ÿWPCu 2# ÌU:× % 0( 0—? 0DÖw@Zb4bv 0J… 0TÏ 0^# 0h 0ré 0|[ 0†× 0] 1uí 0db 0@Æ D3 B9 U *V B)€ DC© AMì ó9 u, AQ¡Æò 0D¸ 0Dü D/@ Bo˜Œv~$vÓ¢˜HP LaserJet 4SiHPPCL5MS,ü,,,,,ü0nLHÎ, øð AZ‹"Arial RegularX($¡¡(G(2öj$¤¤Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  ÝÔ€ô¯ôXXÔÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó deUfgUhDijEklÓ€xŒƒ*#(Ôô3|xx2 ÿÿ0Indent1Ô2ÔÔ3  Ô2" ÿÿ0Indent2à0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2, ÿÿ0Indent3à0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô26 ÿÿ0Indent4à0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2@ ÿÿ0Indent5à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2J ÿÿ0Indent6à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2T ÿÿ0Indent7à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2^ ÿÿ0Indent8à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô ÿÿ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)P ÿÿ8Mac DefaultMac DefaultÓ ` °šXÓ("ÿÿ$££Ò  ÒÒ  Ò""""'ÿÿdxd d< Œ 9p`(Arial% Line 7 d$$$$7Border 1dd* %Cþÿ << Gÿÿ éÝ ƒ!ÝÔ€#ÔÝ  ÝÝ ƒ+"ÝÝ  ÝÔ€#ÔÓ  ÓÔ YYY ÔFILEDÔ€#XÔÌÌò òSeptember€15,€1997ÌÌCecil€Crowson,€Jr.ÌÔ€#ôÔAppellate€Court€Clerkó ó kÝ ƒ!ÝÔ€#ÔÝ  ÝÝ ƒ$ÝÔ€#ôÔÓ  Óà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  ÝRule€10€(Court€of€Appeals).€òòMemorandum€Opinionóó.€„„€(b)€The€Court,€with€the€concurrence€of€allÏjudges€participating€in€the€case,€may€affirm,€reverse€or€modify€the€actions€of€the€trial€court€by€memorandumÏopinion€when€a€formal€opinion€would€have€no€precedential€value.€€When€a€case€is€decided€byÏmemorandum€opinion€it€shall€be€designated€ð ðMEMORANDUM€OPINION,ðð€shall€not€be€published,€and€shallÏnot€be€cited€or€relied€on€for€any€reason€in€a€subsequent€unrelated€case.Ì*+ ,-Cþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(3¯$¢¢Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó..'÷ÿ dxdüÿP Pd ŽÝ ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€#ÔÝ  ÝÝ ƒ$ÝÔ€#ôÔÓ  Óà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  ÝBecause€the€Division€of€Claims€Administration€was€unable€to€act€on€Plaintiffððs€claim€within€ninetyÏdays,€Plaintiffððs€claim€was€transferred€to€the€Claims€Commission€for€resolution€pursuant€to€T.C.A.€ðð€9„8„402(c).ÌPtPtHHÚ(ÿáÿâùFG(üHHÚ(d'hStyl{WP}01•ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃà Ãà Ãà Ãà Ãà ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÐ ÐÐHHÐÐ  ÐÐ2ÐÐÿÿ¸æ$ÿÐÐHHÐÐÐÐÐÐÐÐ  ÐÐ ÐÐ ÐÑÑÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÑ € ÑÑ<Px–ÈÑÒÒÒ443!#4ÒÒ$ *$ÒÒ$*$ÒÒ ÿKK ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÓ.,ÓÓÓÓ6ÓÓ ÓßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÒ  h HD: Geneva ÒÒ  h HD: Geneva ÒÝ ƒ!ÝÔ . ÔÔ€#ÔÝ  ÝÑ\R AØ'\ÑÑ\R AØ'\ÑÞ ÞÌà@ àò òIN€THE€COURT€OF€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEÌà@ àWESTERN€SECTION€AT€JACKSONÌÌÌÌW.€J.€GRAY,€JR.,à àà àà àà à)à àó óFrom€the€Tennessee€ClaimsÌà àà àà àà àà àà àò ò)à àó óCommissionÌà àClaimant/Appellant,à àà àà àò ò)ó óÌà àà àà àà àà àà àò ò)à àó óHon.€Martha€B.€Brasfield,ÏCommissionerÌò òvs.à àà àà àà àà àà à)à àÌà àà àà àà àà àà à)à àó óClaims€Commission€No.€404782ò òÌÙ€*ÙßR€&'%A1-j|` Å `€€@ÿRßà àà àà àà àà àà à)à àó óAppeal€No.€02A01„9703„BC„00055Ìò òà àà àà àà àà àà à)ÌSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE,à àà àà à)à àAFFIRMEDó óÌà àà àà àà àà àà àò ò)Ìà àó óRespondent/Appellee.