ÿWPC …#†VUFÜ %" 0@(4h| 0„‹ 0D n­S 0J 0TJ 0^ž 0hü 0rd 0|Ö 0†R 0Ø 1uh U,Ý 0d U,mU6™B)ÏDCø AM;U*ˆ_²v~!vÓŸ D3r 0@¥ Bå AOÆQ 0\ 0Ds D/· Bæ˜IBM Laser Printer 4019IBM4019ÈÈ,,,,ÈÈ0®ØP Ÿ*–ßfc vP<¾½Q 9Z ‹.Courier New RegularX(ù$¡¡Ó  ÓÓ  Óc`…¡Ó 3|x(4(3DX$¤¤Ý ƒù!ÝÓ  ÓÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó«<þ6X9`("Courier 10cpiXXxþ6X@É“8Ç;X@2 ÿÿ0Indent1Ô2ÔÔ3  Ô2" ÿÿ0Indent2à0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2, ÿÿ0Indent3à0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô26 ÿÿ0Indent4à0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2@ ÿÿ0Indent5à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2J ÿÿ0Indent6à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2T ÿÿ0Indent7à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2^ ÿÿ0Indent8à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô ÿÿ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)< Œ 9p`(ModernP ÿÿ8Mac DefaultMac DefaultÓ ` °šXÓ< Œ 9p`(Monaco< Œ 9p`(Courier New% Line 7 d!!!!7Border 1dd€-"Cþÿ << Gÿÿ< Œ 9p`(Arial UÝ ƒ!ÝÑ  ÑÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ÔÔ€ ÔÓ  ÓÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÝ ƒ"ÝÝ  ÝÔ€$ÔÔ€$ÔÓ  ÓÔ YYY ÔFILEDÔ€$XÔÌÌò òJanuary€31,€1996ÌÌCecil€Crowson,€Jr.ÌÔ€$ôÔAppellate€Court€Clerkó ó Ý ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ÔÔ€ ÔÓ  ÓÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÝ ƒ $Ýà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  ÝòòThe€jail€sentence€was€suspended€pending€the€outcome€of€this€appeal.óóÌPtPtHHÚ(ÿáÿâùFG(üHHÚ(d'@Styl{WP}01•ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃà Ãà Ãà Ãà Ãà ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÐ ÐÐHHÐÐ  ÐÐ2ÐÐÿÿ¸æ$ÿÐÐHHÐÐÐÐÐÐÐÐ  ÐÐ ÐÐ ÐÑÑÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÑ € ÑÑ<Px–ÈÑÒÒÒ443!#4ÒÒ$ *$ÒÒ$*$ÒÒ ÿKK ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÓ.,ÓÓÓÓ6ÓÓ ÓßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßÑMonacoÑÑ ÑÒ  BA: T Monaco ÒÒ  BA: T Monaco Ò0000'ÿÿdxd("ÿÿ$££Ò  ÒÒ  Ò d€-‚ƒCþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(43=K$¢¢Ý ƒù!ÝÓ  ÓÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó„„'÷ÿ dxdüÿP PdÝ ƒ!ÝÔ . ÔÔ€ÔÓ&€X„d&ÓÑ#€Xd#ÑÔ€ ÔÓ  ÓÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÑ ¸ ÑÑ Ü ÑÓ ` Ü` " ¸ ™X ÓÑ\R AØ'\ÑÑ7€IúXXdÖdÈ7Ñà@ àIN€THE€COURT€OF€APPEALSÌÙ€€ÙßL€#%";+'h|` Å `€€LßÌÌÌÌÌÌÌJAMES€NEAL€BROWN,€JR.,€€€€€€€€€€)à àHAMILTONÏCIRCUITÌ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)à àC.A.€NO.€03A01„9508„CV„00287Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€Plaintiff„Appellant€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ìvs.€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)à àHON.€WILLIAM€L.€BROWNÌ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)à àJUDGEÌ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)ÌANNABELLE€SHROUT€BROWN,€€€€€€€€€)à àVACATED€IN€PART,€AFFIRMED€IN€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€Ï)€€PART€AND€REMANDEDÌ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€Defendant„Appellee€€€€)ÌÌÌÌÌBARBARA€S.€ARTHUR,€Rossville,€Georgia,€for€Appellant.ÌÌÌCHARLES€W.