ÿWPC$ …# VUNa %¯ 0cµU< w@T 4” ¨ · 0§¿ 0Lf 0J² 0Tü 0^P 0h® 0r 0|ˆ 0† 0Š 1u 0dU>ó B1 0DNB)’DC» AMþU*K?uæ´ D3šÍßÒ 0@±ñU6v~=vÓ» 0LŽ" AOÚ"Æ)# 0Dï# D/3$ Bb$˜HP LaserJet 4Si/4SiMX PS 600dpiPSCRIPTÈÚØÚÚØÈÚ0nLHÎ(ÈhH  Z 6Times New Roman RegularX(;cW$¡¡Ò°ÒÒ„°ÒÔ€XaBXXXÔ-šBu Z‹$Arrus BT Roman 23E45U6U7U8î9Ó€:Ó€DDÒ ÔøÔXp3|xD(W(3Ñ $¤¤Ý ƒcW!ÝÒ°ÒÒ„°ÒÔ€X„,XXXÔÝ  Ýà ` àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó> ÿÿ$Large Circleððà0 à2 ÿÿ0Indent1Ô2ÔÔ3  Ô2" ÿÿ0Indent2à0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2, ÿÿ0Indent3à0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô26 ÿÿ0Indent4à0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2@ ÿÿ0Indent5à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2J ÿÿ0Indent6à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2T ÿÿ0Indent7à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2^ ÿÿ0Indent8à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô ÿÿ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)P ÿÿ8Mac DefaultMac DefaultÓ ` °šXÓ< Œ 9p`(&Times New Roman d(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó% Line 7 d$$$$7Border 1dd€-%Cþÿ << Gÿÿ< Œ 9p`(Arial 5Ý ƒ!ÝÑ  ÑÑ#€d#ÑÔ€!ÔÒ  ÒÒ „ ÒÔ€ÔÝ  ÝÔ€'ÔÔ€'ÔÓ  Óò òÔ YYY ÔFILEDÔ€'XÔÌÌSeptemberÏ17,Ï1997ÌÌCecilÏW.ÏCrowsonÌAppellateÏCourtÏClerkÔ  Ôó ó ÜÝ ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€!ÔÒ  ÒÒ „ ÒÔ€ÔÝ  ÝÝ ƒ $Ýà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  ÝAlthough€the€trial€courtððs€memorandum€opinion€instructed€HusbandððsÏattorney€to€prepare€and€submit€a€decree€ð ðawarding€judgment€in€theÏarithmetically€correct€amount,ðð€this€was€not€done,€and€the€order€provides€onlyÏthat€Husband€is€entitled€to€the€offset€for€the€amount€stated.Ì""""'ÿÿdxd ûÝ ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€!ÔÒ  ÒÒ „ ÒÔ€ÔÝ  ÝÝ ƒ $Ýà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  Ý€€The€reference€to€ð ðinterestðð€is€apparently€a€misnomer.€€Although€T.C.A.Ï47„14„122€states€that€ð ð[i]nterest€shall€be€computed€on€òòeveryóó€judgment,ðð€T.C.A.€ððÏ47„14„122€(1988€&€1994€Supp.)€(emphasis€added),€ð ðinterestðð€is€defined€asÏð ðcompensation€for€the€use€or€detention€of,€or€forbearance€to€collect,€òòmoneyóó€overÏa€period€of€time.ðð€€T.C.A.€ðð€47„14„102(7)€(1988€&€1994€Supp.);€ò òòòsee€alsoÏó óóóT.R.A.P.€41€(providing€the€time€periods€in€which€to€compute€an€award€ofÏinterest€for€an€appeal€of€a€judgment€for€money€in€a€civil€case).€€Ì ÕÝ ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€!ÔÒ  ÒÒ „ ÒÔ€ÔÝ  ÝÝ ƒ $Ýà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  Ý€€We€note€that€Husband€petitioned€the€trial€court€to€allow€the€sale€ofÏthe€residence€awarded€to€him€by€the€judgment.€€The€court€held€that€it€lackedÏjurisdiction€due€to€the€pending€appeal€by€Wife.€€There€is€nothing€in€the€recordÏto€indicate€that€Husband€appealed€this€decision.€€Ì("ÿÿ$££Ò  ÒÒ  Ò Ý ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€!ÔÒ  ÒÒ „ ÒÔ€ÔÝ  ÝÝ ƒ $Ýà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  Ý€€We€note€that€the€Court€in€ò òòòInmanó óóó€also€found€that€the€appellant€wasÏentitled€to€statutory€post„judgment€interest€on€a€money€judgment.€€ò òòòSee€Inmanó óóó,Ï840€S.W.2d€at€932.