ÿWPCð  ÉV±ú_®}{§Sßñ*µ ¥…#žØÕs™§ Oá Vf% Xh……úÖs:¿`¡Vî ±zB ì­Êê'ru¤ kÄZUW<ß9Ö öoç[@ @|]€fcØJû*[ª±2ô2ðÓj@Qp£˜‡à×”$0 ¯¢ÃÉÏÚ]•Šöû ¡™¤mG‡Ùÿ“ý2oÝ»•ƒ|'õ¯^›ñžìŠËünÛó2ÍXvy&ové’¯„¬Õqi¦]ß…út‰ThήJ ‘y1 >ò\ÙKô°,aÇ>l5C5Ÿæ¢’«áHÃ2ryœÞ3õy¼Ä§E"PJ×ô‡Ý`êöKuÊǾ¦¸»Z²ùl± @©ÔïÞ0VïŸóv*­ñ“ØÞÍ5YÆù!0^.*jx¬ ` `€€@E ` 8ttxPØLð È tß›ñßñà@  êàIN€THE€COURT€OF€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÌà@¦¦(êàAT€NASHVILLEó óÔ€X¶X¼¼MԈР ÐÌÌÌÌADVANCED€œSALES,›€INC.,à 8 àà  àœ)›Ð È À Ðby€GARY€E.€NEELEY,€PRESIDENT,à  à)Ð ® ¦ Ðà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  à)Ìà Ø àPlaintiff/Appellee,à à àà 8 àà  à)Ð zr  Ðà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  à)à è àAppeal€No.Ð `X  Ðà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  à)à è à01„A„01„9805„CH„00245Ð F>  ÐVS.à Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  à)Ð ,$  Ðà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  à)à è àWilson€ChanceryÐ   Ðà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  à)à è àNo.€97069Ð øð  ÐWILSON€COUNTY,€WILSON€COUNTYà  à)à è àà @ àà ˜ àà ð àà H! àà  # àÐ ÞÖ  ÐBOARD€OF€ZONING€APPEALS,à 8 àà  à)Рļ ÐKATHY€DEDMON,€d/b/a€WILSONà  à)Ð ª¢ ÐCOUNTY€BUILDING€INSPECTOR,à  à)Ð ˆ Ðà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  à)Ìà Ø àDefendants/Appellants.à 8 àà  à)Ð \T ÐÌÌà@Ð Ð êàAPPEALED€FROM€THE€CHANCERY€COURT€OF€WILSON€COUNTYˆÌà@ÖÖ$êàAT€LEBANON,€TENNESSEEˆÌÌà@] ] êàTHE€HONORABLE€C.€K.€SMITH,€CHANCELLORˆÌÌÌÌÌB.€KEITH€WILLIAMSÌTAYLOR,€TAYLOR,€LANNOM€&€WILLIAMSÌ102€East€Main€StreetÌLebanon,€Tennessee€37087Ìà Ø àAttorney€for€Plaintiff/AppelleeÌÌMICHAEL€R.€JENNINGSÌ326€North€Cumberland€StreetÌLebanon,€Tennessee€37087Ìà Ø àAttorney€for€Defendants/AppellantsÌÌÌÌÌà@‘‘#êàREVERSED€AND€DISMISSEDˆÌÌÌÌÌà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  àà è àà @ àBEN€H.€CANTRELL,Ìà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  àà è àà @ àPRESIDING€JUDGE,€M.S.ÌÌÌCONCUR:ÌKOCH,€J.ÌCAIN,€J.ÌÓÓò òÔ€„ì[„XX¶Ôòòà@tt(êàO€P€I€N€I€O€Nóóó óÔ€X¶X„„ì[ԈРš:’39 Їà Ø àà 0 àIn€this€appeal€of€a€decision€of€the€Wilson€County€Board€of€ZoningÏAppeals,€we€are€asked€to€decide€(1)€when€is€the€Boardððs€decision€entered€for€theÏpurpose€of€calculating€the€sixty€day€time€œlimit€for›€appeal€in€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€œ27„9„¼102,›€and€(2)€whether€the€Boardððs€decision€was€arbitrary,€illegal,€or€fraudulent.€€TheÏChancery€Court€of€Wilson€County€held€that€the€appeal€was€timely€and€overturned€theÏdecision€of€the€Board.€€We€reverse€and€dismiss€the€action.ÌÌà@²²-êàò òI.ó óˆÐ œ”  ÐÌà Ø àà 0 àOn€December€3,€1996,€Gary€œNeeley›,€President€of€œAdvanced€Sales,€Inc.Ïapplied€to€the€Wilson€County€Board€of€Zoning€Appeals€for€permission€to€use€a€parcelÏof€property€zoned€A„1€for€ð ðmachine€(mfgððd›)€sales€&€minimum€repairs.