˙WPCž …# VUNa %¯ 0(ĩbŨw.å4 ' 6 0J> 0Tˆ 0^Ü 0h: 0rĸ 0| 0† 0 1uĻ U, 0dG U,Ģ U>× B)DC> AMU*Î Bø v~5vĶŗ D3† 0@š AOųÆH 0D D/R B˜HP LaserJet 4Si/4SiMX PS 600dpiPSCRIPTĀĖĀääĀĀĖ0 (ÖÃ9 Z ‹6Times New Roman RegularX($ĄĄ- ų-¤ĨEϧ‹e¨DŠĶ€ŗGav ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙Z3|xŗ2 ˙˙0Indent1Ô2ÔÔ3  Ô2" ˙˙0Indent2ā0 āÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2, ˙˙0Indent3ā0 āā0 āÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô26 ˙˙0Indent4ā0 āā0 āā0 āÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2@ ˙˙0Indent5ā0 āā0 āā0 āā0 āÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2J ˙˙0Indent6ā0 āā0 āā0 āā0 āā0 āÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2T ˙˙0Indent7ā0 āā0 āā0 āā0 āā0 āā0 āÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2^ ˙˙0Indent8ā0 āā0 āā0 āā0 āā0 āā0 āā0 āÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô ˙˙?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)< Œ 9p`(ModernP ˙˙8Mac DefaultMac DefaultĶ ` °šXĶ< Œ 9p`(Monaco< Œ 9p`(&Times New Roman% Line 7 d!!!!7Border 1dd€-"Cū˙ << G˙˙< Œ 9p`(Arial d Ũ ƒ!ŨŅ  ŅŅ#€d#ŅÔ€ÔÔ€ ÔŨ  ŨÔ€$ÔÔ€$ÔĶ  Ķō ōÔ YYY ÔFILEDÔ€$XÔĖĖMay€8,€1996ĖĖCecil€W.€CrowsonĖAppellate€Court€ClerkÔ  Ôķ ķPtPtHHÚ(˙á˙âųFG(üHHÚ(d'@Styl{WP}01•ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃà Ãà Ãà Ãà Ãà ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃĐ ĐĐHHĐĐ  ĐĐ2ĐĐ˙˙¸æ$˙ĐĐHHĐĐĐĐĐĐĐĐ  ĐĐ ĐĐ ĐŅŅŅGenevaŅŅ ŅŅ € ŅŅ<Px–ČŅŌŌŌ443!#4ŌŌ$ *$ŌŌ$*$ŌŌ ˙KK ŌŌ  Geneva ŌŌ  Geneva ŌĶ.,ĶĶĶĶ6ĶĶ ĶßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßŅMonacoŅŅ ŅŌ  BA Op Monaco ŌŌ  BA Op Monaco Ō%%%%'˙˙dxd("˙˙$ŖŖŌ  ŌŌ  Ō€-‚ƒCū˙<< C˙˙ƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$””ō ōÚ  Ú1Ú  Úķ ķ„„'÷˙ dxdü˙P PdŨ ƒ!ŨÔ . ÔÔ€ÔĶ&€X„d&ĶŅ#€Xd#ŅÔ€ ÔŨ  ŨŌ  ŌŌ „ ŌŅ  ŅŅ\R AØ'\қҀŅŅ7€æQXXdėdČ7ŅŅ  ŅŅ  ҜJAMES›€MICHAEL€GEE,ā āā āā ā)Ėā āā āā āā āā āā ā)Ėā āPlaintiff/Appellee,ā āā āā ā)Ėā āā āā āā āā āā ā)ā āMontgomery€ChanceryĖā āā āā āā āā āā ā)ā āNo.€€94„75„126˜VS›.ā āā āā āā āā āā ā)Ėā āā āā āā āā āā ā)ā āAppeal€No.Ėā āā āā āā āā āā ā)ā ā01„A„01„9509„CH„00427ĖŲ€€؜ßL€#&";+'h|æy` į `€€LߛAMY€ELIZABETH€(œMISCHELL›)€GEE,ā ā)Ėā āā āā āā āā āā ā)Ėā āDefendant/Appellant.ā āā āā ā)ĖĖĖā@ āIN€THE€COURT€OF€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEĖĖā@ āMIDDLE€SECTION€AT€NASHVILLEĖĖĖā@ āAPPEAL€FROM€THE€CHANCERY€COURT€OF€MONTGOMERY€COUNTYĖĖā@ āAT€œCLARKSVILLE›,€TENNESSEEĖĖĖā@ āHONORABLE€ALEX€W.€œDARNELL›,€CHANCELLORĖĖĖĖĖLaurence€M.€œMcMillan›,€Jr.ĖCUNNINGHAM,€MITCHELL,€HICKS€&€œMcMILLAN›Ė310€Franklin€Street˜Clarksville›,€Tennessee€37040ĖATTORNEY€FOR€PLAINTIFF/APPELLEEĖĖĖĖFRANK€J.€œRUNYON›ĖP.O.€Box€1023˜Clarksville›,€Tennessee€37041ĖATTORNEY€FOR€DEFENDANT/APPELLANTĖĖĖĖAPPEAL€DISMISSED€WITHOUT€PREJUDICE.ĖCAUSE€REMANDED.ĖĖĖā āā āā āā āā āHENRY€F.€TODDĖā āā āā āā āā āPRESIDING€JUDGE,€MIDDLE€SECTIONĖĖĖCONCUR:ĖSAMUEL€L.€LEWIS,€JUDGEĖWILLIAM€C.€KOCH,€JR.,€JUDGEĖĮJAMES€MICHAEL€GEE,ā āā āā ā)Ėā āā āā āā āā āā ā)Ėā āPlaintiff/Appellee,ā āā āā ā)Ėā āā āā āā āā āā ā)ā āMontgomery€ChanceryĖā āā āā āā āā āā ā)ā āNo.€€94„75„126˜VS›.ā āā āā āā āā āā ā)Ėā āā āā āā āā āā ā)ā āAppeal€No.Ėā āā āā āā āā āā ā)ā ā01„A„01„9509„CH„00427ĖAMY€ELIZABETH€(œMISCHELL›)€GEE,ā ā)Ėā āā āā āā āā āā ā)Ėā āDefendant/Appellant.