€€Because€Husband€was€awarded€real€property,€and€not€aÏmoney€judgment,€this€portion€of€ò òòòInmanó óóó€is€not€applicable€to€the€instant€case.€€Ì< Œ 9p`(Courier NewPtPtHHÚ(ÿáÿâùFG(üHHÚ(d'hStyl{WP}01•ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃà Ãà Ãà Ãà Ãà ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÐ ÐÐHHÐÐ  ÐÐ2ÐÐÿÿ¸æ$ÿÐÐHHÐÐÐÐÐÐÐÐ  ÐÐ ÐÐ ÐÑÑÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÑ € ÑÑ<Px–ÈÑÒÒÒ443!#4ÒÒ$ *$ÒÒ$*$ÒÒ ÿKK ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÓ.,ÓÓÓÓ6ÓÓ ÓßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÒ  h HD: Geneva ÒÒ  h HD: Geneva Ò>ßb$Large Circleððà0 à€-‚ƒCþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó„„'÷ÿ dxdüÿP PdÝ ƒ!ÝÔ . ÔÔ€!ÔÒ  ÒÒ „ ÒÔ€ÔÝ  ÝÑ\R AØ'\ÑÑ\R AØ'\ÑÑ7€“¨XXdêdÈ7ÑÑ  ÑÓ  ÓÞ ÞÌà@ àIN€THE€COURT€OF€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEÌà@ àWESTERN€SECTION€AT€NASHVILLEÌà àà à€€€€______________________________________________ÌÌò òMARY€JOYCE€BEATY,€ó óÌÌà àPlaintiff„Appellant,Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àà àWilliamson€Chancery€No.€16691ÌVs.à àà àà àà àà àà àà àC.A.€No.€01A01„9704„CH„00173ÌÌò òJACK€LLOYD€BEATY,€SR.,ó óÌÌà àDefendant„Appellee.Ì____________________________________________________________________________ÌÌà@ àFROM€THE€CHANCERY€COURT€FOR€WILLIAMSON€COUNTYÌà@ àTHE€HONORABLE€HENRY€DENMARK€BELL,€CHANCELLORÌÌÌÌÌÌà@ àLisa€M.€Carson;€Petersen,€Buerger,€Ìà@ àMoseley€&€Carson€of€FranklinÌà@ àFor€AppelleeÌÌà@ àThomas€W.€Hardin;€Hardin€&€Parkes€of€ColumbiaÌà@ àFor€AppellantÌÌÌÌÌÌà@ àò òòòREVERSED€AND€REMANDEDó óóóÌÌà@ àOpinion€filed:€€ÌÙ€€ÙßR€&(%A1-j|õy` à. `€€@ÿRßÌÌÌÌÌÌÌà àà àà àÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àà àò òW.€FRANK€CRAWFORDó ó,Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àà àà àò òPRESIDING€JUDGE,€W.S.ÌÌÌÌÌÌCONCUR:ÌÌALAN€E.€HIGHERS,€JUDGEÌÌHOLLY€KIRBY€LILLARD,€JUDGEó óÌ›Ñ7€“¨XXdêXXdê7ÑÑ  ÑÓÓà àThis€appeal€involves€post„divorce€proceedings.€€Plaintiff,€Mary€Joyce€BeatyÏ(Wife),€appeals€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court€awarding€an€offset€of€$17,102.30Ïto€defendant,€Jack€Lloyd€Beaty,€Sr.€(Husband),€against€$9,794.52€in€post„judgment€interest€he€owed€to€Wife.€€Ìà àThe€parties€were€divorced€by€a€decree€entered€December€28,€1992.€€TheÏdecree€provided€in€pertinent€as€follows:Ìà8 àà8 à2.€€That€Mr.€Beaty€be€and€he€is€hereby€awarded€allÏright,€title€and€interest€in€and€to€the€residence€locatedÏon€Covington€Drive,€Brentwood,€Williamson€County,ÏTennessee€and€in€and€to€the€real€estate€located€onÏColumbia€Avenue,€Franklin,€Williamson€County,ÍTennessee.€€Mr.€Beaty€will€be€responsible€for€the€debtsÏsecured€by€the€liens€on€said€parcels€of€real€estate.€ÏAppropriate€quitclaim€deeds€with€respect€to€said€realÏestate€shall€be€prepared€and€delivered€to€Mrs.€BeatyÏfor€execution.€€Mr.€Beaty€will€indemnify€and€holdÏharmless€Mrs.€Beaty€with€respect€to€the€indebtednessÏrelated€to€the€aforementioned€property.€ÌÌà8 àà8 à3.€€Mr.€Beaty€will€be€and€is€hereby€awarded€all€right,Ïtitle€and€interest€in€and€to€the€business€known€asÏFranklin€Jewelry€and€Loan€Company,€Inc.€€Mrs.€BeatyÏwill€execute€appropriate€powers€of€attorney€and/orÏstock€certificates€in€order€to€transfer€her€stockÏownership€in€said€business€to€Mr.€Beaty,€and€Mr.