ðð€€The€BoardððsÏminutes€of€December€20,€1996€reflect€that€the€application€was€denied€ð ðbased€on€staffÏrecommendation€and€area€resident€concerns.ðð€€ÌÌà Ø àà 0 àOn€February€19,€1997,€œAdvanced€Sales,€Inc.€filed€a€petition€for€certiorariÏin€the€Chancery€Court€of€Wilson€County€alleging€that€the€Boardððs€decision€was€illegal,Ïarbitrary,€and€capricious.€€The€petition€asserted€that€the€use€he€was€being€denied€wasÏessentially€the€same€as€the€use€allowed€by€the€Board€to€a€prior€landowner,€and€thatÏthe€Boardððs€denial€was€based€exclusively€on€opposition€from€neighbors.ÌÌà Ø àà 0 àThe€Board€moved€to€dismiss€because€the€sixty€day€statute€of€limitationsÏhad€run.€€The€Board€also€filed€an€answer€denying€all€the€material€allegations€in€theÏcomplaint.€€The€chancellor€overruled€the€motion€to€dismiss€and€found€that€the€BoardÏhad€acted€arbitrarily€in€denying€the€application€to€use€the€property€for€the€requestedÏpurposes.€€The€courtððs€order€overturned€the€Boardððs€decision€and€ordered€that€ð ðtheÏuse€on€appeal€sought€by€the€plaintiff€shall€be€granted€to€establish€a€machinery€salesÏand€machine€repair€shop€and€business€on€the€16.85€acres€of€A„1€zoned€propertyÏowned€by€the€plaintiff€.€.€.€.ððÐ d9\28 Їà@––-êàò òII.ó óˆÐ  ÐÌà Ø àà 0 àTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€27„9„102€requires€a€petition€for€certiorari€to€reviewÏthe€actions€of€certain€boards€and€commissions€to€be€filed€ð ðwithin€sixty€(60)€days€fromÏthe€entry€of€the€order€or€judgment.ðð€€The€failure€to€file€the€petition€within€the€statutoryÏlimit€deprives€the€reviewing€court€of€jurisdiction€to€consider€the€appeal.€€òòThandiwe›€v.Ð ÈÀ ÐœTraughber›óó,€909€S.W.2d€802€(Tenn.€App.€1994).Ð ¨  ÐÌà Ø àà 0 àIn€this€case€the€petition€œfor€certiorari€alleges›€that,€ð ðon€December€20,Ï1996€the€Plaintiff€Gary€œNeeley›€as€President€of€œAdvanced€Sales,€Inc.;€who€is€theÏcurrent€owner€of€the€parcel€in€question€appealed€a€decision€of€the€building€inspectorÏthat€denied€him€the€use€of€his€property€in€a€commercial€enterprise.€€This€appeal€wasÏdenied.ðð€€The€face€of€the€petition€shows€that€it€was€filed€on€February€19,€1997.€€Thus,Ïif€the€statutory€period€began€to€run€on€December€20,€1996,€the€petition€was€filed€tooÏlate.ÌÌà Ø àà 0 àThe€petitioner€alleges€that€the€Boardððs€ð ðorder€or€judgmentðð€was€notÏentered€until€January€24,€1997€when€the€Board€met€and€approved€the€minutes€of€theÏDecember€20€meeting.€€We€fail€to€find€where€that€appears€in€the€record.€€What€doesÏappear€is€the€application€dated€December€3,€1996€reflecting€a€hearing€date€ofÏDecember€20.€€Various€notices€to€the€public€and€to€affected€landowners€appear€in€theÏrecord€announcing€a€hearing€date€of€December€20.€€The€petition€itself€has€a€sectionÏon€which€to€show€the€action€of€the€Board.