€BURSON,€ATTORNEY€GENERAL€AND€REPORTER€and€JAMES€H.ÏTUCKER,€JR.,€ASSISTANT€ATTORNEY€GENERAL,€Nashville,€for€Appellee.ÌÌÌÌÌÌÓÓà@ àòòO€P€I€N€I€O€NóóÌÌà€ àMcMurray,€J.ÌÌà àThis€case€originated€as€a€divorce€action€between€the€parties.ÏThis€appeal€results€from€a€judgment€of€the€trial€court€finding€theÏappellant€to€be€contempt€of€court€for€failing€to€pay€child€supportÏas€ordered€by€the€court€and€sentencing€him€to€serve€ninety€(90)Ïdays€in€the€Hamilton€County€Jail.× ƒ& ××  ×€€Child€support€payments€wereÏsuspended€during€the€period€of€incarceration.€€We€vacate€theÏjudgment€in€part€and€affirm€the€judgment€in€part.ÌÌà àThis€action€was€instituted€by€the€State€of€Kentucky€as€assigneeÏof€Annabelle€Brown.€€The€action€was€filed€in€the€original€divorceÏcase€and€no€objection€was€taken€thereto.€€The€State€of€KentuckyÏsought€a€finding€that€the€appellant€was€in€willful€contempt€ofÏcourt€and€asked€that€he€be€required€to€pay€all€child€supportÏarrearage.ÌÌà àDuring€the€pendency€of€the€action€for€contempt€and€for€theÏcollection€of€child€support,€the€appellant€filed€for€bankruptcyÏunder€the€provisions€of€Chapter€13€of€the€U.S.€Bankruptcy€Code.€ÏThe€appellant€filed€a€motion€in€the€Circuit€Court€to€stay€orÏdismiss€the€proceedings€because€of€the€bankruptcy€action.€€TheÏtrial€court€denied€the€motion.€€Thereafter€a€motion€was€made€inÏthe€Bankruptcy€Court€for€a€temporary€restraining€order€prohibitingÏthe€state€court€from€proceeding€further€pending€the€outcome€of€theÏbankruptcy€action.ÌÌà àThe€Bankruptcy€Court€for€the€Eastern€District€of€TennesseeÏdenied€a€temporary€restraining€order.€€In€its€memorandum€opinion,Ïthe€Bankruptcy€Court€stated:ÌÌÓÓà8 àà à...€[B]ecause€the€Sixth€Circuit€Court€of€Appeals€hasÏrecognized€that€the€court€in€which€the€litigation€claimedÏto€be€stayed€is€pending€may€determine€whether€the€automaticÏstay€applies€to€that€litigation,€and€because€the€stateÏcourt€ruled€against€the€plaintiff€on€her€claim€€that€theÏautomatic€stay€prevented€a€continuation€of€the€state€courtÏaction,€the€court€believes€that€the€plain‚Ô&  Ôtiff's€remedy€isÏnot€to€obtain€injunctive€relief€in€the€bankruptcy€court,Ïbut€to€appeal€the€state€court€ruling.ÌÔ'  ÔÌÓÓÌà àThe€Bankruptcy€Court€abstained€from€any€opinion€as€to€whetherÏthe€automatic€stay€applied€under€the€circumstances€of€this€caseÏand€left€that€determination€to€the€state€court.ÌÌà àThe€appellant€presents€two€issues€for€our€consideration:ÌÌÓÓà8 àA.à0 àWhether€or€not€the€trial€court€should€have€stayedÏthe€proceedings€upon€being€notified€that€RespondentÏ[appellant]€had€filed€a€petition€for€relief€inÏBankruptcy.ÌÌà8 àB.à0 àWhether€or€not€the€respondent's€[appellant's]€con…duct€in€failing€to€pay€all€the€child€support€he€owedÏamounted€to€willful€contempt€of€court.ÌÌÓÓÌà àInsofar€as€we€have€been€able€to€determine,€the€issue€of€theÏapplication€of€an€automatic€stay€as€it€relates€to€the€collectionÏof€child€support€has€not€been€decided€by€the€courts€of€this€jurisƒdiction.€€There€is€a€multitude€of€bankruptcy€cases,€however,€whichÏhave€dealt€with€the€issue.ÌÌà à11€U.S.C.