ā āā āā ā)ĖĖĖā@ āōōO€P€I€N€I€O€NķķĖĖĖĶĶā āThe€captioned€defendant€has€appealed€from€a€partial€judgment€which€resolved€some,Ībut€not€all,€of€the€issues€in€this€divorce€case.€€The€judgment€is€not€a€final€judgment€appealableĪas€of€right,€and€is€subject€to€revision€by€the€Trial€Court€at€any€time€before€all€issues€areĪdetermined.€€œT.R.A.P.›€Rule€3(a).ĖĖā āFor€the€assistance€of€the€Trial€Court€and€counsel€on€remand,€the€proceedings€andĪpresent€status€of€the€case€as€revealed€by€the€abbreviated€record,€will€be€discussed.ĖĖā āOn€April€12,€1994,€the€husband€sued€for€divorce€on€grounds€of€irreconcilableĪdifferences€and€cruel€and€inhuman€treatment,€requesting€distribution€of€marital€property€andĪdebts,€custody€of€two€children€and€child€support.ĖĖā āOn€April€26,€1994,€the€wife€answered€admitting€irreconcilable€differences,€denyingĪcruel€and€inhuman€treatment,€and€requesting€dismissal€of€the€husbandđđs€complaint.€€By€cross„complaint,€the€wife€sought€divorce,€child€custody€and€support,€and€division€of€marital€estate.ĖĖā āOn€January€11,€1995,€the€wife€filed€the€following€motion:ĖĶĶā8 āā8  Comes€now€Amy€Elizabeth€(Michelle)€Gee,€defendant/cross„plaintiff,€and€moves€the€Court,€prior€to€making€a€determinationĪas€to€custody€which€determination€is€currently€set€to€beĪannounced€on€January€17,€1995,€to€allow€her€to€present€proof€ofĪmaterial€changes€in€circumstances€affecting€the€custody€of€theĪchildren€since€the€hearing€in€this€cause€on€November€15,€1994.€ĪThese€changes€are€to€the€detriment€of€the€children,€has€adverselyĪaffected€them,€has€emotionally€adversely€affected€them,€andĪthose€changes€are€definitely€not€in€the€best€interest€of€theĪchildren.ĖĖā8 āā8  James€Michael€Gee€continues€to€ignore€what€is€in€the€bestĪinterest€of€the€children€regarding€bed„time,€living€conditions,Īetc.ĖĖĖĶĶā āThe€motion€was€resisted€by€the€husband.ĖĖā āOn€March€30,€1995,€at€12:30€P.M.,€the€Trial€Court€entered€a€đ đFinal€Decree€ofĪDivorce,đđ€stating:ĖĶĶā8 āā8  This€cause€came€to€be€heard€on€November€15,€1994,€andĪNovember€22,€1994€before€the€Honorable€Alex€œDarnell›,ĪChancellor€of€the€Chancery€Court€for€Montgomery€County,ĪTennessee€upon€plaintiffđđs€complaint€for€absolute€divorce,Īdefendantđđs€answer€and€counter„complaint,€the€testimony€of€theĪparties,€statements€of€counsel€and€the€entire€record€in€this€cause,Īfrom€all€of€which€it€appears€to€the€Court€that€each€party€hasĪalleged€and€proved€inappropriate€marital€conduct€and€as€a€result,Īthe€parties€should€be€declared€divorced.€€It€is€therefore,Ėā8 āā8  Ordered,€adjudged€and€decreed€that€the€bonds€of€matrimonyĪexisting€between€the€parties€and€the€same€hereby€are€foreverĪdissolved,€and€the€parties€are€hereby€declared€divorced€pursuantĪto€T.C.A.€36„4„129(b),€and€both€the€plaintiff€and€the€defendantĪare€hereby€restored€to€all€of€the€rights€and€privileges€ofĪunmarried€persons.Ėā8 āā8  All€matters€as€to€child€custody,€support€and€the€division€ofĪmarital€property€are€reserved€until€further€order€of€the€Court.ĖĖĖĶĶā āOn€the€same€date,€March€30,€1995,€at€12:40€P.M.,€the€Trial€Court€entered€an€orderĪstating€that€the€cause€was€heard€on€November€15€and€22,€1994,€January€17€and€27,€1995,€andÍFebruary€17,€1995.