WPCc  #VUF %" 0@(4h| 0 0D nS 0J 0TJ 0^ 0h 0rd 0| 0R 0 1uh U, 0d U,mU6B)DC AM;U*`ov~v D3 0@ BE AOb 0\w 0D D/ BF IBM Laser Printer 4019IBM4019,,,,0P *fc vP<Q 9Z .Courier New RegularX($    U_A  3|x(4(3DX$ !         0  (#$  0  <6X9`("Courier 10cpiXXx6X@8;X@2 0Indent123  2" 0Indent20 23  2, 0Indent30 0 23  26 0Indent40 0 0 23  2@ 0Indent50 0 0 0 23  2J 0Indent60 0 0 0 0 23  2T 0Indent70 0 0 0 0 0 23  2^ 0Indent80 0 0 0 0 0 0 23   ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)<  9p`(ModernP 8Mac DefaultMac Default ` X<  9p`(Monaco<  9p`(Courier New% Line 7 d!!!!7Border 1dd-"C << G<  9p`(Arial V !  #d#      "  $$   YYY FILED$X February16,1996CecilCrowson,Jr.$AppellateCourtClerk  e !#d#       $       Rule10.AffirmativewithoutopinionMemorandumopinion .(a)AffirmanceWithoutOpinion.TheCourt,withtheconcurrenceofalljudgesparticipatinginthecase,mayaffirmtheactionofthetrialcourtbyorderwithoutrenderingaformalopinionwhenanopinionwouldhavenoprecedentialvalueandoneormoreofthefollowingcircumstancesexistandaredispositiveoftheappeal:̀(1)theCourtconcursinthefactsasfoundorasfoundbynecessaryimplicationbythetrialcourt.̀(2)thereismaterialevidencetosupporttheverdictofthejury.̀(3)noreversibleerroroflawappears.̀Suchcasesmaybeaffirmedasfollows:"AffirmedinaccordancewithCourtofAppealsRule10(a)."̀(b)MemorandumOpinion.TheCourt,withtheconcurrenceofalljudgesparticipatinginthecase,mayaffirm,reverseormodifytheactionsofthetrialcourtbymemorandumopinionwhenaformalopinionwouldhavenoprecedentialvalue.Whenacaseisdecidedbymemorandumopinionitshallbedesignated"MEMORANDUMOPINION,"shallnotbepublished,andshallnotbecitedorreliedonforanyreasoninasubsequentunrelatedcase.[AsamendedbyorderfiledApril22,1992.]PtPtHH(FG(HH(d'@Styl{WP}01  HH  2$HH  Geneva  <Px443!#4$*$$*$ KK  Geneva  Geneva .,6 Monaco   BA: T Monaco  BA: T Monaco 0000'dxd("$     d-C<< CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(43=K$ !     ($$   1  ' dxdP Pd ! . &Xd&#Xd#             \RA'\7iXXdd7L#%";+'h|`  `L@ INTHECOURTOFAPPEALSWANDAGAYESEALCOLLINS,) HANCOCKCHANCERỲ) C.A.NO.03A019511CH00390̀)̀PlaintiffAppellant)̀)̀)̀)̀)̀)vs.) HON.DENNISH.INMAǸ) CHANCELLOR̀)̀)̀)̀)̀)CHARLESEDWARDCOLLINS,) AFFIRMEDANDREMANDED̀)̀DefendantAppellee)JULIAA.MARTIN,Knoxville,forAppellant.AARONM.FELDMAN,Knoxville,forAppellee.@ MEMORANDUMOPINION McMurray,J. Thisisarathersordiddivorcecase.Thechancellorgrantedadivorceandcustodyofthepartiesminorchildtotheappellee.Weaffirmthejudgmentofthetrialcourt. Theappellanthaspresentedthefollowingissuesforourconsideration:8 1.0 Whetherthechancellorerredinnotawardingappellant,WandaCollins,custodyoftheelevenyearoldminorchildbasedonthebestinterestsofthechildandthecomparativefitnessdoctrine?8 2.0 Whetherthechancellorerredinplacingsolecustodyoftheminorchildwithappelleeinlightoftestimonypresentedattrialregardingsexualharassmentofappellantbyherfatherinlaw? Afterareviewoftherecordinthiscasewehavedeterminedthattheevidencedoesnotpreponderateagainstthefindingsofthechancellor.UnderRule13(d),TennesseeRulesofAppellateProcedure,weare,therefore,requiredtoaffirmthejudgmentofthetrialcourt. Sinceitwouldservenopurposetomakethedetailsofthiscasemorepublicthantheyalreadyare,thecourtisoftheopinionthatthisisanappropriatecasefordispositionunderRule10,RulesoftheCourtofAppeals.Thecourtconcursinthefactsasfoundbythetrialcourtandnoreversibleerroroflawappears.Accordingly,thecaseisaffirmedinaccordancewithCourtofAppeals,Rule10(a). &    Costsaretaxedtotheappellantandthiscauseisremandedtothetrialcourtforthecollectionthereof.Ӏ__________________________________̀DonT.McMurrayCONCUR:___________________________________HerschelP.Franks,J.___________________________________CharlesD.Susano,Jr.,J.  7;_XXdXXd7@ INTHECOURTOFAPPEALSWANDAGAYESEALCOLLINS,) HANCOCKCHANCERỲ) C.A.NO.03A019511CH00390̀)̀PlaintiffAppellant)̀)̀)̀)̀)̀)vs.) HON.DENNISH.INMAǸ) CHANCELLOR̀)̀)̀)̀)̀)CHARLESEDWARDCOLLINS,) AFFIRMEDANDREMANDED̀)̀DefendantAppellee)@ ORDER  ThisappealcameontobeheardupontherecordfromtheChanceryCourtofHancockCounty,briefsandargumentofcounsel.Uponconsiderationthereof,thisCourtisofopinionthattherewasnoreversibleerrorinthetrialcourt. Thetrialcourt'sjudgmentisaffirmedinallrespects.Costsaretaxedtotheappellantandthiscauseisremandedtothetrialcourtforthecollectionthereof.̀PERCURIAM