€362(a)€provides€in€pertinent€part€as€follows:ÌÌÓÓà8 àà à(a)€Except€as€provided€in€subsection€(b)€of€this€section,Ïa€petition€filed€under€section€301,€302,€or€303€of€thisÏtitle,€or€an€application€filed€under€section€5(a)(3)€of€theÏSecurities€Investor€Protection€Act€of€1970€[15€USCSÏðð78eee(a)(3)],€operates€as€a€stay,€applicable€to€allÏentities,€ofððððÌÌà8 àà à(1)€the€commencement€or€continuation,€including€theÏissuance€or€employment€of€process,€of€a€judicial,€adminis…trative,€or€other€action€or€proceeding€against€the€debtorÏthat€was€or€could€have€been€commenced€before€the€commence…ment€of€the€case€under€this€title€[11€USCS€ðððð101€et€seq.],Ïor€to€recover€a€claim€against€the€debtor€that€arose€beforeÏthe€commencement€of€the€case€under€this€title€[11€USCSÏðððð101€et€seq.];ÌÌà@ à*€€€€€*€€€€€*€€€€€*ÌÌÌà8 àà à(6)€any€act€to€collect,€assess,€or€recover€a€claimÏagainst€the€debtor€that€arose€before€the€commencement€ofÏthe€case€under€this€title€[11€USCS€ðððð101€et€seq.];ÌÌà@ à*€€€€€*€€€€€*€€€€€*ÌÌà8 àà à(b)€The€filing€of€a€petition€under€section€301,€302,€orÏ303€of€this€title€[11€USCS€ðððð301,€302,€303],€or€of€anÏapplication€under€section€5(a)(3)€of€the€Securities€Inves…tor€Protection€Act€of€1970€[15€USCS€ðð78eee(a)(3)],€does€notÏoperate€as€a€stayððððÌÌà8 à(1)€under€subsection€(a)€of€this€section,€of€the€commence…ment€or€continuation€of€a€criminal€action€or€proceedingÏagainst€the€debtor;ÌÌÌà à(2)€under€subsection€(a)€of€this€sectionððððÌÌà8 àà0 àà à(A)à àof€the€commencement€or€continuation€of€anÏaction€or€proceeding€forððððÌÌà8 àà0 àà à(i)à àthe€establishment€of€paternity;€orÌÌà8 àà0 àà à(ii)à àthe€establishment€or€modification€of€an€orderÏfor€alimony,€maintenance,€or€support;€orÌÌà8 àà0 àà à(B)à àof€the€collection€of€alimony,€maintenance,€orÏsupport€from€property€that€is€not€property€of€the€estate;ÌÌÓÓÌà àParagraph€(2)€set€out€above€was€substituted€by€an€amendment€toÏthe€act,€effective€October€22.€1994,€for€a€paragraph€that€read:ÌÌÓÓà8 àà à(2)€€Under€subsection€(a)€of€this€section,€of€the€collec…tion€of€alimony,€maintenance,€or€support€from€property€thatÏis€not€property€of€the€estate.ÌÌÓÓÌà àWe€note€that€the€action€which€gave€rise€to€this€appeal€wasÏinstituted€on€December€1,€1994,€after€the€effective€date€of€theÏamendment€set€out€above.€€We€are€of€the€opinion€that€the€statute,Ïeither€before€or€after€the€amendment,€does€not€operate€to€exemptÏthe€collection€of€child€support€arrearage€from€the€automatic€stay.€ÏAs€applied€to€this€case,€we€believe€that€the€statute€limits€theÏcourt€to€the€trial€of€a€criminal€contempt€action,€the€establish…ment€or€modification€of€a€support€order€with€prospective€applica…tion€only€and€the€determination€of€the€amount€of€arrearage.ÌÌà àIn€our€construction€of€the€statute€we€are€guided€by€the€princi…ples€set€out€in€òòU.€S.€Nat.€Bank€of€Ore.€v€Ins.€Agentsóó,€508€USÏ____,€124€L€Ed€2d€402,€(1993).€€The€U.€S.€Supreme€Court€ad‚dressingÏthe€concept€of€statutory€construction€stated:ÌÌÓÓà8 àà àOver€and€over€we€have€stressed€that€"[i]n€expounding€aÏstatute,€we€must€not€be€guided€by€a€single€sentence€orÏmember€of€a€sentence,€but€look€to€the€provisions€of€theÏwhole€law,€and€to€its€object€and€policy."