WPCW F19l5\QAig,KP,_EܼNmm3Anmbi4'9|Ŋ*,er~]-0?OߵJ7stF5`,t&MZnlOeE'Zia*/{l%wQ6vܹ;^+(/s)訥܄i,~VSV'tn < _0l8p Ku f$͹Å У+ ?NUwRІI׺%% N8#% w?#o((!:-@pKf5IJbZ"arC%ʕޱ8h w-a}K|['UNxnYFe-c9ϡt'Rp Ce7J(z4i83iĒ(:I[\SK\N+1W#U%N % 0:w  0~ 0D ^ 4   m 0  UN5"E8888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888 B:HP LaserJet 4050 Series PCL 5e,,,,0(9 Z6Times New Roman RegularX($USUS.,  ($USUS.,    1    _&%XXԀRule10(RulesoftheCourtofAppealsofTennessee).(b) MemorandumOpinion .TheCourt,  withtheconcurrenceofalljudgesparticipatinginthecase,mayaffirm,reverseormodifytheactionsof  thetrialcourtbymemorandumopinionwhenaformalopinionwouldhavenoprecedentialvalue.When d acaseisdecidedbymemorandumopinionitshallbedesignated MEMORANDUMOPINION,shall < notbepublished,andshallnotbecitedorreliedonforanyreasoninasubsequentunrelatedcase.#XX%&e#(.(3($ !USUS.,      0  (#$  0  )L ~(3|xU<rr@SK:QuickFormat1XXXXXXXXcb   XXXXXXXXcb   (hH  Z 6Times New Roman Regular   ($USUS.,    2    _TheKentuckyorderstatesthatKentucky retainsjurisdictionoveranycustodyissues  withchild.However,noissueappearstohavebeenraisedwiththeTennesseetrialcourtorin  thisappealregardingthejurisdictionoftheTennesseetrialcourt.   d !USUS.,  _  XX8Xdd8  OY@ INTHECOURTOFAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @$ATNASHVILLE  #XXI# XX  CHARLESDEWAYNECOLBAUGHv.BETHWARRENCOLBAUGH   #XXe#@  AnAppealfromtheChanceryCourtforMauryCounty  6 @_ _ No.98595StellaL.Hargrove,Judge  " @*AV) ` dE< ` A߈    @ No.M199900755_COA_ԄR3CVFiledAugust25,_2000_Ԁ   AV) ` dE<h` A i     Thisisapostdivorcevisitationcase.Themotherandfatherlivedwiththeirinfantchildin d  Columbia,Tennessee.Afterthecoupleseparated,themothertookthepartieschildtoher P  hometownofBowlingGreen,Kentucky,overonehundredmilesfromColumbia.Upontheparties < divorce,thetrialcourtawardedcustodyofthechildtothemotherandvisitationtothefatherfor (x twelvedayseachmonth,nogreaterthanfourteendaysapart.Thetrialcourtorderedthemotherand d fathertomeethalfwaybetweentheirtworesidencestoexchangethechildforthefathersvisitation. P Themotherappealedthetrialcourtsvisitationschedule,arguingthatitadverselyaffectsthechilds < senseofstability,thatitplacesoverlyburdensometravelrequirementsonthemotherandthechild, ( andthatitisunworkableinthiscasebecauseofthemotherandfathersinabilitytocooperate.We  affirm.    Tenn.R.App.P.3;JudgmentoftheChanceryCourtisAffirmed.   HollyKirbyLillard,J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichW.FrankCrawford, ` P.J.,W.S.,andDavidR.Farmer,J.,joined. L WayneDetring,Hendersonville,Tennessee,fortheappellant,BethWarrenColbaugh. $ t BarbaraJ.Walker,Columbia,Tennessee,fortheappellee,Charles_DeWayne_Ԁ_Colbaugh_. !L!   @! MEMORANDUMOPINION  #  1      ׈ #$#    Defendant/AppellantBethWarrenColbaugh( Mother)andPlaintiff/AppelleeCharles % % _DeWayne_Ԁ_Colbaugh_Ԁ( Father)weremarriedonDecember20,1997.MotherandFatherhadone &!