination in the workplace. The new office is being led by Phillis Rambsy, a Jackson native. An employment law attorney, Rambsy has worked at law firms in Tennessee, Kentucky, Washington and Maryland. The office is located in the UBS Tower at 315 Deaderick St., Suite 1550, Nashville 37238 and can be reached at 615-647-8952. Read more in this press release from the firm.

read more »

Wearable Technology that Monitors Workers Could Lead to Legal Problems for Employers

Employers are outfitting workers with wearable technology to track inventory, map routes through warehouses, monitor employee interactions and keep truck drivers awake.

But lawyers see potential legal complications as wearable technology becomes more common in the workplace, the Washington Post reports. The ABA Journal has more on the story from Debra Cassens Weiss.

read more »

Lawyers Sought for Women’s Empowerment Conference

Volunteer lawyers are needed for an upcoming Women’s Empowerment Conference organized by Women Overcoming Many Battles Ministries, a faith-based nonprofit that seeks to help women overcome life’s challenges. The conference will take place July 30 from 10 a.m. to 1 p.m. at Mt. Lebanon Missionary Baptist Church in Nashville. Attorneys are needed to lead 15-minute presentations on child support enforcement and wrongful eviction and participate in a general question and answer session. Lawyers also are needed to provide brief legal advice in one-on-one meetings with the women. Those interested in helping should contact AOC Pro Bono Coordinator Patricia Mills

read more »

Letter from the Editor

Here’s the latest newsletter from TBA’s Labor and Employment Section.  I want to thank this issue's authors for their insightful articles – Greg Grisham (a regular contributor), Brad Harvey, Megan Walton and Jeb Garth. If you have an article, I urge you to e-mail me at bbuchanan@sblimmigration.com.

Bruce Buchanan

read more »

Letter from the Chair

It is a sincere honor and privilege to serve as this year’s chair of our L&E Section.  Please join me in congratulating our outgoing chair, Michael Russell, for a job well done.  We had planned to present Michael with a bottle of Chattanooga Whiskey Company’s 1816 Cask at the section’s annual meeting in May, but, alas, the executive council got a bit carried away in its effort to ensure the hooch’s quality.  In any event, thanks Michael. We owe you one.

I’d also like to thank Bruce Buchanan for his continued willingness to serve as the editor of the section’s newsletter.  Bruce does a great job (as can be gleaned from the current version), and he is always looking for articles of interest. As such, please contact Bruce if you would be willing to offer a contribution to the “next” newsletter.

As most of you likely appreciate, our L&E Section has, over the years, grown to be one of the association’s largest sections, tallying approximately 700 members.  Its newsletter and annual meeting (providing six entertaining hours of CLE) are always well received/attended. My primary goal as this year’s chair is “not to screw things up.” With that goal now memorialized, I also hope to expand the section’s assistance – assistance to its members, assistance to the legislative and judiciary branches, and assistance to the public at large.  (I also like helping small animals, but my vision in that regard is still clouded by the whiskey.)

Seriously though, to reach any of the above goals, the section needs your help. Please don’t hesitate to reach out to me (or any member of the section’s executive council) with your thoughts (including any constructive criticism). Also, be sure to check out the section’s webpage, as it has an impressive amount of valuable information. 

It should be a great year.

John R. Bode,

Chair


*John is the longtime chair of Miller & Martin’s labor and employment department, working out of its Chattanooga office.  He’s married, and he and his wife have one daughter and one dog.       

read more »

UT Facing Costs of $3M for Title IX Suit

The University of Tennessee will spend roughly $3 million to settle a federal lawsuit alleging that the school allowed a “hostile sexual environment” and violated Title IX in its response to sexual assault cases, especially those accusing student athletes. The amount includes a $2.48 million payment to eight plaintiffs and legal fees to their lawyers, and more than $500,000 to the Nashville law firm Neal & Harwell, which represented the university in the matter, Knoxnews reports. The settlement was announced July 5.

read more »

New Harassment Policy in Place for Officials, Staff

Tennessee House Speaker Beth Harwell, R-Nashville, has announced the immediate implementation of a new workplace harassment policy for the Tennessee General Assembly. The new policy expands the current focus on sexual harassment to include all workplace harassment and includes for the first time a transparency component, which will require that a public report be issued for any elected official or staff member found to be in violation of the policy. The new policy is the result of recommendations from a committee appointed by Harwell. Humphrey on the Hill has more from speaker's office and a link to the policy.

read more »

Corporate Counsel Courses Now Online

Did you miss the 2016 Corporate Counsel forum? Good news, you can now stream high-quality online videos from the program on our website. Sessions cover ERISA and ACA litigation updates, new federal overtime rules, OSHA investigations and recent developments in employment law.