à àà àò ò)à àÌà àà àà àà àà àà à)à àW.€J.€Gray,€Jr.,€pro€seà àÌà àà àà àà àà àà à)à àó óJackson,€Tennesseeò òÌà àà àà àà àà àà à)à àó óÌà àà àà àà àà àà àò ò)à àJohn€Knox€Walkupó óÌà àà àà àà àà àà àò ò)à àAttorney€General€&€ReporterÌà àà àà àà àà àà à)à àHeather€C.€RossÌà àà àà àà àà àà à)à àAssistant€Attorney€Generaló óÌà àà àà àà àà àà àò ò)à àó óAttorneys€for€Appelleeò òà àà àÌòòó ó€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€óóÌà@ àò òMEMORANDUM€OPINIONó ó× ƒ( ××  ×Ìòò€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€óóÌà àòòò òHIGHERS,€J.ó óóóÌÌÓÓÓ  ÓÑ7€üXXdæXXdæ7ÑÌ›à àPlaintiff,€W.€J.€Gray,€Jr.,€filed€a€claim€with€the€Tennessee€Division€of€ClaimsÏAdministration€seeking€damages€for€the€Stateððs€failure€to€hold€a€preliminary€hearingÏafter€Plaintiff€had€been€arrested€and€charged€with€armed€robbery€and€for€the€StateððsÍprolonged€detention€of€the€Plaintiff€pending€trial.€€The€State€filed€a€motion€to€dismissÏPlaintiffððs€claim,€and€the€Tennessee€Claims€Commission€(the€ð ðCommissionðð)€grantedÏthe€Stateððs€motion€to€dismiss.€€Plaintiff€appealed€the€Commissionððs€order€dismissingÏhis€claim€and€sought€anòò€en€bancóó€hearing€of€the€Commission.€€The€CommissionÏgranted€in€part€and€denied€in€part€Plaintiffððs€motion€for€an€òòen€bancóó€hearing.€€TheÏCommission€granted€an€òòen€bancóó€hearing€to€determine€the€following€issues:€€(1)Ïwhether€the€Commission€had€jurisdiction€to€hear€a€claim€for€the€negligent€deprivationÏof€a€constitutional€right€and€(2)€whether€Plaintiffððs€claim€was€timely€filed.€€After€an€òòenÏbancóó€hearing€before€the€Commission,€the€Commission€held€that€Plaintiffððs€claim€mustÏbe€dismissed€because€it€was€not€filed€within€the€time€allowed€by€the€statute€ofÏlimitations.€€€Plaintiff€appeals€from€the€order€of€the€œCommission›€dismissing€his€claimÏand€argues€that€œthe€statute€of€limitations€does€not€bar€his›€claim.€€For€the€reasons€statedÏhereafter,€we€affirm€the€order€of€the€Commission.ÌÌà@ àò òFACTSó óÌÌà àIn€1984,€Plaintiff€was€arrested€and€charged€with€armed€robbery€in€MadisonÏCounty,€Tennessee.€€œA›€preliminary€hearing€was€not€held.€€œPlaintiff›€allegedly€remainedÏin€jail€for€ten€months€until€his€criminal€trial€was€held.€€œAfter›€a€trial€by€jury,€Plaintiff€wasÏfound€not€guilty€and€released.€ÌÌà àOn€May€12,€1995,€Plaintiff€filed€a€claim€with€the€Division€of€ClaimsÍAdministration.× ƒ/ ××  ×€œIn›€his€claim,€Plaintiff€alleged€that€his€First,€Fourth,€Fifth,€Eighth€andÏFourteenth€Amendment€rights€were€violated€when€he€was€denied€a€preliminaryÏhearing€and€when€he€was€held€in€jail€for€ten€months€pending€trial.€€œAlternatively,›ÏPlaintiff€premises€his€claim€on€the€alleged€negligence€and€professional€malpractice€ofÏthe€judge€who€presided€over€his€criminal€trial.€€Ìà@ àò òLAWó óÌÌà àT.C.A.€ðð€28„3„104(a)(1980€&€1996€Supp.)€provides€as€follows:ÌÓÓà8 àThe€following€actions€shall€be€commenced€within€one€(1)€year€after€theÏcause€of€action€accrued:ÌÌà8 à(1)€Actions€for€libel,€for€injuries€to€the€person,€false€imprisonment,Ïmalicious€prosecution,€breach€of€marriage€promise;ÌÌà8 à(2)€Actions€and€suits€against€attorneys€or€licensed€public€accountants€orÏcertified€public€accountants€for€malpractice,€whether€the€actions€areÏgrounded€or€based€in€contract€or€tort;ÌÌà8 à(3)€Civil€actions€for€compensatory€or€punitive€damages,€or€both,€broughtÏunder€the€federal€civil€rights€statutes;€€andÌÌà à(4)€Actions€for€statutory€penalties.