& childduringthemarriage,JonathanDouglasColbaugh,bornJuly1,1998.Motherwaspregnant '"'' withJonathanatthetimeofthepartiesmarriage.Whenthecouplemarried,theyagreedthatMother  wouldremaininherhometownofBowlingGreen,Kentucky,untilafterJonathanwasborn.After  Jonathansbirth,MothermovedwithFatherintoahomethecouplehadpurchasedinColumbia,  Tennessee.InAugust1998,MotherandFatherseparatedandMothermovedwithJonathanback t toKentucky. `   Duringthemarriage,Motherwastheprimary_caregiver_ԀforJonathananddidnotworkoutside 8  thehome.Atthetimeoftrial,MotherworkedparttimeatadaycarecenterinKentuckyandtook $ t Jonathanwithhertowork.MotheralsoattendedWesternKentuckyUniversity,takingtwelve  ` semesterhoursatthetimeoftrial.Fatherworkedasalinemanforalocalelectriccompany.His  L  workhourswerefrom8:00a.m.until4:30p.m.,MondaythroughFriday.Fatherwasalsooncall  8  everythirdweekend. $    AfterMotherandFatherseparated,onSeptember21,1998,Fatherfiledacomplaintfor   divorceallegingthatMotherwasguiltyofinappropriatemaritalconductor,inthealternative,that   irreconcilabledifferenceshadarisen.OnSeptember29,1998,Motherfiledananswerandcounter   complaintfordivorce.Inhercountercomplaint,MotherallegedthatFatherhadcommittedactsof p domesticviolenceagainstherduringthepartiesmarriage.(R.at56,Vol.1)Motherattachedto \ hercountercomplaintacopyofaKentuckycourtsdomesticviolenceordercitingFathersactsof H domesticviolenceagainstMother,grantingMothertemporarycustodyofJonathan,awardingFather 4 visitation,andrequiringFathertopaychildsupport. #  2      ؀Fatherdisputedtheabuse.IntheTennessee  p trialcourt,bothparentssoughttemporaryandpermanentcustodyofJonathan.  \   OnSeptember29,1998,MotherfiledamotionfortemporarycustodyofJonathan.Mother 4 alsorequestedthatFathersvisitationbesupervised.OnOctober12,1998,thetrialcourtentered   anordergrantingMothertemporarycustodyofthechildandawardingFather visitationon   alternatingweekends.ThetrialcourtorderedthepartiestomeethalfwaybetweenBowlingGreen,  Kentucky,andColumbia,Tennessee,ataShellconveniencemarketlocatedattheBrileyParkway  exitofInterstate40inNashville,Tennessee.ThedistancefromMothersresidenceinBowling  Green,KentuckytoFathersresidenceinColumbia,Tennesseeisjustoveronehundredmiles,and l takesbetweenoneandonehalfandtwoandonehalfhours. X    XXXXOnOctober1,1999,thetrialcourtenteredafinaldecreeofdivorce.Inthedecree,thetrial 0"  courtawardedMothercustodyofJonathanandgrantedFatherextensivevisitation.Theorderstated #l! that,inconsiderationofthedistancebetweenthepartiesresidences,Father shallhavevisitation $X" withthechildtwelve(12)dayseachmonthwithhisperiodsofvisitationbeingnogreaterthan $D # fourteen(14)daysapart....#XXXX#Thetrialcourtagainorderedthepartiestomeethalfwaybetweentheir %0!