This is TBA’s newest section and was created by TBA leadership to provide members the opportunity to come together for the purposes of exchanging information and to provide CLE on appellate practice issues.
In a unanimous opinion, the Tennessee Supreme Court Friday ordered a new trial for a Gibson County man after determining that statements he made during a police interrogation should not have been used as evidence at trial. The case involves the 2007 arrest of David H. Climer Jr., during which he asked whether he could “have … an appointed lawyer right now.” The detective questioning him said “not at this time” and proceeded to question him for three hours. The trial and appeals courts found that the statements were properly admitted because Climer never unequivocally invoked his right to counsel. The Supreme Court disagreed, saying the prosecution failed to prove that the defendant understood and waived his constitutional right to appointed counsel. Download the opinion.
The TBA today filed a motion and provisional brief to proceed as amicus curie in the case of Hooker v. Haslam -- the latest case to test the constitutionality of the Tennessee Plan for merit selection, performance evaluation and retention elections. The brief was prepared by Pat Moskal and Edmund Sauer of Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP serving as special counsel.