ÏBeaty€will€be€responsible€for€any€indebtedness€relatedÏto€said€business,€and€he€shall€indemnify€and€hold€Mrs.ÏBeaty€therefrom.ÌÌà àà àà à*à àà àà à*à àà àà à*ÌÌà8 àà8 à5.€€Mrs.€Beaty€is€hereby€awarded€a€judgment€againstÏMr.€Beaty€in€the€amount€of€Fifty€Thousand€DollarsÏ($50,000.00)€for€which€execution€may€issue€ifÏnecessary.€€Said€Judgment€represents€in€part€anÏequalization€of€the€equities€in€the€propertiesÏmentioned€in€Paragraphs€2€and€3€above.€ÌÌà àWife€appealed€the€December€29,€1992€order€to€this€Court,€and€the€awardÏof€the€marital€residence€to€Husband€was€a€central€issue€in€that€appeal.€€PendingÏthe€appeal,€Wife€refused€to€execute€the€quitclaim€deed€on€the€marital€residence,Ïand€Husband€refused€to€pay€Wife€the€$50,000.00€awarded€in€the€divorceÏdecree.€€On€October€7,€1994,€this€Court€affirmed€the€ruling€of€the€trial€court.€Ïò òòòBeaty€v.€Beatyó óóó,€1994€WL€543582,€No.€01„A„0109305„CH00203€(Tenn.€App.Ï1994).€€€On€December€13,€1994,€upon€remand€to€the€trial€court,€Husband€paidÏthe€$50,000.00€into€court.€€On€December€14,€1994,€Husband€filed€a€petitionÏrequesting,€òòinter€aliaóó,€that,€in€the€event€the€trial€court€awarded€Wife€post„judgment€interest€for€the€delay€in€payment€of€the€$50,000.00,€he€be€allowed€toÏoffset€the€damages€he€allegedly€incurred€as€a€result€of€the€delay€in€the€sale€of€theÍCovington€Drive€residence.€€On€January€3,€1995,€the€trial€court€entered€anÏagreed€order€stating€that€issues€involving€execution€and€delivery€of€stockÏcertificates€and€quitclaim€deeds€had€been€resolved.€€On€January€9,€1995,€WifeÏfiled€an€answer€and€counter„petition€requesting€statutory€post„judgmentÏinterest€on€the€$50,000.00€award€from€December€28,€1992,€the€date€of€theÏoriginal€judgment,€until€December€13,€1994,€the€date€Husband€paid€theÏ$50,000.00€into€court.€€Ìà àA€hearing€was€held€on€March€7,€1995€in€which€the€parties€put€on€proofÏin€support€of€their€claims€against€each€other.€€On€March€15,€1995,€the€trialÏcourt€filed€a€memorandum€opinion,€and€on€March€29,€1995,€the€trial€courtÏentered€an€order€denying€relief€to€either€party.€€Wife€appealed€the€trial€courtððsÏorder€denying€her€interest.€€The€only€issue€presented€by€Wife€in€her€brief€forÏreview€was€ð ðwhether€the€Wife/Appellant€is€entitled€to€post„judgment€interest€onÏa€judgment€of€$50,000.00€awarded€her€by€the€decree€of€divorce€enteredÏDecember€28,€1992.ðð€€Because€there€was€no€transcript€of€the€March€7,€1995Ïhearing,€Wife€submitted€a€statement€of€the€evidence.€€The€trial€court€approvedÏa€corrected€copy€of€the€statement€of€the€evidence,€which€noted€that€HusbandÏput€on€proof€as€to€damages€he€allegedly€incurred€as€a€result€of€a€delay€in€theÏtransfer€of€title€to€the€Covington€Drive€property.€€Ìà àThis€Court€reversed€the€trial€courtððs€decision,€holding€that€Wife€wasÏentitled€to€statutory€interest€under€T.C.A.€ðð€47„14„122,€and€remanded€the€caseÏto€the€trial€court€for€a€determination€of€any€offset€to€which€Husband€wasÏentitled.€€ò òòòBeaty€v.€Beatyó óóó,€1996€WL€99784,€No.€€01A01„9507„CH„00325€(Tenn.ÏApp.€1996).€€On€remand,€Husband€moved€the€trial€court€for€a€final€hearing€andÏclaimed€that€he€was€entitled€to€offset€damages€allegedly€resulting€from€a€delay€inÏthe€sale€of€the€Covington€Drive€property.