$ tworesidencestoexchangeJonathanforFathersvisitation.Fromthisorder,Mothernowappeals. &"% OY      Onappeal,Motherarguesthatthetrialcourterredinsettingthevisitationschedule.She  contendsthatthescheduleeffectivelyconstitutesanawardofjointcustodybecauseoftheamount  oftimewhichJonathanspendswithFather.Motherassertsthatthearrangementisunworkablein  thiscasebecauseofMotherandFathersinabilitytocooperate.MotheralsoassertsthatXXXXtheschedule t placesoverlyburdensometravelrequirementsonMotherandJonathanandinhibitscontinuityand ` stabilityinthelifeofsuchayoungchild.SheassertsthatJonathan#XXXX%#XXXXԀwillnotbeabletoestablisha L  permanentbondwithMotherifheiswithMotherforonlythetimeaffordedunderthevisitation 8  schedule.#XXXXC #XXXX $ t   FatherarguesthatthetrialcourtsvisitationscheduleservesJonathansbestinterests.He  L  contendsthattheschedulereflectsanimplicitfindingbythetrialcourtthatFatherposesnothreat  8  ofharmtoJonathanandthatFatheris,infact,agoodparent.Fathercontendsthatthevisitation $  arrangementallowsJonathantheopportunitytoformarelationshipwithbothparents.#XXXX7!#     Inchildcustodyandvisitationcases,ourreviewisdenovoontherecordwithapresumption   thatthetrialcourtsfindingsoffactarecorrect,unlesstheevidencepreponderatesagainstthem. See    Tenn.R.App.P.13(d).Insuchcases,thewelfareandbestinterestofthechildaretheprimary p concerns. See Whitakerv.Whitaker ,957S.W.2d834,837(Tenn.Ct.App.1997).XXXXԀ#XXXX]%#Becausethe \ determinationofwhereachildsbestinterestliesistheresultoftheconsiderationofanumberof H factorsinthecontextofaspecificfactualsituation,SKXXXXXXXXcb     seeSKv&XXXXXXXXcb     ݀ Adelspergerv.Adelsperger ,970S.W.2d 4 482,485(Tenn.Ct.App.1997),itisparticularlyfact-driven.SKXXXXXXXXcb     SeeSK$(XXXXXXXXcb     ݀SKXXXXXXXXcb     Rogerov.PittSKJ)XXXXXXXXcb     ,759S.W.2d109,  p 112(Tenn.1988).Suchdecisionsoftenhingeonsubtlefactors,includingthetrialcourts  \ assessmentoftheparentsdemeanorandcredibility.SKXXXXXXXXcb     SeeSKM+XXXXXXXXcb     ݀SKXXXXXXXXcb     AdelspergerSKs,XXXXXXXXcb     ,970S.W.2dat485. H   Inthiscase,thereisnotranscriptoftheproceedingsbelow.Thetrialcourtapproveda   statementoftheevidence.Thestatementoftheevidencereferstonotestimony,fromMother,   Father,anyfamilymember,friendorexpert,regardingtheparentsinabilitytocooperatewith  respecttoJonathan,JonathansreactiontotransfersbetweenMotherandFather,anyallegedviolent  behaviorbyFatherinJonathanspresence,Jonathansrelationshipwitheitherparent,ortheeffect  onsuchayoungchildoftheconstanttravelbetweenhouseholds.Onappeal,theappellantmust l presentthisCourtwitharecordwhichincludesevidencesupportingtheappellantsposition.Inthe X  absenceofarecordwhichincludessuchevidence,wemustpresumethattheevidencepresentedat D! trialsupportsthetrialcourtsfindings. SeeWordv.Word ,937_S.W.2d_Ԁ931,932(Tenn.Ct.App. 0"  1996)(quoting _Sherrod_Ԁv._Wix_ ,849_S.W.2d_Ԁ780,783(Tenn.Ct.App.1992)).Therefore,inthiscase, #l! wemustconcludethattheevidencedoesnotpreponderateagainstthetrialcourtsfindingthatthe $X" visitationscheduleisinthechildsbestinterest.Consequently,weaffirmthetrialcourtsvisitation $D # award. %0!$   '#&   Thedecisionofthechancerycourtisaffirmed.CostsareassessedagainsttheAppellant,  BethWarren_Colbaugh_,andhersurety,forwhichexecutionmayissueifnecessary.     `     h   򀀀 L     `     h   HOLLYKIRBYLILLARD,J. 8     `