€òò€United€States€vÏHeirs€of€Boisdoróó,€8€How€113,€122,€12€L€Ed€1009€(1849)Ï(quoted€in€more€than€a€dozen€cases,€most€recently€òòDole€vÏSteelworkersóó,€494€US€26,€35,€108€L€Ed€2d€23,€110€S€Ct€929Ï(1990));€òòsee€alsoóó€òòKing€v€St.€Vincent's€Hospitalóó,€502€USÏ____,€____,€116€L€Ed€2d€578,€112€S€Ct€570€(1991).€€No€moreÏthan€isolated€words€or€sentences€is€punctuation€alone€aÏreliable€guide€for€discovery€of€a€statute's€meaning.€ÏStatutory€construction€"is€a€holistic€endeavor,"€òòUnitedÏSavings€Assn.€of€Texas€v€Timbers€of€Unwed€Forest€Associ…ates,€Ltdóó.,€484€US€365,€371,€98€L€Ed€2d€740,€108€S€Ct€626Ï(1988),€and,€at€a€minimum,€must€account€for€a€statute'sÏfull€text,€language€as€well€as€punctuation,€structure,€andÏsubject€matter.ÌÌòòU.S.€Not.€Bank€of€Ore.€v€Ins.€Agentsóó,€supra,€pp€417€„418.ÌÌÌÓÓÌà àThe€accepted€rules€of€statutory€construction€in€this€state€areÏnot€at€variance€with€the€rules€of€statutory€construction€set€outÏabove.€€The€cardinal€rule€of€Tennessee€statutory€interpretation€isÍto€ascertain€and€give€effect€to€the€intent€and€purpose€of€theÏLegislature€in€relation€to€the€subject€matter€of€the€legislation,Ïall€rules€of€construction€being€but€aids€to€that€end.€€òòRippeth€v.ÏConnellyóó,€60€Tenn.€App.€430,€447€S.W.2d€380,€381€(1969).€A€statuteÏmust€be€construed€so€as€to€ascertain€and€give€effect€to€the€intentÏand€purpose€of€the€legislation,€considering€the€statute€as€a€wholeÏand€giving€words€their€common€and€ordinary€meaning.€€òòMarion€CountyÏBoard€of€Commissioners€€v.€Marion€County€Election€Commissionóó,€594ÏS.W.2d€681€(Tenn.€1980).€€The€Court€should€assume€that€the€Legis…lature€used€each€word€in€the€statute€purposely€and€that€the€use€ofÏthese€words€conveyed€some€intent€and€had€a€meaning€and€purpose.€ÏòòAnderson€Fish€&€Oyster€Company€v.€Oldsóó,€197€Tenn.€604,€277€S.W.2dÏ344€(1955).€€òòSee€alsoóó€òòCrowe€v.€Fergusonóó,€814€S.W.2d€721€(Tenn.Ï1991).€ÌÌà àThe€appellant€argues€that€since€this€is€basically€a€collectionÏaction,€only€property€which€òòis€notóó€a€part€of€the€debtor's€estateÏmay€be€subjected€to€the€satisfaction€of€the€appellant's€childÏsupport€arrearage.€€Under€our€construction€of€the€statutes€weÏgenerally€agree€with€the€argument€advanced€by€the€appellant.ÍHowever,€there€is€an€express€exemption€from€the€automatic€stay€forÏproceedings€of€a€criminal€nature.€€Therefore,€we€must€determineÏwhether€the€contempt€action€in€this€case€is€civil€or€criminal.€€IfÏcivil,€the€action€must€be€stayed€absent€relief€from€the€automaticÏstay.€€If€criminal,€the€action€may€go€forward.€€The€scope€of€theÏtrial€court€action,€however,€is€limited€to€punishment€for€theÏcriminal€contempt,€modifying€its€support€order€prospectively€andÏto€ascertaining€of€the€amount€of€arrearage€owed€by€the€debtor.€ÏòòSeeóó€òòIn€Re:€Campbellóó,€185€B.R.€628;€òòIn€Re€Allisonóó,€182€B.R.€881€andÏòòIn€Re:€Wardóó,€188€B.R.€1002.€€The€payment€of€the€arrearage€isÏsubject€to€the€Chapter€13€plan€as€confirmed.€€òòSeeóó€òòIn€Re:€Walteróó,Ï153€B.R.€38.ÌÌà àIn€ascertaining€whether€the€contempt€action€and€punishmentÏtherefor€is€civil€or€criminal,€we€look€to€òòState€ex€rel.€AndersonÏv.€Daughertyóó,€137€Tenn.€125,€191€S.W.€974€[1916],€in€which€theÏfollowing€language€appears:Ì€ÌÓÓà8 àà à"Contempts€are€of€two€kinds,€civil€and€criminal.