![]() |
Family Law SectionMarch 1997 NewsletterArticles |
![]()
![]()
Professor Janet Richards asked me to describe how this pilot program
came about. In the movie, The Blues Brothers, Jake and Elwood
Blues fight to save the orphanage in which they were raised. During
this process, I too, have felt somewhat like Jake and Elwood.
In early 1995, Mary Frances Lyle contacted me to ask if I would
speak to the legislature against a bill that would have provided
a presumption of joint custody in all divorce cases. I did that,
and had the opportunity to meet Representative Bob Patton. The
bill was subsequently defeated and, to be quite honest, it brought
to me new awareness of a system in our state that was more slanted
toward good adversarial tactics rather than looking at what is
best for children. That summer, Vanderbilt University provided
me with two interns to help me with whatever project I deemed
necessary. We found a statute in the state of Washington we thought
was refreshing and redrafted that legislation to make it applicable
to Tennessee with some rather substantial changes in the area
of child custody.
I have been working on my masters degree in Judicial Studies
at the University of Nevada. One requirement for graduation is
to write a thesis. It seemed logical to me to write why this
draft legislation should be adopted in Tennessee. The University
of Memphis law school agreed to print the article. In fact, it
will be published this summer. In 1997, I was asked once again
to speak to the joint committee on child custody to address this
presumption of joint custody and, after some discussion, the subcommittee
became aware of my draft legislation which I subsequently submitted
to them. Shortly thereafter, the bill was filed and with the
support of many people across the state of Tennessee, including
some fine legislators, a pilot program was adopted.
The Tennessee Bar Association, through its Family Law Code Commission,
reviewed this legislation and with a few changes, adopted it.
I hope this legislation will have the opportunity to positively
affect divorcing parents and their children for many years to
come. I have also been contacted by many different attorneys asking
exactly what this legislation does. I think it is rather simple.
The first part of the legislation mandates a four hour seminar
for both parents to attend individually which will provide them
with a number of alternatives. The program will discuss marriage
counseling if the couple wants to salvage their marriage, mediation
and its process and the judicial process. The most important aspect
of this seminar will be to try to defuse the parties anger and
refocus their priority on helping the children cope with their
parents getting a divorce. Obviously, where there are instances
of drug abuse or domestic violence, there would be additional
specialized counseling for these people.
The next aspect of this legislation would provide that if the
parties proceed on irreconcilable differences and they have children
who are minors, they would provide a parenting plan. This would
be a uniform document across the state which is simple to fill
out. Instead of using the terms custody or joint custody there
would be residential provisions, decision-making provisions and
an element of continued mediation in the event that other differences
arise. If the parties could not reach an agreement within 120
days, then every divorce case, unless a motion is filed to relieve
them from such an obligation, would go to a family mediator. During
mediation, each side would present a proposed parenting plan and
the mediator would try to work with the individuals to come to
terms about how they are going to continue as parents of their
children. It has been my experience on the bench that in most
cases where people agree to a settlement, they are more willing
to buy into its provisions than if it is court-ordered. In the
event that the parties cannot agree to a parenting plan through
a family mediator, the matter would go to trial, just as any divorce
would. The only difference would be that each side would submit
a proposed parenting plan and the judge would try to construct
his or her own parenting plan based on what would be in the best
interest of the minor child or children. This parenting plan would
allow the parties to choose one of three mediators to help them
resolve further disputes. This section could be waived in the
event of physical or emotional harm to the child or children.
I am convinced the adversary system for domestic relations cases
are damaging families across the state. Hopefully, this proposed
plan would allow attorneys to be counselors as well as advocates.
In my opinion, it will not resolve all contested cases, but instead
it will give an alternative to parents and try to focus on Gods
most important gift to all of us, our children.
![]()
Tennessee has the third highest divorce rate in the country. One
way to curb the number of divorces is to educate our youth. The
Family Law Section of the American Bar Association has designed
a program to teach high school students the necessary communication
and conflict resolution skills that are required to salvage a
marriage. The course, which is entitled PARTNERS (Preventing
And Reducing Tension New Education for Responsible Spouses) aims
at improving the quality of family life as well as reducing the
number of divorces.
PARTNERS is a ten class period course; five videotape lessons
and five classroom lectures by local divorce attorneys. The topics
include premarital expectations, family income and budget preparation,
child care, custody, support issues and domestic violence. The
curriculum objective of PARTNERS is three-fold. First, to provide
young people with practical information to assist them in making
informed decisions about their life partners and in understanding
the financial, emotional and other demands of a marriage. Secondly,
to advice the students of the legal implication of dissolving
a marriage and explain the impact that divorces have on children
and lastly, to teach these young adults the essential elements
of marriage, communication, negotiations and interaction, with
an emphasis on reducing tension, stress and any negative feelings
harbored against the other partner.
In 1996, Tennessee became the eleventh state to implement this
course in some of its high schools. The program has expanded in
Shelby County and now impacts over 300 students per semester.
The number of volunteer domestic relations lawyers who teach the
course has doubled since 1996. If you and/or your high school
is interested in adding this course to your high school curriculum,
please contact Glenda Sharp of the American Bar Association, Family
Law Section at (312)988-5584.
![]()
The TBA Family Law Section re-instituted the Family Law Code Commission
in 1996 at the request of Amy Amundsen who was chair of the Family
Law Section at that time. The Commission has met numerous times
during the past year discussing issues related to child support,
parentage and custody.
The Commission drafted several pieces of legislation which were
successfully lobbied through the 1997 Tennessee General Assembly
by TBA Legislative Counsel, Steve Cobb. The bills drafted by the
Commission are the Parentage Act, repeal of the tender years statute
and the Parental Access Bill.
The Commission was also very involved in drafting the final
version of the Model Custody Project Act. This is a very comprehensive
piece of legislation which will establish model projects in several
counties throughout the state to involve parties in custody cases
in mediation in an effort to resolve custody and support issues
prior to litigation. It calls for the parents to attempt to arrive
at parenting plans to resolve issues of residential time with
each parent and decision-making.
The Commission is in the process of determining the issues to
take up next with an eye toward further legislation to update
and improve family law legislation in Tennessee. Alimony guidelines,
property division and domestic violence are possibilities.
![]()
![]()
![]()
© Copyright 2000 Tennessee Bar Association