€€That€section€reflects€that€the€petition€wasÐ ¨9 26 Ðpresented€to€the€Board€on€December€20,€1996,€and€the€entry,€ð ðRelief€Denied,ðð€isÏcircled€on€the€form.€€It€is€true€that€the€place€on€the€form€showing€how€the€membersÏvoted€is€left€blank,€but€there€is€no€dispute€that€the€Board€voted€unanimously€to€denyÏthe€petition.€€The€form€is€signed€by€the€Board€secretary.ÌÌà Ø àà 0 àWe€think€the€Boardððs€order€or€judgment€was€entered€on€December€20,Ï1996.€€The€applicant€relies€on€the€case€of€òòCarter€v.€Board€of€Zoning€Appeals€of€CityÐ H@  Ðof€Nashvilleóó,€377€S.W.2d€914€(Tenn.€1964)€for€the€proposition€that€the€Boardððs€orderÐ (  Ðor€judgment€in€this€case€was€only€ð ðrenderedðð€on€December€20,€1996€and€not€ð ðenteredððÏuntil€the€Board€approved€the€minutes€in€January€of€1997.€€The€òòCarteróó€case,€however,Ð èà Ðstands€for€an€entirely€different€proposition.€€In€that€case€the€petition€for€certiorariÏalleged€that€the€Board€made€an€oral€ruling€on€February€11,€1963,€but€the€appellantÏfiled€a€petition€to€rehear€and€the€order€of€the€Board€was€not€entered€until€April€24,Ï1963.€€The€petition€for€certiorari€was€filed€on€April€25,€1963.ÌÌà Ø àà 0 àThe€Supreme€Court€held€that€if€the€facts€alleged€in€the€petition€were€true,Ïthe€petition€was€timely€filed.€€The€òòCarteróó€case€does€not€deal€with€the€effect€of€aÐ %  ÐBoardððs€action€in€approving€its€minutes€at€a€later€meeting.€€It€deals€only€with€a€factÏquestion€as€to€when€the€Boardððs€order€was€actually€entered.€€In€this€case€we€think€theÏrecord€before€the€Board€conclusively€shows€that€the€Boardððs€action€was€entered€onÏthe€record€on€December€20,€1996.ÌÌà@zz,êàò òIII.ó óˆÐ H0@), ÐÌà Ø àà 0 àBeyond€the€question€of€whether€the€petition€was€filed€in€time,€we€thinkÏthe€chancellor€erred€in€reversing€the€Boardððs€action.€€The€chancellorððs€order€statedÏâ âthat€there€was€no€material€evidence€to€support€the€Boardððs€decision€and€that€theÐ È7À04 ÐBoard€acted€arbitrarily€based€on€the€prior€use€of€the€property€and€the€use€of€theÏsurrounding€property.Ìâ âÌà Ø àà 0 àWe€think€all€the€proof€is€to€the€contrary;€there€is€a€complete€lack€of€proofÏshowing€that€the€applicant€was€entitled€to€the€use€on€appeal.€€Although€the€zoningÏordinance€is€not€in€the€record,€the€parties,€without€objection,€quote€from€it€in€theirÏbriefs.€€They€agree€that€the€use€proposed€by€the€applicant€is€not€allowed€in€an€A„1Ïclassification.€€The€ordinance€does,€however,€recognize€that€the€Board€may€allowÏcertain€ð ðuses€on€appealðð€in€an€A„1€zone.€€These€uses€included€ð ðuses€permitted€orÏpermissible€on€appeal€in€a€C„1€neighborhood€commercial€districtðð€(Section€5.20.03(V))Ïand€ð ðother€similar€uses€as€reviewed€and€approved€by€the€Board€of€Zoning€Appeals.ðð€Ï(Section€5.20.03(W)).