€A€'civilÏcontempt'€is€one€where€a€person€refuses€or€fails€to€complyÏwith€an€order€of€court€in€a€civil€case;€and€punishment€isÏmeted€at€the€instance€and€for€the€benefit€of€a€partyÍlitigant.€The€proceeding€is€in€furtherance€of€the€right€ofÏa€private€person€which€the€court€has€determined€that€he,€asÏa€litigant,€is€entitled€to.€To€this€class€of€ContemptsÏbelong€such€an€act€as€the€refusal€to€pay€alimony,€asÏordered.€Unless€special€elements€of€contumacy€appear,€suchÏrefusal€is€looked€upon€as€a€resistance€of€the€oppositeÏparty,€and€not€the€court€itself.€If€imprisonment€be€orderedÏit€is€remedial€and€coercive€in€character,€having€relationÏto€the€compelling€of€the€doing€of€something€by€the€contem…nor€which€when€done€will€work€his€discharge.€As€has€beenÏsaid,€in€such€case€the€one€imprisoned€'carries€the€keys€toÏhis€prison€in€his€own€pocket.'€òòIn€re€Naevoidóó,€[8€Car.]€117ÏF.€[448]€451,€54€C.P.A.,€622.€ÌÌÌà8 àà à"'Criminal€Contempts,'€on€the€other€hand,€are€punitive€inÏcharacter,€and€the€proceeding€is€to€vindicate€the€authorityÏof€the€law,€and€the€court€as€an€organ€of€society.€SuchÏContempts,€while€they€may€arise€in€private€litigation,€in€aÏvery€true€sense€'raise€an€issue€between€the€public€and€theÏaccused.'"ÌÌòòHugging€v.€Fallenóó,€500€S.W.2d€4435€(Tenn.€1973).ÌÌÓÓÌà àIn€this€case€there€is€no€question€but€that€special€elements€ofÏcontumacy€appear.€€The€appellant€has€demonstrated€that€he€has€noÏregard€for€the€orders€of€the€court.€€He€has€failed€and€refused€toÏcomply€with€the€orders€of€the€court€over€a€long€period€of€timeÏwithout€sufficient€cause.€€ÌÌà àSince€the€order€of€support€in€this€case€was€entered,€theÏappellant€has€remarried,€sired€three€additional€children,€took€onÏthe€responsibility€of€a€step„child€and€the€support€of€his€wife.€ÏHe€asks€the€court€to€excuse€him€from€punishment€for€his€failure€toÏpay€because€of€his€inability€to€adequately€support€his€presentÏfamily€and€wife.€€He€further€asserts€that€his€present€wife€is€illÏand€that€as€a€result€he€is€unable€to€be€employed€to€the€extent€heÏwould€be€otherwise.€€It€is€well„settled€that€voluntary€obligationsÏassumed€after€an€order€of€support€is€entered€are€not€sufficient€toÏconstitute€a€change€in€circumstances€and€give€rise€to€a€reductionÏin€support€obligations.€€òòSeeóó€€òòElliot€v.€Elliotóó,€825€S.W.2d€87Ï(Tenn.€App.€1991)€and€òòDillow€v.€Dillowóó,€575€S.W.2d€289,€291€(Tenn.ÏApp.€1978).ÌÌà àIt€is€clear€from€the€record€that€the€appellant's€disregard€ofÏthe€court's€order€has€been€willful€and€is€of€such€long€standingÏthat€this€proceeding€is€necessary€to€vindicate€the€authority€ofÏthe€law€and€the€court.€€Additionally,€the€defendant,€under€theÏcourt's€judgment,€does€not€"carry€the€keys€to€his€prison€in€hisÏown€pocket."€€He€has€been€sentenced€to€a€definite€sentence€in€theÍcounty€jail€or€workhouse.€€He€has€been€represented€by€counselÏthrough€the€entire€proceedings.€€In€addition,€all€the€requirementsÏof€Rule€42(b),€T.R.Cr.P.€have€been€met.€€€We,€therefore,€find€thatÏthe€contempt€is€criminal,€not€civil,€and€the€automatic€stay€pro…vided€in€the€Bankruptcy€Code€is€inapplicable€to€the€contemptÏproceeding.