read more »

Court Will Not Rehear Union Dues Case

The U.S. Supreme Court on a 4-4 vote declined to rehear a challenge by California teachers to a ruling that a union’s “fair share” agreement with the state did not violate their constitutional rights. The teachers had urged the court to hold the case until a ninth justice was confirmed and seated, but the court denied the petition for rehearing without comment. Legal counsel for the group said it was disappointed in the court’s action but “will look for opportunities to challenge compulsory union dues in other cases.” Bloomberg BNA has more on the case.

read more »

Mississippi Religious Objections Bill Blocked

A federal judge ruled yesterday that Mississippi clerks cannot cite religious beliefs to avoid issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples, the Associated Press reports. The ruling blocks the state from enforcing part of a religious objections bill that was supposed to become law Friday. State officials indicated they likely would appeal the decision to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. News 5 has the story.

read more »

Court Still to Rule on Most Controversial Cases

The U.S. Supreme Court issued five decisions Monday, including rulings (1) upholding a patent review procedure known as inter partes review, which has been used by Apple and Google to invalidate patents; (2) directing lower courts in Alabama, Louisiana and Mississippi to re-examine three convictions for evidence of racial prejudice in jury selection; and (3) directing the U.S. Labor Department to do a better job of explaining why it is changing a longstanding policy on whether certain workers deserve overtime pay. With just one week left in the court’s current term, however, the most contentious cases still need to be resolved, including regulation of Texas abortion clinics, the use of race in college admissions, the legality of the president’s immigration executive orders, and the public corruption conviction of Virginia’s former governor. WKRN looks at the remaining cases.

read more »

Columnists Cover Elders, Recording Employees and Coffee, Milk and Sugar

This month's Tennessee Bar Journal columnists cover a lot of ground: Monica Franklin writes about "Protecting Older Adults from Financial Exploitation: Proposed Federal Laws and Regulations." Edward Phillips and Brandon Morrow explore the issues of one employee recording another's harassment in "O, That Mine Enemy Would Record Me With Her Smartphone." Humor columnist Bill Haltom handles a hot topic with a cold outcome -- a recent lawsuit involving too much ice in Starbucks coffee. The Hon. Creed McGinley reviews Haltom's new book, Milk & Sugar: The Complete Book of Seersucker. Read the review, then come to the TBA Convention on Thursday to have the book signed, following the CLE, "Seersucker and Civility: How to Dress and Behave Like a Lawyer."

read more »

Learn About New Overtime Rule in 1-Hour Webcast

Nashville attorneys Stanley Graham and Andrew Naylor, both of Waller Lansden Dortch & Davis LLP, will explain the new federal overtime rule in a one-hour webcast CLE on June 28 at noon CST. The changes include increasing the minimum salary required for exempt employees from $23,660 to over $47,000 per year. The course, approved for one CLE credit, will replay on July 21. 

read more »

Former UT Football Player Sues SEC, NCAA

The Tennessean reports that former University of Tennessee football player O.J. Owens is suing the Southeastern Conference and the NCAA in an effort to recoup unspecified damages for the effects of head trauma he experienced during his college career. His suit is one of 10 filed in the past two months by Chicago-based law firm Edelson on behalf of former college football players. UT is not named as a defendant in the suit. 

read more »

Former UT Football Player Sues SEC, NCAA

The Tennessean reports that former University of Tennessee football player O.J. Owens is suing the Southeastern Conference and the NCAA in an effort to recoup unspecified damages for the effects of head trauma he experienced during his college career. His suit is one of 10 filed in the past two months by Chicago-based law firm Edelson on behalf of former college football players. UT is not named as a defendant in the suit. 

read more »

Sen. Alexander Acts to Block New Overtime Rule

U.S. Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., today filed legislation that would nullify the new federal overtime rule that allows full-time salaried employees to qualify for overtime if they make up to $47,476 a year. Alexander argued the change – set to take effect later this year – would reduce work hours and inhibit flexible work schedules. The Knoxville News Sentinel reports U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., chairman of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, joined Alexander in the filing. 

read more »

Jury Awards $2M to Conductor Struck by Train

A jury this week awarded railroad conductor Shawn Hall more than $2 million after he was struck by a train in Shelby County, even after determining that Hall was 50 percent responsible for the accident. Hall, who lost part of his leg and fractured both of his arms in the accident, argued Illinois Central Railroad Company was negligent because it failed to warn him of the unscheduled train that hit him. Read more from The Commercial Appeal

read more »