€A€C„1€neighborhood€commercial€district€is€described€in€theÏordinance€as€a€ð ðrestricted€commercial€district,€limited€to€a€narrow€range€of€retail,Ïservice€and€convenience€goods€only.ððÌÌà Ø àà 0 àThere€is€no€transcript€of€the€evidence€taken€before€the€Board.€€TheÏrecord€does,€however,€contain€a€history€of€how€this€controversy€arose.€€The€priorÏowner,€Mr.€Tidwell›,€got€Board€approval€of€a€use€as€a€used€car€lot€and€repair€shop.€€HeÏalso€œtried›€unsuccessfully€to€have€the€lot€rezoned€to€a€C„3€classification.€€On€OctoberÏ21,€1996€the€Wilson€County€building€inspector€wrote€the€following€letter€to€theÏapplicant,€œAdvanced€Sales,€Inc.ÌÓÓà8 Ø àà80 Ø ü!Ø ü!àI€noticed€that€a€crane€and€some€hoppers€have€beenÏplaced€on€a€tract€of€land€located€on€Highway€231€South,Ïprior€owner€being€Mr.€Chester€Tidwell›.€€After€checking€theÏtax€records€I€find€you€as€the€new€owner€of€the€property.Ð 0 ¤0 ¤ ÐÌà8 Ø àà80 Ø ü!Ø ü!àThe€property€is€Parcel€27€on€Wilson€County€Tax€Map€114.€ÏThe€property€is€zoned€A„1€Agriculture.€€Mr.€œTidwell›€wentÏbefore€the€Board€of€Zoning€œAppeals›€December€1,€1989,Ïat€which€time€the€Board€granted€the€use€of€a€used€car€lotÏrepair€shop.€€The€property€being€Lot€5€Padgett€Estates.Ð 0 ¤0 ¤ Ðâ âÐ È7À04 Ðà8 Ø àà80 Ø ü!Ø ü!àWith€the€property€being€zoned€Agriculture,€the€onlyÏcommercial€use€that€can€be€conducted€on€the€site€is€theÏuse€allowed,€a€used€car€lot€and€repair€shop.Ð 0 ¤0 ¤ Ðâ âÌà8 Ø àà80 Ø ü!Ø ü!àIf€you€desire€to€have€a€different€commercial€use€on€thisÏtract€you€will€need€to€make€application€to€the€Board€ofÏZoning€Appeals€for€the€use.€€You€make€application€in€thisÏoffice.€€We€are€located€in€Room€6,€Basement€of€theÏcourthouse,€Lebanon,€Tennessee€and€we€are€openÏMonday€through€Friday€from€8:00€a.m.€until€4:00€p.m.Ð 0 ¤0 ¤ ÐÌÌÌÓÓà Ø àà 0 àœAdvanced€Sales,€Inc.€then€filed€the€application€under€consideration.€€TheÏonly€description€of€the€proposed€use€appears€in€the€record€as€a€Fact€Sheet,€and€itÏshows€the€following:ÌÒ0 €ÒÒ„ÒÓÓOwners:à à àGary€E.€Neeley›,€œMurfreesboro›,€TennesseeÐ ØÐ Ðà ˆ àà à àCarlyle€œNeeley›,€œKendallville›,€IndianaÌÌBusiness:à à àSales€of€new€and€used€industrial€and€materials€Ð ¨  Ðà ˆ àà à àhandling€equipment.ÌÌGross€Sales:€1995€„€$58,255Ìà ˆ àà à à1996€„€$375,000€(projected)Ìà ˆ àà à à1997€„€$600,000€(budgeted)ÌÌPlan€„€Employees:à 8 àIt€is€anticipated€that€Advance€Sales,€Inc.,Ð 8"0 Ðwill€employ€4„6€people€by€the€end€of€1997.ÌÌPlan€„€Site:€The€owners€of€the€property€at€3828€œMurfreesboro›ÏœRoad,›€assuming€they€are€granted€the€appropriate€useÏvariance€on€approximately€five€acres€of€the€subject€property,Ïplan€to€enclose€the€perimeter€of€the€area€granted€theÏvariance€with€a€suitable€fence€and€construct€a€60'€X€100'€poleÏbarn€to€house€any€machinery€stored€on€the€property.€ÏProperty€is€located€on€the€property€only€for€the€time€itÏrequires€to€find€a€suitable€buyer€and€then€perform€anyÏrefurbishing€required€by€that€buyer.