WPC K(z"%/RcWFaa BqAs59;| LѪ= {x.u-ğE-&3C,e_svk>^%ZɘYc *:~.pi JeL\Kռ.]^CBsIҏZ&f  ] FEʷew`5Jjglŭ*y\ZOMqNYn$ r8.A>l{DRAhy(>__xrd#!xUN % 0( 0l 0D c  w4,;N= m?7VU:^  B 0D D544444 AQi 0D 0DHP LaserJet 8000 DN PS0(hH  Z 6Times New Roman RegularX($ $    2    ThenoticeofappealinthismatterwasfiledAugust28,1998inthetrialcourt.((3$ !      0  (#$  0    $    1    _AhearingonHusbandsmotiontosuspend_pendente_ԀlitealimonyandWifesmotionfor  contemptwasheldonMay19,1998.Thestatementoftheevidenceconcerningthathearingstatesasfollows:8   ` Testimonyfocusedonthefollowingissues:whetheralimony_pendente_ԀlitesupportshouldbesuspendedwhiletheHusbandwasonleaveofabsencefromhisemployerundertheFamilyandMedicalLeaveActtocareforhisfather;andwhetherHusbandwasincontemptforfailuretopaycertainitems.      `  8   ` TheTrialCourtorderedcounselforeachpartytosubmitaproposedFinalDecreeaddressingallissuesandindicatedthattheCourtwouldsignoneoftheproposedOrders.{Z='(3|xU - b"  _XXXXuXX   Ad FILEDXXu  September29,1999Cecil_Crowson_,Jr.AppellateCourtClerkdAx ,cAZ"Arial Regular='L  d(3$ !   )!dxdxabZc[C<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(3$ !  ($$   1  !  _TR[A' Legal3'A' Legal3'T',XXX' 8$Xdd8x`[B2.jz`  `@El}` 8ttxP x_@O O INTHECOURTOFAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE,  @$ATNASHVILLE   @. . _______________________________________________________  ) MARYL.ELDRIDGE ,  )  SumnerCountyCircuitCourt 8    )  No.16910C ( x ЀPlaintiff/Appellee  )  d   )VS.  )  C.A.No.01A019808CV00451  <    ) ANTHONYW.ELDRIDGE ,  )     )̀Defendant/Appellant.  )     )______________________________________________________________________________@ee# PARTIALDISSENT  P ______________________________________________________________________________0,X` X,XX0   ` IconcurwiththemajorityopinionwiththeexceptionoftheaffirmanceofthatportionofthetrialcourtsdecreethatfoundHusbandresponsibleforarrearagesonalimonyandhouseholdbillsintheamountof$1,421. ` ByorderofJune16,1997,thetrialcourtorderedHusbandtopay$100perweektemporaryalimonyandallreasonableandnecessaryhouseholdbillsandoutstandingmedicalexpenses.OnJanuary30,1998WifefiledamotionaskingthatHusbandbeheldincontemptforfailuretocomplywiththeheretoforedescribedorder.ByorderofFebruary25,1998thetrialcourtenteredanorderdismissingWifespetitionforcontempt. ` OnMay12,1998WifefiledanothermotionforcontemptallegingthatHusbandwasfourpaymentsbehindinhisalimonypayments(presumably$400),andthathehadfailedtopayvarioushouseholdbillsenumeratedinthemotion. #  1      ׀ThefinaldecreewasfiledJune3,1998.  0\+/ Subsequently,onJune19,1998WifefiledamotionforcontemptallegingthatHusbandwas10  paymentsbehindinhisalimonypaymentsintheamountof$1,000aswellashisfailuretopay  varioushouseholdbillsenumeratedtherein.HusbandthenfiledamotionaskingthatWifebeheld ` incontemptforfailuretocomplywiththetrialcourtsfinaldecreeregardingdispositionofpersonal 8  property.ThetrialcourtenteredanorderonSeptember16,1998whereinitwasstatedthatboth  ` partieswerefoundtobein technicalcontemptofcourt.T #  2        8   ` Themajorityholdsthattheevidencedoesnotpreponderateagainstthetrialcourts   award.Asstatedinthemajorityopinion,ourreviewofthismatteris denovo withthepresumption p thatthetrialcourtsfindingsoffactarecorrect,unlessthepreponderanceoftheevidenceis H otherwise.However,inreviewingthismeagerrecord,Ihavebeenunabletofindanyevidenceto  p supportthetrialcourtsawardof$1,421.00inarrearageandwouldthereforereversethataward. H  ` Themajorityaffirmsonthebasisthatthestatementofevidencedoesnotdescribethe  evidencepresentedonthisissue.Thestatementofevidencewasapprovedbythetrialjudgein  accordancewithrule24(f)T.R.A.P.Thereisnoindicationintherecordthattheappelleeobjected X  tothestatementoftheevidence. See rule24(c)T.R.A.P.Themajorityfurtherstatesthattheparty 0"  raisinganissueonappealisresponsibleforfurnishingtheappellatecourtwitharecordthatwould $X" enablethatcourttoreachtheissueand,withoutanyevidentiaryrecord,thereisnowaytodetermine %0!$ iftheevidencepreponderatesagainstthetrialcourtsfindingsoffact.Theforegoingisclearlyan '#& accuratestatementofthelaw.However,Ithinkitisjustasreasonabletobelievethatthestatement )$( oftheevidenceinthiscasedoesnotcontainanyevidenceontheamountofarrearagebecausenone h+&* waspresentedtothetrialcourt.TheburdenofproofwasuponWifetopresentevidencetothetrial @-(,  2.2 courtoftheamountofarrearagesonalimonyandhouseholdbills.   `     h     __________________________________ `  `     h     FARMER,J.     x   L   `