Court to Decide Whether Workers Can Sue Employers Over Tips

The Tennessee Supreme Court today heard a case that debates whether service industry workers who believe their tips are being unfairly split can sue their employers, or if they must file complaints with state regulators. State law says that tips left at businesses like bars and restaurants should go to employees who serve patrons, according to The Tennessean. The case was brought by a former server and bartender at a PGA Tour country club in Memphis who filed a class-action suit in March that claimed the business and PGA affiliates were withholding tips she and others had earned. 

read more »

New Federal Overtime Rule Finalized

The U.S. Department of Labor finalized today a new overtime rule that will make employees who earn yearly salaries of $47,476 or less to be eligible for overtime if they work more than 40 hours a week. The overtime rule, which has not been changed since 2004, is expected to impact 4.2 million workers. Read more from Fast Company.

read more »

Circuit Court Denies Claims in Age Discrimination Suits

Two former Knox County 4th Circuit Court supervisors filed identical age discrimination lawsuits that claim their ages and salaries were the reason for their termination in January 2015. But Knox County Criminal Court Clerk Mike Hammond paints a different picture of why they were let go, claiming the pair “acted as ringmasters over a circus atmosphere surrounding the handling of domestic violence cases.” The county also denied the women, ages 66 and 60, were the oldest on staff. The Knoxville News Sentinel reports the women are each seeking $500,000 in punitive damages as well as lost wages.

read more »

QB Brady Adds Ted Olson to Defense Team; Granted Extension

New England Patriots quarterback Tom Brady and the newest addition to his defense group – former U.S. Solicitor General Ted Olson – were granted a 14-day extension earlier this week for the NFL Player’s Association to file a motion for a rehearing by the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals. Brady is seeking to overturn the appeals court’s April 25 ruling that required a four-game "Deflategate" suspension imposed by the NFL. Olson has won several high-profile cases before the U.S. Supreme Court, including Citizens United and Bush v. GoreRead more from the Boston Herald and the ABA Journal

read more »

Volkswagen to Appeal Ruling on Chattanooga Union Election

Volkswagen is appealing a National Labor Relations Board ruling that enabled a union vote by the United Auto Workers at the automaker’s Chattanooga assembly plant, the Associated Press reports.  A Volkswagen Chattanooga spokesman said the board “declined to fully evaluate” Volkswagen's challenge to the election. About 160 workers participated in the December election; the company said labor decisions should be made by the entire hourly workforce.

read more »

Annual Labor & Employment Forum, May 6

Debra Lawrence of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission will speak on the Equal Pay Act at the 20th Annual Labor & Employment Forum on May 6 at the Bar Center in Nashville. Other topics include federal and Tennessee Law updates, hot topics in wage and hour law, and perspectives from the bench. The forum, approved for six CLE credits, is from 8:30 a.m. – 3 p.m. Register by May 1.

read more »

Calculating Economic Losses in Employment Termination Cases in Tennessee

*By Charles L. Baum II, Ph.D.

In employment termination cases, plaintiffs will typically claim compensatory damages that include lost earnings. In these cases, attorneys may hire a forensic economist to calculate the value of these losses. The courts provide guidance to be followed when calculating lost earnings from a termination. For example, in Suggs v. ServiceMaster Educ. Food Management, the court identifies the following factors to be considered: “(1) the employee’s future in the position from which she was terminated; (2) her work and life expectancy; (3) her obligation to mitigate her damages; (4) the availability of comparable employment opportunities and the time reasonably required to find substitute employment; (5) the discount tables to determine the present value of future damages; and (6) ‘other factors that are pertinent in prospective damage awards’” (quoting Shore v. Federal Express Corp.).[i] In this article, I review the guidance provided by Tennessee statutes for these and other key factors when calculating lost earnings in ET cases.

I. Earnings Capacity

Tennessee courts allow damages from lost earnings to be recovered in ET cases[ii] to make the injured party whole.[iii] In Frye v. Memphis State Univ., the Tennessee Supreme Court defines the appropriate measure of damages to be “the amount the employee would have earned had the employer not dismissed him, less what would have been earned, or might have been earned, in some other employment, by the exercise of reasonable diligence.”[iv]

Plaintiffs may recover losses from the time of the termination to the trial—referred to as back pay—and losses incurred after the trial—referred to as front pay—if it is not possible for the terminated employee to be reinstated to the original position of employment.[v] Otherwise, the courts seem to view reinstatement as the preferred remedy.[vi] Regardless, reinstatement and an award of front pay are alternative remedies and should not be applied cumulatively.[vii]

II. Employment Benefits

Many workers receive compensation from their employers in the form of employment benefits. For example, health insurance benefits and retirement contributions are often at least partially financed by the employer. Other benefits, such Social Security and Medicare contributions made by the employer on behalf of the employee, are mandated by the government.