ÌÌThe€owners€plan€to€improve€the€building€and€immediate€areaÏsurrounding€the€building€with€appropriate€driveway€andÏlandscaping€to€enhance€the€appearance€of€the€property€fromÏthe€road.ÌÌÌÌœñÒñÌÌÌÌÌÐ ¨9 26 ÐñÒñThe›€Board€staff€recommendations€were€as€follows:ÌÌò ò1662€„€Gary€œNeeley›,€Advance€Sales,€œHwy›.€231€SouthÐ èà Ðó óÌRequest€is€to€establish€manufactured€machine€sales€andÏminimal€repair€services€on€A„1€property.€€The€A„1€districtÏallows€numerous€uses€on€appeal€including€uses€allowed€inÏthe€C„1€district.€€œMachine›€sales€and€repair€service€could€beÏconsidered€heavy€commercial/industrial€use.€€œThis›€siteÏalready€has€numerous€pieces€of€heavy€equipmentÏ(apparently€used€for€asphalt€or€gravel€production)€alreadyÏstored€on€site,€much€of€which€may€be€unserviceable.€€StaffÏdoes€not€consider€this€use€similar€in€nature€to€any€of€the€usesÏpermitted€or€permitted€on€appeal€in€the€A„1€district,Ïò òòòrecommend€denialó óóó.Ð (  ÐÌÒ€0 ÒÒ„ÒÓÓà Ø àà 0 àœñÏñÌñÏññÑññÐñÌñÐññÑññÏñà Ø àà 0 àñÏñBased›€on€this€record€we€cannot€say€that€the€Board€acted€arbitrarily€inÏdenying€the€use€on€appeal.€€We€think€the€Boardððs€conclusion€that€the€use€sought€wasÏnot€similar€to€the€uses€in€a€C„1€neighborhood€commercial€district€was€based€onÏsubstantial€and€material€evidence.€€òòSee€œHedgepath›€v.€Nortonóó,€839€œS.W.2d›€416€(Tenn.Ð ˆ€ ÐApp.€1992).ÌÌà Ø àà 0 àThe€applicant€asserts€that€the€chancellor€correctly€reversed€the€BoardÏbecause€the€Boardððs€decision€was€motivated€entirely€by€neighborhood€opposition.€ÏThe€minutes€do€reflect€that€the€decision€was€influenced€by€neighborhood€opposition,Ïbut€that€was€not€the€sole€reason.€€It€is€true€that€an€administrative€body€cannot€denyÏa€landowner€the€right€to€use€his€property€in€a€lawful€manner€because€of€the€concernsÏof€adjacent€property€owners.€€òòMerritt€v.€Wilson€Co.€œBd›.€of€Zoning€Appealsóó,€656€œS.W.2d›Ð ˆ,€%( Ðœ846›€(Tenn.€App.€1983);€òòFather€Ryan€œHigh›€School€v.€Oak€Hillóó,€774€œS.W.2d›€184€(Tenn.Ð h.`'* ÐApp.€1988).€€But€these€cases€dealt€with€rights€that€the€landowner€was€entitled€to€asÏa€matter€of€course,€once€the€conditions€precedent€had€been€satisfied.€€œThis€caseÏinvolves€an€interpretation€of€the€zoning€ordinance,€a€matter€in€which€the€BoardððsÏexpertise€is€entitled€to€great€deference.€€òòC.F.€Industries€v.€Tenn.€Pub.ñÊñlicñÊñ€ServñËñ.ñËññÌñiceñÌñ€CommñÍñ.ñÍññÎñissionñÎñóó,Ð è5à.2 Ð599€S.W.2d€536€(Tenn.€1980).€€›ÌÐ ¨9 26 Ðœ‡ñÓñÌ›ÌñÓñ›à Ø àà 0 àThe€judgment€of€the€court€below€is€reversed€and€the€petition€dismissed.€ÏRemand€the€case€to€the€Chancery€Court€of€Wilson€County€for€any€further€proceedingsÏnecessary.€€Tax€the€costs€on€appeal€to€œAdvanced€Sales,€Inc.