WPC0  !_ZE\=>xb?p;m,S7g(+8 FZIi?]0q0ƴy!W9RT5Z;}W^:GfZߐ*4L` 0(ow@UNU://///////////////UBi % AQ 0D 0D  0DPP D/ B B D3y&3|x($ UEEDDӀ ""  XpXXXXXp   Ad FILEDXpX  July29,1999CecilCrowson,Jr.AppellateCourtClerkdAh (hH  Z 6Times New Roman Regular,cAZ"Arial Regular<6X9`(*Courier 12pt10cpiX!"#$&C<< CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(3$ !  (3$ !  ($$   1  ((' dxd dP Pd'''''dxd !    TR[A' Legal3'A' Legal3'T7 XXdd7X7XXXXX7 X7Xr )<,(j 8` `@E ` 8ttxP  rߛJAMESHOSALE,d/b/aCLIFFS    )  PLUMBING,   <     )   4    <     )AppealNo. 4 Plaintiff,  <     )01A019810CV00523 L    !     4    <     )v. 4    <     )    4    <     )DavidsonCircuitROBERT(BOB)WARREN, <     ) | t  4    <     ) 4 Defendant.  <     ) TL   4   @ COURTOFAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE@ddMIDDLESECTIONATNASHVILLEAPPEALEDFROMTHECIRCUITCOURTOFDAVIDSONCOUNTYATNASHVILLE,TENNESSEETHEHONORABLEHAMILTONV.GAYDEN,JR.,JUDGEDANR.ALEXANDER20168thAvenueSouthNashville,Tennessee37204 4 AttorneyforAppelleeTHOMASD.FROST815SouthChurchStreetMurfreesboro,Tennessee37130 4 AttorneyforAppellant 4    < @LL!AFFIRMEDANDREMANDED 4    <      D HERSCHELP.FRANKS,JUDGECONCUR:GODDARD,P.J.SUSANO,J. ;49 @VV%OPINION   4  ThedefendantappealsfromajudgmententeredinCircuitCourtinfavoroftheplaintiffintheamountof$6,148.00. 4  Plaintiffisaplumber,anddefendantisanengineerwhohadhiredorreferredplaintiffseveraltimes.WilliamTarpleyoperatedaconstructionbusinessknownasW.T.Construction,andinFebruaryof1995Tarpleyanddefendantformedalimitedliabilitycompanyknownas W&TConstruction.Althoughtheydisputethedetailsofthediscussion,plaintiffanddefendanthadaconversation,afterwhichplaintiffcontactedTarpleyandbeganworkonaproject. 4  Plaintiffbilleddefendantfortheproject,butwastoldtocontactTarpley.PlaintiffreceivedapartialpaymentdrawnontheaccountofW&TConstruction.Tarpleyfiledforbankruptcy,andplaintifffiledsuitagainstdefendantfortheunrecoveredamount. 4  InCircuitCourt,defendantarguedtherewasnocontractbetweentheparties,Ϝabutndthatbuueveniftherewas,hewasnotliablebecause W&TwasanL.L.C.PlaintiffarguedthathewasnevertoldofanyL.L.C.HealsocontendedthatdefendantrepresentedtheentityasajointventureandtoldhimthatdefendantandTarpleywereinvolvedinapartnership.JudgmentwasenteredbytheCircuitJudgeinfavorofplaintiff.asstated: 4  Theappellantdefendantstatestheasissuesinhisbrief:0 4 0 4(#4(#1.Whatistheproperstandardofreviewinthismatter?  (# (#  4  2.DidthePlaintiffhaveacontractwiththeDefendant?0 4 0 4(#4(#3.IstheDefendant,asamemberofalimitedliabilitycompany,personallyliabletotheDefendant[sic]?  (# (# ThestatementoftheissuesdoesnotcomplywithT.R.A.P.27(a)(4).Questionspresented mustnotbesogeneralastobemeaningless.Statev.Dykes,803S.W.2d250,255 0|)- (Tenn.Cr.App.1990)(citationomitted).InTortorichv.Erickson,675S.W.2d190,191 \2T+/ (Tenn.App.1984),theappellantposedonly generalquestions.Thecourtnotedthat [t]oanswersuchaqueryrequiresadegreeofclairvoyancewithwhichthisCourtisnotpossessed.Id. 705  4  DespitetheinadequacyoftheStatementoftheIssues,wehavereviewedthe 927 recordandfindthattheevidencedoesnotpreponderateagainsttheTrialJudgesfindings.T.R.A.P.Rule13(d).ItisobviousfromtherecordthatmuchoftheTrialCourtsdecisiondependeduponitsassessmentofthewitnessescredibility. Inacasetriedwithoutajury,thequestionofcredibilityofthewitnessisexclusivelyforthetrialjudgetryingthecaseandcannotbereviewedbytheappellatecourts.Harwellv.Harwell,612S.W.2d182,184 h`  (Tenn.App.1980)(citationomitted). 4  WeaffirmthejudgmentoftheTrialCourtandremandatappellantscost. 4    <     ________________________ 4    <     HerschelP.Franks,J.CONCUR:___________________________#pIXX@#HoustonM.Goddard,P.J. $ XXpI___________________________#pIXX#CharlesD.Susano,Jr.,J. *#& XXpI#pIXX:#