ÿWPC¨  ¦+·upÁ-þ‰KuRú×Iü–9”o}½ˆk0(5ç,º&z0ŸI²³cqˆÞ3üAëìÉkÈsß1}t—'è­#¥•¿‘š. ¶í"Ááø¾&@"!Æ(ûx‘‹ïë%š¬ù¨ª°v~ûßWû&›t.ÛÑñË/:™A¿C +p)l?ˆ±û÷vƒx496ðosÍ ÿ°Ñ˜éê¦IÝ{§ž`ÃjÛwÄAÙˆ#B`Êˉ\¬Y÷WKù]‘°ÌÖHšÔel ww³ž4¶Š¦°ªÝM•¶SohWM—« Ù€«Ä‡ÊŽ®!ä·ùTL,ãZˆ|¼ÌüDWj–ÖÔ{.Æë¼Eƒ^9o.d¸™½ªrv•I´”løK‘-³Áh«žˆjÁ¨@>¨DÒïÛPWà2ét‘FÛ¥¿ø‡Q:~qW!x<ÑEè*ýtý“€¶c‡+`­¼ëŸXƒç@%½À’,™ï&éâÎL1´â˹Aä¬Xq èg&O}.XÔAÙ '%5> Éôw>hÁÏYÌQˆº# Ä´)(Ÿuƒ9ïþùÛ$âäÓ¾éIÂÑœ‹¸åÃûÈ…½ '……$å'å~˜uð¶Ï§<ƒ@óχòU*# LUNW %¥ 0(«w@Ó4'U:6 0lp 0DÜ (((((((((((((((((((( AQ)Æz 0D@ 0D„ 0DÈ È D/ B; BX D3u ˜HP LaserJet 4SiHPPCL5MS,ü,,,,,ü0nLhÎ(ÈhH  Z 6Times New Roman RegularX($¡¡ !b#V$U%e&E(•)E*Ó€4F&3|x4,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular((3þÝ$¤¤Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  Úóó(%Ã$òòÚ  Ú1Ú  Úóó ÷Ý ƒ"¯"ÝÝ  ÝÔ€X¯iXXXÔÔ€0XX¯iÔÓ  Óò òÔ Ad ÔFILEDÔ€X¯iX0ÔÐ  ÐÌMay€13,€1999ÌÌCecil€Crowson,€Jr.ÌAppellate€Court€ClerkÔdAhÔó ó!"#$&Cþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(3¯$¢¢Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ý(3¯$££Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó(('÷ÿ dxd düÿP Pd'''''ÿÿdxdÝ ƒ!ÝÝ  Ýñ*ññ%ñ›ñ%ññ*ñÑX°ÑÑTR[¤ AØ'ÿ Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑñ4ññ*ñßr€ )<,(j 8` `€€@Eȱ` 8ttxP°ð  rßñ*ññ4ññ4ññ4ññ*ñ›ñ*ñà@} } ìàò òIN€THE€COURT€OF€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÌà0  àà ° àà@úú$ì(#(#àAT€NASHVILLEˆÌñ4ññ4ñÌñ4ñœßt€ )>.*jx9` `€€@E̹` 8ttxP€ð 9 tß›ñ4ñJAMES€E.€COBBLE,à  àà h àà À à)Ð €Ð Ðà  àPlaintiff/Appellantà  àà h àà À à)Ð pÀ Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à)ÌVS.à  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à)ó óà  àò òAppeal€No.€01„A„01„9803„CV„00169Ð P   Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à)à  àRutherford€Circuit€No.€34585Ð @  ÐIVAN€E.€SHEWMAKE€andà h àà À à)Ð 0 € ÐRICHARD€SMITH,€JR.,à  àà h àà À à)Ð  p  Ðà  àDefendants/Appelleesà h àà À à)Ð `  Ðòò€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€óó€)Ð P  Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à)à  à(CONSOLIDATED€APPEALS)Ð ð@  ÐCHARLES€F.€JOHNSON,à  àà h àà À à)Ð à0  Ðà  àPlaintiff/Appellantà  àà h àà À à)Ð Ð  Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à)ÌVS.à  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à)à  àAppeal€No.€01„A„01„9803„CV„00170Ð ° Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à)à  àRutherford€Circuit€No.€34561Ð  ð ÐIVAN€E.€SHEWMAKE€andà h àà À à)Ð à ÐRICHARD€SMITH,€JR.,à  àà h àà À à)Ð €Ð Ðà  àDefendants/Appelleesà h àà À à)Ð pÀ Ðòò€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€óó€)Ð `° ÐÌó óWM.€KENNERLY€BURGER,€BPR€#3731Ð @ ÐAttorney€for€Plaintiffs/AppellantsÌSunTrust€Bank€Building,€Suite€306Ì201€E.€Main€Street,€P.O.€Box€1969ÌMurfreesboro,€TN€€€37133„1969Ì615„893„8933ÌÌDAVID€L.€GOADÌAttorney€for€Plaintiffs/AppellantsÌP.O.€Box€206ÌMurfreesboro,€TN€€€37133„0206Ì615„233„5585ÌÌJOHN€KNOX€WALKUPÌFor€Defendants/AppelleesÌÌJOHN€KNOX€WALKUPÌAttorney€General€&€ReporterÌÌMICHAEL€E.