ÌÌÌÌÓÓà àUnder€Tennessee€law,€a€cause€of€action€accrues€when€a€plaintiff€suffers€inÏactuality€a€legally„cognizable€wrong€and€thus€acquires€the€right€to€bring€suit€forÏredress.€€òòShell€v.€Stateóó,€893€S.W.2d€416,€422€(Tenn.€1995).€€€In€the€present€case,ÏPlaintiffððs€alleged€cause€of€action€accrued€in€1984€when€Plaintiff€was€denied€aÍpreliminary€hearing€œand€was€held›€in€jail€for€ten€months€pending€trial.€€Because€PlaintiffÏfiled€his€claim€with€the€Division€of€Claims€Administration€on€May€12,€1995,€PlaintiffððsÏclaim€is€barred€by€the€one„year€statute€of€limitations€contained€in€T.C.A.€ðð€œ28„3„104(a).ÌÌà àPlaintiff€argues€that€his€claim€is€not€barred€by€the€statute€of€limitations€becauseÏhe€filed€suit€on€February€26,€1985€against€the€City€of€Jackson,€the€State€of€TennesseeÏand€other€defendants€in€United€States€District€Court€for€the€Western€District€ofÏTennessee.€€Because€the€District€Court€did€not€enter€a€final€order€until€October€18,Ï1994,€Plaintiff€claims€that€his€claim,€which€was€filed€with€the€Division€of€ClaimsÏAdministration€on€May€12,€1995,€falls€within€the€appropriate€limitations€period.€€(TRÏ122)€As€support€for€his€argument,€Plaintiff€cites€T.C.A.€ðð€9„8„307(i)(1)(1992€&€Supp.Ï1996)€which€provides€asÏfollows:à àÓÓà8 àClaims€that€were€timely€filed€with€a€court€ofÏcompetent€jurisdiction€and€that€fall€within€theÏjurisdiction€of€the€claims€commission€found€inÏsubsection€(a)€may€be€transferred€to€theÏdivision€of€claims€administration€by€agreementÏof€the€parties€and€the€consent€of€the€attorneyÏgeneral€and€reporter€and,€upon€such€transfer,Ïshall€be€considered€timely€filed€with€theÏdivision€of€claims€administration.€€SuchÏtransfer€shall€be€effected€by€filing€with€theÏdivision€of€claims€administration€the€parties'Ïagreement€and€the€complaint€which€is€theÏsubject€of€the€agreement.€€Such€claims€shallÏbe€considered€by€the€division€of€claimsÏadministration€and€the€claims€commission,€asÏprovided€by€law,€even€if€the€court€retainsÏjurisdiction€over€the€claim.ÌÌÓÓBecause€there€is€no€proof€in€the€record€indicating€that€the€parties€to€the€action€in€theÏUnited€States€District€Court€agreed€to€a€transfer€of€the€case€to€the€Division€of€ClaimsÍAdministration€or€that€the€attorney€general€and€reporter€agreed€to€a€transfer€of€theÏcase,€Plaintiffððs€argument€is€without€merit.€€Thus,€Plaintiffððs€filing€of€a€suit€in€the€UnitedÏStates€District€Court€on€February€26,€1985€does€not€serve€to€toll€the€running€of€theÏstatute€of€limitations€in€the€present€action.€€òòSeeóó€òòLocust€v.€Stateóó,€912€S.W.2d€716€(Tenn.ÏCt.€App.€1995).€€For€the€foregoing€reasons,€Plaintiffððs€action€is€barred€by€the€one„yearÏstatute€of€limitations€contained€in€T.C.A.€ðð€28„3„104(a).Ì›Ìà àThe€order€of€the€Commission€is€hereby€affirmed.€€Costs€on€appeal€are€taxed€toÏthe€Appellant€for€which€execution€may€issue€if€œnecessary.ò òÌ›œÌ›œÌÓÓà àà àà àà àà àà àà àà àà àòòó ó€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€Ïóóà àà àà àà àà àà àà àà àà àHIGHERS,€J.ÌÌÌÌCONCUR:ÌÌÌÌòò€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€óóÌFARMER,€J.ÌÌÌÌòò€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€óóÌLILLARD,€J.ò ò›ÌÌÌà àó óÌœ