Employment benefits in ET cases in Tennessee are recoverable;[viii] however Tennessee courts do not provide instructions for calculating their value. As a result, these losses are typically handled in the same fashion as lost wage and salary earnings. If a worker lost an employment benefit as a result of an employment termination but that individual did not replace the benefit that had been provided by the employer after the termination, then the plaintiff may be ineligible to claim damages, and therefore receive compensation, for that benefit.[ix]

III. Growth Rates

Earnings typically grow over time with inflation as prices increase and with productivity increases. Tennessee courts in ET cases allow awards of front pay to grow for these reasons.[x] Although earnings are anticipated to grow over time, Tennessee statutes do not address what acceptable growth rates might be. Earnings growth should not be included as damages when future raises are speculative.[xi]

IV. Worklife and Life Expectancies

Worklife expectancy is often used in ET cases when calculating front pay to estimate the number of years an individual would have remained in the labor force and been employed. Tennessee courts recognize the appropriateness of examining losses over one’s worklife,[xii] but they provide no preference for the methodology to use when approximating worklife expectancy. Economists in Tennessee cases have used worklife expectancy tables produced by researchers, made their own separate adjustments for the probability of living and the probability of being employed, and assumed fixed worklife durations based on common retirement ages.[xiii] Front pay damages have not been allowed when the terminated worker could not reasonably have remained with the terminating employer.[xiv]

V. Mitigation

Those who are injured are typically assumed by forensic economists to take action to limit damage. In ET cases, a primary way terminated workers can limit damage to offset losses is by acquiring another job with earnings and benefits. For example, in Frye v. Memphis State Univ., the Tennessee Supreme Court states that in the case of a wrongful termination, “there is a duty to minimize this loss by seeking other employment.”[xv] With mitigation, economic damages should be the difference in compensation from earnings and benefits without and with the employment termination (i.e., mitigating factors should be subtracted from any economic losses).[xvi] If the worker becomes employed at another job that pays more than the terminating employer, there would be no subsequent damages from earnings losses.[xvii]

The terminated worker is “required to exercise reasonable diligence in seeking other employment of a similar or comparable nature … [but] … [t]he employee is not required to mitigate damages by accepting a position that is not comparable or is, in effect, a demotion.”[xviii] If the plaintiff does not exercise reasonable diligence to find another job, then the right to subsequent damages is forfeited, but the defendant has the burden of proving this.[xix]

Similarly, economic damages should be reduced by payments, such as severance pay, made by the terminating employer to the plaintiff, [xx] but the tortfeasor’s liability should not be reduced for payments, such as unemployment compensation, that they have not financed.[xxi]

VI. Interest

Tennessee courts have allowed interest to be paid on pre-judgment losses as damages in ET cases,[xxii] to make the plaintiff whole,[xxiii] with a few exceptions (such as inexcusable delays in pursuing a claim).[xxiv] Post-judgment interest on upheld damages awards may be allowed during appeals.[xxv]

Tennessee Code Annotated §47-14-123 limits interest to not more than 10 percent.[xxvi] In compliance, the District Court in Taylor v. Brennan used the interest rate on U.S. Treasury bills during the relevant loss period.[xxvii] However, in Killian v. Yorozu Auto. Tenn. Inc., the jury failed to include pre-judgement interest, which benefited the defendant, and failed to discount future losses to present value, which benefited the plaintiff, so the appeals court did not adjust the damages calculations because these errors were thought to at least partially offset one another.[xxviii]

[i] Suggs v. ServiceMaster Educ. Food Management, 72 F.3d 1228, 1234 (6th Cir. 1996); Shore v. Federal Express Corp., 777 F.2d 1155, 1160 (6th Cir. 1985).

[ii] Frye v. Memphis State University, 806 S.W.2d 170 (Tenn. 1991); Shore, 777 F.2d at 1158.

[iii] Barnes v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co., 2001 WL 568033 at *4 (Tenn.Ct.App. 2001); Hawley v. Dresser Industries, Inc., 958 F2d 720, 725 (6th Cir. 1992).

[iv] Frye, 806 S.W.2d at 173.

[v] Coffey v. Fayette Tubular Product, 929 S.W.2d 326, 332 (Tenn. 1996); Suggs, 72 F.3d at 1234; Sasser v. Averitt Exp., Inc., 839 S.W.2d 422, 433 (Tenn.Ct.App. 1992).

[vi] Sasser, 839 S.W.2d at 432.

[vii] Suggs, 72 F.3d at 1234; Sasser, 839 S.W.2d at 435.