€€On€August€28,€1996,€Wife€filed€aÏmotion€in€opposition€to€Husbandððs€request€for€a€hearing€and€a€memorandum€inÏsupport€thereof.€€She€objected€to€the€proposed€hearing€on€the€ground€thatÏHusband€was€barred€from€re„litigating€the€issue€because€he€failed€to€appeal€theÏtrial€courtððs€order€denying€him€damages.€€€The€trial€court€entered€an€orderÏoverruling€Wifeððs€motion€in€opposition€to€Husbandððs€motion€and€set€theÏmatter€for€a€hearing.€€At€the€hearing,€the€trial€court€permitted€Husband€toÏpresent€proof€as€to€the€damages€he€allegedly€suffered€from€the€delay€in€the€saleÏof€the€house,€and€on€February€12,€1997,€the€trial€court€entered€an€orderÏawarding€Husband€an€offset€of€$17,102.30€against€the€$9,794.52€in€interest€heÏowed€to€Wife.× ƒ) ××  ×€€Ìà àWife€appeals€and€presents€one€issue€for€review:€€whether€the€trial€courtÏcommitted€error€in€entering€a€judgment€in€favor€of€Husband€for€an€offsetÏagainst€interest€awarded€to€Wife€by€the€Court€of€Appeals.€Ìà àWife€first€asserts€that€the€trial€courtððs€March€29,€1995€order€denyingÏHusband€damages€became€the€final€judgment€on€this€issue,€because€HusbandÏdid€not€file€a€notice€of€appeal€within€thirty€days€after€its€entry,€nor€did€heÏpresent€this€as€an€issue€in€her€appeal.€€She€points€out€that€Husband€put€onÏproof€as€to€his€damages€at€the€March€7,€1995€hearing€and€that€the€trial€courtÏfound€that€he€was€not€entitled€to€damages.€€She€argues€that€Husbandððs€failureÏto€appeal€the€issue€of€damages€precludes€re„litigation€of€this€issue€and€that€theÏtrial€court€erred€in€allowing€him€to€present€proof€of€his€damages€on€remand.€Ìà àHusband,€on€the€other€hand,€points€out€that€upon€the€first€remand€heÏfiled€a€petition€to€execute€quitclaim€deeds€and€stock€certificates€and€thatÏparagraph€6€of€his€petition€read:ÌÓÓà8 àà8 àPetitioner€would€state€that€in€the€event€the€CourtÏshould€determine€that€the€Respondent€is€entitled€toÏinterest€on€the€judgment€from€the€date€of€the€finalÏhearing€then€he€would€ask€this€Court€to€award€himÏdamages€for€the€unnecessary€delay€he€has€encounteredÏin€selling€the€real€estate€he€was€awarded€in€that€saidÏreal€estate€is€a€four€(4)€bedroom€house€in€which€heÏwas€the€only€person€residing.€€Because€of€the€failure€ofÏthe€Respondent€to€allow€him€to€sell€the€real€estate,€heÏincurred€$15,398.48€in€additional€payments€ofÍinterest€and€principal€that€he€would€not€have€had€toÏpay€had€he€been€allowed€to€go€ahead€and€sell€the€realÏestate€and€pay€the€judgment€as€requested.ÌÌÓÓHusband€insists€that€this€petition€is€in€fact€a€request€for€an€offset€against€anyÏpost„judgment€interest€awarded€to€Wife.€€Husband€further€contends€that€theÏtrial€court€never€reached€the€issue€of€an€offset€because€the€trial€court€foundÏthat€Wife€was€not€entitled€to€recover€post„judgment€interest.€€HusbandÏconcedes€that€he€did€not€file€a€cross„appeal€when€Wife€appealed€the€denial€ofÏpost„judgment€interest,€however,€he€asserts€that€T.R.A.P.€13(a)€does€not€requireÏa€cross„appeal€to€be€filed€and€that€he€raised€the€issue€of€an€offset€in€his€briefÏand€in€oral€arguments€before€this€Court.€€In€addition,€Husband€points€out€thatÏthis€Court€stated€the€following€in€its€previous€opinion:ÌÓÓà8 àà8 àThe€Husband/Appellee€insists€that€if€the€Wife€isÏentitled€to€post„judgment€interest€on€the€$50,000Ïjudgment,€then€the€Husband€is€entitled€to€offset€theÏalleged€interest€owed€to€him€on€the€assets€that€theÏWife€refused€to€transfer€pending€the€appeal.