€MOOREÌSolicitor€GeneralÌFor€Defendants/AppelleesÌÌMERIDITH€DEVAULT,€BPR€#9157ÌSenior€CounselÌ425€Fifth€Avenue€NorthÌNashville,€TN€37243Ì615„741„6819ÌÌÐ  p5À04 Ðñ!ñѰXÑñ!ñÓ  Óà@55'ìàò òòòOPINIONóóó óˆÐ ° ÐÌÌÓÓà  àIt€appearing€to€this€Court€from€the€Judgement€of€the€Trial€Court€pursuant€to€Rule€10Aòò1óó€of€Ð €Ð Ðthe€Court€of€Appeals,€that€the€Plaiññtnñññ ñntñ ñiffs/Appellants€appealed€from€the€Judgement€of€the€Trial€CourtÏñ%ñgrantiungñ%ññ%ñgrantingñ%ñ€the€Defendant/Appellees€Motion€for€Summary€Judgement€after€finding€that€there€was€anÏabsence€of€disputed€material€facts€and€therefore,€no€genuine€issues€for€the€Trial€Court€to€decide,€847ÏS.W.2d€208,€214€(ñ%ñtennñ%ññ%ñTennñ%ñ€1993).€€The€parties€entitled€to€Summary€Judgement€when€both€the€facts€andÏthe€conclusion€to€be€drawn€from€the€facts€are€so€certain€that€a€reasonable€in€the€exercise€of€a€free€andÏimpartial€judgment€can€reach€only€one€conclusion.€€Haga€vs.€Blanc€and€West€Lumber€œCompany,ñ&ñ€ñ&ññ*ñ›ñ*ññ)ññ(ñÌñ(ññ)ñ›Ì666€S.W.€2d€61,€65€(Tenn€1984).Ìà  àFollowing€the€Trial€Courtððs€granting€the€Motion€for€Summary€Judgement,€the€PlaintiffsÏsought€to€supplement€their€responses€to€Defendantsðð€Motion€for€Summary€Judgement€by€relying€on€Ïthe€depositions€of€Connie€Qualls€and€Bill€Reynolds,€however€these€depositions€were€never€ñ%ñbweforeñ%ññ%ñbeforeñ%ñÏthe€Trial€Court€and€were€not€submitted€in€response€to€Defendantsðð€Motion€for€Summary€Judgement.€ÏThese€depositions€were€not€filed€until€after€the€Trial€Court€found€Summary€Judgement€forÏDefendants€and€Dismissed€the€Complaint.€€Plaintiffs€also€rely€on€the€deposition€of€Ivan€Shewmake,Ïwhich€was€taken€before€Mr.€Shewmake€was€a€Defendant€in€this€case.€€The€deposition€they€ñ%ñse4edkñ%ññ%ñseekñ%ñ€toÏrely€on€was€taken€in€another€case€brought€by€a€separate€Plaintiff€against€a€separate€Defendant.€ÏHowever,€Plaintiffs€did€not€submit€this€deposition€in€response€to€Defendantsðð€Motion€for€SummaryÏJudgement.€€The€deposition€they€seek€to€rely€on€is€absent€from€the€record€and€absent€from€PlaintiffsððÏresponse,€including€Motion€for€Summary€Judgement.€€However,€even€if€considered,€there€is€nothingÏin€this€deposition€to€establish€that€either€of€the€Plaintiffs€suffered€serious€or€emotional€distress€asÏrequired€under€Tennessee€law€in€intentional€infliction€of€emotional€distress€matters€or€that€theirÏdamages€should€be€presumed€under€these€circumstances.€€This€Court€is€prohibited€from€consideringÏfacts€outside€the€record.€€We€find€no€citations€to€any€ñ%ñpagweñ%ññ%ñpageñ%ñ€numbers€in€the€record€as€required€by€theÏTennessee€Rules€of€Civil€Procedure€#27(g)€in€any€of€the€facts€in€Plaintiffsðð€Brief.€€The€depositionsÏrelied€upon€by€the€Plaintiffs€are€outside€the€record.€€Plaintiffs€failed€to€produce€any€evidence€of€anyÏserious€severe€emotional€distress,€which€was€an€essential€element€of€the€tort€of€intentional€inflictionÏof€emotional€distress,€absent€proof€of€this€element€of€the€claim€precludes€the€claim€going€forwardÏas€a€matter€of€law,€Camper€v.€Miner,€915€S.W.2nd€437€(Tenn€1996).Ìñ#ñÐ