€€Said€order€awarded€joint€custody€to€the€parties€and€physical€custody€onĪalternating€weeks.€€The€husband€was€ordered€to€pay€the€wife€$450€per€month€rehabilitativeĪalimony€pursuant€to€T.C.A.€đđ€36„5„101(d)(1).€€The€husband€was€ordered€to€provide€healthĪcare€for€the€children€and€to€pay€cost€of€day€care€to€be€selected€by€the€parties.€€The€residence€ofĪthe€parties€was€awarded€to€the€husband€subject€to€a€mortgage€and€further:ĖĶĶā8 āā8 ā€.€.€.€To€balance€the€equation,€the€court€is€of€the€opinion€thatĪJames€Michael€Gee€shall€pay€to€Amy€Gee€the€sum€of€$2,500.00Īin€a€lump€sum€or€the€sum€of€$2,650.00€in€equal€monthlyĪinstallments€over€a€period€of€ten€(10)€months,€whichever€heĪshould€choose.€€The€first€payment€shall€be€due€no€later€thanĪthirty€(30)€days€from€the€entry€of€this€order.ĖĖĖĶĶThe€husband€was€ordered€to€pay€the€wife€$3,253.95€as€her€share€of€the€cash€value€of€anĪinsurance€policy€on€his€life,€and€$600€fee€for€her€counsel.€€Further,€the€order€provided:ĖĶĶā8 āā8  It€is€further€ordered,€adjudged€and€decreed€that€there€will€be€noĪchild€support€payable€in€connection€with€this€case€due€to€theĪequal€sharing€of€the€children€and€joint€custody€herewithĪawarded.ĖĖā8 āā8  €It€is€further€ordered,€adjudged€and€decreed€that€the€defendant,ĪAmy€Gee,€shall€have€15%€of€plaintiffđđs€military€pension€payableĪmonthly€upon€retirement€of€the€plaintiff.ĖĖĖĶĶā āOn€the€same€date,€March€30,€1995,€at€12:50€P.M.,€the€Trial€Court€entered€theĪfollowing€order:ĖĶĶā8 āā8  This€cause€came€to€be€heard€on€January€17,€1995,€upon€motionĪof€the€defendant/counter„plaintiff€to€allow€her€to€present€proof€ofĪmaterial€changes€in€circumstances€affecting€the€custody€of€theĪchildren€since€the€hearing€in€this€cause€on€November€15,€1994,Īas€well€as€the€defendant/counter„plaintiffđđs€motion€for€aĪclarification€as€to€the€award€of€the€residence€of€the€parties.€ĪUpon€the€statements€of€counsel€and€the€record€as€a€whole,€theĪCourt€is€of€the€opinion€that€the€motions€are€not€well€taken€andĪshould€be€denied.€€It€is€therefore,Ėā8 āā8  Ordered€that€the€plaintiffđđs€motion€to€reopen€the€proof€as€wellĪas€the€plaintiffđđs€motion€for€a€clarification€are€hereby€denied.ĖĖĖĶĶā āIt€is€seen€that€three€orders€were€entered€on€March€30,€1995.€€The€12:30€order€resultedĪfrom€hearings€on€November€15€and€22.€€The€12:40€order€resulted€from€hearings€on€NovemberΜ22›œ,›€January€17€and€27€and€February€17.€€The€12:50€order€resulted€from€a€hearing€on€JanuaryĪ17.ĖĖā āOn€April€26,€1995,€the€wife€filed€separate€motions€to€alter€or€amend€all€three€March€30,Ī1995,€orders.ĖĖā āOn€May€1,€1995,€the€husband€moved€the€Trial€Court€to€hold€the€wife€in€contempt€forĪfiling€an€affidavit€after€the€Court€had€refused€to€hear€further€evidence.ĖĖā āOn€July€20,€1995,€the€Trial€Court€entered€an€order€overruling€the€husbandđđs€motion€toĪalter€or€amend€the€đ đFinal€Decree€of€Divorce€entered€on€March€30,€1995€at€12:30€P.M.đđĖĖā āOn€July€26,€1995,€the€Trial€Court€entered€an€order€stating:ĖĶĶā8 āā8  This€cause€came€to€be€hard€on€Friday€June€9,€1995€uponĪdefendantđđs€Motions€to€Alter€or€Amend€the€Final€Decree€ofĪDivorce€and€the€Final€Order€with€regard€to€child€custody€andĪproperty€division,€as€well€as€plaintiffđđs€Motions€for€aĪRestraining€Order€and€for€Contempt.