WPCq" # VUNa % 0(w@c 4  0 { T U:\ { ULt {UN { { 0J 0T 0^F 0h 0r  0|~ 0 0 1uU, 0d B D32U,eU> 0@U*B)9DCb AMU*v~7v AO  0D! 0D! D/%" BT"HP LaserJet 4 Plus/4M PlusHPPCL5E,,,,0 (hH  Z 6Times New Roman RegularX($  1 ' IB013C60IB013C6 .    DDD* 3|x<TTD:QuickFormat1XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX<77Dp4:QuickFormat1XXX  XXX  ,  AZ"Arial Regular<QQD:QuickFormat1XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 1 iAZ4Century Gothic Regular<QQD:QuickFormat1XXXX  XMXXXXXXX  XMXXX(hH  Z 6Times New Roman Regular<QQD`:QuickFormat1XXXX XxXXXXXXX XxXXX<QQD:QuickFormat1XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX2 0Indent123  2" 0Indent20 23  2, 0Indent30 0 23  26 0Indent40 0 0 23  2@ 0Indent50 0 0 0 23  2J 0Indent60 0 0 0 0 23  2T 0Indent70 0 0 0 0 0 23  2^ 0Indent80 0 0 0 0 0 0 23   ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)<  9p`(ModernP 8Mac DefaultMac Default ` X d%%%%'dxd<  9p`(Monaco<  9p`(&Times New Roman("$    <  9p`(Times% Line 7 d////7Border 1dd-0C << G<  9p`(Arial  !!,  "  22   YYY FILED2X February6,1996CecilCrowson,Jr.2AppellateCourtClerk PtPtHH(FG(HH(d'@Styl{WP}01  HH  2$HH  Geneva  <Px443!#4$*$$*$ KK  Geneva  Geneva .,6 Monaco   BA: T Monaco  BA: T Monaco -C<< CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(3$ !  ($$   1  ' dxdP Pd ! . !&++Xd&#++Xd#,  &..Xd&\RA'\T T T T T ԛ@ INTHECOURTOFAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE @ WESTERNSECTIONATJACKSON 0 0 @ _____________________________________________ HERBERTADAMS,   ) FromtheChanceryCourt      )  forCrockettCounty,Tennessee Plaintiff/Appellee,   )      ) TheHon.GeorgeR.Ellis,Chancellor vs.      )      )  CrockettCountyChanceryNo.6358 ROBERTSIMSAND   ) AppealNo.02A019411CH00252 L130;+'h|X`  `LPATRICIASIMS    )      ) DISMISSED&REMANDED  Defendants/Appellants.  )      ) TheoJ.Emison      ) Alamo,Tennessee      )  AttorneyforAppellants      )       )  JamesBelewWebb      )  Milan,Tennessee      ) AttorneyforAppellee̜________________________________________________________________________̛̜0 0 @ OPINIONANDORDER ________________________________________________________________________ LILLARD,J.  ThiscasecametobeconsideredbytheCourtuponagrantofaRule9applicationforpermissiontoappealaninterlocutoryOrderofthetrialcourt. Theappellants,RobertandPatriciaSims,seektoappealthetrialcourtsrulingontheirmotioninliminetoexcludefromthetrialcertaintypesofevidence.ThetrialcourtgrantedtheappellantsRule9applicationforpermissiontoappealthedenialofappellantsmotioninlimine.ThisCourtthereaftergrantedappellantsRule9requestforpermissiontoappealthetrialcourtsruling. Afterhearingoralargument,anduponexaminationoftherecord,theCourtisoftheOpinionthattheRule9applicationforpermissiontoappealwasimprovidentlygrantedandthatthemattershouldberemandedtothetrialcourtforfurtherproceedings.  ItisthereforeorderedthattheRule9applicationisdismissedandthematterisremandedtothetrialcourt.Costsaretaxedtotheappellant. ItisSOORDEREDthis______dayofJanuary,1996.               _________________________________       LILLARD,J.        _________________________________       CRAWFORD,P.J.,W.S.        _________________________________       HIGHERS,J.