€€Further,€we€are€of€the€opinion€that€contempt€has€beenÏestablished€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt.ÌÌà àThe€trial€court€found€the€arrearage€at€the€time€of€trial€to€beÏ$11,400.90.€€He€further€established€current€support€at€$52.00€perÏweek€plus€the€clerk's€commission€of€5%€and€ordered€an€additionalÏ$10.00€per€week€to€be€paid€on€the€arrearage.ÌÌà àThe€automatic€stay€provided€by€the€Bankruptcy€Code€applies€toÏthat€part€of€the€court's€judgment€requiring€weekly€payments€on€theÏarrearage.€Actions€taken€in€violation€of€an€automatic€stay€areÏvoid,€òòKalb€v.€€Feuersteinóó,€308€U.S.€433,€438,€60€S.Ct.€343,Ï345„46,€84€L.Ed.€370€(1940);€òòWalter€P.€Richard€v.€City€of€Chicagoóó,Ï80€B.R.€451€(1987).€Arrearage€payments€will€abide€the€orders€ofÏthe€Bankruptcy€Court.€€ÌÌà àFurther,€we€believe€that€the€appellant's€child€should€not€beÏpenalized€for€the€willful€acts€of€the€appellant.à àAccordingly,€weÏvacate€that€part€of€the€order€of€the€trial€court€requiring€weeklyÏpayment€on€child€support€arrearage€and€suspending€payment€of€childÏsupport€while€the€appellant€is€incarcerated.€€The€trial€court'sÏjudgment€is€affirmed€in€all€other€respects.ÌÌà àCosts€are€taxed€to€the€appellant€and€this€cause€is€remanded€toÏthe€trial€court€for€the€collection€thereof€and€for€such€other€andÏfurther€action€as€necessary€to€execute€the€judgment€of€the€trialÏcourt€in€conformity€with€this€opinion.ÌÌÌÌÓÓ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€__________________________________Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€Don€T.€McMurray,€J.ÌÌÌCONCUR:ÌÌ___________________________________ÌHerschel€P.€Franks,€J.ÌÌ___________________________________ÌWilliam€H.€Inman,€Senior€Judge.ÌÇÑ  Ñà@ àIN€THE€COURT€OF€APPEALSÌÌÌÌÌÌJAMES€NEAL€BROWN,€JR.,€€€€€€€€€€)à àHAMILTON€CIRCUITÌ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)à àC.A.€NO.€03A01„9508„CV„00287Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€Plaintiff„Appellant€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ìvs.€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)à àHON.€WILLIAM€L.€BROWNÌ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)à àJUDGEÌ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)ÌANNABELLE€SHROUT€BROWN,€€€€€€€€€)à àVACATED€IN€PART,€AFFIRMED€IN€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€Ï)€€PART€AND€REMANDEDÌ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€Defendant„Appellee€€€€)ÌÌÌ€Ìà@ àò òòòORDERóóó óÌÌÌÓÓà àThis€appeal€came€on€to€be€heard€upon€the€record€from€theÏCircuit€Court€of€Hamilton€County,€briefs€and€argument€of€counsel.€ÏUpon€consideration€thereof,€we€vacate€that€part€of€the€order€ofÏthe€trial€court€requiring€weekly€payment€on€child€support€arrear…age.€€and€suspending€payment€of€child€support€while€the€appellantÍis€incarcerated.€€The€trial€court's€judgment€is€affirmed€in€allÏother€respects.Ìà àCosts€are€taxed€to€the€appellant€and€this€cause€is€remanded€toÏthe€trial€court€for€the€collection€thereof€and€for€such€other€andÏfurther€action€as€necessary€to€execute€the€judgment€of€the€trial€Ïin€conformity€with€this€opinion.ÌÌ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€PER€CURIAM