× ƒ+ ××  ×€€ThisÏclaim€is,€of€course,€subject€to€possible€proof€offered€atÏa€hearing€before€the€trial€court€for€that€purpose.€€WeÏdo€not€decide€the€issue,€but€remand€the€case€to€theÍtrial€court€for€such€action€that€it€deems€proper.Ì€€€€€ÌÓÓà àWe€respectfully€disagree€with€Wifeððs€contention€that€Husband€did€notÏtimely€raise€the€issue€of€an€offset.€€He€raised€this€issue€in€his€petition€to€theÏtrial€court€upon€the€first€remand€and€in€his€brief€to€this€Court€when€WifeÏappealed€the€trial€courtððs€order€denying€her€interest.€€In€addition,€the€mere€factÏthat€Husband€had€the€opportunity€to€put€on€proof€as€to€his€damages€at€theÏMarch€7,€1995€hearing€and€did€so€does€not€in€this€case€bar€re„litigation€of€theÏissue.€€The€trial€court€found€that€Wife€was€not€entitled€to€post„judgmentÏinterest.€€As€such,€there€was€nothing€with€which€to€offset€the€damages,€if€any,Ïthat€Husband€incurred.€€A€remand€for€further€proceedings€is€within€the€purviewÏof€the€judicial€discretion€of€the€appellate€court,€especially€when€the€issue€hadÏbeen€left€undecided€by€the€trial€court.€€ò òòòFirst€Tennessee€Bank€Natððl€Assððn€v.ÏHurd€Lock€&€Mfg.€Co.ó óóó,€816€S.W.2d€38,€40€(Tenn.€App.€1991).€€This€issue€isÏwithout€merit.€€€€€€Ìà àWife€next€asserts€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€awarding€Husband€anÏoffset.€€She€argues€that€Husband€failed€to€establish,€through€admissibleÏevidence,€damages€to€support€his€claim.€€She€argues€that€there€is€no€proof€ofÏthe€value€of€the€Covington€Drive€residence€or€the€equity€therein€and€that€theÏtrial€court€erred€in€allowing€Husband€to€establish€damages€by€estimating€theÍexpenses€he€would€have€saved€had€he€sold€the€house€and€rented€an€apartmentÏduring€the€relevant€time€period.€€Ìà àSince€this€case€was€tried€by€the€court€sitting€without€a€jury,€we€reviewÏthe€case€òòde€novoóó€upon€the€record€with€a€presumption€of€correctness€of€theÏfindings€of€fact€by€the€trial€court.€€Unless€the€evidence€preponderates€againstÏthe€findings,€we€must€affirm,€absent€error€of€law.€€T.R.A.P.€13(d).€€There€is€noÏpresumption€of€correctness€€of€the€trial€courtððs€conclusions€of€law.€€òòò òUnionÏCarbide€Corp.€v.€Huddlestonó óóó,€854€S.W.2d€87,€91€(Tenn.€1993).Ìà àExcept€as€otherwise€provided€in€Rule€62€of€the€òòò òTennessee€Rules€of€CivilÏProcedureó ó,€óóthe€mere€taking€of€an€appeal€does€not€operate€to€stay€execution€uponÏa€judgment.€€Tenn.€R.€Civ.€P.€62.04;€ò òòòsee€also€Underwood€v.€Liberty€Mut.€Ins.ÏCo.ó óóó,€782€S.W.2d€175,€177€(Tenn.€1989).€€Under€the€provisions€of€Rule€62,Ïjudgments€may€continue€to€be€enforced€pending€an€appeal€unless€a€stay€isÏordered€by€the€trial€court.€€€Tenn.€R.€Civ.€P.€62.04.€€Neither€party€requested€aÏstay€in€the€present€case,€thus,€the€judgment€rendered€by€the€trial€court€becameÏenforceable€thirty€days€after€its€entry.€€Tenn.€R.€Civ.€P.€62.01;€ò òòòUnderwoodó óóó,€782ÏS.W.2d€at€177.Ìà àInstead€of€enforcing€the€judgment€or€filing€a€petition€for€contempt,ÏHusband€sought€on€remand€to€offset€the€damages€he€allegedly€incurred€pendingÍthe€appeal€as€a€result€of€Wifeððs€refusal€to€execute€the€title€documents€on€theirÏmarital€residence.