€€Upon€the€arguments€ofĪcounsel€and€the€record€as€a€whole€the€Court€was€of€the€opinionĪthat€ōōthere€may€be€certain€matters€with€regard€to€debts€andĪvacation€property€that€have€not€beenķķ€ōōresolvedķķ,€and€that€thoseĪmatters€should€be€resolved;€and€that€the€affidavit€of€Vicki€HunterĪshould€be€sealed;€and€that€plaintiff€should€be€allowed€anĪopportunity€to€supplement€his€motion€for€restraining€order€withĪthe€affidavits€of€persons€in€his€chain€of€command.€€It€isĪtherefore,Ėā8 āā8  Ordered€that€the€parties€shall€communicate€with€regard€to€theĪōōdisposition€of€certain€debts€and€the€vacation€property€identifiedķķĪōōby€the€defendant€as€not€having€been€allocated€in€connectionķķ€ōōwithĪthe€termination€of€these€proceedingsķķ.ĖĖā8 āā8 ā€.€.€.€.ĖĖā8 āā8  It€is€further€ordered€that€the€plaintiff€shall€be€allowed€to€fileĪstatements€by€individuals€within€his€chain€of€command€withĪregard€to€the€times,€places€and€substance€of€conversations€hadĪby€those€persons€with€individuals€which€the€plaintiff€requests€toĪbe€enjoined€from€further€communication€with€his€chain€ofĪcommand.€€(Emphasis€supplied.)ĖĖĖĶĶā āOn€July€27,€1995,€the€wife€filed€notice€of€appeal€from€the€order€entered€on€July€20,Ī1995.ĖĖā āIt€is€obvious€from€the€above€excerpts€from€the€order€of€July€26,€1995,€that€all€of€theĪissues€between€the€parties€were€not€resolved€by€said€order€and€that€certain€issues€do€in€factĪremain€for€resolution,€to€wit,ĖĶĶā8 āā8  disposition€of€certain€debts€and€the€vacation€property€identifiedĪby€the€defendant€as€not€having€been€allocated€with€theĪtermination€of€these€proceedings.ĖĖĖĶĶā āAlso,€it€appears€that€an€issue€remains€as€to€the€restraint€of€communication€withĪsuperiors€of€the€husband.ĖĖĖā āUnder€these€circumstances,€the€orders€of€the€Trial€Court€are€not€appealable,€but€areĪsubject€to€revision€at€any€time€before€entry€of€a€final€judgment€adjudicating€all€the€claims,€rightsĪand€liabilities€of€the€parties.€€œT.R.C.P.›€Rule€54.02,€œT.R.A.P.›€Rule€3(a).ĖĖā āThe€piecemeal€trial€and€adjudication€of€various€issues€in€this€cause€are€not€reversibleĪerror.€€However,€it€is€much€to€be€desired€and€is€recommended€that,€upon€remand,€all€formerÍand€future€adjudications€of€all€issues€will€be€embodied€in€one€orderly,€comprehensive€finalĪjudgment.ĖĖā āThis€appeal€is€dismissed€without€prejudice€to€a€timely€appeal€from€any€rulings€of€theĪTrial€Court€after€the€entry€of€final€judgment€adjudicating€all€the€claims,€rights€and€liabilities€ofĪthe€parties.€€Costs€of€this€appeal€are€taxed€against€the€appellant/wife.€€The€cause€is€remanded€toĪthe€Trial€Court€for€further€proceedings.€€In€event€of€further€appeal,€the€record€of€this€appealĪmay€be€made€a€part€of€the€record€of€the€future€appeal€upon€motion.ĖĖĶĶā āAppeal€Dismissed€Without€Prejudice.Ėā āCause€Remanded.ĖĖĖā āā āā āā āā āā ā_______________________________________Ėā āā āā āā āā āā āHENRY€F.€TODDĖā āā āā āā āā āā āPRESIDING€JUDGE,€MIDDLE€SECTIONĖĖCONCUR:ĖĖĖĖ_____________________________________ĖSAMUEL€L.€LEWIS,€JUDGEĖĖĖĖ_____________________________________ĖWILLIAM€C.€KOCH,€JR.,€JUDGE