[viii] For example, see Jordan v. A.C. Enterprises, Inc., 2012 WL 6562032 at *4 (Tenn.Ct.App. 2012) or Taylor v. Brennan, 2015 WL 3466272 at *1 (W.D. Tenn. 2015).

[ix] Plunk v. Gibson Guitar Corp., 2013 WL 2420539 at *10 (Tenn.Ct.App. 2013).

[x] Jackson v. City of Cookeville, 31 F.3d 1354, 1360 (6th Cir. 1994).

[xi] Barnes, 2001 WL 568033 at *4.

[xii] Coffey, 929 S.W.2d at 332; Suggs, 72 F.3d at 1235.

[xiii] For examples, see Branson v. Harrah’s Tunica Corp., 832 F.Supp.2d 929, 939 (W.D. Tenn. 2011), Cox v. Shelby State Community College, 194 Fed.Appx. 267, 276 (6th Cir. 2006), and Mountjoy v. City of Chattanooga, 2002 WL 707467 at *5 (Tenn.Ct.App. 2002).

[xiv] For examples, see Ayala v. Summit Constructors Inc., 788 F.Supp.2d 703, 724 (M.D. Tenn. 2011) and Bohannon v. Baptist Memorial Hospital-Tipton, 2010 WL 1856548 at *7 (W.D. Tenn. 2010).

[xv] Frye, 806 S.W.2d at 173.

[xvi] Coffey, 929 S.W.2d at 332; Sasser, 839 S.W.2d at 434.

[xvii] Maness v. Collins, 2010 WL 4629614 at *11 (Tenn.Ct.App. 2010); Denney v. Lovett, 2006 WL 1915303 at *10 (Tenn.Ct.App. 2006).

[xviii] Frye, 806 S.W.2d at 173.

[xix] Maness, 2010 WL 4629614 at *10; Frye, 806 S.W.2d at 173.

[xx] Barnes, 2001 WL 568033 at *9.

[xxi] Hoback v. City of Chattanooga, 2012 WL 3834828 at *13 (E.D. Tenn. 2012); Barnes, 2001 WL 568033 at *8; Jackson, 31 F.3d at 1360.

[xxii] Frye, 806 S.W.2d at 172; Shore, 777 F.2d at 1158.

[xxiii] Scholz v. S.B. Intern., Inc., 40 S.W.3d 78, 83 (Tenn.Ct.App. 2000); Myint v. Allstate Ins. Co., 970 S.W.2d 920, 927 (Tenn. 1998); Spencer v. A-1 Crane Serv., Inc., 880 S.W.2d 938, 944 (Tenn. 1994).

[xxiv] Foster-Henderson v. Memphis Health Center, Inc., 479 S.W.3d 214, 226 (Tenn.Ct.App. 2015); Scholz v. S.B. Intern., Inc., 40 S.W.3d at 783.

[xxv] Shalka v. Fernald Environmental Restoration Management Corp., 178 F.3d 414, 427 (6th Cir. 1999).

[xxvi] T.C.A. §47-14-123. [xxvii] Taylor, 2015 WL 3466272 at *3. [xxviii] Killian, 454 F.3d at 558.

_________________________

*Charles L. Baum is a professor of economics at Middle Tennessee State University, where he has taught since 1999. Dr. Baum received his Ph.D. in economics from the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill in 1999.  From 2008 to 2014, he served as the chair of the MTSU Department of Economics and Finance.  Dr. Baum is a member of the National Association of Forensic Economists (NAFE) and the American Academy of Economic and Financial Experts (AAEFE). He has served as an economics expert for plaintiffs and defendants in numerous cases around the southeastern United States. Dr. Baum has published several articles in peer-reviewed economics journals on the methodologies used when calculating economic losses.  In July 2015, he published an article in the Tennessee Bar Journal on guidance provided by Tennessee statutes on economic damages in employment termination cases.  To contact Dr. Baum, please e-mail him at baumeconomics@gmail.com or call at 615-556-9287.

read more »

More Damages Ordered to Trooper Wrongly Labeled Terrorist

A federal appeals court ordered U.S. District Judge Tena Campbell to consider "a more appropriate damages award" for a former trooper with the Knoxville branch of Tennessee Highway Patrol, who was fired after a military liaison falsely labeled him a budding terrorist. De'Ossie Dingus, a Sunni Muslim, was denied his attorney’s request for $300,000 in damages; Campbell denied that request primarily because Dingus did not seek counseling. She symbolically awarded him $1. Dingus had won a separate hearing that awarded him back pay and lost wages. Read more from the Knoxville News Sentinel

read more »