× ƒ, ××  ×€€The€trial€court€erred€in€allowing€Husband€an€offset€becauseÏthere€is€no€basis€under€which€Husband€could€recover€his€alleged€damages.€ÏUnlike€the€statute€mandating€the€award€of€post„judgment€interest€to€Wife,Ïthere€is€no€statute€allowing€a€party€to€recover€damages€allegedly€suffered€fromÏanother€partyððs€failure€to€comply€with€a€judgment€pending€an€appeal.€€InÏaddition,€any€damages€allegedly€suffered€could€have€been€avoided€had€Husband,Ïinstead€of€sitting€on€his€rights,€enforced€the€judgment€or€filed€a€petition€forÏcontempt.€€€€€€Ìà àIn€support€of€an€offset,€Husband€relies€on€ò òòòInman€v.€Inmanó óóó,€840€S.W.2dÏ927€(Tenn.€App.€1992),€and€ò òòòWade€v.€Wadeó óóó,€897€S.W.2d€702€(Tenn.€App.Ï1994).€€These€cases€are€distinguishable€from€the€instant€case.€€In€both€ò òòòInmanó óóóÏand€ò òòòWadeó óóó,€the€Court€reversed€a€trial€courtððs€award€of€real€and€personal€propertyÏand€allowed€the€appellant€to€recover€damages€for€the€loss€of€the€use€and€benefitÏof€the€property€under€the€principles€of€restitution.€€ò òòòSee€Inmanó óóó,€840€S.W.2d€atÍ932„33;€ò òòòWadeó óóó,€897€S.W.2d€at€720.× ƒ. ××  ×€€In€the€instant€case,€however,€HusbandððsÏclaim€of€damages€is€not€based€on€a€reversal€in€his€favor,€but€is€instead€based€onÏthe€appeal€of€an€original€award€that€this€Court€affirmed.€€There€is€no€basisÏunder€restitution€principles€to€award€a€party€damages€for€sitting€on€his€or€herÏrights€while€another€party€exercises€the€right€to€appeal,€even€if€a€judgment€isÏaffirmed€in€that€partyððs€favor.€€Again,€Husband€had€other€means€available€toÏprotect€his€assets€pending€appeal,€including€enforcing€the€judgment€or€filing€aÏpetition€for€contempt.€€€€€€€€Ìà àHusband€argues€that€he€did€not€pay€Wife€the€$50,000.00€judgmentÏbecause€this€obligation€was€contingent€on€her€executing€the€title€documents€toÏthe€Covington€€Drive€residence.€€This€assertion€is€not€supported€by€the€divorceÏdecree.€€Although€the€trial€court€stated€that€the€$50,000.00€judgmentÏrepresented€in€part€an€attempt€to€equalize€the€distribution€of€property,€the€trialÏcourt€did€not€state€that€these€obligations€were€contingent.€€This€argument€isÏwithout€merit.Ìà àIn€any€event,€Husband€did€not€prove€that€he€suffered€any€damages.€€HeÏfailed€to€present€any€proof€that€he€would€have€sold€the€home€or€any€proof€ofÍthe€price€at€which€it€would€have€been€sold.€€Moreover,€his€estimation€of€theÏcosts€that€he€would€have€saved€had€he€sold€the€home€and€rented€an€apartmentÏis€speculative€at€best.€€The€trial€court€erred€in€allowing€Husband€an€offsetÏagainst€the€post„judgment€interest€he€owed€to€Wife.€€€€Ìà àAccordingly,€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court€is€reversed.€€This€case€isÏremanded€for€such€proceedings€as€may€be€necessary.€€Costs€are€assessed€one„halfÏagainst€appellant€and€one„half€against€appellee.ÌÓÓà àà àà àà àà àà àà à_________________________________Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àà àò òW.€FRANK€CRAWFORD,€Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àà àPRESIDING€JUDGE,€W.S.ó óÌÌò òCONCUR:ÌÌ____________________________________ÌALAN€E.€HIGHERS,€JUDGEó óÌÌò ò____________________________________ÌHOLLY€KIRBY€LILLARD,€JUDGEó óœÔ€/ÔÔ€/Ô