ÌÓÓÌÌÌÌÌà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  àà è àà @ àà ˜ àà ð àà H! àà  # à¼à Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  à_________________________________Ìà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  àBEN€H.€CANTRELL,€Ìà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  àPRESIDING€JUDGE,€M.S.ÌÌÌÌÌCONCUR:›ÌÌÌÌœÌ_____________________________›ÌWILLIAM€C.€KOCH,€JR.,€JUDGE̛̜ÌÌœÌ_____________________________›ÌWILLIAM€B.€CAIN,€œJUDGEÌÌÐ  ø%ð! ÐÑ  ÑÔ€¼Ç ¼XX™XÔò ò›à@êê.êàœñÔñIN€THE€COURT€OF€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ  Ðà@™™(êàAT€NASHVILLEñÔñó óñÔñÔ€X™XX¼¼Ç ÔˆÐ  ÐÌÌÌADVANCED€œSALES,›€INC.,à 8 àà  àœ)›Ð  ü Ðby€GARY€E.€NEELEY,€PRESIDENT,à  à)Ð ô ì Ðà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  à)Ìà Ø àPlaintiff/Appellee,à à àà 8 àà  à)Ð ÔÌ Ðà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  à)à è àAppeal€No.Рļ  Ðà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  à)à è à01„A„01„9805„CH„00245Ð ´¬  ÐVS.à Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  à)Ð ¤œ  Ðà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  à)à è àWilson€ChanceryÐ ”Œ  Ðà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  à)à è àNo.€97069Ð „|  ÐWILSON€COUNTY,€WILSON€COUNTYà  à)à è àà @ àà ˜ àà ð àà H! àà  # àÐ tl  ÐBOARD€OF€ZONING€APPEALS,à 8 àà  à)Ð d\ ÐKATHY€DEDMON,€d/b/a€WILSONà  à)à è àReversed€andÐ TL ÐCOUNTY€BUILDING€INSPECTOR,à  à)à è àœDismissed›Ð D< Ðà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  à)Ìà Ø àDefendants/Appellants.à 8 àà  à)Ð $ ÐÌÔ€¼Ç ¼XX™XÔò òòòà@uu'êàJ€U€D€G€M€E€N€Tóóó óˆÐ ü ÐÌÓÓÔ€X™XX¼¼Ç Ôà Ø àà 0 àThis€cause€came€on€to€be€heard€upon€the€record€on€appeal€from€theÐ 0( ÐChancery€Court€of€Wilson€County,€briefs€and€argument€of€counsel;€upon€considerationÏwhereof,€this€Court€is€of€the€opinion€that€in€the€decree€of€the€Chancellor€there€isÏreversible€error.Ìà Ø àà 0 àIt€is,€therefore,€ordered€and€decreed€by€this€Court€that€the€decree€of€theÏChancellor€is€œreversed€and€the€petition€dismissed.›€€The€cause€is€remanded€to€theÏChancery€Court€of€Wilson€County€for€any€further€proceedings€necessary€and€for€theÏcollection€of€the€costs€accrued€below.Ìà Ø àà 0 àCosts€of€this€appeal€are€taxed€against€œAdvanced€Sales,€Inc.,€for€whichÏexecution€may€issue€if€necessary.ÌÓÓÌÌà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 à______________________________________Ìà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àBEN€H.€CANTRELL,€PRESIDING€JUDGE,€M.S.ÌÌÌà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 à______________________________________Ìà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àWILLIAM€C.€KOCH,€JR.,€JUDGEÌÌÌà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 à______________________________________Ìà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àWILLIAM€B.€CAIN,€JUDGEñÔñ›